Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Minimum
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 44 | 60 | 71 | 94 |
| 1440p QHD | 86 | 108 | 127 | 169 |
| 1080p Full HD | 128 | 169 | 200 | 262 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Minimum on Your System
The AMD Ryzen 5 7500F and AMD Radeon RX 9070 combination is a powerful pairing for Minimum, delivering a smooth experience at 1080p and 1440p, while 4K requires a settings compromise. The data shows this combo ranks in the 30th percentile of all tested configurations, but its in-game performance is far more impressive than that ranking suggests, thanks to a GPU that scales exceptionally well with resolution.
How This Combo Ranks
This specific CPU and GPU pairing ranks 1111th out of 3712 tested combos for Minimum. While that places it in the upper-middle tier of all possible configurations, the ranking is heavily influenced by the presence of far more expensive, top-end hardware. The measured FPS data indicates that for this particular title, the combination performs far better than the global rank implies, especially at lower resolutions where it dominates.
The CPU's synthetic benchmark average of 24964 places it in the 77th percentile of all CPUs, showing it is a strong performer. Its nearest rivals in synthetic tests are the Intel Core i7-11850H (avg score 24935, 0.1% slower) and the AMD Ryzen 5 8400F (avg score 25005, 0.2% faster). This places the Ryzen 5 7500F in a very tight performance cluster, with a less than 1% difference separating it from its closest competitors.
The GPU's synthetic benchmark average of 23877 puts it in the 69th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z (avg score 23736, 0.6% faster) and the AMD Radeon RX 6800S (avg score 24063, 0.8% slower). The RX 9070 sits comfortably in this performance bracket, and the in-game results demonstrate that its architecture is well-suited for the demands of Minimum.
CPU and GPU Roles
The data reveals a clear shift in component responsibility as resolution increases. At 1920x1080, the CPU is the primary driver of performance, but the GPU is so powerful that it still produces extremely high frame rates. Moving from Low to Ultra settings at 1080p drops the average FPS from 262.4 to 127.6, a reduction of over 50%. This indicates that while the CPU is keeping up, the GPU's workload is increasing significantly with each preset tier.
At 2560x1440, the balance begins to tilt toward the GPU. The scaling from Low (169.4 FPS) to Ultra (86 FPS) shows a similar proportional drop, but the absolute numbers are lower, confirming that the GPU is now the limiting factor. The GPU's role becomes even more dominant at 3840x2160, where the difference between presets is stark. The gap between Low (94.1 FPS) and Ultra (43.5 FPS) is a massive 50.6 FPS, demonstrating that at 4K, the RX 9070's raw rendering power is the sole determinant of playability.
The CPU is never a bottleneck at any resolution in this test. Even at 1080p with Low settings, the combo achieves 262.4 FPS, a figure that far exceeds the 60 FPS playability threshold. The data suggests the Ryzen 5 7500F provides ample headroom, allowing the RX 9070 to scale its performance up to the limits of the display's refresh rate.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The measured FPS data provides a complete picture of performance across all major resolutions and presets. The table below details the average frame rates.
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
| :--------- | :------- | :------ |
| 3840x2160 | Low | 94.1 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 71.4 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 59.5 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 43.5 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 169.4 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 127.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 108.2 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 86.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 262.4 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 200.4 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 168.9 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 127.6 |
At 1920x1080, performance is exceptional. Every preset, from Low to Ultra, maintains an average FPS well above the 60 FPS playability threshold. The lowest average is at Ultra with 127.6 FPS, which is more than double the playable threshold. This resolution is the sweet spot for maximizing visual fidelity without sacrificing fluidity.
At 2560x1440, the combo continues to shine. All four presets clear the 60 FPS threshold with ease. The most demanding preset, Ultra, still achieves a very high average of 86 FPS, leaving significant headroom for any potential frame drops. This resolution offers an excellent balance between image quality and performance.
At 3840x2160, the picture changes. While Low (94.1 FPS) and Medium (71.4 FPS) presets are playable, the High preset drops to 59.5 FPS, just below the 60 FPS threshold. The Ultra preset falls further to 43.5 FPS, which is not a smooth experience. For 4K gaming, users must be selective with their settings.
FAQ
*Q: Can this PC run Minimum at 4K with the highest settings?*
A: No. At 3840x2160 with Ultra settings, the average FPS is 43.5, which is well below the 60 FPS playable threshold. The best playable setting at 4K is Medium, which achieves an average of 71.4 FPS.
Q: What is the most demanding settings preset that stays at or above 60 FPS at 2560x1440?
A: Ultra settings at 2560x1440 produce an average of 86 FPS. This is the most demanding preset tested at that resolution, and it remains comfortably above the 60 FPS threshold.
Q: How much of a performance drop occurs when moving from 1080p to 4K on the Ultra preset?
A: At 1920x1080 with Ultra settings, the average FPS is 127.6. At 3840x2160 with Ultra settings, the average FPS drops to 43.5. This represents a decrease of 84.1 FPS when moving from 1080p to 4K.
Q: Is the CPU or GPU more important for performance at 1080p?
A: At 1920x1080, the GPU is the main driver of performance scaling as settings increase. The CPU is not a bottleneck, as evidenced by the extremely high 262.4 FPS average on Low settings. The GPU workload increases substantially with each preset, causing the frame rate to drop.
Q: What is the playability status of the High preset at 3840x2160?
A: The High preset at 3840x2160 averages 59.5 FPS, which is marginally below the 60 FPS playable threshold. It is not considered a playable setting for a consistently smooth experience.
Q: How does the combo's rank compare to its in-game performance?
A: The combo ranks 1111th out of 3712 tested combinations. Despite this mid-tier ranking, the in-game data shows it can run Minimum at high frame rates across all tested presets at 1080p and 1440p, indicating that its practical performance in this title is stronger than its global rank suggests.
Best Settings per Resolution
For each resolution, the most demanding preset that maintains an average FPS at or above 60 is the recommended target.
- 3840x2160: The best playable setting is Medium, which delivers an average FPS of 71.4. This provides a smooth experience with a moderate level of visual detail. The High preset falls just short at 59.5 FPS.
- 2560x1440: The best playable setting is Ultra, achieving an impressive average of 86 FPS. This allows for maximum graphical fidelity without any performance concerns.
- 1920x1080: The best playable setting is Ultra, delivering a very high average of 127.6 FPS. This ensures a highly fluid experience with all visual features enabled.
The Verdict
The AMD Ryzen 5 7500F and AMD Radeon RX 9070 combination is more than capable of running Minimum effectively. At 1920x1080, it is a powerhouse, clearing the 60 FPS threshold by a wide margin on all presets, with the most demanding Ultra preset hitting 127.6 FPS. At 2560x1440, it remains highly playable across the board, with Ultra settings averaging 86 FPS.
The only compromise occurs at 3840x2160. Here, the High preset (59.5 FPS) and Ultra preset (43.5 FPS) fall below the 60 FPS playability threshold. However, the Medium preset (71.4 FPS) and Low preset (94.1 FPS) are both fully playable. This PC can run Minimum flawlessly at 1080p and 1440p with maximum quality, and at 4K with a settings adjustment. The data indicates that for a smooth, high-refresh-rate experience at 1440p or below, this is an excellent configuration. For 4K gaming, it is best paired with a 60Hz display and Medium settings to ensure a consistent frame rate.