Minimum

How This Combo Ranks

The AMD Ryzen 5 3600 paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 ranks 398 out of 3712 tested combinations in Minimum. That places this pairing in the top 11 percent of all tested combos, a strong position driven almost entirely by the GPU's raw output. The CPU sits at the 71st percentile among all tested processors, while the GPU reaches the 86th percentile among all tested graphics cards. When the database ranks combos, it weighs the measured frame rates across the tested settings and resolutions, and the RTX 4080's heavy lifting carries this pairing well above the median.

The recorded data shows that this combination clears the 60 FPS playable threshold at every resolution and every preset tested. At 1080p, the weakest recorded average is 174 FPS on Ultra, which is nearly three times the playable threshold. At 1440p, the lowest average is 112 FPS on Ultra, again well above 60. Even at 4K, the most demanding tested resolution, the Ultra preset holds an average of 61 FPS, which just barely clears the threshold. This is a combo that does not struggle with Minimum under any tested condition, and the rank reflects that consistency.

The data also shows that the frame rate scales predictably with resolution. At 1080p, the combo produces between 174 FPS (Ultra) and 273 FPS (Low). At 1440p, the range is 112 FPS (Ultra) to 230 FPS (Low). At 4K, the range compresses to 61 FPS (Ultra) to 124 FPS (Low). The 4K Ultra result is the only point in the entire measured set that sits close to the 60 FPS line, which makes it the single point of concern for this pairing. Every other combination of resolution and preset leaves a comfortable margin.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The CPU's nearest rivals in the database are separated by fractions of a percent. The Intel Core i7-1260P scores 17007, which is 0.2 percent below the Ryzen 5 3600's average score of 17035. The Intel Core i5-11400 scores 17067, 0.2 percent above. The AMD EPYC 7573X scores 17070, also 0.2 percent above, and the AMD EPYC 7742 scores 16998, 0.2 percent below. These four alternatives are effectively identical in CPU performance for this game, so swapping the Ryzen 5 3600 for any of them would not meaningfully change the measured frame rates in Minimum. The game is not CPU-bound in the tested scenarios, as the frame rate differences between resolutions are much larger than the differences between these CPUs.

The GPU's nearest rivals tell a similar story on the graphics side. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER scores 54209, just 0.1 percent below the RTX 4080's average score of 54247. The AMD Radeon Pro W5700X scores 54828, 1.1 percent above. The AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB scores 55698, 2.6 percent above, and the AMD Radeon 8060S scores 55757, 2.7 percent above. These deltas are small enough that in practical terms, any of these cards would produce nearly identical frame rates in Minimum. The RTX 4080 SUPER is the closest match, and the database records it as essentially a tie with the RTX 4080. The AMD alternatives are slightly ahead in aggregate benchmark score, but the difference is within the noise of real-world testing for this title.

For a builder looking at this combo, the meaningful takeaway is that neither component has a close rival that would change the outcome in Minimum. The CPU side has multiple options within 0.2 percent, and the GPU side has options within 2.7 percent. None of them would push the 4K Ultra result from 61 FPS below the 60 FPS threshold, and none would turn the 1080p results into anything other than very high frame rates.

CPU and GPU Roles

The division of labor between the Ryzen 5 3600 and the RTX 4080 in Minimum is clear from the resolution scaling. Moving from 1080p to 1440p at the same preset drops the average FPS by roughly 35 percent across all presets. Moving from 1440p to 4K drops the average by roughly another 45 percent. These are large drops that track the pixel count, which indicates the GPU is the limiting factor at every resolution. The CPU's job is to feed the GPU, and the Ryzen 5 3600 does that without becoming the bottleneck in any tested configuration.

At 1080p Low, the combo records 273 FPS. At 1080p Ultra, it records 174 FPS. The gap between presets at the same resolution is 99 FPS, which shows how much headroom the GPU has when the visual load is reduced. At 4K, the gap between Low and Ultra is 63 FPS (124 vs 61), which is a smaller absolute gap but a larger proportional one. The Ultra preset at 4K cuts the Low preset result nearly in half. This is classic GPU-bound behavior: the CPU delivers frames as fast as it can, and the GPU's rendering cost at higher settings and resolutions determines the final output.

The preset scaling at each resolution also shows that the CPU is not the limiting factor. If the CPU were the bottleneck, the frame rate would stay roughly flat as the resolution increased, because the CPU would be producing the same number of frames regardless of pixel count. Instead, the frame rate drops substantially with each resolution increase, which means the RTX 4080 is doing the work and the Ryzen 5 3600 is keeping up. The 3DMark multi-thread score of 4605 and the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 15045 are respectable for a 6-core, 12-thread Zen 2 part, and they are sufficient for this game at these settings.

The Verdict

Yes, this PC can run Minimum, and it can do so at every resolution and preset combination that was measured. The verdict data lists all four presets (Low, Medium, High, Ultra) as playable at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. The playable threshold is 60 FPS, and every recorded average exceeds it.

At 1080p, the lowest average is 174 FPS on Ultra, with Low hitting 273 FPS, Medium 248 FPS, and High 229 FPS. At 1440p, the lowest average is 112 FPS on Ultra, with Low at 230 FPS, Medium 176 FPS, and High 148 FPS. At 4K, the lowest average is 61 FPS on Ultra, with Low at 124 FPS, Medium 95 FPS, and High 79 FPS. The only result that approaches the threshold is 4K Ultra at 61 FPS, and even that one clears it.

The data indicates that a 60 FPS experience is available at 4K with Ultra settings, but with only 1 FPS of headroom. For players who want a safety margin at 4K, dropping to High gives 79 FPS, which is 19 FPS above the threshold. At 1440p and below, the margin is large enough that no preset choice creates any risk of falling below 60 FPS. The 1440p Medium result includes a recorded minimum of 149 FPS and a maximum of 202 FPS, which shows that even the frame time variance stays far above the playable line.

FAQ

Q: Can this combo run Minimum at 4K with Ultra settings?

A: Yes. The measured average at 4K Ultra is 61 FPS, which clears the 60 FPS playable threshold. It is the tightest result in the entire dataset, with only 1 FPS of headroom.

Q: What is the best preset at 1440p for this combo?

A: Ultra is the best preset at 1440p. It records an average of 112 FPS, which is well above the 60 FPS threshold and leaves no reason to lower the settings.

Q: How much faster is 1080p compared to 4K at the same preset?

A: At Ultra settings, 1080p records 174 FPS while 4K records 61 FPS, making 1080p roughly 2.9 times faster. At Low settings, 1080p records 273 FPS while 4K records 124 FPS, roughly 2.2 times faster.

Q: Is the Ryzen 5 3600 holding back the RTX 4080 in this game?

A: The data does not show a CPU bottleneck. Frame rates drop significantly as resolution increases, which indicates the GPU is the limiting factor. The CPU sits at the 71st percentile and its nearest rivals are all within 0.2 percent in aggregate score.

Q: How does the RTX 4080 compare to its closest rival, the RTX 4080 SUPER?

A: The RTX 4080 SUPER scores 54209 in the database, 0.1 percent below the RTX 4080's 54247. This is effectively a tie, and the two cards would produce nearly identical frame rates in Minimum.

Q: Is the 4K Ultra result stable, or does it dip below 60 FPS?

A: The 4K Ultra average is 61 FPS, and no minimum frame rate was recorded for that configuration in the dataset. The 4K Medium result, which is 95 FPS on average, has a recorded minimum of 80 FPS, so the 4K Ultra result likely has less margin than that, but the average still clears the threshold.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 1920x1080, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Ultra, with an average of 174 FPS. The full preset ladder at 1080p is Low at 273 FPS, Medium at 248 FPS with a minimum of 211 FPS, High at 229 FPS, and Ultra at 174 FPS. Every preset clears 60 FPS by a wide margin, so the choice comes down to visual quality rather than performance. Ultra is the recommended setting.

At 2560x1440, Ultra is again the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS, with an average of 112 FPS. The preset ladder is Low at 230 FPS, Medium at 176 FPS with a minimum of 149 FPS, High at 148 FPS, and Ultra at 112 FPS. The Ultra preset has 52 FPS of headroom above the threshold, so there is no reason to compromise on settings at this resolution.

At 3840x2160, Ultra is the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS, with an average of 61 FPS. The preset ladder is Low at 124 FPS, Medium at 95 FPS with a minimum of 80 FPS, High at 79 FPS, and Ultra at 61 FPS. Ultra clears the threshold but with only 1 FPS of margin. Players who want a buffer at 4K should consider High, which delivers 79 FPS and still stays comfortably above the playable line. The recorded data supports Ultra as the best visual preset at 4K, but High is the safer choice for consistent frame pacing.