Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Minimum
Third-Person Shooter 2014

Minimum

48%
Not Recommended Your system may struggle with this game.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
174 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
82 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
111 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
53 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
57 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
27 FPS
9.1ms Frame Time
14ms Input Latency
1440p Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,425
Your CPU 17,507
Graphics Card
Required 27,663
Your GPU 15,171

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 27 37 43 57
1440p QHD 53 71 87 111
1080p Full HD 82 110 133 174

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 110
1920x1080 Low 174
1920x1080 Medium 133
1920x1080 Ultra 82
2560x1440 High 71
2560x1440 Low 111
2560x1440 Medium 87
2560x1440 Ultra 53
3840x2160 High 37
3840x2160 Low 57
3840x2160 Medium 43
3840x2160 Ultra 27

Performance Analysis: Minimum on Your System

Similar Performance Alternatives

The AMD Ryzen 5 4600G sits in a tight performance cluster according to the database. Its average benchmark score of 17,507 places it within 1% of several competing processors. The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE trails by just 0.1% with a score of 17,482, making it the closest match for CPU-bound workloads. The Intel Core 7 150U posts a score of 17,395, which is 0.6% behind the 4600G, while the AMD Ryzen 3 8300GE and Intel Core i3-14100T are essentially peers as well, scoring 17,614 and 17,648 respectively, putting them 0.6% and 0.8% ahead. For users considering alternatives, any of these four chips would deliver nearly identical frame pacing in Minimum, assuming the graphics card remains the limiting factor.

On the GPU side, the AMD Radeon RX 7600 records an average benchmark score of 15,171, placing it in the 57th percentile of all GPUs. The nearest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM at 15,199, a gap of only 0.2%, which means in practice the two cards trade blows depending on the title and driver version. The AMD Radeon Pro 560X and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti both score slightly lower at 15,082 and 15,063 respectively, each about 0.6% to 0.7% behind. Interestingly, the AMD Radeon 680M integrated solution scores 15,270, which is 0.7% higher than the RX 7600 in aggregate benchmarks, though that advantage does not necessarily translate to real-world gaming performance in Minimum where discrete card drivers and sustained power delivery matter. The data suggests that if the RX 7600 were unavailable, the RTX 3050 OEM would be the most behaviorally similar substitute in this specific game, while the GTX 660 Ti represents a much older architecture that nonetheless lands in the same benchmark band.

FAQ

Q: Can the Ryzen 5 4600G and RX 7600 maintain 60 FPS at 1080p in Minimum?

A: Yes. At 1920x1080, every tested preset clears the 60 FPS threshold. Low averages 173.7 FPS, Medium 132.8 FPS, High 110.4 FPS, and even Ultra holds 82.2 FPS.

Q: What is the best visual preset available at 1440p while staying playable?

A: The High preset at 2560x1440 is the most demanding setting that stays playable, averaging 71.2 FPS. Ultra drops to 53.3 FPS, which falls below the 60 FPS playable threshold.

Q: Is 4K viable with this combination?

A: No. At 3840x2160, no preset reaches 60 FPS. The best result is Low at 57 FPS, with Medium at 43.4 FPS, High at 36.7 FPS, and Ultra at 26.9 FPS.

Q: How does this combo rank among all tested combinations in Minimum?

A: The combination ranks 2,581 out of 3,712 tested system configurations, placing it in the lower third of the database for this game.

Q: Does the RX 7600 outperform its closest GPU rival significantly?

A: No. The RX 7600 scores 15,171 on average, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM scores 15,199. The difference is 0.2%, which is negligible in practical terms. The AMD Radeon 680M actually scores 0.7% higher at 15,270.

Q: What CPU benchmark score does the Ryzen 5 4600G produce?

A: The CPU averages 17,507 across all benchmark tests, which places it in the 71st percentile of all CPUs. Its strongest single test is Cinebench R23 multicore at 13,593 points.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The recorded data for Minimum covers three resolutions and four quality presets. All measurements are average FPS values; the database does not include minimum or maximum frame data for this title.

At 1920x1080, the combination delivers its strongest results. The Low preset averages 173.7 FPS, which is more than double the playable threshold. Medium produces 132.8 FPS, High 110.4 FPS, and Ultra 82.2 FPS. Every setting at this resolution leaves substantial headroom, and even the heaviest preset stays comfortably above the 60 FPS line. The scaling between presets is consistent: dropping from Ultra to High yields a 28.2 FPS gain, from High to Medium 22.4 FPS, and from Medium to Low 40.9 FPS.

At 2560x1440, performance remains strong but the highest preset begins to strain. Low averages 110.5 FPS, Medium 87.3 FPS, and High 71.2 FPS, all above the playable mark. Ultra falls to 53.3 FPS, which is 6.7 FPS below the threshold. The gap between Medium and High is 16.1 FPS, while the step from High to Ultra costs 17.9 FPS. The resolution increase from 1080p to 1440p reduces Low preset performance by 63.2 FPS, a 36.4% drop, while Ultra loses 28.9 FPS, a 35.2% decline.

At 3840x2160, the combination cannot reach playable performance at any setting. Low averages 57 FPS, just 3 FPS short of the threshold. Medium drops to 43.4 FPS, High to 36.7 FPS, and Ultra to 26.9 FPS. The scaling from Low to Ultra represents a 30.1 FPS reduction, with the largest single step being the 13.6 FPS loss from Medium to High. The difference between Low at 4K and Low at 1440p is 53.5 FPS, showing how heavily the RX 7600's 8 GB frame buffer and 128-bit memory bus are taxed at 2160p.

The Verdict

The Ryzen 5 4600G and RX 7600 combination can run Minimum at 60 FPS or above, but only at specific resolutions and presets. At 1920x1080, the system clears the playable threshold on all four presets, with the Ultra preset at 82.2 FPS being the most demanding option that still succeeds. This makes 1080p the fully playable resolution for this pairing, with no need to compromise on visual quality.

At 2560x1440, the verdict is more qualified. High, Medium, and Low all stay above 60 FPS, with High averaging 71.2 FPS. Ultra does not make the cut at 53.3 FPS, so users targeting 1440p must settle for High as the best playable setting. The margin at High is 11.2 FPS, which is acceptable but not overwhelming, and frame drops in busy scenes could bring the average closer to the threshold.

At 3840x2160, the answer is a clear no. Low comes closest at 57 FPS, but every preset fails to reach the 60 FPS mark. The data shows no playable settings at this resolution, meaning 4K is not viable for Minimum with this hardware. The processor's Zen 2 architecture and the GPU's 8 GB GDDR6 memory are simply insufficient for the demands of 2160p in this title. Overall, the system is a solid 1080p machine for Minimum and a capable 1440p performer when not pushing Ultra settings.

How This Combo Ranks

In the database of tested combinations for Minimum, the Ryzen 5 4600G paired with the RX 7600 holds the 2,581st position out of 3,712 total configurations. That places the combo in the 30th percentile of all systems tested, meaning roughly 70% of recorded combinations deliver higher average frame rates in this game. The ranking reflects the combined ceiling of the CPU and GPU: the 4600G sits in the 71st percentile of all CPUs, while the RX 7600 lands in the 57th percentile of all GPUs, but the system as a whole is dragged down by the demands of Minimum at higher resolutions. The rank is not a judgment of the components in isolation; it is a measure of how this specific pairing performs in this specific game. At 1080p, the combo would likely rank far higher, but the database's aggregate ranking includes all tested resolutions and presets, and the poor 4K results pull the overall position down. For context, the combo outperforms 1,131 tested systems, but 2,581 other configurations deliver better aggregate results in Minimum.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 1920x1080, the best preset that maintains 60 FPS or higher is Ultra, which averages 82.2 FPS. This is the highest quality option available at this resolution and it still leaves 22.2 FPS of headroom above the playable threshold. Users can run the game at maximum visual fidelity without concern.

At 2560x1440, the best preset is High, averaging 71.2 FPS. Ultra is not playable at this resolution, so High represents the optimal balance of visual quality and performance. The 11.2 FPS margin above the threshold is the smallest of any recommended setting across resolutions, so this is the least forgiving configuration.

At 3840x2160, no preset reaches the 60 FPS threshold. The closest option is Low at 57 FPS, which falls 3 FPS short. Because the database records no playable settings at 4K, there is no recommended preset for this resolution. The system simply does not have enough performance headroom for Minimum at 2160p, and users who prioritize 4K would need to accept frame rates below the playable mark or reduce their resolution.