Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Minimum
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 39 | 51 | 61 | 79 |
| 1440p QHD | 72 | 95 | 113 | 148 |
| 1080p Full HD | 112 | 147 | 175 | 229 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Minimum on Your System
The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 is a strong mid-range combination for playing Minimum (a 2014 Third-Person Shooter). Measured benchmark data shows this combo handles the game comfortably at 1080p and 1440p with high visual quality, while 4K requires a light settings adjustment to maintain smooth gameplay. The data confirms that this system delivers a playable experience at all three tested resolutions, provided you select the appropriate preset.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The measured frame rates for this combination show a clear and predictable scaling pattern across resolutions and presets. At 1920x1080, the combo is exceptionally fast. The Low preset averages 229 FPS, which jumps to 175 FPS on Medium with a minimum of 149 FPS and a maximum of 201 FPS. High settings produce an average of 147 FPS, while the most demanding Ultra preset still holds an average of 112 FPS. All 1080p presets clear the 60 FPS playable threshold by a wide margin, making this resolution almost effortless for the hardware.
Moving to 2560x1440, performance remains strong but the gap between presets tightens. The Low preset averages 148 FPS, Medium drops to 113 FPS (with a 96 FPS minimum and 130 FPS maximum), and High averages 95 FPS. Ultra settings at 1440p produce an average of 72 FPS, which is still above the 60 FPS target. The data shows that even the heaviest preset at this resolution stays playable, though the margin over the threshold is much smaller than at 1080p.
At 3840x2160, the strain becomes evident. The Low preset averages 79 FPS, but Medium drops to 61 FPS with a minimum of 52 FPS and a maximum of 70 FPS. High settings average 51 FPS, and Ultra falls to 39 FPS. The key finding here is that only Low and Medium presets maintain an average at or above 60 FPS; both High and Ultra dip below that threshold, indicating that 4K gaming with this combo requires accepting reduced visual details.
CPU and GPU Roles
The scaling data indicates that the GPU is the primary bottleneck at higher resolutions, while the CPU provides ample headroom even at lower settings. When moving from 1080p to 1440p, the average FPS drops by roughly 35-40% across all presets (e.g., from 229 to 148 FPS on Low, and from 112 to 72 FPS on Ultra). This significant reduction points directly to the RTX 3070's rendering limits, as the Ryzen 5 7400F with its 6 cores and 12 threads is more than capable of feeding frames at these rates.
The transition from 1440p to 4K shows an even steeper decline, with the Low preset dropping from 148 to 79 FPS (a 47% reduction) and Medium falling from 113 to 61 FPS (a 46% reduction). This pattern is typical of a GPU-bound scenario where the 8 GB of GDDR6 memory and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth on the RTX 3070 become limiting factors at higher pixel counts. The CPU's role is more apparent at 1080p, where frame rates exceed 200 FPS on Low — a level that demands strong single-thread performance, which the 7400F delivers with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3072 and a Passmark single-thread score of 3689.
Interestingly, the delta between Low and Ultra presets grows with resolution. At 1080p, the difference between Low (229 FPS) and Ultra (112 FPS) is 117 FPS, while at 4K it shrinks to just 40 FPS (79 vs 39). This suggests that at lower resolutions the CPU can push higher frame ceilings, but at 4K the GPU's pixel throughput becomes the dominant constraint, making preset selection less impactful.
Best Settings per Resolution
Based on the measured data and the 60 FPS playability threshold, the optimal settings for each resolution are as follows.
At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset is the clear choice, averaging 112 FPS. This gives the best visual quality while maintaining a frame rate nearly double the playable threshold. There is no reason to drop below Ultra at this resolution, as even the most demanding preset leaves substantial performance headroom.
For 2560x1440, the Ultra preset also remains the best option, averaging 72 FPS. This stays above the 60 FPS target, allowing gamers to enjoy maximum settings without sacrificing smoothness. If you prefer a larger buffer above the threshold, the High preset at 95 FPS is a viable alternative, but the data supports Ultra as playable.
At 3840x2160, the Medium preset is the highest setting that remains playable, averaging 61 FPS. However, note that the minimum FPS of 52 dips below the 60 FPS threshold, meaning there will be occasional stutters in heavy scenes. The Low preset at 79 FPS offers a safer margin, but Medium is technically the most demanding preset with an average above 60 FPS. For a consistent experience, Low is recommended despite the visual downgrade.
Similar Performance Alternatives
Looking at the nearest rivals for both components, several hardware combinations would produce very similar gameplay results in Minimum.
On the CPU side, the AMD Ryzen 5 7400F has an average benchmark score of 32750. The closest alternatives are the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H (average score 32812, just 0.2% faster), the Intel Core i5-14600T (32707, 0.1% slower), the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (32697, 0.2% slower), and the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 (32662, 0.3% slower). These processors are effectively identical in performance for this game, so swapping to any of them would yield negligible FPS changes. The 7400F sits in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs, indicating it is a strong performer overall.
For the GPU, the RTX 3070 averages 17208 in benchmark scores. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT (17083, 0.7% slower), the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 (17037, 1% slower), the AMD Radeon HD 7970M (17019, 1.1% slower), and the NVIDIA Tesla K40c (17468, 1.5% faster). The delta percentages are small, meaning these GPUs would produce nearly identical frame rates in Minimum. The RTX 3070 ranks in the 61st percentile of all GPUs, which is respectable but not top-tier.
Given these scores, a system with a Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H and a Tesla K40c would perform within about 1.5% of this combo, making it functionally equivalent for this game.
How This Combo Ranks
Among all tested combinations in the benchmark database, this specific CPU and GPU pairing ranks 1589 out of 3712 total combos for Minimum. This places it in the upper half of all systems tested, which is a solid result considering the game's age and the hardware's capabilities. The rank reflects the balance between the 7400F's strong single-thread performance and the RTX 3070's 20.31 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, which is well-suited for a 2014 title.
That said, the rank also shows that many other combos achieve higher frame rates, particularly those with more powerful GPUs or newer architectures. The 7400F's 83rd percentile CPU score helps offset the RTX 3070's more modest 61st percentile GPU score, but the GPU remains the limiting factor at higher resolutions. In games like Minimum that are not heavily threaded, the CPU's 6 cores and 12 threads are sufficient, and the data confirms that frame rates scale almost entirely with GPU load.
The Verdict
Yes, this PC can run Minimum effectively at all three tested resolutions, with some caveats at 4K.
At 1920x1080, the system delivers a flawless experience, with every preset averaging above 112 FPS. Ultra settings are fully playable and offer the best visual experience. At 2560x1440, all four presets — Low (148 FPS), Medium (113 FPS), High (95 FPS), and Ultra (72 FPS) — clear the 60 FPS threshold, making this resolution entirely playable at maximum quality.
At 3840x2160, the story changes. Only Low (79 FPS) and Medium (61 FPS) averages meet the 60 FPS requirement, while High (51 FPS) and Ultra (39 FPS) fall short. The Medium preset is technically playable by the average metric, but its 52 FPS minimum means you may encounter noticeable dips. For the smoothest 4K experience, the Low preset at 79 FPS is the safer choice, though it sacrifices visual fidelity.
In practical terms, this combo is best suited for 1080p and 1440p gaming with maximum settings. For 4K, you will need to lower expectations to Medium or Low, which still provides a playable experience but not the full visual showcase. The hardware is well-matched for this game, with the CPU never becoming a limiting factor at any resolution tested.