Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Minecraft: Java Edition
Action 2023

Minecraft: Java Edition

81%
Great Match Your system meets recommended requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
383 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
149 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
243 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
96 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
128 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
48 FPS
4.1ms Frame Time
6ms Input Latency
1440p Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 33,226
Your CPU 35,365
Graphics Card
Required 26,068
Your GPU 16,361

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 48 81 102 128
1440p QHD 96 150 190 243
1080p Full HD 149 241 303 383

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 241
1920x1080 Low 383
1920x1080 Medium 303
1920x1080 Ultra 149
2560x1440 High 150
2560x1440 Low 243
2560x1440 Medium 190
2560x1440 Ultra 96
3840x2160 High 81
3840x2160 Low 128
3840x2160 Medium 102
3840x2160 Ultra 48

Performance Analysis: Minecraft: Java Edition on Your System

The Intel Core i7-12700KF paired with the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT delivers a strong performance profile for Minecraft: Java Edition, with the recorded data showing that this combination clears the 60 FPS playable threshold across nearly every tested configuration. The only exception is the Ultra preset at 4K, which falls short. The database measurements reveal a system that scales predictably with resolution and settings, offering headroom for high-refresh-rate monitors at 1080p and 1440p while still maintaining playable frame rates at 4K on most presets.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 3840x2160, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is High, with an average of 81.4 FPS. The Ultra preset drops to 48.4 FPS, which is below the playable threshold. The data shows that Low and Medium also remain above 60 FPS at this resolution, at 128.3 FPS and 101.6 FPS respectively, but High is the highest quality option that maintains smooth performance.

For 2560x1440, the Ultra preset is fully playable and delivers an average of 95.9 FPS. This is the best visual quality available in the measurement set, and it comfortably exceeds the 60 FPS threshold. The other presets at this resolution are all well above the threshold as well, with Low at 243.4 FPS, Medium at 190.2 FPS, and High at 150.4 FPS.

At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset achieves an average of 148.6 FPS, making it the clear choice for maximum quality without any performance concerns. The remaining presets are even faster: High at 240.6 FPS, Medium at 302.5 FPS, and Low at 383 FPS. The 1080p results indicate that this combination is not bottlenecked by either component at this resolution, as even the heaviest preset leaves substantial frame rate headroom.

How This Combo Ranks

This specific CPU and GPU combination ranks 1315 out of 1727 tested combos in the database for Minecraft: Java Edition. That places it in the lower portion of the overall ranking, but the measured frame rates tell a more nuanced story. The rank reflects the full pool of tested combinations, many of which include newer or higher-end components. Despite the mid-pack ranking, the actual performance data shows that this combo exceeds 60 FPS in 11 of the 12 tested scenarios, with only the 4K Ultra preset falling short.

The ranking position is influenced by the fact that Minecraft: Java Edition is highly sensitive to single-thread CPU performance and the RX 5700 XT, while capable, sits in the 59th percentile among all GPUs in the database. The i7-12700KF, by contrast, ranks in the 85th percentile among all CPUs. The combination of a strong CPU with a mid-range GPU produces solid results, but it does not compete with top-tier combos that pair flagship CPUs with flagship GPUs.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The recorded data provides a clear picture of performance across three resolutions and four settings tiers.

At 1920x1080, the Low preset delivers 383 FPS average, which is the highest frame rate recorded for this combo. Medium follows at 302.5 FPS, High at 240.6 FPS, and Ultra at 148.6 FPS. The spread from Low to Ultra is 234.4 FPS, which shows that the game scales significantly with settings at this resolution.

At 2560x1440, Low produces 243.4 FPS, Medium drops to 190.2 FPS, High to 150.4 FPS, and Ultra to 95.9 FPS. The transition from 1080p to 1440p reduces frame rates by roughly one-third to two-fifths across presets, which is consistent with the increased pixel count placing more load on the GPU.

At 3840x2160, Low yields 128.3 FPS, Medium 101.6 FPS, High 81.4 FPS, and Ultra 48.4 FPS. The 4K Ultra result is the only measurement below the 60 FPS threshold. The drop from High to Ultra at 4K is particularly steep, from 81.4 FPS to 48.4 FPS, a 33 FPS reduction that pushes the preset out of playable territory.

The data shows no minimum or maximum FPS values were recorded for any configuration, so the analysis relies solely on average frame rates. The averages are consistent and show no anomalies that would suggest stuttering or frame pacing issues.

Similar Performance Alternatives

Looking at the CPU nearest rivals, the Intel Core i7-12700KF has an average benchmark score of 35365. The Intel Core i7-13700T is effectively identical with a score of 35403 and a delta of -0.1 percent. The Intel Core i5-13600T scores 35305 with a delta of 0.2 percent, and the Intel Core 5 213PE scores 35428 with a delta of -0.2 percent. The Intel Core i7-12700K scores 35287 with a delta of 0.2 percent. All four rivals are within 0.2 percent of the i7-12700KF, meaning a system with any of these CPUs would produce nearly identical frame rates in Minecraft: Java Edition, assuming the same GPU and settings.

On the GPU side, the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT has an average benchmark score of 16361. The AMD Radeon Pro 5600M scores 16351 with a delta of 0.1 percent. The NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell scores 16408 with a delta of -0.3 percent. The AMD Radeon PRO W7500 scores 16415 with a delta of -0.3 percent. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 scores 16504 with a delta of -0.9 percent. These deltas are all under 1 percent, so swapping the RX 5700 XT for any of these GPUs would yield essentially the same frame rates in this game. The practical takeaway is that a user with any of these alternative components in either the CPU or GPU slot would experience performance within a fraction of a percent of the tested combo.

CPU and GPU Roles

The scaling data reveals which component carries more weight at each resolution. At 1920x1080, the frame rates are extremely high across all presets, with even Ultra exceeding 148 FPS. This suggests the CPU is doing the heavy lifting, as the GPU is not being stressed enough at this resolution to become the limiting factor. The difference between Low and Ultra at 1080p is 234.4 FPS, which shows that settings changes have a large impact on the rendering workload.

At 2560x1440, the frame rates remain high but the gap between presets narrows somewhat. Low drops from 383 FPS at 1080p to 243.4 FPS, a reduction of 139.6 FPS, while Ultra drops from 148.6 FPS to 95.9 FPS, a reduction of 52.7 FPS. The proportional decrease is larger for lower presets, which indicates that the GPU is beginning to take on more responsibility as pixel count increases.

At 3840x2160, the GPU becomes the dominant factor. Low falls to 128.3 FPS and Ultra to 48.4 FPS. The fact that Ultra cannot maintain 60 FPS at 4K while High stays at 81.4 FPS points to the RX 5700 XT being the limiting component at this resolution. The CPU, with its 85th percentile ranking, has ample headroom, but the GPU, ranked in the 59th percentile, cannot sustain the heaviest workload at 4K.

The single-thread performance of the i7-12700KF, reflected in its 3dmark single thread score of 1043 and passmark single thread score of 3984, is important for Minecraft: Java Edition, which relies heavily on a single core for world generation and game logic. The multi-thread scores, such as the cinebench r23 multicore result of 28838, matter less for this title but confirm the CPU is not a bottleneck in most scenarios.

The Verdict

This PC can run Minecraft: Java Edition successfully in the vast majority of configurations. At 1920x1080, all four presets clear 60 FPS, with Ultra delivering 148.6 FPS. At 2560x1440, all four presets also clear 60 FPS, with Ultra at 95.9 FPS. At 3840x2160, the High preset is the best playable option at 81.4 FPS, and Low and Medium also remain above the threshold at 128.3 FPS and 101.6 FPS respectively. The only configuration that fails to reach 60 FPS is 4K Ultra, which averages 48.4 FPS.

The verdict by resolution confirms this: 1080p and 1440p are fully playable across all settings, while 4K is playable up to High. Users with a 4K display should stick to High or lower settings for a smooth experience. Users with 1080p or 1440p displays can enable Ultra without concern. The data indicates that this combination is well balanced for this game, with the CPU providing enough single-thread performance and the GPU handling the rendering demands at all but the most extreme settings.

FAQ

Q: Can this PC run Minecraft: Java Edition at 60 FPS on Ultra settings?

A: Yes, at 1920x1080 and 2560x1440. The Ultra preset averages 148.6 FPS at 1080p and 95.9 FPS at 1440p. At 3840x2160, Ultra only averages 48.4 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS threshold.

Q: What is the best settings preset for 4K resolution?

A: High is the best preset at 3840x2160, with an average of 81.4 FPS. Low and Medium also work, at 128.3 FPS and 101.6 FPS, but High offers the best quality while staying above 60 FPS.

Q: How does this combo rank among all tested combinations?

A: It ranks 1315 out of 1727 combos tested for Minecraft: Java Edition. The rank is in the lower portion, but the measured performance is still playable in nearly all scenarios.

Q: Which component is more important at 1080p, the CPU or the GPU?

A: The CPU is more important at 1080p. The frame rates are very high across all presets, indicating the GPU is not stressed enough to bottleneck. The i7-12700KF has strong single-thread performance, which matters for this game.

Q: What happens to performance when moving from 1440p to 4K?

A: Frame rates drop substantially. For example, Ultra goes from 95.9 FPS at 2560x1440 to 48.4 FPS at 3840x2160. High goes from 150.4 FPS to 81.4 FPS. The GPU becomes the limiting factor at 4K.

Q: Are there other CPUs or GPUs that would perform similarly?

A: Yes. The Intel Core i7-13700T, Intel Core i5-13600T, Intel Core 5 213PE, and Intel Core i7-12700K are all within 0.2 percent of the i7-12700KF in average benchmark score. The AMD Radeon Pro 5600M, NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell, AMD Radeon PRO W7500, and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 are all within 0.9 percent of the RX 5700 XT.