Minecraft: Java Edition

The Intel Core Ultra X7 368H paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile is a high-end mobile configuration for Minecraft: Java Edition. The database lists this combo as rank 1 out of 1,727 tested combinations, yet no measured FPS data is available (dataIsMeasured: false). This analysis draws on synthetic benchmarks, percentile rankings, and rival comparisons to characterize expected behavior.

Measured FPS Breakdown

Because dataIsMeasured is false, the FACT PACK contains no average, minimum, or maximum FPS figures for this combination. The hardware’s raw performance can instead be inferred from its synthetic benchmark scores. The CPU achieves 28,221 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 3,984 in single-core, while the GPU scores 17,469 in PassMark G3D and 89,569 in Geekbench Vulkan. These scores place the CPU at the 87th percentile and the GPU at the 67th percentile among all tested parts.

The CPU’s 16 cores and 16 threads, with a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, provide strong multi-threaded throughput. Its PassMark multithread score of 32,956 and floating-point math score of 105,681 further underscore its compute capability. The single-thread score of 4,005 in PassMark indicates robust per-core performance, which is often critical for game logic and physics. The CPU’s cache hierarchy includes 192 KB L1 per core, 2.5 MB L2 per core, and 18 MB shared L3, facilitating fast data access.

The GPU’s 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus delivers 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth. With 3,072 shading units, 96 TMUs, and 48 ROPs, the RTX 4060 Mobile is a competent mid-range part. Its pixel rate is 90.72 GPixel/s and texture rate is 181.4 GTexel/s. The GPU also features 24 RT cores and 96 tensor cores, supporting ray tracing and AI workloads, though Minecraft: Java Edition’s typical rendering path may not utilize these fully. The GPU’s PassMark DirectX 12 score is 73, while DirectX 11 scores 157 and DirectX 9 scores 216, reflecting its architecture’s strengths across different API generations.

Without measured FPS, these synthetic numbers remain the only quantitative indicators. The absence of measured data means that any specific frame-rate claims cannot be substantiated from this database entry.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s percentile ranking?

A: The Intel Core Ultra X7 368H ranks at the 87th percentile among all CPUs in the database, indicating it outperforms the majority of processors.

Q: What is the GPU’s percentile ranking?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile ranks at the 67th percentile among all GPUs, placing it in the upper third of graphics cards.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival?

A: The CPU is 0.1% slower than the Intel Core 7 253PE and 0.2% slower than the Intel Core 5 223PE, but 0.2% faster than the AMD Ryzen 9 7940H and Intel Xeon 6507P.

Q: How does the GPU compare to the RTX 2080?

A: The RTX 4060 Mobile is 0.7% slower than the desktop RTX 2080, and 1.3% faster than the RTX 5060 Mobile.

Q: What is the combo’s rank for Minecraft: Java Edition?

A: The combo ranks 1 out of 1,727 tested combinations, making it the top-performing CPU/GPU pair in the database for this game.

Q: Is there any measured FPS data available?

A: No, the FACT PACK explicitly sets dataIsMeasured to false, so no in-game frame rates are recorded.

Similar Performance Alternatives

Based on nearestRivals, the CPU’s performance is nearly identical to several other processors. The Intel Core 7 253PE has an average score of 40,557, a delta of -0.1% relative to the Ultra X7 368H. The Intel Core 5 223PE scores 40,585 (-0.2%), the AMD Ryzen 9 7940H scores 40,431 (+0.2%), and the Intel Xeon 6507P scores 40,426 (+0.2%). Any of these CPUs paired with the same RTX 4060 Mobile would deliver essentially the same frame rates, as the performance differences are within two-tenths of a percent.

For the GPU, the closest rivals are the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (average score 22,895, -0.7%), the AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT (22,549, +0.8%), the Intel Arc B580 (23,021, -1.3%), and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile (22,435, +1.3%). A system with an RTX 2080 would be slightly faster, while an RX 7700 XT would be slightly slower, but all remain within a narrow performance band. Users seeking a comparable experience could consider these GPUs with the same CPU.

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 40,518, and the GPU’s is 22,729. These values align closely with the rival averages, confirming that the combo sits in a tightly contested performance tier.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo ranks first out of 1,727 tested configurations for Minecraft: Java Edition. This top rank indicates that, among all CPU/GPU pairs in the database, this specific combination is the most capable for this game. The CPU’s high single-thread score (3,984 in Cinebench R23) and the GPU’s robust PassMark G3D score (17,469) contribute to this ranking. However, because dataIsMeasured is false, the rank is derived from synthetic benchmarks rather than direct game FPS measurements.

The rank of 1 is a strong statement about the hardware’s overall performance envelope. It suggests that no other tested combo offers a higher combined CPU and GPU score for this title. The CPU’s 87th percentile and GPU’s 67th percentile individually are not the absolute highest, but their combination yields the best aggregate result. This could be due to the CPU’s exceptional single-thread performance, which is often the limiting factor in Java Edition’s single-threaded renderer, combined with a GPU that provides sufficient fill rate and memory bandwidth.

The Verdict

The playable threshold is set at 60 FPS. The database provides no verdict by resolution, meaning there is no official confirmation of which settings clear 60 FPS. Given the combo’s rank 1 status and its benchmark scores, it is highly likely to exceed 60 FPS at common resolutions, but without measured data, a definitive statement cannot be made. The hardware’s specifications—16 CPU cores, 5.00 GHz boost, 8 GB GDDR6 GPU memory—are consistent with high-performance gaming.

The CPU’s 25 W TDP and GPU’s 115 W TDP indicate a power-efficient design suitable for laptops, yet the performance headroom suggests it can handle demanding titles. The GPU’s 8 GB VRAM is ample for modern games at 1080p and 1440p, and the CPU’s 18 MB L3 cache reduces memory latency. However, the absence of measured FPS means the verdict remains conditional. Users should expect strong performance, but the database does not formally certify 60 FPS at any specific resolution or preset.

Best Settings per Resolution

Since no measured FPS data exists, the database cannot specify the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS for any resolution. The playable threshold is 60 FPS, and the combo’s top rank suggests that even the highest presets would likely maintain this frame rate, but this remains unverified. The GPU’s 256.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and the CPU’s 153.6 GB/s system memory bandwidth provide ample data throughput, while the CPU’s 5.00 GHz boost clock ensures responsive gameplay.

For 1080p, the GPU’s 3,072 shading units and 90.72 GPixel/s pixel rate are more than sufficient for typical Minecraft scenes. For 1440p and 4K, the 8 GB VRAM and 256-bit memory bus (though listed as 128-bit) still offer adequate bandwidth, but without measured data, no specific settings can be recommended. The database simply does not include the necessary frame-rate measurements to determine the optimal balance between visual quality and performance. Users are advised to rely on in-game benchmarking or community-tested settings for resolution-specific guidance.