Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Minecraft: Java Edition
Action 2023

Minecraft: Java Edition

99%
Excellent Match Your system exceeds recommended requirements!

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
698 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
316 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
512 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
201 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
267 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
107 FPS
2ms Frame Time
3ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 33,226
Your CPU 32,279
Graphics Card
Required 26,068
Your GPU 54,209

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 107 170 214 267
1440p QHD 201 324 405 512
1080p Full HD 316 509 644 698

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 509
1920x1080 Low 698
1920x1080 Medium 644
1920x1080 Ultra 316
2560x1440 High 324
2560x1440 Low 512
2560x1440 Medium 405
2560x1440 Ultra 201
3840x2160 High 170
3840x2160 Low 267
3840x2160 Medium 214
3840x2160 Ultra 107

Performance Analysis: Minecraft: Java Edition on Your System

The Intel Core i5-14400F paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER delivers exceptional performance in Minecraft: Java Edition, with benchmark results showing this combination can handle the game at maximum settings across all tested resolutions. The measured data indicates this system achieves an average of 106.5 FPS even at the most demanding 4K Ultra preset, while lower resolutions produce frame rates that far exceed typical high-refresh-rate display capabilities. This analysis examines the specific performance metrics, compares the hardware to its nearest rivals, and provides detailed guidance on optimal settings for each resolution based on the measured FPS data.

FAQ

Q: What is the maximum playable settings preset at 4K resolution for this combination?

A: The Ultra preset is fully playable at 3840x2160, with an average FPS of 106.5, which comfortably exceeds the 60 FPS playable threshold.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its closest rival in synthetic benchmarks?

A: The Intel Core i5-14400F has an average benchmark score of 32279, which is 0.1% higher than the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U and 0.2% higher than the Intel Core i9-11900, while being 0.2% lower than the AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS.

Q: What is the frame rate difference between Low and Ultra settings at 1440p?

A: At 2560x1440, the Low preset averages 511.5 FPS, while the Ultra preset averages 201 FPS, representing a significant performance gap of approximately 310 FPS between the two extremes.

Q: Is the RTX 4080 SUPER significantly faster than the standard RTX 4080?

A: According to the nearest rival data, the RTX 4080 SUPER has an average benchmark score of 54209, which is 0.1% lower than the RTX 4080's score of 54247, indicating virtually identical performance.

Q: What percentage of all tested CPUs does the i5-14400F outperform?

A: The i5-14400F ranks in the 83rd percentile among all CPUs, meaning it performs better than approximately 83% of the processors in the benchmark database.

Q: What is the highest average FPS recorded in the measured data?

A: The highest average FPS recorded is 697.8, achieved at 1920x1080 resolution with the Low settings preset.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The Intel Core i5-14400F sits in a performance tier nearly identical to several other processors, based on average benchmark scores. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U is the closest match with an average score of 32233, just 0.1% behind the i5-14400F's 32279. The Intel Core i9-11900 follows closely at 32226, a 0.2% difference, while the AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS is marginally ahead at 32354, representing a 0.2% advantage. The Intel Core i7-12800H completes the group at 32121, which is 0.5% behind. For Minecraft: Java Edition, these processors would yield essentially indistinguishable frame rates, as the game's performance at the tested settings is likely to be constrained more by the GPU at higher resolutions and presets.

On the graphics side, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER's nearest rival is the standard RTX 4080, which scores 54247 versus the SUPER's 54209, a negligible 0.1% difference. The AMD Radeon Pro W5700X is 1.1% ahead at 54828, while the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB delivers a 2.7% higher score of 55698. The AMD Radeon 8060S leads this group with 55757, 2.8% above the RTX 4080 SUPER. In practice, these performance deltas are small enough that all of these GPUs would produce nearly identical results in Minecraft: Java Edition, with the game's relatively modest graphical demands allowing each to hit very high frame rates across all tested settings.

CPU and GPU Roles

The benchmark data reveals how the balance between CPU and GPU workload shifts across resolutions and presets in Minecraft: Java Edition. At 1920x1080, the system achieves 697.8 FPS on Low settings, 644.1 FPS on Medium, 508.8 FPS on High, and 315.5 FPS on Ultra. The relatively small gap between Low and Medium at this resolution suggests that the CPU is providing ample headroom, but the significant drop from Medium to Ultra indicates that the GPU begins to take on more responsibility as graphical complexity increases. Moving to 2560x1440, the Low preset delivers 511.5 FPS, Medium reaches 405.4 FPS, High produces 323.9 FPS, and Ultra falls to 201 FPS. The scaling from 1080p to 1440p shows a roughly 27% reduction in Low preset performance, which is consistent with the increased pixel count placing more load on the GPU.

At 3840x2160, the role of the GPU becomes substantially more pronounced. The Low preset averages 266.6 FPS, Medium drops to 213.5 FPS, High achieves 170.3 FPS, and Ultra settles at 106.5 FPS. Comparing the 1080p to 4K scaling for each preset reveals the GPU bottleneck: Low settings see a 62% performance reduction when going from 1920x1080 to 3840x2160, while Ultra settings experience a 66% reduction. This consistent scaling pattern across all presets indicates that at 4K, the RTX 4080 SUPER is the primary limiting factor, whereas at 1080p, the CPU's 83rd percentile ranking and 10-core, 16-thread configuration are more than sufficient to feed the GPU without creating a bottleneck. The data suggests that for players targeting the highest possible frame rates at 1080p, the CPU's performance ceiling is not reached, as evidenced by the 697.8 FPS Low preset result.

The Verdict

This PC configuration can run Minecraft: Java Edition with exceptional performance at every resolution and preset combination tested. At 3840x2160, all four settings presets — Low, Medium, High, and Ultra — clear the 60 FPS playable threshold, with the Ultra preset delivering an average of 106.5 FPS. The 2560x1440 resolution shows even more headroom, with the Ultra preset averaging 201 FPS, more than triple the playable threshold. At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset achieves 315.5 FPS, which is over five times the 60 FPS minimum requirement. The verdict is unambiguous: this system not only runs the game but does so with sufficient performance to drive high-refresh-rate monitors at maximum settings across all tested resolutions. The best settings at each resolution are always the Ultra preset, since even the most demanding configuration maintains a substantial margin above the playable threshold.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080 resolution, the measured average FPS values span a wide range depending on settings. The Low preset produces 697.8 FPS, representing the highest frame rate in the entire dataset. The Medium preset achieves 644.1 FPS, which is 7.7% lower than Low. The High preset delivers 508.8 FPS, a 21% reduction from Medium. The Ultra preset averages 315.5 FPS, which is 38% below High and represents the largest single-step drop between any consecutive presets at this resolution. The progression from Low to Ultra demonstrates a total performance reduction of 54.8% across the four settings levels.

At 2560x1440, the Low preset averages 511.5 FPS, which is 26.7% lower than the same preset at 1080p. Medium delivers 405.4 FPS, a 20.8% reduction from Low at the same resolution. High achieves 323.9 FPS, representing a 20.1% decrease from Medium. Ultra averages 201 FPS, which is 38% below High. The scaling from 1080p to 1440p shows reductions of 26.7% for Low, 37.1% for Medium, 36.3% for High, and 36.3% for Ultra, indicating that the GPU load increases proportionally with pixel count across all settings.

At 3840x2160, the Low preset averages 266.6 FPS, Medium reaches 213.5 FPS, High produces 170.3 FPS, and Ultra settles at 106.5 FPS. The performance deltas between consecutive presets are 19.9% from Low to Medium, 20.2% from Medium to High, and 37.5% from High to Ultra. When comparing 4K to 1440p, the reductions are 47.9% for Low, 47.3% for Medium, 47.4% for High, and 47% for Ultra. The consistent percentage reductions across presets when moving between resolutions indicate that the rendering workload scales uniformly with pixel density for this game.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset is the recommended setting, delivering an average of 315.5 FPS. This is the most demanding preset and still provides more than five times the 60 FPS playable threshold, making it the clear choice for maximum visual quality without sacrificing smoothness. At 2560x1440, the Ultra preset again emerges as the best option, with an average of 201 FPS. This maintains a comfortable margin above the playable threshold while offering the highest graphical fidelity. At 3840x2160, the Ultra preset remains the best choice, achieving 106.5 FPS on average. While this is the lowest frame rate recorded in the dataset for Ultra settings, it still exceeds the 60 FPS playable threshold by 77.5%, ensuring a smooth gameplay experience at maximum settings.

The data shows that this system's performance headroom is so substantial that there is no scenario where players need to compromise on visual quality to achieve playable frame rates. The lowest recorded average FPS across all resolutions and presets is 106.5 FPS, which occurs at 4K Ultra, and even this figure is well above the playable threshold. For players with high-refresh-rate monitors, the 1440p Ultra setting at 201 FPS and 1080p Ultra at 315.5 FPS provide ample performance to take full advantage of 144Hz or 240Hz displays.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the Intel Core i5-14400F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER ranks 113th out of 1727 tested system configurations for Minecraft: Java Edition. This places the combo in the top 6.5% of all tested hardware pairings, reflecting the strong performance of both components in this game. The CPU's 83rd percentile ranking among all processors and the GPU's 86th percentile ranking among all graphics cards contribute to this high overall position. The 113th rank out of 1727 combos indicates that while there are 112 configurations that achieve higher performance in this game, the majority of those likely feature more expensive or newer hardware. The measured frame rates show that this ranking is well-earned, with the system delivering playable performance at all tested settings and resolutions. The combination of a 10-core, 16-thread CPU with 20 MB of L3 cache and a GPU with 10240 shading units, 80 RT cores, and 16 GB of GDDR6X memory provides a balanced platform that excels in Minecraft: Java Edition's specific rendering workload, as evidenced by the high frame rates observed across the entire test matrix.