Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Minimum
Third-Person Shooter 2014

Minimum

99%
Excellent Match Your system exceeds recommended requirements!

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
299 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
160 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
211 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
103 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
113 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
56 FPS
4.8ms Frame Time
7ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,425
Your CPU 36,945
Graphics Card
Required 27,663
Your GPU 44,795

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 56 73 87 113
1440p QHD 103 135 161 211
1080p Full HD 160 210 250 299

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 210
1920x1080 Low 299
1920x1080 Medium 250
1920x1080 Ultra 160
2560x1440 High 135
2560x1440 Low 211
2560x1440 Medium 161
2560x1440 Ultra 103
3840x2160 High 73
3840x2160 Low 113
3840x2160 Medium 87
3840x2160 Ultra 56

Performance Analysis: Minimum on Your System

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti combination delivers a consistently high-performance experience in Minimum, with benchmark data showing that every tested resolution and preset configuration clears the 60 FPS playability threshold except for one demanding 4K setting. This pairing of a six-core Zen 3 processor with an Ada Lovelace GPU places it in the 84th percentile for GPU performance and 85th percentile for CPU performance, and the measured frame rates reflect that headroom across the board.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the combo produces exceptional frame rates that saturate high-refresh displays. The Low preset averages 299 FPS, which is the highest recorded result across all configurations. Medium settings average 250 FPS, with minimums of 212 FPS and maximums of 287 FPS, indicating strong frame pacing even during demanding scenes. The High preset averages 210 FPS, while Ultra remains highly playable at 160 FPS average. No minimum or maximum values were recorded for Low, High, or Ultra at this resolution, but the averages alone show that the RTX 4070 Ti has ample headroom at 1080p.

Moving to 2560x1440, frame rates remain well above the 60 FPS threshold, though the scaling from 1080p shows the expected resolution penalty. Low averages 211 FPS, nearly matching the 1080p Low result. Medium averages 161 FPS with minimums of 137 FPS and maximums of 185 FPS, representing a 36% reduction in average FPS compared to the 1080p Medium result. High averages 135 FPS, and Ultra averages 103 FPS. The gap between Low and Ultra at 1440p is 108 FPS, which is a wider spread than at 1080p, suggesting that the higher resolution amplifies the cost of the more demanding preset.

At 3840x2160, the RTX 4070 Ti begins to show its limits, but the game remains playable at most settings. Low averages 113 FPS, Medium averages 87 FPS with minimums of 74 FPS and maximums of 100 FPS, and High averages 73 FPS. The Ultra preset drops to 56 FPS average, which falls below the 60 FPS playability threshold. The scaling from 1440p to 4K at High settings is a 46% reduction in average FPS (from 135 to 73), while the Low preset sees a 46% reduction as well (from 211 to 113). This consistent scaling indicates that the GPU is the primary bottleneck at higher resolutions, as the CPU has less impact on the frame rate when pixel count increases.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of AMD Ryzen 5 5600F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti ranks 601st out of 3,712 tested combos in Minimum, placing it in the top 16% of all configurations in the database. This rank reflects the strength of both components, as the CPU sits at the 85th percentile among all tested processors and the GPU at the 84th percentile among all tested graphics cards.

The rank of 601 out of 3,712 means that roughly 3,111 other combinations outperform this pairing in this specific game, but the measured FPS data shows that the vast majority of those higher-ranked combos are likely using more expensive or newer hardware. For the target resolutions and settings that matter most to players, this combo provides frame rates that exceed what many lower-ranked configurations could achieve, particularly at 1080p and 1440p where the RTX 4070 Ti delivers 160 FPS or higher at the most demanding presets.

The percentile positions of the individual components suggest that the CPU and GPU are well matched in overall performance, with the CPU's 85th percentile and GPU's 84th percentile indicating near-parity in their respective benchmark hierarchies. This balance helps avoid situations where one component severely bottlenecks the other, which is reflected in the consistent scaling between resolutions and presets observed in the measured data.

CPU and GPU Roles

The benchmark data reveals clear division of labor between the CPU and GPU across different resolution and preset combinations. At 1920x1080, the CPU plays a larger role in determining frame rates, as evidenced by the relatively small differences between presets. The jump from Low to Ultra at 1080p results in a 139 FPS reduction (from 299 to 160), but even the Ultra preset maintains 160 FPS, suggesting that the Ryzen 5 5600F can feed the GPU sufficiently at lower resolutions.

As resolution increases, the GPU becomes the dominant factor. The scaling from 1080p to 1440p at the same preset shows reductions of 29% to 36% across presets, while the scaling from 1440p to 4K shows reductions of 46% to 48%. This progressive widening of the performance gap with resolution indicates that the RTX 4070 Ti's rendering workload grows faster than the CPU's instruction throughput as pixel count increases.

The presets also reveal the GPU's role in handling graphical complexity. At 4K, the difference between Low and Ultra is 57 FPS (113 vs. 56), while at 1080p the same preset gap is 139 FPS (299 vs. 160). The proportionally smaller absolute difference at 4K suggests that the GPU is nearing its limits at that resolution, whereas at 1080p it has enough headroom to absorb the additional load from higher presets without collapsing frame rates.

For the Ultra preset specifically, the CPU's role becomes more apparent at lower resolutions. At 1080p Ultra, the combo achieves 160 FPS, while at 4K Ultra it drops to 56 FPS. This 104 FPS difference is the largest across any preset between the two resolutions, indicating that the Ultra preset's additional visual effects tax the GPU heavily at 4K, pushing it below the playable threshold.

The Verdict

This PC can run Minimum exceptionally well at 1080p and 1440p, and remains playable at 4K with the right settings. At 1920x1080, all four presets—Low, Medium, High, and Ultra—exceed 60 FPS, with the Ultra preset averaging 160 FPS. This means players can enable the highest visual quality without sacrificing smoothness, and even the most demanding settings leave ample headroom for frame rate fluctuations.

At 2560x1440, the verdict is equally positive. Every preset from Low to Ultra clears the 60 FPS threshold, with Ultra averaging 103 FPS. The best playable setting at this resolution is Ultra, which delivers 103 FPS average, providing both visual fidelity and performance. The minimum recorded FPS at Medium is 137, indicating that even transient drops stay well above the playability threshold.

At 3840x2160, the situation becomes more nuanced. The High preset averages 73 FPS and is the best playable setting, while Low averages 113 FPS and Medium averages 87 FPS. The Ultra preset falls to 56 FPS average, which does not meet the 60 FPS playability threshold. For 4K Ultra, players would need to either reduce the resolution or lower the preset to High to maintain smooth gameplay. The minimum FPS recorded at 4K Medium is 74, which is still above 60, but the Ultra preset's 56 FPS average suggests that the GPU is overextended at this configuration.

Similar Performance Alternatives

For the CPU, the nearest rivals based on average benchmark scores include the Intel Core Ultra 5 225, which scores 36,938 with a 0% deltaPct relative to the Ryzen 5 5600F's 36,945 average. The AMD Ryzen 5 5500X3D scores 37,018 with a -0.2% deltaPct, meaning it performs nearly identically. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 scores 37,093 with a -0.4% deltaPct, and the Intel Core i9-12900T scores 37,112 with a -0.5% deltaPct. All four alternatives are within 0.5% of the Ryzen 5 5600F's performance, so any of these CPUs would deliver essentially the same frame rates in Minimum when paired with the RTX 4070 Ti.

For the GPU, the nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile, which averages 45,152 in benchmark scores with a -0.8% deltaPct relative to the RTX 4070 Ti's 44,795 average. The AMD Radeon Pro 5500 XT scores 45,384 with a -1.3% deltaPct, the NVIDIA RTX A6000 scores 44,075 with a 1.6% deltaPct (meaning the RTX 4070 Ti is slightly faster), and the Intel Arc A730M scores 45,592 with a -1.7% deltaPct. These alternatives would produce nearly identical frame rates in Minimum, with the RTX A6000 being the closest match at just 1.6% slower.

Players considering an upgrade or a similar build could expect comparable performance from any of these CPU-GPU pairings, as the deltaPct values indicate that the differences are within measurement noise for most practical purposes.

FAQ

Q: Can this combo achieve 60 FPS at 4K with Ultra settings?

A: No. At 3840x2160 with Ultra settings, the average FPS is 56, which falls below the 60 FPS playability threshold. The High preset at 4K averages 73 FPS and is the best playable setting.

Q: What is the highest preset that maintains 60 FPS at 1440p?

A: The Ultra preset at 2560x1440 averages 103 FPS, making it the most demanding preset that stays above 60 FPS. All presets at this resolution clear the threshold.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals in benchmark scores?

A: The Ryzen 5 5600F averages 36,945 in benchmark scores. The Intel Core Ultra 5 225 scores 36,938 (0% delta), the AMD Ryzen 5 5500X3D scores 37,018 (-0.2%), the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 scores 37,093 (-0.4%), and the Intel Core i9-12900T scores 37,112 (-0.5%). All are within 0.5% performance.

Q: Does the GPU have a significant performance lead over its closest rival?

A: The RTX 4070 Ti averages 44,795 in benchmark scores. The NVIDIA RTX A6000 scores 44,075, which is 1.6% slower. The RTX 5090 Mobile scores 45,152, which is 0.8% faster. The differences are small enough that in-game performance would be nearly identical.

Q: What is the frame rate difference between 1080p and 4K at High settings?

A: At 1080p High, the average FPS is 210. At 4K High, the average FPS is 73. This represents a 65% reduction in average frame rate when moving from 1080p to 4K at the High preset.

Q: Is the Medium preset at 4K smooth?

A: Yes. At 3840x2160 with Medium settings, the average FPS is 87, with a minimum of 74 FPS and a maximum of 100 FPS. The minimum stays well above the 60 FPS playability threshold.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 1920x1080, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Ultra, which averages 160 FPS. This provides the maximum visual quality with a frame rate that is more than double the playability threshold, making it the clear recommendation for 1080p displays.

At 2560x1440, the Ultra preset again delivers the best experience, averaging 103 FPS. This is comfortably above 60 FPS and represents the highest visual fidelity available in the game. Players with 1440p monitors can enable all graphical features without concern.

At 3840x2160, the most demanding preset that maintains 60 FPS is High, averaging 73 FPS. While this is above the threshold, it is close enough that players sensitive to frame rate dips might prefer Medium, which averages 87 FPS with a minimum of 74 FPS. The Ultra preset at 4K is not recommended, as its 56 FPS average falls short of the playability standard.