Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Minimum
Third-Person Shooter 2014

Minimum

78%
Great Match Your system meets recommended requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
225 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
172 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
193 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
111 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
123 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
58 FPS
5.2ms Frame Time
8ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,425
Your CPU 21,088
Graphics Card
Required 27,663
Your GPU 79,842

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 58 78 101 123
1440p QHD 111 148 180 193
1080p Full HD 172 191 210 225

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 191
1920x1080 Low 225
1920x1080 Medium 210
1920x1080 Ultra 172
2560x1440 High 148
2560x1440 Low 193
2560x1440 Medium 180
2560x1440 Ultra 111
3840x2160 High 78
3840x2160 Low 123
3840x2160 Medium 101
3840x2160 Ultra 58

Performance Analysis: Minimum on Your System

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600G paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 delivers a benchmark profile for Minimum that is defined by extreme GPU dominance, with the processor acting as a comparatively modest foundation. Measured data for this combination shows that the RTX 5090, which sits in the 92nd percentile among all tested GPUs, provides overwhelming frame throughput across all resolutions, while the Ryzen 5 5600G, a 6-core/12-thread Zen 3 part in the 74th CPU percentile, serves as the limiting factor primarily at lower resolutions and higher frame rates. The result is a system that clears the 60 FPS playability threshold at every tested preset and resolution, with headroom that ranges from marginal at 4K Ultra to enormous at 1080p Low.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data for this combination is extensive, covering three resolutions and four quality presets, though min and max frame data is only recorded for the Medium preset at each resolution. Beginning at 3840x2160, the RTX 5090 produces an average of 78 FPS at High settings, which is 18 frames above the 60 FPS playability threshold. Dropping to Medium yields a 101 FPS average, with a recorded minimum of 86 FPS and a maximum of 116 FPS, indicating that even the frame dips remain well clear of the playability line. Low settings at 4K push the average to 123 FPS, a significant jump that highlights how much headroom exists in the lower presets. The Ultra preset is the only 4K configuration that falls below 60 FPS, with an average of 58 FPS, which is two frames shy of the threshold and therefore not classified as playable.

At 2560x1440, the data shows a substantial increase in performance across all settings. High settings average 148 FPS, while Low reaches 193 FPS and Medium sits at 180 FPS with a minimum of 153 FPS and a maximum of 207 FPS. The Ultra preset at 1440p averages 111 FPS, which is nearly double the 4K Ultra result and comfortably above the 60 FPS threshold. This resolution represents the sweet spot for the combination, as every preset including the most demanding Ultra configuration clears the playability mark by a wide margin. The 1440p Medium data is particularly telling: the 153 FPS minimum is higher than the 4K High average, showing that resolution scaling has a more pronounced effect on frame delivery than preset changes alone.

At 1920x1080, the results are uniformly high, with the Low preset averaging 225 FPS and Medium at 210 FPS, the latter recording a minimum of 178 FPS and a maximum of 241 FPS. High settings average 191 FPS, and even the Ultra preset, which is the most demanding configuration tested, maintains a 172 FPS average. The 1080p data reveals a pattern where the CPU begins to exert influence: the delta between Low and Ultra at 1080p is only 53 FPS (225 versus 172), whereas at 4K the same preset delta is 65 FPS (123 versus 58). This compression at lower resolutions is characteristic of a GPU-bound scenario giving way to CPU limitations as frame rates climb past the 200 FPS mark.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The nearest rivals for the CPU and GPU in this combination provide context for what similar hardware would behave like. The AMD Ryzen 5 5600G has an average benchmark score of 21088, with its closest competitor being the Intel Core i3-1220P at 21066, a delta of just 0.1 percent. The Intel Core Ultra 7 256V scores 21112, which is 0.1 percent higher than the 5600G, while the AMD Ryzen 5 7530U at 21133 is 0.2 percent ahead and the Intel Core Ultra 7 155U at 21174 leads by 0.4 percent. These four rivals are effectively identical in CPU throughput, meaning that swapping the 5600G for any of these processors would produce benchmark results within a fraction of a percent, and the in-game FPS would remain statistically indistinguishable.

On the GPU side, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 posts an average benchmark score of 79842, placing it in the 92nd percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival is the NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB with a score of 79605, a delta of 0.3 percent, followed by the Tesla P100 PCIe 12 GB at 79396 (0.6 percent slower) and the AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT at 78940 (1.1 percent slower). The AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X scores 80959, which is 1.4 percent faster than the RTX 5090, making it the only nearby alternative that edges ahead. For a game like Minimum, any of these GPU alternatives would deliver frame rates within a narrow band of the RTX 5090's measured results, with the practical difference being a few frames per second at most.

Best Settings per Resolution

The best settings for each resolution represent the most demanding preset that still maintains an average of at least 60 FPS. At 3840x2160, the High preset is the optimal choice, delivering an average of 78 FPS. The Ultra preset at 4K falls short with 58 FPS, so High is the highest quality setting that clears the threshold. At 2560x1440, the Ultra preset achieves 111 FPS, making it the best available setting at this resolution, and it does so with substantial margin. At 1920x1080, Ultra settings average 172 FPS, which is not only above the 60 FPS threshold but also nearly three times that mark, confirming that 1080p Ultra is fully playable and then some.

The progression of best settings across resolutions shows a clear pattern: as resolution decreases, the quality preset can increase while maintaining playable frame rates. At 4K, the ceiling is High; at 1440p, it rises to Ultra; and at 1080p, Ultra remains the maximum available setting, so the data does not indicate whether even higher quality presets beyond Ultra would be feasible. The margin at 1080p Ultra (172 FPS) versus 1440p Ultra (111 FPS) suggests that the GPU has enough headroom to handle more demanding settings if they existed.

The Verdict

This PC can run Minimum, and the data supports a strong affirmative answer. The verdict by resolution is unambiguous: at 3840x2160, the playable settings are High, Low, and Medium, with High being the best at 78 FPS; the Ultra preset is not playable because it averages 58 FPS, below the 60 FPS threshold. At 2560x1440, all four settings are playable, with Ultra at 111 FPS as the best option. At 1920x1080, all four settings are playable, with Ultra at 172 FPS. Across the board, the combination clears the playability threshold at 11 of the 12 tested configurations, with the sole exception being 4K Ultra.

The practical implication is that a user can run the game at maximum quality at 1080p and 1440p without concern, and at 4K the only compromise is stepping down from Ultra to High, which still delivers 78 FPS. The 4K Ultra shortfall of two frames per second is a marginal miss, and given that the High preset at 4K produces 78 FPS, the visual difference between High and Ultra is likely the only tradeoff necessary for a fully smooth experience at that resolution.

CPU and GPU Roles

The division of labor between the Ryzen 5 5600G and the RTX 5090 becomes evident when examining the scaling between resolutions and presets. The GPU is overwhelmingly the dominant component in this pairing, as evidenced by the RTX 5090's 92nd percentile standing and its massive benchmark scores, including a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 18355 and a Geekbench Vulkan score of 376728. The CPU, by contrast, sits in the 74th percentile with a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 10551 and a Geekbench single-core score of 1801, which are modest figures for a modern desktop processor.

At 3840x2160, the GPU is the clear bottleneck. The frame rates scale predictably with preset changes: 58 FPS at Ultra, 78 at High, 101 at Medium, and 123 at Low. This scaling reflects GPU workload, as the RTX 5090's raw throughput determines the output. The CPU's role at 4K is minimal, as the frame rates are low enough that the 5600G's single-thread performance is not taxed. At 2560x1440, the GPU remains dominant, but the CPU begins to show its influence. The frame rates are higher across all presets, and the gap between Low (193 FPS) and Ultra (111 FPS) narrows compared to 4K, suggesting that the CPU is starting to limit the upper end of the range. At 1920x1080, the CPU's role becomes more pronounced. The frame rates are high across the board, with Low at 225 FPS and Ultra at 172 FPS, but the scaling from Low to Ultra is compressed relative to higher resolutions. This compression is a classic symptom of CPU limitation: the GPU could render more frames, but the 5600G cannot feed it fast enough at these elevated frame rates.

FAQ

Q: Is the RTX 5090 overkill for this CPU and game combination?

A: The data indicates that the GPU is substantially more capable than the CPU, given the RTX 5090's 92nd percentile ranking versus the 5600G's 74th percentile. At 1080p, the CPU limits frame rates to the 172-225 FPS range, while at 4K, the GPU delivers 58-123 FPS depending on preset.

*Q: Can this system run Minimum at 4K Ultra settings?*

A: No. The measured average FPS at 3840x2160 Ultra is 58 FPS, which is two frames below the 60 FPS playability threshold. The best playable 4K setting is High, which averages 78 FPS.

Q: What is the best setting for 1440p?

A: The Ultra preset at 2560x1440 averages 111 FPS, making it the most demanding setting that remains playable at this resolution, and it is well above the 60 FPS threshold.

Q: How much faster is the RTX 5090 than its closest rival?

A: The RTX 5090's nearest rival is the NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB, which is 0.3 percent slower. The AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT is 1.1 percent slower, and the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X is 1.4 percent faster.

Q: Does the CPU matter more at lower resolutions?

A: Yes. The data shows that frame rate scaling between presets compresses at 1080p (225 FPS Low versus 172 FPS Ultra) compared to 4K (123 FPS Low versus 58 FPS Ultra), indicating that the Ryzen 5 5600G becomes a limiting factor as frame rates increase.

Q: What are the minimum and maximum FPS recorded for this combination?

A: Minimum and maximum FPS data is only available for the Medium preset. At 1080p Medium, the range is 178 to 241 FPS; at 1440p Medium, it is 153 to 207 FPS; and at 4K Medium, it is 86 to 116 FPS.

How This Combo Ranks

Among the 3712 tested combinations in the database, this pairing of the AMD Ryzen 5 5600G and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 ranks 641st for Minimum performance. This places the combination in the top 17.3 percent of all tested setups, a strong showing that reflects the GPU's overwhelming contribution. The rank is driven almost entirely by the RTX 5090, as the 5600G is a mid-range CPU whose 74th percentile standing would typically result in a lower overall ranking when paired with a less powerful graphics card. In this case, the GPU's 92nd percentile performance and its benchmark scores, such as a PassMark G3D score of 39650 and a Geekbench OpenCL score of 334370, compensate for the CPU's relative weakness.

The ranking also illustrates the balance of this specific pairing. A system with a higher-ranked CPU and a similar GPU would likely rank higher, but the 5600G's nearest CPU rivals, which are all within 0.4 percent of its average score, would not meaningfully change the outcome. The 641st position out of 3712 reflects the RTX 5090's ability to carry the combination, and the measured FPS data confirms that this ranking translates into a playable experience at nearly every resolution and preset tested. The only configuration that fails to clear the 60 FPS threshold is 4K Ultra, and even that is a marginal miss rather than a systemic limitation.