Minecraft: Java Edition

# Measured FPS Breakdown

The FACT PACK for Minecraft: Java Edition with the Intel Core Ultra 5 125H and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile does not contain any measured FPS data. The `measuredFps` array is empty, and the `verdictByResolution` object is also empty. This means the database currently has no empirical frame rate figures for this specific hardware combination running this game.

What we do have is a `comboRankInGame` showing this pairing ranks #1 out of 1,727 tested combos for Minecraft: Java Edition. That rank, however, is derived from synthetic benchmarks and component specifications, not from in-game measurements. The absence of measured FPS data is notable — it means the database cannot yet confirm how this system performs across different resolutions and settings presets.

The GPU's synthetic scores offer some inferential basis. The RTX 4060 Mobile achieves a PassMark G3D score of 17,469 and a PassMark DirectX 11 score of 157. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score is 12,804.5 and single-core is 1,647.5. These numbers suggest a capable gaming platform, but without actual Minecraft: Java Edition frame data, any specific FPS claim would be speculative.

FAQ

Q: Does the database show any measured FPS numbers for Minecraft: Java Edition on this hardware?

A: No. The `measuredFps` array in the FACT PACK is empty. There are zero resolution-by-resolution, setting-by-setting, or avg/min/max frame values recorded for this game with these components.

Q: How does this combo rank among all tested configurations for this game?

A: It ranks #1 out of 1,722 tested combos. This is the top-performing combination in the database for Minecraft: Java Edition, based on the ranking field provided.

Q: What CPU benchmark scores are available?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 125H scores 12,804.5 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 1,647.5 in single-core. Its PassMark single-thread score is 3,399, and its PassMark multi-thread score is 21,100.

Q: What GPU benchmark scores are available?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile scores 17,469 in PassMark G3D and 89,420 in Geekbench OpenCL. Its Vulkan score is 89,569.

Q: Is there any verdict on whether this system can run the game at 60 FPS?

A: No. The `verdictByResolution` field is empty, so there is no database-stated verdict on which resolutions or presets clear the 60 FPS playable threshold.

Q: Why does the rank exist if there is no FPS data?

A: The rank is derived from the component benchmarks and combination scoring, not from in-game measurements. This creates an interesting disconnect: the hardware is ranked #1 among 1,722 combos, yet no Minecraft frame data backs that ranking.

Best Settings per Resolution

Without any measured FPS data, the database cannot recommend specific settings. The FACT PACK shows `verdictByResolution` as an empty object, so there is no authoritative statement about which resolution or preset stays at or above 60 FPS. The `playableThresholdFps` is 60, but no settings guidance is possible from the available facts.

The benchmark data does hint at potential capability. The GPU is in the 67th percentile among all GPUs, and the CPU is in the 79th percentile among all CPUs. But percentiles are not frame rates. For Minecraft: Java Edition, a game known for variable performance depending on chunk loading and render distance, the absence of measured data leaves a genuine gap.

The most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS cannot be identified because the FACT PACK lacks any preset-specific FPS numbers. The ranking of #1 of 1,722 combos suggests high capability, but it does not translate into a specific settings recommendation.

The Verdict

The database cannot currently answer whether this PC can run Minecraft: Java Edition at 60 FPS. The `verdictByResolution` field is empty, and there are no measured FPS values. The combo ranks as #1 out of 1,722 tested configurations, which is a strong indicator of high performance potential, but that rank is not a substitute for frame measurements.

What can be stated from the available facts: the CPU and GPU both sit in upper percentiles — 79th for the CPU and 67th for the GPU. The GPU's PassMark G3D score of 17,469 and the CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 12,804.5 are both strong synthetic numbers. But Minecraft: Java Edition performance is not directly derivable from these scores.

The verdict is therefore: unverified. No resolution or preset can be confirmed to clear the 60 FPS threshold. The data simply does not exist. This is a notable gap for the #1-ranked combo in the database.

CPU and GPU Roles

The data does not include resolution-scaling or preset-scaling measurements. However, the synthetic benchmark scores hint at relative roles. The CPU has an 18-thread headroom that could help with Minecraft's server-side and chunk generation logic, while the GPU's 11.61 TFLOPS FP32 throughput demonstrates strong rasterization capability.

At lower resolutions, Minecraft tends to be more CPU-bound due to its single-threaded game loop; the CPU's single-core PassMark score of 3,399 and Cinebench R23 single-core 1,647.5 are relevant. At higher resolutions, the GPU becomes more dominant; the RTX 4060 Mobile's 256.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 90.72 GPixel/s pixel rate would matter.

But without measured data, these are only inferences. The FACT PACK shows no scaling between resolutions or presets, so the relative importance of CPU vs GPU at 1080p vs 1440p cannot be articulated. The ranking of #1 suggests the combination is well-balanced, but it does not reveal which component dominates.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo rank in-game is #1 of 1,722, meaning this specific pairing of Intel Core Ultra 5 125H and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile is the top-scoring configuration in the database for Minecraft: Java Edition. This is a remarkable ranking, placing it above all other tested CPU+GPU pairs for this game.

The rank is based on the combination's overall benchmark score, not on measured FPS. The CPU's average benchmark score is 27,507, and the GPU's average is 22,729. These feed into a combined ranking that puts this pair at the top. It implies that no other tested hardware combo in the database scores higher for this game.

Similar Performance Alternatives

For the CPU, the nearest rivals in the database are:

• AMD Ryzen 7 5800 — avg score 27,535, delta -0.1% relative to the Intel (the Intel is slightly higher)
• Intel Core i5-12600K — avg score 27,578, delta -0.3%
• AMD Ryzen 7 5700X — avg score 27,578, delta -0.3%
• AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355G — avg score 27,382, delta 0.5% (the AMD is slightly higher)

These four CPUs would behave very similarly to the Core Ultra 5 125H in Minecraft: Java Edition, within a margin of 0.5% or less. The Ryzen 3 PRO 5355G is the only rival that scores higher, by 0.5%.

For the GPU, the nearest rivals are:

• NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 — avg score 22,895, delta -0.7% — the RTX 4060 Mobile is slightly higher
• AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT — avg score 22,549, delta 0.8% (the 4060 is higher)
• Intel Arc B580 — avg score 23,021, delta -1.3% — the Arc B580 scores higher
• NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile — avg score 22,435, delta 1.3% — the 4060 Mobile is higher

These four GPUs are within 1.3% of the RTX 4060 Mobile's average score. In Minecraft, the RTX 2080 or the Arc B580 would likely produce similar frame rates, while the RX 7700 XT and RTX 5060 Mobile are slightly lower-scoring.

Swapping the CPU for a Ryzen 7 5800 or the GPU for an RTX 2080 would result in almost identical performance. The top rank of this combo suggests that the combination is already near the ceiling for this game, but the alternatives above are close enough that a user would notice no meaningful difference.

What is interesting is the spread: the CPU rivals all cluster within 0.5% of each other, while the GPU rivals spread to 1.3%. This implies that GPU choice has a slightly larger performance variance in this game than CPU choice, but the database does not provide enough data to confirm that for Minecraft specifically.