Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Minimum
Third-Person Shooter 2014

Minimum

60%
Playable Your system meets minimum requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
145 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
71 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
94 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
46 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
50 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
25 FPS
10.8ms Frame Time
16ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,425
Your CPU 19,593
Graphics Card
Required 27,663
Your GPU 20,556

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 25 32 39 50
1440p QHD 46 60 72 94
1080p Full HD 71 93 111 145

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 93
1920x1080 Low 145
1920x1080 Medium 111
1920x1080 Ultra 71
2560x1440 High 60
2560x1440 Low 94
2560x1440 Medium 72
2560x1440 Ultra 46
3840x2160 High 32
3840x2160 Low 50
3840x2160 Medium 39
3840x2160 Ultra 25

Performance Analysis: Minimum on Your System

The AMD Ryzen 5 5500 and Intel Arc B570 combination delivers a clear performance picture in Minimum: it handles 1080p and 1440p with playable frame rates across most presets, but falls short of the 60 FPS threshold at 4K. The benchmark data shows a system that is well-balanced for high-refresh gaming at mainstream resolutions, with the GPU becoming the primary bottleneck only when resolution scales to 2160p.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data for this combo covers three resolutions and four quality presets, with average, minimum, and maximum frame rates recorded for select configurations.

At 1920x1080, the system delivers its strongest performance. The Low preset averages 145 FPS, which is the highest recorded figure across the entire test matrix. Medium averages 111 FPS with a minimum of 95 FPS and a maximum of 128 FPS. The High preset still produces a smooth 93 FPS average. Even the most demanding Ultra preset remains well above playable territory, averaging 71 FPS.

Moving to 2560x1440, frame rates scale down predictably but remain respectable. The Low preset averages 94 FPS. Medium holds at 72 FPS average, with a minimum of 61 FPS and a maximum of 82 FPS. High drops to exactly 60 FPS average, which is the playable threshold. The Ultra preset falls below that mark, averaging 46 FPS.

At 3840x2160, the combo struggles to maintain playable performance. Low averages 50 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS threshold. Medium drops further to 39 FPS average, with a minimum of 33 FPS and a maximum of 44 FPS. High averages 32 FPS, and Ultra bottoms out at 25 FPS. None of the 4K presets achieve the 60 FPS playable standard.

Best Settings per Resolution

The verdict data identifies the most demanding preset that remains at or above 60 FPS for each resolution.

At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset is the best playable option, averaging 71 FPS. This means the system has enough headroom to run the game at maximum visual quality while staying comfortably above the playable threshold.

At 2560x1440, the High preset is the best playable setting, averaging exactly 60 FPS. This sits precisely at the playable threshold, so users who want a safety margin might prefer the Medium preset, which averages 72 FPS.

At 3840x2160, no preset achieves the 60 FPS threshold. The Low preset comes closest at 50 FPS, but it still falls short. The verdict data confirms there are no playable settings at this resolution.

CPU and GPU Roles

The scaling pattern across resolutions and presets reveals how the CPU and GPU share the workload in Minimum.

At 1080p, the system shows strong performance even at Ultra settings, with 71 FPS average. The gap between Low (145 FPS) and Ultra (71 FPS) is roughly 2x, indicating that the GPU is handling the increased graphical load effectively. The CPU, a 6-core/12-thread Zen 3 part, has enough headroom at this resolution to feed the GPU without becoming a limiting factor.

At 1440p, the performance drop from Medium (72 FPS) to High (60 FPS) is a 16.7% reduction, while the drop from High to Ultra (46 FPS) is a 23.3% reduction. This suggests the GPU is becoming more influential as resolution increases. The CPU still holds up, as the frame rate differences are primarily driven by the graphical preset changes.

At 4K, the performance collapse is evident. The Low preset (50 FPS) to Medium (39 FPS) drop is 22%, and Medium to High (32 FPS) is another 18% reduction. The Ultra preset (25 FPS) represents a 50% drop from Low. This pattern strongly indicates the GPU is the dominant bottleneck at 2160p. The Arc B570's 10 GB of GDDR6 memory and 380.0 GB/s bandwidth are insufficient to maintain playable frame rates at this resolution, regardless of the CPU's capability.

The data shows a classic resolution-scaling pattern: the CPU matters most at lower resolutions where frame rates are high, while the GPU becomes the limiting factor at higher resolutions where pixel throughput is the primary constraint.

FAQ

*Q: Can this combo run Minimum at 1080p with maximum settings?*

A: Yes. The Ultra preset at 1920x1080 averages 71 FPS, which is above the 60 FPS playable threshold.

Q: What is the best playable setting at 1440p?

A: The High preset at 2560x1440 averages exactly 60 FPS, making it the most demanding preset that stays at or above the playable threshold. The Medium preset offers more headroom at 72 FPS average.

Q: Is 4K playable with this hardware?

A: No. The best 4K result is the Low preset at 50 FPS average, which is below the 60 FPS playable threshold. No 4K preset achieves playable frame rates.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Ryzen 5 5500 has an average benchmark score of 19593, which is nearly identical to the AMD Ryzen AI 5 430 (19617, -0.1% delta) and the Intel Core i7-10700F (19499, +0.5% delta). It trails the Intel Core i5-12500 (19668, -0.4%) and the Intel Core i5-11600KF (19723, -0.7%) by negligible margins.

Q: How does the GPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Intel Arc B570 has an average benchmark score of 20556. It is nearly identical to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile (20534, +0.1% delta) and the Intel Arc A750 (20582, -0.1% delta). The AMD Radeon R9 M390X (20662, -0.5%) and NVIDIA Quadro M4000M (20480, +0.4%) are also within 1% of the Arc B570's score.

Q: What is the lowest playable preset at 1440p?

A: The Low preset at 2560x1440 averages 94 FPS, which is the highest frame rate recorded at that resolution. The Medium preset averages 72 FPS and the High preset averages 60 FPS, so all three are playable.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The nearest rival data for both the CPU and GPU provides a clear picture of what other hardware would behave similarly in this combination.

For the AMD Ryzen 5 5500, the closest performance match is the AMD Ryzen AI 5 430, which scores 19617 in average benchmarks, a mere -0.1% delta. The Intel Core i5-12500 (19668, -0.4%) and Intel Core i7-10700F (19499, +0.5%) are also within half a percent. The Intel Core i5-11600KF (19723, -0.7%) is the farthest of the listed rivals but still effectively equivalent. Any of these CPUs would produce nearly identical frame rates in Minimum when paired with the same GPU.

For the Intel Arc B570, the benchmark scores cluster even tighter. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile (20534, +0.1%) is the closest match, followed by the Intel Arc A750 (20582, -0.1%). The NVIDIA Quadro M4000M (20480, +0.4%) and AMD Radeon R9 M390X (20662, -0.5%) round out the group. All four GPUs have average scores within 1% of the Arc B570, meaning they would deliver virtually identical performance in this game.

When considering a system swap, replacing either component with one of these rivals would preserve the overall performance profile. The combination would still achieve 71 FPS at 1080p Ultra, 60 FPS at 1440p High, and remain below the playable threshold at 4K.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo's position in the benchmark database is clearly defined by its rank data. This pairing ranks 2984 out of 3712 total tested combinations in Minimum, placing it in the lower half of all possible hardware pairings.

This rank reflects the system's performance ceiling. While it handles 1080p and 1440p well, the inability to reach playable frame rates at 4K pushes it down the rankings. The 60 FPS playable threshold at 1440p High and 71 FPS at 1080p Ultra are respectable results, but they don't boost the combo above the median.

The rank suggests that many other tested combinations offer better performance, likely including systems with higher-end GPUs that can manage 4K playable frame rates. However, for gamers targeting 1080p or 1440p, this combo sits in a workable performance tier, even if it doesn't rank among the top performers in the database. The data shows a system that is competent for mainstream resolutions but limited by its 4K capability.