Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Minimum
Third-Person Shooter 2014

Minimum

79%
Great Match Your system meets recommended requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
202 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
99 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
130 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
64 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
70 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
34 FPS
7.7ms Frame Time
12ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,425
Your CPU 37,018
Graphics Card
Required 27,663
Your GPU 17,639

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 34 45 54 70
1440p QHD 64 84 100 130
1080p Full HD 99 130 155 202

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 130
1920x1080 Low 202
1920x1080 Medium 155
1920x1080 Ultra 99
2560x1440 High 84
2560x1440 Low 130
2560x1440 Medium 100
2560x1440 Ultra 64
3840x2160 High 45
3840x2160 Low 70
3840x2160 Medium 54
3840x2160 Ultra 34

Performance Analysis: Minimum on Your System

The AMD Ryzen 5 5500X3D and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 combination delivers a definitive 60 FPS experience in Minimum at 1080p and 1440p, with the playable threshold being met at all tested settings on those resolutions. At 4K, however, the combo is constrained, and only the Low preset maintains a playable average frame rate. The data indicates this pairing is best suited for high-refresh-rate 1080p gaming or solid 1440p play, with 4K requiring significant graphical compromises.

Best Settings per Resolution

1920x1080: The Ultra preset achieves an average of 99 FPS, which is not only above the 60 FPS playable threshold but also leaves substantial headroom for demanding scenes. This is the clear choice for 1080p, as it provides the highest visual fidelity while maintaining a smooth experience. The Low preset reaches 202 FPS, Medium hits 155 FPS, and High sits at 130 FPS, all of which are far beyond the playability mark, but Ultra is the recommended target for maximizing quality without sacrificing performance.

2560x1440: At this resolution, the Ultra preset delivers an average of 64 FPS, just clearing the 60 FPS threshold. This makes it the most demanding playable setting, offering the full visual experience. The High preset runs at 84 FPS, Medium at 100 FPS, and Low at 130 FPS, providing comfortable margins for those who prioritize frame rate stability over absolute visual quality. Given the data, Ultra is the best setting, as it remains playable while offering the highest fidelity.

3840x2160: The 4K resolution presents a significant challenge. The High preset averages 45 FPS, Medium averages 54 FPS, and Ultra drops to 34 FPS, all below the playable threshold. The only setting that clears 60 FPS is Low, which averages 70 FPS. Therefore, Low is the best settings choice at 4K, as it is the sole option that provides a playable frame rate, though it requires a substantial reduction in visual quality.

FAQ

*Q: Can this PC run Minimum at 1080p with the highest settings?*

A: Yes. The benchmark data shows the Ultra preset at 1920x1080 delivers an average of 99 FPS, which is well above the 60 FPS playable threshold.

Q: What is the maximum playable setting at 1440p?

A: The Ultra preset at 2560x1440 achieves an average of 64 FPS, making it the most demanding setting that still maintains a playable frame rate.

Q: Is 4K gaming viable with this hardware?

A: Only with significant compromises. The data shows that at 3840x2160, only the Low preset (70 FPS) reaches the 60 FPS threshold. High (45 FPS), Medium (54 FPS), and Ultra (34 FPS) all fall short.

Q: How does the RTX 4060's performance compare to its closest rivals?

A: The RTX 4060 has an average benchmark score of 17639. Its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon HD 7790, scores 17666, which is only 0.2% higher. The AMD Radeon 780M scores 17588, 0.3% lower, and the AMD Radeon Pro 560 scores 17551, 0.5% lower. This indicates very similar raw compute performance among these GPUs.

Q: How does the Ryzen 5 5500X3D's processing power compare to similar CPUs?

A: The CPU's average benchmark score is 37018. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450, scores 37093, which is 0.2% higher. The AMD Ryzen 5 5600F and Intel Core Ultra 5 225 score 36945 and 36938 respectively, both 0.2% lower. The Intel Core i9-12900T scores 37112, 0.3% higher. This suggests the 5500X3D offers performance on par with these alternatives.

Q: What is the playable frame rate threshold used for this analysis?

A: The playable threshold is set at 60 FPS. Any setting with an average frame rate at or above this mark is considered playable.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the AMD Ryzen 5 5500X3D and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 ranks 2000 out of 3712 tested combos for Minimum. This places the system in the 54th percentile among all tested configurations, indicating it offers a moderate level of performance relative to the broader database. While it is not a top-tier configuration, its ranking shows it is far from the bottom, and the measured frame rates confirm it can handle the game well at 1080p and 1440p. The ranking suggests that many other hardware pairings will outperform it, particularly at higher resolutions, but the specific combination is still well-suited for the game's requirements at standard gaming resolutions.

Similar Performance Alternatives

Based on the nearest rival data for both components, several hardware alternatives would likely produce similar frame rates in Minimum. On the CPU side, the AMD Ryzen 5 5600F, with a benchmark delta of only 0.2% from the 5500X3D, is the closest match and should offer nearly identical processing performance. The Intel Core Ultra 5 225 also sits within 0.2%, while the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 and Intel Core i9-12900T are within 0.3% and -0.3% respectively, all indicating that swapping to any of these CPUs would not meaningfully change the gaming experience.

For the GPU, the AMD Radeon HD 7790 is the nearest rival, with a score just 0.2% higher than the RTX 4060. The AMD Radeon 780M follows at 0.3% lower, and the AMD Radeon Pro 560 and Pro 460 are 0.5% and 0.7% lower, respectively. This data suggests that a system with an RTX 4060 could be swapped for one with a Radeon HD 7790 and expect virtually identical performance in Minimum. The same applies to the other listed GPUs, with the Pro 460 being the most distinct at 0.7% slower, though this difference is still negligible in real-world terms.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 3840x2160, the Low preset delivers an average of 70 FPS, with no minimum or maximum data provided. The Medium preset averages 54 FPS, with a minimum of 46 and a maximum of 62. High averages 45 FPS, and Ultra averages 34 FPS, with no min/max data for the latter two.

At 2560x1440, the Low preset reaches an average of 130 FPS. Medium averages 100 FPS, with a minimum of 85 and a maximum of 115. High averages 84 FPS, and Ultra averages 64 FPS, with no min/max data for High and Ultra.

At 1920x1080, the Low preset achieves an average of 202 FPS. Medium averages 155 FPS, with a minimum of 131 and a maximum of 178. High averages 130 FPS, and Ultra averages 99 FPS, with no min/max data for High and Ultra.

The data shows a clear progression: performance scales predictably with resolution and settings. The only settings with recorded minimum and maximum values are Medium at all resolutions, which provides insight into frame time variance. For instance, at 1080p Medium, the frame rate fluctuates between 131 and 178 FPS, showing a variance of 47 FPS around the 155 FPS average. At 1440p Medium, the range is 85 to 115, a 30 FPS variance. At 4K Medium, the range is 46 to 62, a 16 FPS variance.

The Verdict

The data is unambiguous: this PC can run Minimum with playable performance at 1080p and 1440p. At 1920x1080, all four presets—Low, Medium, High, and Ultra—clear the 60 FPS threshold, with averages ranging from 99 FPS at Ultra to 202 FPS at Low. At 2560x1440, the same holds true, with all presets maintaining averages above 60 FPS, from 64 FPS at Ultra to 130 FPS at Low. For those with 1440p monitors, the Ultra preset is viable, though it offers only a slim margin above the playable threshold.

At 3840x2160, the verdict is more restrictive. Only the Low preset, with an average of 70 FPS, is playable. The Medium preset at 54 FPS, High at 45 FPS, and Ultra at 34 FPS all fall below the 60 FPS threshold and are not considered playable. Therefore, 4K gaming is possible only with the lowest graphical settings. For the best balance of visual quality and performance, the optimal experience is at 1080p with Ultra settings, where the system delivers 99 FPS, or at 1440p with High settings, which offers 84 FPS and greater headroom than the 64 FPS seen at Ultra.