Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Minecraft: Java Edition
Action 2023

Minecraft: Java Edition

100%
Excellent Match Your system exceeds recommended requirements!

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
707 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
277 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
446 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
177 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
235 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
90 FPS
2.2ms Frame Time
3ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 33,226
Your CPU 46,881
Graphics Card
Required 26,068
Your GPU 43,223

Recommendations

Excellent!

Your system exceeds recommended specs. Enjoy max settings!

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 90 148 182 235
1440p QHD 177 283 352 446
1080p Full HD 277 445 561 707

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 445
1920x1080 Low 707
1920x1080 Medium 561
1920x1080 Ultra 277
2560x1440 High 283
2560x1440 Low 446
2560x1440 Medium 352
2560x1440 Ultra 177
3840x2160 High 148
3840x2160 Low 235
3840x2160 Medium 182
3840x2160 Ultra 90

Performance Analysis: Minecraft: Java Edition on Your System

The Intel Core i7-13700K paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER delivers exceptional performance in Minecraft: Java Edition, with benchmark data showing average frame rates that far exceed the 60 FPS playability threshold across every tested resolution and preset combination. Measured results indicate the combo ranks in the 85th percentile of tested configurations, placing it 260th out of 1,727 total combinations. The data reveals a system with substantial headroom, capable of pushing frame rates beyond 700 FPS at lower settings, while still maintaining over 90 FPS at the most demanding 4K Ultra preset.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the combination produces extraordinary frame rates across all presets. The Low preset achieves an average of 707 FPS, which represents the peak performance of the entire test suite. Moving to Medium yields 561.3 FPS, while High settings still deliver 444.8 FPS. The Ultra preset, which typically imposes the heaviest load, maintains an average of 277.4 FPS. These figures demonstrate that at 1080p, the hardware is rarely the limiting factor, as even the most demanding settings produce frame rates nearly five times higher than the 60 FPS playability threshold.

Stepping up to 2560x1440, performance remains exceptionally strong but shows the expected scaling penalty from increased pixel count. The Low preset delivers 445.7 FPS, followed by Medium at 351.6 FPS and High at 283.4 FPS. The Ultra preset drops to 177.3 FPS, which still represents a comfortable margin above playability. The transition from 1080p to 1440p reduces average frame rates by approximately 37% for Low, 37% for Medium, 36% for High, and 36% for Ultra, indicating a consistent resolution scaling factor across all settings.

At 3840x2160, the system continues to impress, though the gap between presets widens considerably. The Low preset achieves 234.7 FPS, while Medium produces 182.3 FPS. High settings deliver 147.5 FPS, and Ultra drops to 90.3 FPS. The 4K Ultra result is particularly notable because it remains above 90 FPS, demonstrating that this hardware can handle maximum visual quality at the highest common resolution without sacrificing smoothness. The scaling from 1440p to 4K shows reductions of approximately 47% for Low, 48% for Medium, 48% for High, and 49% for Ultra, reflecting the larger pixel count impact at higher resolutions.

The data shows no min or max FPS values, only averages, which means the analysis focuses exclusively on sustained frame rates. Across all twelve measurement points, the lowest average recorded is 90.3 FPS at 4K Ultra, while the highest is 707 FPS at 1080p Low. This range illustrates the vast performance envelope available to users depending on their resolution and quality preferences.

How This Combo Ranks

Among the 1,727 tested combinations, this specific CPU and GPU pairing achieves rank 260, placing it in the top 15% of all configurations. The percentile ranking of 85 indicates that only 15% of tested combos outperform it, while the remaining 85% deliver lower average performance in Minecraft: Java Edition. This positioning places the combo in the upper echelon of hardware pairings, though it is not at the absolute top tier.

The ranking reflects the balance between the Core i7-13700K's strong single-thread performance and the RTX 4070 SUPER's capable rendering power. In a game like Minecraft: Java Edition, which exhibits CPU sensitivity due to its Java-based architecture, the processor's 3DMark single-thread score of 1,136 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2,116 contribute significantly to the overall result. The GPU's PassMark G3D score of 29,995 ensures that rendering throughput does not bottleneck the system at typical gaming resolutions.

The gap between this combo and the top performers is modest in absolute terms, but the competitive field becomes denser near the upper ranks. Below this combo, the performance drop-off accelerates, meaning the 260th position represents a meaningful separation from mid-tier configurations. For context, the combo's average benchmark score of 46,881 (combining CPU and GPU metrics) aligns closely with the performance class of high-end desktop systems from the same era.

CPU and GPU Roles

The benchmark data reveals how the balance of CPU and GPU influence shifts with resolution in Minecraft: Java Edition. At 1080p, the frame rates are so high that the CPU's single-thread capabilities become the primary determinant. The jump from 277.4 FPS at Ultra to 707 FPS at Low demonstrates that reducing GPU load allows the processor to push frame rates further, indicating CPU-bound behavior at lower settings. The Core i7-13700K's PassMark single-thread score of 4,333 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2,116 provide the foundation for this headroom.

As resolution increases to 1440p, the GPU begins to assert more influence, but the CPU still maintains a strong presence. The scaling from 1080p to 1440p shows a consistent 36-37% reduction across all presets, suggesting that both components contribute to the performance ceiling. The RTX 4070 SUPER's 12 GB GDDR6X memory and 504.2 GB/s bandwidth become more relevant at this resolution, as the render target grows and texture bandwidth demands increase.

At 4K, the GPU clearly takes precedence. The 49% reduction from 1440p to 4K at Ultra settings indicates that the rendering pipeline is now the limiting factor. The GPU's FP32 throughput of 35.48 TFLOPS and pixel rate of 198.0 GPixel/s must handle the larger framebuffer, while the CPU's role diminishes relatively. However, even at 4K Ultra with 90.3 FPS, the system does not become fully GPU-bound, as the CPU's strong single-thread performance still supports high draw call rates typical of Minecraft's block-based rendering.

The comparison between presets reinforces this analysis. At 1080p, moving from Ultra to Low increases performance by 155%, demonstrating CPU headroom. At 4K, the same preset change yields a 160% increase, but the absolute frame rates are lower, indicating that the GPU's workload scales more directly with pixel count and settings complexity.

The Verdict

This PC can run Minecraft: Java Edition exceptionally well at every resolution and preset combination tested. The verdict data confirms that all four settings — Low, Medium, High, and Ultra — are playable at each of the three resolutions, with no configuration falling below the 60 FPS threshold. At 1920x1080, the best settings are Ultra with an average of 277.4 FPS, providing a massive cushion above playability. At 2560x1440, Ultra delivers 177.3 FPS, and at 3840x2160, Ultra achieves 90.3 FPS.

The 4K Ultra result is the most demanding scenario in the dataset, and even that clears the 60 FPS threshold by 50%. This means users can max out all graphical settings at the highest resolution without concern for frame rate drops. For those seeking maximum smoothness, the 1080p Low preset at 707 FPS offers headroom for high refresh rate displays up to 700 Hz, though such displays are uncommon.

The absence of any unplayable settings across the entire matrix underscores the hardware's capability. The lowest recorded average, 90.3 FPS, still provides a comfortable margin for gameplay, and the typical user would likely prefer the visual quality of Ultra settings over the marginal frame rate gains from lower presets. The system effectively eliminates the need for compromise between visuals and performance.

Similar Performance Alternatives

Looking at the CPU's nearest rivals, the AMD Ryzen 9 5900 shows an average score 0.2% lower, making it functionally equivalent for this game. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 trails by 0.3%, while the AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX and Intel Xeon w3-2535 both outperform by 0.5%. These close margins mean that swapping the Core i7-13700K for any of these processors would produce nearly identical frame rates in Minecraft: Java Edition, with differences unlikely to be perceptible in real-world gameplay.

On the GPU side, the nearest rivals include the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB at 0.1% lower performance, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile at 0.1% lower, and the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 at 0.2% lower. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile leads by 1%, which would provide a slight edge at higher resolutions but would not meaningfully change the playability verdict. These alternatives suggest that the RTX 4070 SUPER sits in a performance band where minor variations exist but do not alter the overall experience.

For users considering alternative hardware, the data indicates that any of these CPU or GPU substitutes would maintain the same playability status across all resolutions and presets. The performance deltas are all within 1%, which translates to frame rate differences of only a few FPS at most. The choice between these components would likely come down to platform preferences rather than gaming performance in Minecraft: Java Edition.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 1920x1080, the most demanding preset that remains at or above 60 FPS is Ultra, delivering an average of 277.4 FPS. This setting provides the highest visual quality while still maintaining frame rates over four times the playability threshold. Users with 144 Hz or 240 Hz monitors can confidently enable Ultra settings for a responsive experience.

At 2560x1440, Ultra is again the recommended preset, achieving 177.3 FPS. This comfortably supports high refresh rate displays at 144 Hz or even 165 Hz. The margin above 60 FPS is substantial, ensuring consistent performance even during complex scenes with many entities or redstone mechanisms.

At 3840x2160, Ultra remains the best choice, with an average of 90.3 FPS. This clears the 60 FPS threshold by 50% and provides a smooth experience on 60 Hz displays with room to spare. For 120 Hz 4K displays, the frame rate would not fully saturate the refresh rate, but the experience would still be smooth without adaptive sync technology.

In all cases, there is no scenario where a lower preset is necessary to achieve playability. The hardware's headroom is so large that the most demanding settings are always viable, and users should prioritize visual quality over frame rate maximization unless targeting very high refresh rates.

FAQ

Q: What is the lowest average frame rate recorded for this combo in Minecraft: Java Edition?

A: The lowest average is 90.3 FPS, recorded at 3840x2160 resolution with Ultra settings. Even this most demanding configuration stays well above the 60 FPS playability threshold.

Q: How does this combo rank among all tested configurations?

A: It ranks 260th out of 1,727 total combinations, placing it in the 85th percentile. Only 15% of tested combos achieve higher performance in this game.

Q: At which resolution does the system show the most CPU influence?

A: At 1920x1080, the CPU's single-thread performance dominates, as evidenced by the jump from 277.4 FPS at Ultra to 707 FPS at Low. The Core i7-13700K's strong single-thread scores enable this behavior.

Q: Is the RTX 4070 SUPER's performance close to the RTX 4090 Mobile?

A: The RTX 4090 Mobile leads by 1% in average benchmark score, which translates to minor frame rate differences in practice. Both GPUs would deliver playable performance across all settings.

Q: Can this system handle 4K gaming at maximum settings?

A: Yes, the 4K Ultra preset achieves 90.3 FPS, which is 50% above the 60 FPS threshold. The system maintains playability at all tested resolutions and presets.

Q: What frame rate does the 1080p Low preset produce?

A: The 1080p Low preset delivers 707 FPS, the highest recorded in the dataset. This provides extreme headroom for very high refresh rate displays.