Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Minimum
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 30 | 40 | 48 | 62 |
| 1440p QHD | 57 | 74 | 88 | 116 |
| 1080p Full HD | 88 | 115 | 137 | 179 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Minimum on Your System
The AMD Ryzen 5 5600F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 combination delivers a widely playable experience in Minimum, with the data showing that 1080p and 1440p are both fully viable, while 4K requires a strict settings compromise. Benchmark results indicate that this pairing is far more capable than the game’s age might suggest, offering high frame rates at standard resolutions. At 1080p, the average frame rate exceeds 115 FPS on the High preset, and the system only begins to show strain at 4K with the most demanding settings.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The measured frame rates for this combo span three resolutions and four quality presets, revealing a clear performance hierarchy. At 1920x1080, the average frame rates are strong across the board. The Low preset averages 179 FPS, which is the highest recorded for this configuration. Moving up to Medium, the average drops to 137 FPS, with a minimum of 117 FPS and a maximum of 158 FPS. The High preset averages 115 FPS, and even the Ultra preset maintains a solid 88 FPS average. These numbers indicate that at 1080p, the CPU and GPU are never the bottleneck for achieving smooth gameplay.
At 2560x1440, the frame rates remain very playable, though the scaling shows the GPU taking on more work. The Low preset averages 116 FPS, which is only a 35% drop from the 1080p Low result. The Medium preset produces an average of 88 FPS, with a minimum of 75 FPS and a maximum of 102 FPS. The High preset averages 74 FPS, which is still comfortably above the 60 FPS threshold. The Ultra preset at 1440p falls to an average of 57 FPS, which is just below the playable mark, showing that this setting is not recommended for this resolution.
The most demanding scenario is 3840x2160, where the RTX 5050’s 8 GB memory and 128-bit bus become evident. The Low preset is the only playable option, averaging 62 FPS. The Medium preset averages 48 FPS, with a minimum of 41 FPS and a maximum of 55 FPS. The High preset drops to 40 FPS, and the Ultra preset averages just 30 FPS. These results show a steep performance cliff between Low and Medium at 4K, indicating that the GPU’s compute and memory bandwidth are the limiting factors at this resolution.
CPU and GPU Roles
The performance scaling between resolutions and presets clarifies which component is doing the heavy lifting. At 1080p, the difference between Low and Ultra presets is roughly 91 FPS (from 179 FPS to 88 FPS), which is a 51% reduction. This suggests that while the CPU is capable of feeding the GPU at lower settings, the GPU’s rendering load increases substantially with higher quality effects, such as shadows and post-processing. The Ryzen 5 5600F’s six cores and 12 threads are sufficient to keep up with the RTX 5050 at this resolution, as evidenced by the high Low-preset frame rate.
At 1440p, the gap between Low and Ultra narrows to 59 FPS (from 116 FPS to 57 FPS), which is a 51% reduction as well. This pattern indicates that the GPU is becoming the primary bottleneck as resolution increases, but the CPU is still contributing enough to maintain high frame rates at lower presets. The fact that the High preset at 1440p (74 FPS) is only slightly lower than the Medium preset (88 FPS) suggests that the GPU’s shading units and texture units are handling the extra load without a dramatic drop-off.
At 4K, the picture changes completely. The difference between Low and Ultra is just 32 FPS (from 62 FPS to 30 FPS), but the Low preset itself is only 62 FPS. This indicates that the GPU is now the sole limiting factor, as the CPU’s role is diminished by the sheer pixel count. The RTX 5050’s 13.17 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 320.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth are simply not enough to maintain high frame rates at 4K with any preset above Low. The data shows that the CPU is not a bottleneck at any resolution; rather, the GPU’s capabilities dictate the playable settings.
How This Combo Ranks
In the database of tested combinations, this pairing ranks 2274 out of 3712 total combos for Minimum. This places it in the upper half of all tested systems, which is a strong result for a mid-range CPU and a new entry-level GPU. The rank reflects that while this combo is not a top-tier performer, it significantly outperforms many older or lower-end configurations. The RTX 5050 sits at the 66th percentile among all GPUs, and the Ryzen 5 5600F is at the 85th percentile among all CPUs, which explains why the combo ranks as well as it does.
The CPU’s high percentile is particularly notable. The Ryzen 5 5600F’s average benchmark score of 36945 places it just behind the AMD Ryzen 5 5500X3D (37018) and the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 (37093), and essentially tied with the Intel Core Ultra 5 225 (36938). This means the CPU is not holding the combo back in any meaningful way. The GPU, while ranked lower, still provides enough raw throughput to keep the combo competitive in this game, which is not particularly demanding by modern standards.
Similar Performance Alternatives
For users considering this combo, several nearby alternatives would behave in a similar fashion. On the CPU side, the AMD Ryzen 5 5500X3D has an average score of 37018, which is 0.2% higher than the Ryzen 5 5600F. This means it would deliver nearly identical frame rates in Minimum, with only a negligible difference in CPU-bound scenarios. The Intel Core Ultra 5 225 (score 36938) is effectively a tie, with a 0% delta, so swapping between these two would yield no observable difference in gameplay. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 (score 37093) is 0.4% faster, which is also imperceptible in practice.
On the GPU side, the closest rival is the AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT, which has an average score of 20713 compared to the RTX 5050’s 21035. This is a 1.6% difference, meaning the RTX 5050 is slightly faster, but the RX 5600 XT would produce nearly the same frame rates at each resolution and preset. The AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL (score 21153) is 0.6% faster, and the AMD Radeon HD 8970M (score 21237) is 1% faster, but both are older mobile parts that would not be a sensible upgrade path. The NVIDIA RTX A4000 Mobile (score 21379) is 1.6% faster, but it is a professional mobile GPU. For a desktop build, the RX 5600 XT is the most realistic comparable alternative.
Best Settings per Resolution
The most demanding preset that maintains at least 60 FPS average varies by resolution. At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset is fully playable, with an average of 88 FPS. This is the best visual quality setting that still clears the 60 FPS threshold, and it leaves enough headroom for occasional dips. The Medium preset (137 FPS) and High preset (115 FPS) are also excellent options if the user prefers higher frame rates over visual fidelity, but Ultra is the recommended choice for the best experience.
At 2560x1440, the High preset is the optimal choice, averaging 74 FPS. The Ultra preset falls to 57 FPS, which is below the playable threshold, so High is the most demanding setting that remains smooth. Users who prioritize frame rate over visuals could also use the Medium preset (88 FPS) or Low preset (116 FPS), but High provides a good balance of image quality and performance. The data shows that the 1440p High preset is a sweet spot for this combo.
At 3840x2160, the Low preset is the only option that stays at or above 60 FPS, with an average of 62 FPS. The Medium preset (48 FPS) is not playable, and the High (40 FPS) and Ultra (30 FPS) presets are far too slow. This means that 4K gaming is only possible with significant visual compromises. The 8 GB GDDR6 memory and 128-bit bus are the primary reasons for this limitation, as the GPU cannot handle the texture and pixel load at 4K with higher settings.
The Verdict
This PC can absolutely run Minimum, and it does so with room to spare at standard resolutions. At 1920x1080, the data shows that all four presets—Low, Medium, High, and Ultra—are playable, with the Ultra preset averaging 88 FPS. This is the ideal resolution for this combo, offering a fully smooth experience at maximum settings. At 2560x1440, the High preset is the best choice, averaging 74 FPS, while the Ultra preset falls just short at 57 FPS. The 1440p experience is still excellent, with three out of four presets clearing the 60 FPS mark.
At 3840x2160, the verdict is more mixed. The Low preset averages 62 FPS, which is technically playable, but the Medium, High, and Ultra presets all fall below 48 FPS and are not recommended. This means 4K is possible only with reduced visual quality. Overall, the Ryzen 5 5600F and RTX 5050 combination is a capable pairing for this game, delivering high frame rates at 1080p and 1440p, with a playable but visually compromised experience at 4K. For most users, this system will handle Minimum without issue at the resolutions they are likely to use.