Minimum

Measured FPS Breakdown

The recorded data for this combination of AMD Ryzen 5 7400F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER in Minimum is drawn from direct measurements, not estimates. The game's playable threshold is set at 60 FPS, and the results vary sharply by resolution and preset.

At 3840x2160 (4K), the combination struggles to maintain playable frame rates. The High preset delivers an average of 38 FPS, which is well below the 60 FPS threshold. Low settings improve the average to 59 FPS, still just under the threshold. Medium settings produce an average of 45 FPS with a minimum of 38 FPS and a maximum of 52 FPS. Ultra is the worst performer here, with an average of only 29 FPS. None of the 4K presets reach the 60 FPS playable mark, and even the best case (Low at 59 FPS) misses by one frame per second.

At 2560x1440 (1440p), the picture improves considerably. High settings average 71 FPS, clearing the threshold with a comfortable margin. Medium settings average 84 FPS, with a minimum of 71 FPS and a maximum of 97 FPS. Low settings hit 110 FPS on average. Ultra, however, falls short with an average of 54 FPS, which is below the playable threshold. So at 1440p, three of the four presets (Low, Medium, High) are playable, while Ultra is not.

At 1920x1080 (1080p), every preset clears the 60 FPS threshold. Ultra averages 83 FPS. High averages 109 FPS. Medium averages 130 FPS, with a minimum of 111 FPS and a maximum of 150 FPS. Low averages 170 FPS, the highest recorded value in the entire dataset. The 1080p results show that this combination has ample headroom at the most common gaming resolution, with even the most demanding preset staying well above the playable mark.

Looking at the pattern across resolutions, the data shows a clear scaling trend. Dropping from 4K to 1440p roughly doubles the frame rate at High settings (from 38 to 71 FPS). Dropping from 1440p to 1080p adds another substantial increase (from 71 to 109 FPS at High). The minimum and maximum values recorded only for Medium settings at each resolution show that the frame pacing is consistent: at 1080p Medium, the minimum of 111 FPS is still well above the threshold, and at 1440p Medium, the minimum of 71 FPS just clears the threshold. At 4K Medium, the minimum of 38 FPS is far below playable.

FAQ

Q: Can this PC run Minimum at 4K resolution?

A: No. At 3840x2160, the highest recorded average is 59 FPS on Low settings, which is one frame short of the 60 FPS playable threshold. Medium averages 45 FPS, High averages 38 FPS, and Ultra averages 29 FPS. The verdict data lists no playable settings at 4K.

Q: What is the best playable preset at 1440p?

A: At 2560x1440, the High preset is the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS, averaging 71 FPS. Medium also works at 84 FPS, and Low hits 110 FPS, but Ultra falls below the threshold at 54 FPS. So High is the highest quality option that remains playable.

Q: Does the RTX 2060 SUPER bottleneck the Ryzen 5 7400F at 1080p?

A: The benchmark data does not indicate a bottleneck. At 1920x1080, even the Ultra preset averages 83 FPS, and Low settings reach 170 FPS. The recorded scores show the GPU is able to push well beyond the playable threshold at all presets, suggesting the combination is well balanced for this game at this resolution.

Q: How does the RTX 2060 SUPER compare to its nearest rivals in the database?

A: The GPU's average benchmark score is 18093, and it sits at the 62nd percentile among all GPUs. Its closest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile, scores 18159, which is 0.4% higher. The AMD Radeon Pro 5700 scores 18189 (0.5% higher), and the AMD Radeon RX 460 scores 18373 (1.5% higher). The Intel Arc A770M scores 18383 (1.6% higher). The differences are all within 2%, meaning these cards deliver nearly identical raw performance.

Q: Is the Ryzen 5 7400F competitive with other CPUs in the database?

A: The CPU has an average benchmark score of 32750 and sits at the 83rd percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core i5-14600T, scores 32707, a 0.1% difference. The Intel Core Ultra 7 155H scores 32697 (0.2% lower), and the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 scores 32662 (0.3% lower). The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H scores 32812, which is 0.2% higher. All four rivals are within 0.3% of this CPU, indicating very close performance parity.

Q: What frame rates can I expect at 1080p with Medium settings?

A: The recorded data shows an average of 130 FPS at 1920x1080 with Medium settings, with a minimum of 111 FPS and a maximum of 150 FPS. This is well above the 60 FPS playable threshold, and even the minimum frame rate offers a substantial buffer.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The nearest rivals in the database provide useful context for what hardware would behave similarly to this combo.

On the CPU side, the AMD Ryzen 5 7400F has an average benchmark score of 32750. The Intel Core i5-14600T is essentially a match, scoring 32707, a delta of 0.1%. That means these two processors will deliver nearly identical performance in CPU-bound scenarios. The Intel Core Ultra 7 155H scores 32697 (0.2% lower), the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 scores 32662 (0.3% lower), and the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H scores 32812 (0.2% higher). All four alternatives fall within a 0.5% band around the 7400F, so any of them would produce indistinguishable results in Minimum. The choice between them would come down to platform features, power characteristics, and availability rather than gaming performance.

On the GPU side, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER has an average benchmark score of 18093. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile scores 18159 (0.4% higher), making it the closest desktop-to-mobile comparison. The AMD Radeon Pro 5700 scores 18189 (0.5% higher). The AMD Radeon RX 460 scores 18373 (1.5% higher), and the Intel Arc A770M scores 18383 (1.6% higher). These deltas are small, so all four alternatives should produce similar frame rates in Minimum. A user with any of these GPUs paired with a comparable CPU would see roughly the same measured FPS numbers as this combo.

For a full system view, the data indicates that any of these CPUs paired with any of these GPUs would land in the same performance neighborhood. The CPU percentile of 83 and GPU percentile of 62 suggest the CPU is the stronger component, but in Minimum, the GPU becomes the limiting factor at higher resolutions. At 4K, the GPU's performance ceiling is the primary constraint, while at 1080p, the combination has enough headroom that neither component becomes a serious bottleneck.

The Verdict

The verdict data is straightforward: this PC can run Minimum at 1440p and 1080p, but not at 4K.

At 1920x1080, all four presets (Low, Medium, High, Ultra) are playable. The best settings are Ultra, which averages 83 FPS. That is the most demanding preset, and it still clears the 60 FPS threshold by a wide margin. This is the resolution where the combo is most comfortable, with no preset falling below playable.

At 2560x1440, three presets are playable: High, Low, and Medium. The best settings are High, averaging 71 FPS. Ultra drops to 54 FPS, which is below the threshold. So at 1440p, users should stick to High or lower to maintain playable frame rates.

At 3840x2160, no preset is playable. The highest average is 59 FPS on Low, which just misses the threshold. Medium averages 45 FPS, High averages 38 FPS, and Ultra averages 29 FPS. Users targeting 4K would need to lower resolution or upgrade the GPU.

The overall verdict: for the most common gaming resolutions, this combination is viable. It delivers smooth performance at 1080p with headroom to spare, and it handles 1440p well as long as Ultra settings are avoided. 4K is the only resolution where the system falls short of the 60 FPS target.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo ranks 2602 out of 3712 tested combinations in the database for Minimum. That places it in the lower-middle range of all tested systems, roughly in the 30th percentile of combos (the rank of 2602 out of 3712 means about 1110 combinations are worse, and about 2601 are better).

This ranking reflects the GPU's age and performance tier. The RTX 2060 SUPER sits at the 62nd percentile among all GPUs, which is a mid-range position, and its average benchmark score of 18093 puts it in the company of mobile and workstation parts rather than high-end desktop cards. The CPU is stronger, at the 83rd percentile, but in Minimum the GPU is the limiting factor at higher resolutions.

The rank suggests that while this combo is not competitive with high-end systems, it is far from the bottom of the pile. For a game like Minimum, which is not among the most demanding titles of its era, this rank is acceptable for 1080p and 1440p gaming. The measured FPS data confirms this: the system clears 60 FPS at 1080p on all presets and at 1440p on most presets.

Best Settings per Resolution

The most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS at each resolution, based on the recorded data:

At 1920x1080, the best settings are Ultra, which averages 83 FPS. This is the highest quality preset available, and it still maintains a comfortable margin above the 60 FPS threshold. Users can run the game at maximum quality at 1080p without concern.

At 2560x1440, the best settings are High, which averages 71 FPS. This provides a solid balance between visual quality and performance. The next step up, Ultra, drops to 54 FPS, which is not playable, so High is the ceiling at this resolution.

At 3840x2160, there are no playable settings. The closest is Low at 59 FPS, which is just below the threshold. Since the verdict data lists no playable settings at 4K, the recommendation is to run the game at a lower resolution if 60 FPS is the target.

For users who prioritize frame rate stability over visual quality, the data shows that Medium settings at 1080p produce 130 FPS with a minimum of 111 FPS, and Medium at 1440p produces 84 FPS with a minimum of 71 FPS. These presets offer the best combination of quality and safety margin, especially for competitive play where frame drops matter.