Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Minimum
Third-Person Shooter 2014

Minimum

60%
Playable Your system meets minimum requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
214 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
105 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
138 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
68 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
74 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
36 FPS
7.3ms Frame Time
11ms Input Latency
1440p Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,425
Your CPU 24,964
Graphics Card
Required 27,663
Your GPU 15,852

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 36 48 57 74
1440p QHD 68 89 106 138
1080p Full HD 105 137 164 214

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 137
1920x1080 Low 214
1920x1080 Medium 164
1920x1080 Ultra 105
2560x1440 High 89
2560x1440 Low 138
2560x1440 Medium 106
2560x1440 Ultra 68
3840x2160 High 48
3840x2160 Low 74
3840x2160 Medium 57
3840x2160 Ultra 36

Performance Analysis: Minimum on Your System

The AMD Ryzen 5 7500F paired with the AMD Radeon RX 7700 delivers a decisive 60+ FPS experience in Minimum at 1080p and 1440p, with 4K limited to Low settings for a smooth frame rate. Benchmark data shows this combo clears the playable threshold of 60 FPS at all tested resolutions, though the margin shrinks significantly at 4K Ultra, where the average drops to 36 FPS. This analysis breaks down the measured performance, compares nearby hardware, and provides the optimal settings per resolution.

FAQ

*Q: Can this PC run Minimum at 60 FPS on a 4K monitor?*

A: Yes, but only at Low settings. The measured average FPS at 3840x2160 Low is 74 FPS. Medium settings drop to 57 FPS average, which falls below the 60 FPS threshold, and High and Ultra produce 48 FPS and 36 FPS respectively.

Q: What is the best preset for 1440p gaming with this combo?

A: Ultra settings are fully playable at 2560x1440, with an average of 68 FPS. The data shows High (89 FPS), Medium (106 FPS), and Low (138 FPS) all also exceed 60 FPS, but Ultra provides the highest visual quality while still clearing the threshold.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals in synthetic benchmarks?

A: The Ryzen 5 7500F has an average benchmark score of 24964, placing it 0.1% above the Intel Core i7-11850H (24935) and 0.2% above the Intel Core i7-13620H (24911). It trails the AMD Ryzen 5 8400F by 0.2% (25005) and leads the Intel Core 5 210H by 0.4% (24872).

Q: How does the GPU's benchmark score position it against similar cards?

A: The Radeon RX 7700 has an average benchmark score of 15852, which is 1.7% below the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti (16129) and 1% below the AMD Radeon RX 9060 (16014). It sits 0.1% above the AMD Radeon R9 370X (15862) and 1.1% above the AMD Radeon Pro W5500 (15679).

Q: What is the performance scaling from 1080p to 4K at Medium settings?

A: At Medium settings, the average FPS drops from 164 at 1920x1080 to 106 at 2560x1440, and then to 57 at 3840x2160. This represents a 35% reduction moving from 1080p to 1440p, and a 46% further reduction from 1440p to 4K.

Q: Is the 4K Ultra preset ever viable for this system?

A: No. The 3840x2160 Ultra preset produces an average of 36 FPS, which is well below the 60 FPS playable threshold. The lowest playable 4K setting is Low at 74 FPS, making Ultra a non-option for smooth gameplay at that resolution.

Similar Performance Alternatives

Based on the nearestRivals data, several CPUs and GPUs would deliver near-identical performance to this combo. For the CPU, the Intel Core i7-11850H (avg score 24935, delta 0.1%), Intel Core i7-13620H (24911, delta 0.2%), and Intel Core 5 210H (24872, delta 0.4%) are all within half a percent of the Ryzen 5 7500F's 24964 average. The AMD Ryzen 5 8400F (25005) is the closest competitor, sitting just 0.2% above. In gaming scenarios, these processors would produce nearly indistinguishable frame rates, meaning any of them paired with the RX 7700 would yield similar results in Minimum.

On the GPU side, the AMD Radeon RX 9060 (avg score 16014, delta -1%) and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti (16129, delta -1.7%) are the closest higher-performing rivals. The AMD Radeon R9 370X (15862, delta -0.1%) is virtually tied with the RX 7700, while the AMD Radeon Pro W5500 (15679, delta 1.1%) sits slightly below. A system swapping the RX 7700 for an RTX 3060 Ti would likely see a marginal FPS increase—perhaps 1-2 frames at most—while the R9 370X would perform almost exactly the same. For players considering alternatives, the data suggests that pairing the Ryzen 5 7500F with any of these GPUs would maintain the same general playability profile: comfortable 60+ FPS at 1080p and 1440p, with 4K requiring Low settings.

CPU and GPU Roles

The measured FPS data reveals how workload shifts between the CPU and GPU as resolution changes. At 1920x1080, the system achieves 214 FPS on Low settings, indicating that the CPU is capable of feeding frames well beyond the 60 FPS threshold even at the lowest graphical load. The Ryzen 5 7500F's strong single-thread performance (3dmark_single_thread score of 974) and high multi-thread capability (cinebench_r23_multicore score of 22799) ensure it is not the bottleneck at this resolution.

Moving to 2560x1440, the average FPS at Low drops to 138, a 36% reduction from 1080p Low. This scaling indicates the GPU begins to take on more responsibility, but the RX 7700 still has ample headroom—the gap between Low (138 FPS) and Ultra (68 FPS) at 1440p is substantial, showing that graphical settings, not CPU limits, dictate performance. At 3840x2160, the GPU becomes the dominant constraint: Low settings yield 74 FPS, but Ultra crashes to 36 FPS, a 51% drop from Low to Ultra at the same resolution.

The resolution scaling pattern confirms that for Minimum, the GPU is the primary performance driver at all resolutions above 1080p. At 1080p, the CPU's capability allows the GPU to stretch its legs—the jump from Ultra (105 FPS) to Low (214 FPS) shows a 104% performance range, which is purely GPU-bound scaling. The CPU's role is most evident at 1080p Low where 214 FPS demonstrates that the Ryzen 5 7500F's 12 threads and 5.00 GHz boost clock can sustain very high frame rates without bottlenecking the RX 7700. At 4K, however, the GPU's 25.18 TFLOPS compute and 624.1 GB/s memory bandwidth are what separate playable Low settings from unplayable Ultra.

The Verdict

This system can run Minimum at 60 FPS or higher across all tested resolutions, but the settings ceiling varies significantly. At 1920x1080, every preset clears the threshold: Ultra runs at 105 FPS average, High at 137 FPS, Medium at 164 FPS, and Low at 214 FPS. The 2560x1440 resolution is equally playable at all settings, with Ultra averaging 68 FPS, High at 89 FPS, Medium at 106 FPS, and Low at 138 FPS.

The 3840x2160 resolution is the limiting factor. Only the Low preset achieves 60+ FPS, with an average of 74 FPS. Medium falls short at 57 FPS, while High (48 FPS) and Ultra (36 FPS) are not playable. The verdict data confirms this: playableSettings at 4K lists only "Low," with bestSettings as "Low" at 74 FPS. For 1440p and 1080p, all four settings are listed as playable, with Ultra being the best setting at 68 FPS and 105 FPS respectively. Gamers with a 4K display should stick to Low settings for a smooth experience; those with 1440p or 1080p monitors can max out the game without concern.

How This Combo Ranks

Among all 3712 tested hardware combinations in Minimum, this pairing of AMD Ryzen 5 7500F and AMD Radeon RX 7700 ranks 1717th. This places it in the upper half of all configurations, though not in the top tier. The rank reflects a balanced system: the CPU's 77th percentile standing among all CPUs (avg benchmark score 24964) and the GPU's 58th percentile among all GPUs (avg benchmark score 15852) combine to produce solid but not elite gaming performance.

The 1717th rank out of 3712 combos indicates that roughly 54% of tested systems perform better in this game. This is consistent with the measured FPS data: the combo excels at 1080p and 1440p, but the GPU's mid-range positioning (58th percentile) prevents it from being a top performer at 4K. The CPU's higher percentile (77th) suggests that upgrading the GPU would yield more noticeable gains than upgrading the CPU, as the processor has more headroom relative to its peers. For context, systems ranking higher likely pair stronger GPUs like the RTX 3060 Ti (which scores 1.7% higher) with similar or better CPUs, while lower-ranked combos would feature weaker GPUs or older CPUs.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 1920x1080, the most demanding preset that remains at or above 60 FPS is Ultra, with an average of 105 FPS. This is the highest quality setting available and provides a comfortable margin above the 60 FPS threshold. The data shows no risk of dropping below playable levels at this resolution, as even the minimum FPS at Medium (139) stays well above 60.

At 2560x1440, the best setting is also Ultra, averaging 68 FPS. This is a tighter margin than 1080p, but still 8 FPS above the threshold. The minimum FPS at Medium is 90, indicating that even in demanding scenes, the frame rate stays smooth. Ultra at 1440p is the recommended choice for maximum visual fidelity while maintaining playability.

At 3840x2160, the only playable setting is Low, which averages 74 FPS. This is the sole option that clears 60 FPS; Medium dips to 57 FPS, and High/Ultra are far below at 48 and 36 FPS respectively. While 74 FPS is playable, it is the least visually impressive option, so 4K users must accept reduced graphical detail to maintain smooth performance. The verdict data confirms this: bestSettings at 4K is "Low" with 74 FPS, whereas 1440p and 1080p both list "Ultra" as the best setting.