Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Minimum
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 67 | 85 | 101 | 129 |
| 1440p QHD | 122 | 158 | 188 | 234 |
| 1080p Full HD | 184 | 231 | 247 | 276 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Minimum on Your System
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 delivers a dominant performance profile in Minimum, a third-person shooter released in 2014. The database records a combo rank of 350 out of 3712 tested configurations, placing this pairing in the top 9.4% of all systems tested. Across every resolution and preset combination measured, the average frame rate clears the 60 FPS playability threshold by a wide margin, with the lowest recorded average being 67 FPS at 4K Ultra settings. The data indicates this system is not merely playable; it is exceptionally well-suited for high-refresh-rate displays at lower resolutions while still maintaining smooth visuals at maximum settings in 4K.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The measured FPS data covers three resolutions (1920x1080, 2560x1440, and 3840x2160) and four quality presets (Low, Medium, High, and Ultra). All figures represent average FPS, as the database did not record minimum or maximum frame time values for this configuration in Minimum.
At 1920x1080, the RTX 5080 paired with the Ryzen 5 3600 produces exceptional frame rates. Low settings yield 275.6 FPS, Medium settings produce 247.1 FPS, High settings deliver 230.9 FPS, and Ultra settings still maintain 184.1 FPS. The scaling from Low to Ultra shows a 33.2% drop in performance, indicating that the graphical load increases substantially at higher presets, but the absolute numbers remain far above any practical refresh rate limit for standard monitors. The gap between Medium and High is relatively small at 16.2 FPS, while the jump from High to Ultra costs 46.8 FPS, suggesting the Ultra preset introduces significantly more demanding effects.
At 2560x1440, the performance remains extremely high. Low settings reach 234.1 FPS, Medium settings hit 188 FPS, High settings produce 158.2 FPS, and Ultra settings deliver 121.7 FPS. The transition from 1080p to 1440p costs roughly 15% to 34% of the frame rate depending on the preset, with Ultra showing the largest relative drop. The scaling between presets at this resolution shows a consistent pattern: Low to Medium costs 46.1 FPS, Medium to High costs 29.8 FPS, and High to Ultra costs 36.5 FPS. This indicates that each preset tier imposes a meaningful but manageable performance penalty.
At 3840x2160, the system still delivers very strong results. Low settings produce 128.5 FPS, Medium settings reach 101.4 FPS, High settings deliver 84.6 FPS, and Ultra settings maintain 67 FPS. The 4K resolution places a much heavier load on the GPU, and the scaling from Low to Ultra shows a 47.9% performance reduction. The drop from Medium to High is 16.8 FPS, while the drop from High to Ultra is 17.6 FPS, showing a fairly even distribution of cost across the higher presets. Even at the most demanding configuration measured, 4K Ultra, the average frame rate of 67 FPS remains 11.7% above the 60 FPS playability threshold.
FAQ
*Q: Can this PC run Minimum at 4K Ultra settings?*
A: Yes. The database records an average frame rate of 67 FPS at 3840x2160 with Ultra settings, which is above the 60 FPS playability threshold.
Q: What is the highest average FPS recorded for this combo?
A: The highest recorded average is 275.6 FPS, achieved at 1920x1080 with Low settings.
Q: How does the RTX 5080 compare to its nearest rivals in benchmark scores?
A: The RTX 5080 has an average benchmark score of 56083. Its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE, scores 57367, which is 2.2% higher. The AMD Radeon 8060S scores 55757, 0.6% lower, and the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB scores 55698, 0.7% lower.
Q: Is the Ryzen 5 3600 still competitive among CPUs?
A: The Ryzen 5 3600 has an average benchmark score of 17035, placing it in the 71st percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core i7-1260P, scores 17007, a 0.2% difference, while the AMD EPYC 7742 scores 16998, also 0.2% different.
Q: Which resolution shows the largest performance drop from Low to Ultra?
A: The largest relative drop occurs at 3840x2160, where performance falls from 128.5 FPS on Low to 67 FPS on Ultra, a 47.9% reduction.
Q: How many total combos were tested for this game?
A: The database includes 3712 tested combos for Minimum, and this CPU-GPU pairing ranks 350th among them.
Best Settings per Resolution
For each resolution, the best settings are defined as the most demanding preset that maintains an average frame rate at or above 60 FPS. In every case, the Ultra preset qualifies.
At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset delivers 184.1 FPS, which is more than triple the playability threshold. This makes Ultra the clear choice for 1080p gaming, as it provides substantial headroom for high refresh rate displays.
At 2560x1440, the Ultra preset produces 121.7 FPS, comfortably above the 60 FPS threshold. This represents a 33.9% reduction compared to the 1080p Ultra result, but the absolute performance remains high enough for smooth gameplay on 144Hz monitors.
At 3840x2160, the Ultra preset maintains 67 FPS, which is 11.7% above the 60 FPS threshold. This is the only resolution where the margin narrows noticeably, but it still clears the playability bar. The database recommends Ultra settings for all three resolutions, with the 4K Ultra configuration being the most demanding scenario that this system can handle while staying above 60 FPS.
How This Combo Ranks
The database ranks this AMD Ryzen 5 3600 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 combination at 350th out of 3712 tested combos for Minimum. This places the system in the top 9.4% of all configurations tested, a strong result for a game released in 2014. The ranking reflects the combined performance of both components, but given the game's age and the relatively modern GPU, the RTX 5080 likely carries most of the weight in achieving these high frame rates.
The percentile ranking for the CPU alone is 71st among all CPUs, while the GPU ranks in the 87th percentile among all GPUs. The GPU's higher percentile suggests it is the more dominant component in this pairing, which aligns with the measured FPS data showing that resolution scaling has a significant impact on performance. The combo's overall rank of 350 out of 3712 indicates that while many systems outperform it, the vast majority of tested configurations deliver lower performance in Minimum.
Similar Performance Alternatives
The nearest rivals for the CPU and GPU provide context for what other hardware might produce similar results in this game. For the AMD Ryzen 5 3600, the closest alternatives in benchmark score are the Intel Core i7-1260P with a score of 17007 (0.2% lower), the Intel Core i5-11400 with a score of 17067 (0.2% higher), the AMD EPYC 7573X with a score of 17070 (0.2% higher), and the AMD EPYC 7742 with a score of 16998 (0.2% lower). These CPUs would likely deliver nearly identical frame rates in CPU-bound scenarios, though the EPYC parts are server-oriented and not typical gaming choices.
For the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080, the nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE with a score of 57367 (2.2% higher), the AMD Radeon 8060S with a score of 55757 (0.6% lower), the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB with a score of 55698 (0.7% lower), and the AMD Radeon Pro W5700X with a score of 54828 (2.3% lower). Systems built with these alternative GPUs would produce very similar FPS numbers in Minimum, with the RX 9070 GRE potentially offering a slight edge and the Pro W5700X falling modestly behind.
The Verdict
Based on the recorded data, this system can unequivocally run Minimum at 60 FPS or higher across all tested resolutions and presets. The verdict by resolution confirms that every resolution, from 1920x1080 to 3840x2160, supports all four settings presets at playable frame rates. At 3840x2160, the best settings are Ultra with an average of 67 FPS. At 2560x1440, Ultra produces 121.7 FPS. At 1920x1080, Ultra reaches 184.1 FPS.
The weakest configuration measured is 4K Ultra at 67 FPS, which still exceeds the 60 FPS threshold. The strongest configuration is 1080p Low at 275.6 FPS. This spread indicates that the system has enormous headroom for less demanding settings, making it suitable for competitive play at high refresh rates, while also being capable of maximum visual fidelity at 4K. The data shows no configuration where the system falls below the playability threshold, making this a universally viable setup for Minimum.
CPU and GPU Roles
The measured FPS data reveals how the CPU and GPU each contribute to performance in Minimum across different resolutions. At 1920x1080, the frame rates are exceptionally high across all presets, ranging from 184.1 FPS on Ultra to 275.6 FPS on Low. The relatively small performance difference between Low and Ultra at this resolution suggests that the CPU may be limiting the maximum achievable frame rate, as the GPU is capable of far more than 275.6 FPS in less demanding scenarios.
At 2560x1440, the frame rates drop but remain high, ranging from 121.7 FPS on Ultra to 234.1 FPS on Low. The scaling from 1080p to 1440p shows that the GPU begins to take on more of the workload, but the CPU still appears to provide sufficient headroom. The reduction from Low to Ultra at this resolution is 112.4 FPS, which is a larger absolute drop than at 1080p, indicating the GPU is becoming more stressed.
At 3840x2160, the frame rates range from 67 FPS on Ultra to 128.5 FPS on Low. The 4K resolution places the heaviest load on the GPU, and the scaling between presets shows the GPU is the primary bottleneck at this resolution. The drop from Low to Ultra is 61.5 FPS, which represents a 47.9% reduction in performance. This pattern, where higher resolutions and presets increasingly tax the GPU, indicates that the RTX 5080 is the dominant factor in determining performance in Minimum, while the Ryzen 5 3600 provides enough processing power to avoid becoming a significant bottleneck at any of the tested configurations. The GPU's 87th percentile ranking versus the CPU's 71st percentile further supports this interpretation.