Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Minecraft: Java Edition
Action 2023

Minecraft: Java Edition

36%
Not Recommended Your system may struggle with this game.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
457 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
183 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
289 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
117 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
154 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
62 FPS
3.4ms Frame Time
5ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 33,226
Your CPU 2,254
Graphics Card
Required 26,068
Your GPU 17,639

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 62 95 121 154
1440p QHD 117 185 233 289
1080p Full HD 183 293 367 457

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 293
1920x1080 Low 457
1920x1080 Medium 367
1920x1080 Ultra 183
2560x1440 High 185
2560x1440 Low 289
2560x1440 Medium 233
2560x1440 Ultra 117
3840x2160 High 95
3840x2160 Low 154
3840x2160 Medium 121
3840x2160 Ultra 62

Performance Analysis: Minecraft: Java Edition on Your System

The Intel Core i5-9400 paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 delivers extremely high frame rates in Minecraft: Java Edition across all tested resolutions. The recorded data shows a system that is heavily overqualified for this title, with even the most demanding preset at 4K maintaining comfortable playability. This analysis breaks down the measured performance, component roles, and how this combination compares to other tested hardware in the database.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 1920x1080, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Ultra, which achieves an average of 182.6 FPS. This is the highest quality setting available and it still delivers more than three times the playable threshold. The headroom here is substantial, meaning users can enable every visual option without concern.

Moving to 2560x1440, the best playable setting remains Ultra, with an average of 117 FPS. This is a significant drop from the 1080p result, but it still nearly doubles the 60 FPS target. The visual quality ceiling does not change at this resolution, only the frame rate headroom does.

At 3840x2160, Ultra remains the best setting that stays at or above 60 FPS, averaging 62.2 FPS. This is the tightest margin in the entire dataset, but it still clears the playable threshold. High settings at this resolution produce 95.1 FPS, Medium produces 121.1 FPS, and Low produces 153.9 FPS, so users who prefer higher frame rates over maximum fidelity have multiple options.

The pattern across all three resolutions is consistent: this combination can run Minecraft: Java Edition at Ultra settings everywhere, with the only question being how much frame rate headroom remains.

CPU and GPU Roles

The scaling between resolutions and presets reveals how the workload shifts between the processor and the graphics card. At 1920x1080, the frame rates are extraordinarily high, with Low settings reaching 457.4 FPS. These numbers indicate that the CPU is capable of feeding the GPU at very high rates, and the GPU is not being stressed heavily at this resolution.

When moving from 1920x1080 to 2560x1440, the frame rates drop by roughly 35 to 40 percent across all settings. For example, Ultra falls from 182.6 FPS to 117 FPS, and Low falls from 457.4 FPS to 288.5 FPS. This consistent proportional drop suggests that the GPU is becoming a larger factor as pixel count increases, but the CPU still has enough headroom to keep up.

The jump from 2560x1440 to 3840x2160 shows an even larger relative decline. Ultra drops from 117 FPS to 62.2 FPS, a reduction of about 47 percent. Medium drops from 233.1 FPS to 121.1 FPS, also about 48 percent. This steeper decline at 4K indicates that the GPU is now the dominant constraint, as the rendering load at this resolution overwhelms the graphics card's capabilities.

Within a single resolution, the difference between Low and Ultra settings shows how much impact quality presets have. At 1080p, the gap between Low (457.4 FPS) and Ultra (182.6 FPS) is 274.8 FPS, a 2.5x difference. At 1440p, the gap narrows to 171.5 FPS, and at 4K it narrows to 91.7 FPS. This pattern confirms that the GPU becomes progressively more important as resolution increases, while the CPU matters more at lower resolutions where frame rates are extremely high.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the recorded average frame rates are as follows: Low settings produce 457.4 FPS, Medium produces 367 FPS, High produces 292.9 FPS, and Ultra produces 182.6 FPS. The spread between the lowest and highest quality settings is substantial, but even the most demanding preset delivers nearly triple the playable threshold.

At 2560x1440, the averages are 288.5 FPS for Low, 233.1 FPS for Medium, 184.7 FPS for High, and 117 FPS for Ultra. Each preset tier shows a consistent step down from the 1080p results, with the relative ordering remaining unchanged. The Ultra setting at this resolution still provides a comfortable margin above 60 FPS.

At 3840x2160, the averages are 153.9 FPS for Low, 121.1 FPS for Medium, 95.1 FPS for High, and 62.2 FPS for Ultra. This is the only resolution where any setting approaches the 60 FPS line, and it is the Ultra preset that does so. The Low setting at 4K still delivers more than double the playable threshold, showing that even at maximum resolution, the hardware has plenty of performance available.

The database records no minimum or maximum frame time data for any of these configurations, so the analysis relies solely on average frame rates. The averages are consistently high enough that stutter or frame pacing issues would need to be severe to push any setting below playable levels.

How This Combo Ranks

This specific combination of the Intel Core i5-9400 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 ranks 971 out of 1727 tested combos in the database for Minecraft: Java Edition. This places it in the upper-middle portion of all tested systems, which is notable given that the game is not particularly demanding on modern hardware.

The percentile data for the individual components provides context for this ranking. The CPU sits at the 47th percentile among all tested processors, meaning it is roughly average in the database. The GPU sits at the 61st percentile among all tested graphics cards, meaning it outperforms the majority of GPUs in the database.

The combination ranking of 971 out of 1727 suggests that the pairing works well together for this title, even though neither component is at the top of its respective percentile. The game's engine appears to favor the strong single-threaded performance of the i5-9400, and the RTX 4060 provides more than enough graphics throughput for the block-based rendering style of Minecraft.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The nearest rivals for the Intel Core i5-9400 in the database are all within a very narrow performance band. The Intel Core i7-1068NG7 has an average benchmark score of 2259, which is 0.2 percent higher than the i5-9400's 2254. The Intel Core i7-10710U scores 2248, a 0.3 percent deficit. The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1500 scores 2246, a 0.4 percent deficit, and the Intel Core i3-10305 scores 2264, a 0.4 percent advantage. Any of these processors would produce nearly identical results in Minecraft: Java Edition when paired with the same GPU.

For the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060, the closest rivals are similarly tight. The AMD Radeon HD 7790 has an average score of 17666, just 0.2 percent above the RTX 4060's 17639. The AMD Radeon 780M scores 17588, a 0.3 percent deficit. The AMD Radeon Pro 560 scores 17551, a 0.5 percent deficit, and the AMD Radeon Pro 460 scores 17509, a 0.7 percent deficit. All of these GPUs would deliver frame rates within a few percent of each other in this game.

The practical takeaway is that users with any of these nearby components could expect very similar performance. The differences between the top and bottom of each rival group are less than one percent, which is well within run-to-run variance for most games.

The Verdict

This PC can run Minecraft: Java Edition at 60 FPS or higher at every resolution and every preset tested. The verdict data confirms that all four settings at all three resolutions are playable.

At 3840x2160, the Ultra preset achieves an average of 62.2 FPS, which is the only configuration in the dataset that comes close to the playable threshold. All other 4K settings are well above 60 FPS, with Low at 153.9 FPS, Medium at 121.1 FPS, and High at 95.1 FPS.

At 2560x1440, every setting clears the threshold with room to spare. The lowest performer is Ultra at 117 FPS, and the highest is Low at 288.5 FPS. This resolution offers the best balance of visual quality and frame rate headroom.

At 1920x1080, the system is massively overprovisioned. Even Ultra settings produce 182.6 FPS, and Low settings reach 457.4 FPS. Users with high refresh rate monitors can take full advantage of their display at this resolution.

The strongest recommendation based on the data is to run Ultra settings at 1440p, which provides 117 FPS while maintaining the highest visual quality. At 4K, Ultra is still viable at 62.2 FPS, but users who prefer smoother motion might choose High at 95.1 FPS instead.

FAQ

Q: Can this system run Minecraft: Java Edition at 4K Ultra settings?

A: Yes, the measured average frame rate at 3840x2160 with Ultra settings is 62.2 FPS, which clears the 60 FPS playable threshold.

Q: What is the highest frame rate recorded for this combination?

A: The highest average frame rate in the dataset is 457.4 FPS, achieved at 1920x1080 with Low settings.

Q: How much performance is lost when moving from 1080p to 1440p?

A: At Ultra settings, the average frame rate drops from 182.6 FPS at 1920x1080 to 117 FPS at 2560x1440, a reduction of approximately 36 percent.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU more important for this game at higher resolutions?

A: The data shows steeper frame rate drops between 1440p and 4K compared to 1080p to 1440p, indicating the GPU becomes the dominant constraint at higher resolutions.

Q: How does this combo rank among all tested systems?

A: This combination ranks 971 out of 1727 tested combos for Minecraft: Java Edition in the database.

Q: Are there any settings that fail to reach 60 FPS?

A: No. Every resolution and preset combination in the measured data achieves an average of at least 62.2 FPS, with the lowest result being 4K Ultra.