Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Minecraft: Java Edition
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your system exceeds recommended specs. Enjoy max settings!
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 104 | 168 | 213 | 267 |
| 1440p QHD | 200 | 322 | 406 | 513 |
| 1080p Full HD | 320 | 506 | 644 | 801 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Minecraft: Java Edition on Your System
The Intel Core i5-14600K paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER delivers exceptionally high frame rates in Minecraft: Java Edition across all tested resolutions and presets. The measured data shows this combination is far beyond the 60 FPS playable threshold, with average frame rates ranging from a low of 103.6 FPS at 4K Ultra settings to a staggering 801.3 FPS at 1080p Low settings. This is a configuration where the GPU’s raw power and the CPU’s strong single-thread performance combine to eliminate any performance concerns for this title.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The benchmark results for this combo are defined by high averages and a massive gap between the most demanding and least demanding settings. At 1920x1080, the frame rates are extraordinarily high. With Low settings, the average FPS reaches 801.3. Moving to Medium settings drops the average to 644 FPS, and High settings still yields 506 FPS. The most demanding preset, Ultra, produces an average of 320.4 FPS. Even at this resolution with maximum settings, the system is pushing well over 300 frames per second.
At 2560x1440, the performance scales down but remains exceptionally strong. The Low preset averages 513 FPS, which is a significant drop from the 1080p result but still an enormous figure. Medium settings average 406.2 FPS, and High settings deliver 322.3 FPS. The Ultra preset, which is the most demanding, still manages an average of 199.7 FPS. This indicates that even at 1440p, the system is never remotely challenged to maintain high refresh rates.
At 3840x2160, the GPU begins to show more influence, but the results are still impressive. The Low preset averages 266.5 FPS, while Medium settings average 212.6 FPS. High settings produce a 168.2 FPS average, and the Ultra preset is the only one to fall below the 200 FPS mark, landing at 103.6 FPS. This 4K Ultra result is still nearly double the 60 FPS playable threshold, showing that this hardware can handle the game at maximum fidelity even at 4K.
The scaling between settings is consistent: Low to Medium typically incurs a moderate hit, Medium to High another step down, and High to Ultra the largest drop. For example, at 1080p, the difference between Low and Medium is 157.3 FPS, while the difference between High and Ultra is 185.6 FPS. This pattern holds across all resolutions, confirming that the Ultra preset is significantly more demanding than the others.
CPU and GPU Roles
The data reveals a clear shift in component importance depending on resolution. At 1920x1080, the frame rates are so high that the workload is likely heavily influenced by the CPU’s single-thread performance. The Intel Core i5-14600K, with its 5.30 GHz boost clock, is well-suited for this task. The fact that the Low preset at 1080p hits 801.3 FPS suggests that the CPU is capable of feeding the GPU with an enormous number of draw calls, a common bottleneck in Java Edition.
As resolution increases to 2560x1440, the GPU begins to take on more responsibility. The frame rates at 1440p are lower than at 1080p across all settings, which is expected as the GPU has to render more pixels. However, the drop from 1080p Low to 1440p Low is 288.3 FPS, a significant reduction that indicates the GPU is starting to become a limiting factor, though the CPU is still clearly able to keep up.
At 3840x2160, the GPU’s role becomes dominant. The 4K results show a much steeper decline in performance as settings increase. The difference between Low and Ultra at 4K is 162.9 FPS, which is a larger absolute gap than at 1440p, where the difference is 313.3 FPS. This suggests that at 4K, the RTX 4080 SUPER’s rendering capabilities are the primary constraint, and the CPU is no longer the bottleneck. The combination of the CPU’s strong single-core performance and the GPU’s massive 16 GB memory buffer and 736.3 GB/s bandwidth ensures that even at 4K Ultra, the game remains highly playable.
Similar Performance Alternatives
Based on the average benchmark scores provided, there are several CPUs and GPUs that would perform similarly to the components in this combo. For the CPU, the closest rivals are all within a very tight margin of performance. The Intel Xeon Gold 5318H has an average score of 48698, which is 0.2% lower than the Core i5-14600K’s score of 48618. The AMD EPYC 4345P scores 48470, which is 0.3% higher. The Intel Core Ultra 5 245HX scores 48287, a 0.7% difference, and the Intel Core Ultra 5 245 scores 48995, which is 0.8% lower. These four processors are essentially performance equivalents for this game, meaning a system with any of them would produce nearly identical frame rates in Minecraft.
For the GPU, the nearest rivals are also extremely close in average score. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 scores 54247, which is only 0.1% lower than the RTX 4080 SUPER’s score of 54209. The AMD Radeon Pro W5700X scores 54828, a 1.1% difference. Interestingly, the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB scores 55698, which is 2.7% higher, and the AMD Radeon 8060S scores 55757, 2.8% higher. While these scores are from synthetic benchmarks, they suggest that the RTX 4080 SUPER and its rivals would deliver very similar real-world performance in a game like Minecraft, where the engine is not particularly demanding on the GPU at lower resolutions.
How This Combo Ranks
In the benchmark database, this specific CPU and GPU combination ranks 84th out of 1727 tested combos for Minecraft: Java Edition. This places it in the top 5% of all configurations tested. The high ranking is a direct result of the exceptional frame rates measured at all resolutions and settings. The data shows that this combo outperforms the vast majority of other systems, making it a top-tier choice for this game. The only systems that rank higher are likely those with even more powerful CPUs or GPUs, such as the RTX 4090 series or top-tier server processors, but the differences would be marginal given the already sky-high frame rates.
FAQ
Q: Can this system run Minecraft at 4K Ultra settings?
A: Yes. The measured average FPS at 3840x2160 with Ultra settings is 103.6 FPS, which is well above the 60 FPS playable threshold.
Q: What is the highest average FPS recorded for this combo?
A: The highest average FPS is 801.3, recorded at 1920x1080 with Low settings.
Q: How does the RTX 4080 SUPER compare to the regular RTX 4080 in this context?
A: The RTX 4080 has an average benchmark score that is 0.1% lower than the RTX 4080 SUPER. In practice, the performance difference in Minecraft would be negligible.
Q: Is the CPU or GPU the main bottleneck at 1080p?
A: At 1080p with Low settings, the frame rate is 801.3 FPS, which suggests the CPU’s single-thread performance is a key factor. The Intel Core i5-14600K has a boost clock of 5.30 GHz, which is well-suited for this game’s engine.
Q: What is the least demanding preset that still achieves over 60 FPS at 4K?
A: All presets at 4K, including Low, Medium, High, and Ultra, achieve over 60 FPS. The lowest average is 103.6 FPS at Ultra.
Q: Does the combo rank in the top 100 of all tested systems?
A: Yes, it ranks 84th out of 1727 tested combos for this game.
Best Settings per Resolution
For each resolution, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is the Ultra preset, and the measured average FPS at these settings is as follows:
- 1920x1080 Ultra: 320.4 FPS
- 2560x1440 Ultra: 199.7 FPS
- 3840x2160 Ultra: 103.6 FPS
Since the Ultra preset remains well above the 60 FPS threshold at every resolution, there is no reason to lower the settings for performance reasons. The data shows that this combination can handle maximum visual fidelity at 4K while still providing a smooth experience. For users with high refresh rate monitors, even the 4K Ultra setting at 103.6 FPS is sufficient for most displays, and at 1440p or 1080p, the frame rates are high enough to take full advantage of 240Hz or faster panels.