Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Minecraft: Java Edition
Action 2023

Minecraft: Java Edition

100%
Excellent Match Your system exceeds recommended requirements!

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
711 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
278 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
446 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
173 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
232 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
92 FPS
2.2ms Frame Time
3ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 33,226
Your CPU 49,394
Graphics Card
Required 26,068
Your GPU 43,223

Recommendations

Excellent!

Your system exceeds recommended specs. Enjoy max settings!

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 92 148 184 232
1440p QHD 173 283 353 446
1080p Full HD 278 447 563 711

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 447
1920x1080 Low 711
1920x1080 Medium 563
1920x1080 Ultra 278
2560x1440 High 283
2560x1440 Low 446
2560x1440 Medium 353
2560x1440 Ultra 173
3840x2160 High 148
3840x2160 Low 232
3840x2160 Medium 184
3840x2160 Ultra 92

Performance Analysis: Minecraft: Java Edition on Your System

The pairing of Intel's Core i5-14600KF with NVIDIA's GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER raises an interesting question for Minecraft: Java Edition — a game whose performance profile is often shaped by raw single-thread throughput as much as by GPU muscle. The data below covers measured average frame rates across three resolutions and four presets, and the short answer is that this combination clears every tested configuration comfortably. What the numbers also reveal is where the bottleneck sits, and how far this hardware can be pushed before frame rates approach anything resembling a limitation.

Measured FPS Breakdown

All figures below are measured average frame rates; minimum and maximum frame rates were not recorded for this game in the database, so the analysis rests on averages.

At 1920x1080, the results are:

  • Low: 710.5 avg FPS
  • Medium: 562.8 avg FPS
  • High: 446.6 avg FPS
  • Ultra: 277.6 avg FPS

At 2560x1440:

  • Low: 445.7 avg FPS
  • Medium: 352.6 avg FPS
  • High: 282.5 avg FPS
  • Ultra: 173.4 avg FPS

At 3840x2160:

  • Low: 232 avg FPS
  • Medium: 184.2 avg FPS
  • High: 148.4 avg FPS
  • Ultra: 91.8 avg FPS

Two patterns stand out. First, even the worst measured configuration — 4K Ultra at 91.8 FPS — sits more than 50 percent above the 60 FPS playability threshold. Second, the step from High to Ultra costs more than any other preset jump: at 1080p, frame rates drop from 446.6 to 277.6, while at 4K they fall from 148.4 to 91.8. That suggests Ultra's additional load lands squarely on the GPU, and the margin at 4K is thinner there than anywhere else.

Best Settings per Resolution

Because every preset at every resolution stays at or above the 60 FPS threshold, the "best settings" question simply becomes "how far can you go?" The answer in all three cases is Ultra:

  • 1920x1080 — Ultra, 277.6 avg FPS
  • 2560x1440 — Ultra, 173.4 avg FPS
  • 3840x2160 — Ultra, 91.8 avg FPS

The interesting wrinkle is the margin at 4K. While 1080p Ultra retains a cushion of well over 200 frames above the threshold, 4K Ultra sits at 91.8 FPS — comfortable, but the smallest buffer in the dataset. Players chasing very high refresh rates at 4K would need to step down to High, which recovers 148.4 FPS.

How This Combo Ranks

Among the 1,727 hardware combinations tested for Minecraft: Java Edition in the database, this CPU and GPU pairing ranks 257th. That places it in roughly the top 15 percent of tested combos — strong, but not at the extreme top of the chart, which makes sense for a game that some very high-end and highly clocked configurations will dominate.

Looking at the components individually: the Core i5-14600KF sits in the 90th percentile versus all CPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 49,394, while the RTX 4070 SUPER sits in the 83rd percentile versus all GPUs with an average benchmark score of 43,223. Both parts are well above the median of their respective stacks, which explains the combo's high rank: neither component is holding the other back in a game this lightweight for modern hardware.

Similar Performance Alternatives

For a CPU behaving like the Core i5-14600KF, the database's nearest rivals give a tight cluster:

  • AMD Ryzen 9 7900 — average score 49,228, just 0.3 percent below the i5-14600KF
  • AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G — average score 49,196, 0.4 percent behind
  • Intel Core Ultra 5 245 — average score 48,995, 0.8 percent behind
  • AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388 — average score 49,796, actually 0.8 percent ahead

All four sit within one percent of this CPU's aggregate score, so any of them should deliver near-identical frame rates in this game, assuming a comparable GPU.

On the GPU side, the RTX 4070 SUPER's nearest rivals are an odd mix:

  • NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB — average score 43,262, 0.1 percent ahead
  • NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile — average score 43,268, 0.1 percent ahead
  • NVIDIA Quadro M6000 — average score 43,301, 0.2 percent ahead
  • NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile — average score 43,367, 1 percent ahead

Anyone running one of those GPUs with a comparable CPU should expect Minecraft: Java Edition numbers within a few percent of the measured results above.

CPU and GPU Roles

Which component matters more here? The scaling data points to the GPU as the dominant factor at higher resolutions — and by implication, to strong CPU headroom.

Moving from 1080p Ultra to 4K Ultra cuts frame rates from 277.6 to 91.8, a drop of roughly two-thirds. The same pattern holds at Low, where 710.5 FPS at 1080p falls to 232 FPS at 4K. When frame rates scale this steeply with resolution, the GPU is the limiting component; a CPU-limited configuration would show much flatter scaling.

That said, the absolute ceiling at 1080p Low — 710.5 FPS — is itself evidence of exceptional single-thread capability on the CPU side. The Core i5-14600KF's Geekbench single-core score of 2,445 and PassMark single-thread score of 4,273 sit in the 90th percentile of all CPUs, and Minecraft: Java Edition is exactly the kind of game that rewards that kind of throughput. The data suggests that at 1080p, both components are operating well within their limits, and the practical constraint is the GPU only once the resolution climbs.

Notably, the preset scaling (Low to Ultra) costs a similar proportion at every resolution — roughly 60 percent of frame rate going from Low to Ultra in all three cases. That uniformity reinforces the picture of a GPU-bound title at the demanding end of the settings spectrum.

The Verdict

Yes — emphatically. Every single tested configuration of this PC clears the 60 FPS playability threshold for Minecraft: Java Edition:

  • 1920x1080: all presets playable (Low through Ultra), best is Ultra at 277.6 avg FPS
  • 2560x1440: all presets playable, best is Ultra at 173.4 avg FPS
  • 3840x2160: all presets playable, best is Ultra at 91.8 avg FPS

The verdict data confirms there are no settings compromises required at any resolution. The only scenario worth flagging is 4K Ultra, where the 91.8 FPS average leaves the least headroom — but even there, the combination stays well clear of the threshold. For high-refresh 1080p or 1440p play, this pairing is effectively unconstrained by this game.

FAQ

Q: Can the i5-14600KF + RTX 4070 SUPER run Minecraft: Java Edition at 4K on max settings?

A: Yes. 3840x2160 at Ultra averages 91.8 FPS — comfortably above the 60 FPS threshold, though with the smallest margin of any tested configuration.

Q: What is the highest frame rate this combo achieves in the game?

A: 710.5 average FPS, at 1920x1080 on the Low preset. That figure is more likely to be capped by a monitor's refresh rate than by the hardware.

Q: How does this combo rank against other tested hardware for this game?

A: It ranks 257th out of 1,727 tested combinations, placing it in roughly the top 15 percent.

Q: Is the CPU or the GPU more important for this game with this pairing?

A: The GPU. Frame rates drop sharply as resolution climbs — from 277.6 to 91.8 FPS going from 1080p to 4K at Ultra — which indicates GPU-limited scaling. The CPU's strong single-thread scores (90th percentile overall) provide ample headroom.

Q: Which alternative CPUs would perform similarly?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 7900, AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G, Intel Core Ultra 5 245, and AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388 all sit within one percent of the i5-14600KF's average benchmark score.

Q: Does dropping from Ultra to High at 4K help?

A: Yes, significantly. The High preset at 3840x2160 averages 148.4 FPS versus 91.8 on Ultra — a substantial gain for players targeting higher refresh rates.