Minimum

Similar Performance Alternatives

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600 sits in a dense performance cluster. Its average benchmark score of 20,468 places it within 0.5% of four nearby processors. The closest match is the Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, which scores 20,454, a difference of just 0.1%. The AMD Ryzen 5 8500G and AMD EPYC 9454P follow at 20,425 and 20,422 respectively, each trailing by 0.2%. The AMD EPYC 7713 rounds out the group with a score of 20,363, a 0.5% gap. For CPU-bound scenarios, any of these processors would deliver nearly identical frame pacing.

On the graphics side, the AMD Radeon RX 570 posts an average score of 28,766. The nearest rival is the AMD Radeon RX 470 at 28,996, which is 0.8% faster. The AMD Radeon RX 6800M comes in at 28,874, a 0.4% advantage. The AMD Radeon R9 M295X scores 28,580, sitting 0.7% behind. The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 trails by 1.2% with a score of 28,421. These four GPUs bracket the RX 570 within a narrow 2% performance band, meaning a user switching between any of these cards would see almost identical frame rates in Minimum.

The practical implication for this combination: the CPU and GPU both rank at the 74th percentile among their respective categories, but their direct competitors cluster tightly. The Ryzen 5 5600 has a clear edge in threaded workloads, as indicated by its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 18,309, while the RX 570's GCN 4.0 architecture with 2,048 shading units handles the rasterization load. Neither component is an outlier; both sit in a well-populated middle tier of the performance distribution.

Best Settings per Resolution

The measured data reveals a strict progression across resolutions. At 3840x2160, no settings preset reaches the 60 FPS playable threshold. The best recorded average is 30.3 FPS at Low settings, which falls far short. High settings drop to 19.7 FPS, Medium to 23.9 FPS, and Ultra to 14.2 FPS. This resolution is not viable for smooth gameplay regardless of configuration.

At 2560x1440, the situation improves but remains below the threshold. Low settings deliver 53.8 FPS average, the highest of any preset at this resolution. Medium reaches 38.5 FPS, High 32 FPS, and Ultra 27 FPS. None clear 60 FPS, so no settings combination is recommended here.

At 1920x1080, the system finally finds playable territory. The most demanding preset that maintains at least 60 FPS average is Medium, which records 63.8 FPS. Low settings run faster at 83.9 FPS, but Medium offers a better visual balance while still staying above the threshold. High settings fall to 56 FPS, just below the playable line, and Ultra drops to 39.2 FPS. The verdict for 1080p: Medium is the highest quality setting that sustains smooth performance.

FAQ

Q: Can this PC run Minimum at 4K resolution?

A: No. At 3840x2160, the best average frame rate is 30.3 FPS at Low settings. Medium averages 23.9 FPS, High 19.7 FPS, and Ultra 14.2 FPS. None approach the 60 FPS playable threshold.

Q: What is the highest playable settings preset at 1440p?

A: No preset at 2560x1440 reaches 60 FPS. Low settings come closest at 53.8 FPS average, but this is still below the playable threshold. The system cannot maintain smooth gameplay at this resolution.

Q: Which settings should I use at 1080p for the best experience?

A: Medium settings at 1920x1080 deliver 63.8 FPS average, which clears the 60 FPS threshold. Low settings run at 83.9 FPS for higher frame rates, but Medium provides the best balance of visual quality and performance that stays playable.

Q: How does the RX 570 compare to the RX 470?

A: The RX 570 scores 28,766 on average, while the RX 470 scores 28,996. The RX 470 is 0.8% faster, a negligible difference in real-world gameplay.

Q: What is the frame rate difference between Low and Ultra at 1080p?

A: Low settings average 83.9 FPS, while Ultra averages 39.2 FPS. The gap is 44.7 FPS, representing a 114% performance increase when dropping from Ultra to Low.

Q: Does the CPU hold back the GPU in this game?

A: The data does not indicate a CPU bottleneck. At 1080p Medium, the system reaches 63.8 FPS, and the CPU's single-thread score of 882 in 3DMark suggests adequate headroom. The GPU's 4 GB GDDR5 memory and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth are the limiting factors at higher resolutions.

The Verdict

This system can run Minimum at 1920x1080 with Medium settings, achieving an average of 63.8 FPS. That is the only resolution and preset combination that clears the 60 FPS playable threshold. Low settings at 1080p also qualify at 83.9 FPS, but Medium is the recommended choice for visual fidelity without sacrificing smoothness.

At 2560x1440, the system falls short across all presets. Low settings produce 53.8 FPS, which is playable in a casual sense but does not meet the defined threshold. Medium drops to 38.5 FPS, High to 32 FPS, and Ultra to 27 FPS. None of these are recommended for competitive or fast-paced play.

At 3840x2160, the system is not viable. Even Low settings only achieve 30.3 FPS, and Ultra drops to 14.2 FPS. This resolution should be avoided entirely. The verdict is clear: this combination is a 1080p machine for Minimum, with Medium settings as the ceiling for consistent 60+ FPS performance.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 3840x2160, the results are uniformly below playable levels. Low settings average 30.3 FPS, Medium 23.9 FPS, High 19.7 FPS, and Ultra 14.2 FPS. The scaling from Low to Ultra represents a 53% performance drop.

At 2560x1440, Low settings average 53.8 FPS. Medium drops to 38.5 FPS, High to 32 FPS, and Ultra to 27 FPS. The gap between Low and Ultra is 26.8 FPS, or a 50% reduction.

At 1920x1080, the system shows its best behavior. Low settings average 83.9 FPS. Medium averages 63.8 FPS, staying above the playable threshold. High averages 56 FPS, just missing the mark. Ultra averages 39.2 FPS, a significant drop from Low. The progression from Low to Ultra is 44.7 FPS, representing a 53% decrease. The data shows consistent scaling behavior across all three resolutions: each step from Low to Medium to High to Ultra reduces performance by roughly 25% to 30%.

How This Combo Ranks

In the database for Minimum, this combination of AMD Ryzen 5 5600 and AMD Radeon RX 570 ranks 3,506 out of 3,712 tested combinations. This places it in the 6th percentile of all tested systems, meaning 94% of other configurations deliver better performance in this game.

The low rank is primarily attributable to the GPU's age. The RX 570, with its GCN 4.0 architecture and 4 GB GDDR5 memory, struggles with the demands of Minimum at higher resolutions. The CPU, by contrast, ranks in the 74th percentile among all processors, indicating it is not the limiting factor. The combination's rank reflects a mismatch: a modern mid-range CPU paired with a legacy GPU that cannot fully utilize the available processing power.

For context, the CPU's nearest rivals all score within 0.5% of each other, confirming the Ryzen 5 5600 is well-positioned. But the GPU's nearest rivals, including the RX 470 and RX 6800M, also score within 1.2%, showing that the RX 570 is not anomalously weak for its class. The combination's low game-specific rank suggests Minimum is particularly demanding on GPU resources, especially at higher resolutions.

CPU and GPU Roles

The data indicates that the GPU is the dominant factor in Minimum's performance across all resolutions. At 3840x2160, the frame rates range from 14.2 FPS at Ultra to 30.3 FPS at Low. These numbers are far below the 60 FPS threshold, and the CPU's strong single-thread performance cannot compensate. The Ryzen 5 5600's 3DMark single-thread score of 882 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2,584 indicate ample processing headroom.

At 2560x1440, the pattern continues. Low settings reach 53.8 FPS, but Medium drops to 38.5 FPS. The GPU's 4 GB memory capacity and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth are likely the limiting factors, as higher settings increase memory pressure and texture bandwidth demands. The CPU's 32 MB L3 cache and 51.2 GB/s memory bandwidth are more than sufficient for this workload.

At 1920x1080, the GPU still leads the performance equation, but the CPU's role becomes more evident. The jump from Low (83.9 FPS) to Medium (63.8 FPS) shows the GPU handling increased shading load, while the CPU maintains frame pacing. The drop to High (56 FPS) and Ultra (39.2 FPS) suggests the GPU's 2,048 shading units and 32 ROPs reach their limits. The CPU's 6 cores and 12 threads, with a boost clock of 4.40 GHz, are not the constraint here.

The scaling between resolutions confirms this analysis. At Low settings, performance drops from 83.9 FPS at 1080p to 53.8 FPS at 1440p, a 36% reduction. At Medium, the drop is from 63.8 to 38.5 FPS, a 40% reduction. This consistent scaling points to GPU-bound behavior, as a CPU bottleneck would show less variation with resolution changes. The verdict: the RX 570 dictates playability, while the Ryzen 5 5600 provides a stable foundation that does not limit the experience. Upgrading the GPU would yield the largest performance gains in Minimum.