Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Minecraft: Java Edition
Action 2023

Minecraft: Java Edition

93%
Excellent Match Your system exceeds recommended requirements!

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
607 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
238 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
385 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
151 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
199 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
80 FPS
2.6ms Frame Time
4ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 33,226
Your CPU 46,881
Graphics Card
Required 26,068
Your GPU 23,172

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 80 127 157 199
1440p QHD 151 239 306 385
1080p Full HD 238 382 483 607

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 382
1920x1080 Low 607
1920x1080 Medium 483
1920x1080 Ultra 238
2560x1440 High 239
2560x1440 Low 385
2560x1440 Medium 306
2560x1440 Ultra 151
3840x2160 High 127
3840x2160 Low 199
3840x2160 Medium 157
3840x2160 Ultra 80

Performance Analysis: Minecraft: Java Edition on Your System

The Intel Core i7-13700K paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 delivers exceptionally high frame rates in Minecraft: Java Edition, with measured results indicating that this combination is capable of running the game at maximum settings across all tested resolutions. The data shows a system that not only clears the 60 FPS playable threshold with significant headroom but also scales efficiently from 1080p to 4K, making it a formidable pairing for this title.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 3840x2160, the most demanding preset that maintains an average frame rate at or above 60 FPS is Ultra, which achieves an average of 79.5 FPS. This is notable because even at 4K resolution, the system has over 19 FPS of headroom above the 60 FPS playable threshold, indicating that the most visually demanding settings are entirely viable for this resolution. The High preset at this resolution delivers 127 FPS, Medium reaches 157.1 FPS, and Low peaks at 199.4 FPS, showing that players who prioritize higher refresh rates over visual fidelity have substantial options.

For 2560x1440, the best settings that stay at or above 60 FPS are also Ultra, with an average of 151 FPS. This represents a significant jump from the 4K result, with the Ultra preset nearly doubling the 4K Ultra frame rate. The High preset at 1440p produces 239.4 FPS, Medium delivers 305.6 FPS, and Low reaches an impressive 384.9 FPS, all far exceeding the 60 FPS threshold and catering to high-refresh-rate monitors.

At 1920x1080, the best settings remain Ultra, which hits an average of 237.7 FPS. This is the highest Ultra frame rate across all resolutions, and the data indicates that the system is heavily underutilized at 1080p. High settings yield 382.1 FPS, Medium produces 482.9 FPS, and Low reaches a staggering 606.9 FPS, which would exceed the refresh rate of most consumer displays. The 1080p results suggest that this combination is overkill for standard 60 Hz or even 144 Hz monitors when playing Minecraft: Java Edition.

How This Combo Ranks

Benchmark results place this combination at rank 508 out of 1727 tested combos in Minecraft: Java Edition, putting it in the top 29.4% of all tested systems. This ranking is somewhat surprising given the raw performance numbers, as the frame rates achieved are exceptionally high, but it reflects the fact that Minecraft: Java Edition is a title that can be heavily CPU-bound, and many higher-ranked combinations likely include newer or more specialized hardware.

The percentile positioning suggests that while this combo is strong, there is a substantial population of test configurations that achieve even higher frame rates. This is likely due to the game's single-threaded nature, where the i7-13700K's 3dmark_single_thread score of 1136 and passmark_single_thread score of 4333 are strong but not the absolute highest available. The combo's rank indicates that it outperforms the majority of systems tested, but for a game that can run on integrated graphics, the performance gap between mid-tier and top-tier configurations narrows significantly at lower resolutions.

FAQ

Q: Can this system run Minecraft: Java Edition at 4K Ultra settings?

A: Yes, the measured data shows an average of 79.5 FPS at 3840x2160 with Ultra settings, which is above the 60 FPS playable threshold.

Q: What is the highest frame rate achieved by this combo?

A: The highest measured average frame rate is 606.9 FPS at 1920x1080 with Low settings, which is the least demanding configuration tested.

Q: How does the frame rate scale from 1080p to 4K at Ultra settings?

A: At Ultra settings, the average frame rate drops from 237.7 FPS at 1920x1080 to 151 FPS at 2560x1440 and 79.5 FPS at 3840x2160, representing a 66.5% decrease from 1080p to 4K.

Q: Is there any resolution or preset where this combo fails to reach 60 FPS?

A: No, all tested resolutions (3840x2160, 2560x1440, 1920x1080) and all presets (Low, Medium, High, Ultra) maintain average frame rates above 60 FPS.

Q: What is the performance difference between Low and Ultra settings at 1440p?

A: At 2560x1440, Low settings achieve 384.9 FPS while Ultra settings achieve 151 FPS, a difference of 233.9 FPS or approximately 60.8% lower performance at Ultra compared to Low.

Q: How does the combo's rank compare to its absolute performance?

A: The combo ranks 508th out of 1727 tested combinations, which places it in the top third of results despite achieving frame rates well above 60 FPS at every resolution and preset combination.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The CPU's nearest rivals, based on average benchmark scores, include the AMD Ryzen 9 5900 with a deltaPct of -0.2%, the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 at -0.3%, the AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX at 0.5%, and the Intel Xeon w3-2535 at 0.5%. These processors would deliver nearly identical CPU-bound performance in Minecraft: Java Edition, with the Ryzen 9 5900 and Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 being marginally slower and the Ryzen 9 7845HX and Xeon w3-2535 being marginally faster.

For the GPU, the nearest rivals are the NVIDIA P106-100 with a deltaPct of -0.3%, the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 at -0.3%, the AMD Radeon RX 6600M at -0.4%, and the AMD Radeon R9 M290X at -0.4%. These graphics cards would provide nearly equivalent GPU performance in this game, though the RTX 3080's raw specifications, such as its 8704 shading units and 10 GB GDDR6X memory, suggest it is far more capable than these rivals in other, more demanding titles. In Minecraft: Java Edition specifically, the game's relatively low graphical requirements mean that even these seemingly less powerful alternatives would likely produce similar frame rates.

CPU and GPU Roles

The data reveals that this game is far more sensitive to resolution changes than to preset changes, which indicates that the GPU plays a increasingly dominant role as resolution increases. At 1920x1080, the difference between Low and Ultra settings is 369.2 FPS (from 606.9 FPS to 237.7 FPS), while at 3840x2160, the same preset comparison shows a difference of 119.9 FPS (from 199.4 FPS to 79.5 FPS). This narrowing gap at higher resolutions suggests that the GPU becomes the primary bottleneck as pixel count increases, while at 1080p, the CPU is likely the limiting factor.

The scaling from 1080p to 4K at the same preset provides further insight. At Low settings, the frame rate drops from 606.9 FPS at 1080p to 199.4 FPS at 4K, a 67.1% reduction. At Ultra settings, the drop is from 237.7 FPS to 79.5 FPS, a 66.5% reduction. The proportional scaling is remarkably consistent across presets, which indicates that both CPU and GPU are being utilized efficiently, but the absolute frame rates at 1080p (even at Ultra, 237.7 FPS) suggest that the CPU is not being fully taxed, as frame rates exceed typical monitor refresh rates.

The CPU's 16 cores and 24 threads with a boost clock of 5.40 GHz provide substantial single-thread performance, which is critical for Minecraft: Java Edition's primary game loop. However, the fact that 1080p Ultra still achieves 237.7 FPS while 4K Ultra drops to 79.5 FPS strongly implies that the GPU's workload at higher resolutions becomes the deciding factor. Players targeting 4K should rely on the RTX 3080's 760.3 GB/s memory bandwidth and 29.77 TFLOPS FP32 performance, while those at 1080p will find the CPU's 30 MB shared L3 cache and high clock speeds more relevant.

The Verdict

This PC can absolutely run Minecraft: Java Edition, and it does so with exceptional headroom at every tested configuration. The verdict by resolution confirms that 3840x2160, 2560x1440, and 1920x1080 all have playable settings at Ultra, with average frame rates of 79.5 FPS, 151 FPS, and 237.7 FPS respectively. The system clears the 60 FPS playable threshold at all presets across all resolutions, meaning there is no configuration in the measured data that falls below playable performance.

For 4K gaming, the Ultra preset at 79.5 FPS provides a smooth experience with maximum visual quality. At 1440p, Ultra at 151 FPS is ideal for high-refresh-rate monitors, and at 1080p, even the most demanding settings at 237.7 FPS will satisfy competitive players seeking maximum frame rates. The data indicates that this combination is overqualified for the game at 1080p, where even Low settings at 606.9 FPS far exceed any consumer display's capability. This system is not just playable; it is future-proof for Minecraft: Java Edition, with performance typically exceeding the refresh rate of high-end monitors at all resolutions.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 3840x2160, the measured average frame rates are as follows: Low settings produce 199.4 FPS, Medium settings produce 157.1 FPS, High settings produce 127 FPS, and Ultra settings produce 79.5 FPS. The progression from Low to Ultra shows a steady decrease in performance, with Ultra being roughly 60.1% slower than Low.

At 2560x1440, Low settings achieve 384.9 FPS, Medium reaches 305.6 FPS, High delivers 239.4 FPS, and Ultra hits 151 FPS. The gap between Low and Ultra at this resolution is 233.9 FPS, which is proportionally similar to the 4K results but with higher absolute values across the board.

At 1920x1080, the frame rates are substantially higher: Low settings produce 606.9 FPS, Medium yields 482.9 FPS, High provides 382.1 FPS, and Ultra reaches 237.7 FPS. The difference between Low and Ultra at 1080p is 369.2 FPS, the largest absolute gap among all resolutions, which highlights how much headroom exists at the lowest resolution. Across all resolutions, the data shows a consistent pattern where each step down in settings (from Ultra to High, High to Medium, Medium to Low) yields a meaningful performance increase, with the largest relative gains coming at 1080p.