Minecraft: Java Edition

Intel Core Ultra 7 155H and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile is a high-end mobile pairing for its generation, and the data reflects that. The CPU sits in the 83rd percentile among all tested processors, while the GPU lands in the 67th percentile for all GPUs. This combination ranks 1st out of 1727 tested combos for this specific game, placing it at the very top of the database's hierarchy for Minecraft: Java Edition. However, the measured FPS breakdown and verdict fields are empty in the provided data, meaning there are no direct benchmark scores for this exact CPU/GPU pairing in this title. The analysis below relies entirely on the component-level benchmark data, ranking information, and nearest rival comparisons supplied.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this combination. The "measuredFps" array is empty, and the "dataIsMeasured" flag is false. Consequently, there are no resolution-by-resolution, settings-by-settings, or average/minimum/maximum frame rate figures to report. The database does not provide empirical frame time data for the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile in Minecraft: Java Edition.

What the data does offer is a set of synthetic benchmark scores that indicate the raw capability of each component. The RTX 4060 Mobile's PassMark G3D score is 17469, with a DirectX 11 score of 157 and a DirectX 12 score of 73. Its Vulkan score via Geekbench is 89569, and its OpenCL score is 89420. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score is 15028 and single-core is 1743. These figures establish the hardware's compute headroom but cannot be translated into specific in-game FPS numbers without actual game benchmarks.

Since the requested FPS breakdown section cannot be filled with measured values, the practical implication is that any frame rate claims would be speculative. The database's ranking algorithm has placed this combo at rank 1, which suggests it outperforms other tested combinations in aggregate score, but the absence of game-specific FPS data means the exact average, minimum, and maximum frame rates at 1080p, 1440p, or 4K with various render distances and graphics presets remain unquantified. The verdict fields are also empty, so there is no official call on playability thresholds from the data itself.

FAQ

Q: What is the performance percentile of the CPU and GPU in this combo?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 155H ranks in the 83rd percentile among all CPUs, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile ranks in the 67th percentile among all GPUs. This indicates the processor is a stronger relative performer than the graphics card within their respective categories.

Q: How does the RTX 4060 Mobile compare to its nearest GPU rivals in aggregate score?

A: The RTX 4060 Mobile has an average benchmark score of 22729. Its closest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080, scores 22895, which is 0.7% higher. The AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT scores 22549, which is 0.8% lower. The Intel Arc B580 scores 23021, 1.3% higher, and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile scores 22435, 1.3% lower.

Q: What is the CPU's average benchmark score and how does it stack against its nearest rivals?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 155H has an average benchmark score of 32697. The Intel Core i5-14600T scores 32707 (0% delta), the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 scores 32662 (0.1% delta), the AMD Ryzen 5 7400F scores 32750 (-0.2% delta), and the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H scores 32812 (-0.4% delta). The differences are minimal, within a fraction of a percent.

Q: Does the data include any direct FPS measurements for Minecraft: Java Edition?

A: No. The measured FPS array is empty, and the data is flagged as not measured. There are no resolution-specific, settings-specific, or average/min/max FPS figures for this game with this hardware combination. The ranking is derived from component benchmark scores, not in-game frame rate capture.

Q: What are the launch details for the CPU and GPU?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 155H was released on 2023-12-13 with a launch MSRP of $503. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile was released on 2023-01-02, but no launch MSRP is provided in the data.

Q: How does the combo rank among all tested combinations for this game?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 155H and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile combination ranks 1st out of 1727 tested combos for Minecraft: Java Edition. This is the top position in the database, indicating the highest aggregate performance among all recorded pairings.

How This Combo Ranks

The comboRankInGame field specifies a rank of 1 out of 1727 tested combos. This is the highest possible ranking, meaning the data places this CPU/GPU pairing above all other 1726 combinations in the database for Minecraft: Java Edition. This is a significant distinction, as it suggests that for this specific game, no other tested hardware combination achieves a higher aggregate performance score.

The percentile data supports this top ranking. The CPU's 83rd percentile places it in the upper echelon of processors, and the GPU's 67th percentile, while lower, is still above the median. The combination of a strong multi-core processor (Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 15028) with a capable mobile GPU (PassMark G3D score of 17469) appears to be sufficient to top the charts for this game. The rank of 1 is not a marginal lead; it is the definitive top spot, which implies the hardware pairing is exceptionally well-suited for the game's workload characteristics, likely a mix of single-threaded world generation and multi-threaded chunk rendering.

The playable threshold is 60 FPS. While the verdictByResolution field is empty, the rank of 1 strongly suggests that this combo would clear that threshold at typical gaming resolutions, but the lack of measured data prevents a definitive statement. The ranking is based on component benchmarks, not actual game FPS, so while the position is impressive, it does not substitute for direct frame rate validation.

Similar Performance Alternatives

For the CPU, the nearest rivals are all within a 0.4% delta in average benchmark score. The Intel Core i5-14600T has a score of 32707 (0% delta), making it the closest match. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 scores 32662 (0.1% delta), the AMD Ryzen 5 7400F scores 32750 (-0.2% delta), and the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H scores 32812 (-0.4% delta). In practical terms, any of these processors would deliver nearly identical CPU-bound performance in Minecraft, as the score differences are negligible. The Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H is technically the highest-scoring of the group, but the delta is so small it would be imperceptible in gameplay.

For the GPU, the nearest rivals show slightly larger deltas. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 scores 22895, which is 0.7% higher than the RTX 4060 Mobile's 22729. This is the closest competitor. The AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT scores 22549, 0.8% lower, and the Intel Arc B580 scores 23021, 1.3% higher. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile scores 22435, 1.3% lower. The RTX 2080 is a previous-generation desktop card, while the RX 7700 XT and Arc B580 are desktop offerings from AMD and Intel. In a laptop context, the RTX 4060 Mobile would behave similarly to a desktop RTX 2080 in terms of aggregate GPU compute, which suggests that frame rates in Minecraft would be comparable between these two. The Arc B580's slightly higher score indicates marginally better raw performance, but again, the delta is within a couple of percentage points.

A user seeking a similar experience to this combo could look for laptops with an RTX 2080-class GPU or a desktop with an RX 7700 XT or Arc B580 paired with a mid-range modern CPU. The CPU alternatives listed are all desktop or mobile parts with similar multi-threaded and single-threaded capabilities, so any of them would pair well with the RTX 4060 Mobile's performance envelope.

Best Settings per Resolution

Without measured FPS data, it is impossible to specify the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS at any resolution. The verdictByResolution field is empty, and the measuredFps array contains no values. The data does not provide frame rates for 1080p, 1440p, or 4K, nor does it indicate which settings presets (e.g., Fast, Fancy, Fabulous) would achieve playable frame rates.

The hardware's benchmark scores suggest a high level of capability. The GPU's DirectX 11 score of 157 and DirectX 12 score of 73, combined with its 8 GB GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus with 256.0 GB/s bandwidth, indicate it can handle modern rendering workloads. The CPU's PassMark single-thread score of 3468 and multi-thread score of 24873 suggest strong performance in both lightly-threaded and heavily-threaded scenarios. However, translating these numbers into specific Minecraft settings is not supported by the FACT PACK.

Minecraft's Java Edition is known for being CPU-bound, particularly at higher render distances. The Core Ultra 7 155H's single-core Cinebench R23 score of 1743 indicates robust single-thread performance, which is relevant for the game's main game loop. The 24 MB of shared L3 cache could also help with chunk data. But any statement about "the most demanding preset at each resolution" would require actual game testing data, which is absent. Therefore, this section must remain unfilled with specific numbers, and only a qualitative observation about the hardware's general strength can be made.

The Verdict

The data does not provide a definitive verdict on whether this PC can run Minecraft: Java Edition at 60 FPS or higher. The verdictByResolution field is empty, and there are no measured FPS values. The playable threshold is set at 60 FPS, but without resolution-specific or preset-specific scores, a clear answer cannot be given.

What the data does show is that this combo ranks 1st out of 1727 tested combinations. This top ranking, based on aggregate component benchmarks, implies that the hardware is among the most capable for this game in the entire database. The CPU's 83rd percentile and the GPU's 67th percentile are both above average, and the combination of the two has produced the highest composite score. For a game like Minecraft, which can be demanding on both single-threaded CPU performance and GPU rasterization, this pairing appears well-equipped.

The absence of measured data means the verdict must be cautious. The benchmark results indicate a high-performance system that would very likely exceed 60 FPS at common resolutions like 1080p and 1440p with standard settings, given its top ranking. However, the lack of direct FPS figures prevents a categorical statement. The data supports a strong positive expectation but does not confirm it with actual game frame rates. Users should treat this combo as a top-tier performer for the game based on its rank, but the official database record does not contain the verification needed to state exact settings or resolutions that clear the 60 FPS threshold.