Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Minecraft: Java Edition
Action 2023

Minecraft: Java Edition

100%
Excellent Match Your system exceeds recommended requirements!

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
809 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
316 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
508 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
201 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
268 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
107 FPS
2ms Frame Time
3ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 33,226
Your CPU 79,097
Graphics Card
Required 26,068
Your GPU 54,209

Recommendations

Excellent!

Your system exceeds recommended specs. Enjoy max settings!

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 107 165 211 268
1440p QHD 201 320 402 508
1080p Full HD 316 510 640 809

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 510
1920x1080 Low 809
1920x1080 Medium 640
1920x1080 Ultra 316
2560x1440 High 320
2560x1440 Low 508
2560x1440 Medium 402
2560x1440 Ultra 201
3840x2160 High 165
3840x2160 Low 268
3840x2160 Medium 211
3840x2160 Ultra 107

Performance Analysis: Minecraft: Java Edition on Your System

The Intel Core i9-14900K and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER combination delivers exceptionally high frame rates in Minecraft: Java Edition across all tested resolutions and settings. Benchmark data shows this pairing ranks 93rd out of 1727 tested combos for this game, placing it in the top percentile of systems. The measured FPS figures indicate that this hardware is far beyond the playable threshold of 60 FPS at every resolution and preset tested, with performance scaling predictably as resolution and settings increase.

Similar Performance Alternatives

For the Intel Core i9-14900K, the nearest rival in aggregate benchmark scores is the Intel Core i9-14900KF, which scores 79371 compared to the 79097 average of the i9-14900K, a delta of -0.3%. This means the i9-14900KF performs essentially identically in synthetic workloads. The Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus scores 79574, also within -0.6% of the i9-14900K, indicating near-equivalent CPU performance. The AMD EPYC 7413 scores 80041, a -1.2% delta, while the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 scores 77740, which is 1.7% ahead of the i9-14900K. For gaming purposes, these deltas are negligible, and any of these CPUs would produce similar frame rates in Minecraft: Java Edition when paired with the same GPU.

On the GPU side, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER has an average benchmark score of 54209. Its closest rival is the standard NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080, with a score of 54247 and a delta of -0.1%, meaning the two cards are virtually indistinguishable in performance. The AMD Radeon Pro W5700X scores 54828 (-1.1%), the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB scores 55698 (-2.7%), and the AMD Radeon 8060S scores 55757 (-2.8%). While these AMD options are slightly ahead in raw aggregate scores, the differences are small enough that in Minecraft: Java Edition, which is not particularly GPU-demanding at lower settings, the practical frame rate differences would be minimal. At 4K Ultra, however, the RTX 4080 SUPER’s 107.4 FPS average suggests that the GPU is the limiting factor, so rivals with higher scores might show marginally better performance in that specific scenario.

CPU and GPU Roles

The data reveals how the balance between CPU and GPU shifts across resolutions and presets in Minecraft: Java Edition. At 1920x1080 with Low settings, the system achieves 808.8 FPS average. This extremely high frame rate indicates that the CPU, with its 24 cores and 32 threads, is providing ample headroom, and the GPU is not the bottleneck. Moving to 2560x1440 Low, the average drops to 508.2 FPS, a reduction of roughly 37%. At 3840x2160 Low, the average falls further to 268 FPS, another substantial drop. This pattern shows that even at Low settings, increasing resolution places more load on the GPU, reducing the frame rate significantly.

When comparing presets at a fixed resolution, the CPU and GPU roles become clearer. At 1920x1080, going from Low (808.8 FPS) to High (510.3 FPS) reduces performance by about 37%, and Ultra (315.7 FPS) is roughly 61% below Low. At 3840x2160, the spread is different: Low (268 FPS) to High (165.4 FPS) is a 38% reduction, but Ultra (107.4 FPS) is about 60% below Low. This suggests that at 4K, the GPU is increasingly the dominant factor, as the higher pixel count stresses the RTX 4080 SUPER more than the CPU. The CPU’s influence is most visible at 1080p Low where the frame rate exceeds 800 FPS, a level that only a very strong processor can sustain. The data indicates that for this game, the CPU matters most at lower resolutions and settings, while the GPU becomes the primary constraint at 4K and higher presets.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the system delivers an average of 808.8 FPS on Low settings, 639.6 FPS on Medium, 510.3 FPS on High, and 315.7 FPS on Ultra. The progression from Low to Ultra shows a steady decline, with Ultra producing roughly 61% of the performance of Low. No minimum or maximum FPS values are recorded in the data, so only averages are available for analysis.

At 2560x1440, the averages are 508.2 FPS on Low, 401.7 FPS on Medium, 319.9 FPS on High, and 200.6 FPS on Ultra. Compared to 1080p, the frame rates drop by approximately 37% at Low, 37% at Medium, 37% at High, and 36% at Ultra. This consistent reduction across all presets indicates that resolution scaling is the primary factor at this step, with the GPU handling the extra pixel load uniformly.

At 3840x2160, the averages are 268 FPS on Low, 211.1 FPS on Medium, 165.4 FPS on High, and 107.4 FPS on Ultra. The drop from 1440p to 4K is more pronounced: Low falls by 47%, Medium by 47%, High by 48%, and Ultra by 46%. This larger reduction confirms that 4K resolution is significantly more demanding on the GPU. The Ultra preset at 4K, with an average of 107.4 FPS, is the lowest recorded figure in the entire dataset, yet it still comfortably exceeds the 60 FPS playable threshold.

The Verdict

This PC can run Minecraft: Java Edition at every resolution and preset tested, with all average frame rates well above the 60 FPS playable threshold. At 3840x2160, the verdict lists all four settings as playable: Low (268 FPS), Medium (211.1 FPS), High (165.4 FPS), and Ultra (107.4 FPS). Even the most demanding combination, 4K Ultra, maintains an average of 107.4 FPS, which is nearly double the playable threshold.

At 2560x1440, all settings are also playable, with Ultra delivering 200.6 FPS, High at 319.9 FPS, Medium at 401.7 FPS, and Low at 508.2 FPS. The margin above 60 FPS is enormous, ranging from over 3x at Ultra to over 8x at Low. At 1920x1080, the system produces even higher figures: Ultra at 315.7 FPS, High at 510.3 FPS, Medium at 639.6 FPS, and Low at 808.8 FPS. The lowest of these, 315.7 FPS at Ultra, is still more than five times the 60 FPS threshold. The data shows no scenario where this system would fall below playable performance, making it suitable for high-refresh-rate monitors at any resolution.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the Intel Core i9-14900K and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER ranks 93rd out of 1727 tested combos for Minecraft: Java Edition. This places it in the top 5.4% of all systems tested for this game. The rank reflects the combined performance of both components, and given the high FPS figures across all resolutions, this ranking is consistent with the data. The 1727 total combos in the database means that 1634 other systems perform worse than this pairing, while only 92 perform better. The superior single-threaded performance of the i9-14900K, evidenced by its Geekbench single-core score of 2655 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2262.5, likely contributes to the high rank, as Minecraft: Java Edition is known to be sensitive to single-thread performance. The RTX 4080 SUPER’s percentile of 86 among all GPUs and the CPU’s percentile of 95 among all CPUs further support this strong placement.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 3840x2160, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Ultra, which achieves an average of 107.4 FPS. This is the highest-quality setting available, and it still maintains a comfortable margin above the playable threshold. At 2560x1440, the best settings also allow Ultra at 200.6 FPS average, providing excellent visual quality with very high frame rates. At 1920x1080, Ultra runs at 315.7 FPS average, which is the best possible setting and yields an exceptionally smooth experience. In all three resolutions, the system can run the maximum preset without dropping below 60 FPS, so no compromise is necessary. The data shows that the best settings per resolution are simply Ultra at every resolution, with the lowest average being 107.4 FPS at 4K.

FAQ

Q: Can this system handle Minecraft: Java Edition at 4K Ultra settings?

A: Yes, the measured average FPS at 3840x2160 with Ultra settings is 107.4 FPS, which is above the 60 FPS playable threshold. The verdict lists Ultra as playable at this resolution.

Q: What is the highest average FPS recorded for this combo?

A: The highest average FPS is 808.8, achieved at 1920x1080 resolution with Low settings. This is the maximum value in the measured FPS data.

Q: How does the RTX 4080 SUPER compare to the standard RTX 4080?

A: The RTX 4080 SUPER has an average benchmark score of 54209, while the RTX 4080 scores 54247, a delta of -0.1%. This indicates they perform nearly identically in synthetic benchmarks.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU more important at 1080p Low settings?

A: At 1920x1080 Low, the system reaches 808.8 FPS, which suggests the CPU has significant headroom. The high frame rate indicates the CPU is providing adequate performance, while the GPU handles the relatively light load easily.

Q: What percentile does the CPU rank among all CPUs?

A: The Intel Core i9-14900K ranks in the 95th percentile among all CPUs, based on its aggregate benchmark score of 79097.

Q: What is the lowest average FPS recorded in the entire dataset?

A: The lowest average FPS is 107.4, recorded at 3840x2160 resolution with Ultra settings. This is still well above the 60 FPS playable threshold.