Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Minecraft: Java Edition
Action 2023

Minecraft: Java Edition

88%
Great Match Your system meets recommended requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
684 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
354 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
567 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
225 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
296 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
118 FPS
1.8ms Frame Time
3ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 33,226
Your CPU 25,292
Graphics Card
Required 26,068
Your GPU 60,347

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 118 187 235 296
1440p QHD 225 357 450 567
1080p Full HD 354 570 630 684

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 570
1920x1080 Low 684
1920x1080 Medium 630
1920x1080 Ultra 354
2560x1440 High 357
2560x1440 Low 567
2560x1440 Medium 450
2560x1440 Ultra 225
3840x2160 High 187
3840x2160 Low 296
3840x2160 Medium 235
3840x2160 Ultra 118

Performance Analysis: Minecraft: Java Edition on Your System

The Intel Core i5-13400F paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 delivers exceptional performance in Minecraft: Java Edition, with measured frame rates that far exceed the 60 FPS playability threshold at every resolution and preset tested. The data shows a system that is heavily overqualified for this title, with the lowest recorded average frame rate being 117.9 FPS at 4K Ultra settings. This combination demonstrates that even the most demanding settings at the highest resolution present no challenge, leaving massive headroom for high-refresh-rate monitors or heavily modded gameplay.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the combination produces extraordinary frame rates across all presets. The Low preset achieves an average of 683.6 FPS, while the Medium preset reaches 629.6 FPS. High settings yield 569.7 FPS, and even the Ultra preset maintains a robust 353.6 FPS. The scaling between presets is consistent, with the jump from High to Ultra representing a 38% reduction in frame rate, yet still leaving performance far above any practical display refresh rate.

Moving to 2560x1440, the frame rates remain exceptionally high. The Low preset delivers 567 FPS, Medium provides 450 FPS, and High reaches 356.8 FPS. The Ultra preset at this resolution produces 224.5 FPS, which is still more than triple the playability threshold. The performance drop from 1080p to 1440p is modest across all settings, with the Ultra preset showing the largest relative decline of 36.5%.

At 3840x2160, the system continues to dominate. Low settings produce 295.6 FPS, Medium delivers 234.8 FPS, and High achieves 186.7 FPS. The Ultra preset, which is the most demanding configuration tested, still manages an average of 117.9 FPS. This represents a 67% reduction compared to the 1080p Ultra result, but remains nearly double the 60 FPS threshold, indicating that 4K Ultra gaming is not only playable but also leaves room for additional graphical mods or shaders.

The data reveals a clear pattern: the performance ceiling is never approached at any resolution or setting. The widest gap between presets occurs at 4K, where Ultra is 60.1% slower than Low, while at 1080p the gap is narrower at 48.3%. This suggests that the GPU becomes more of a limiting factor as resolution increases, but even so, the absolute performance remains overwhelmingly sufficient for this game.

FAQ

Q: Can this PC run Minecraft: Java Edition at 4K Ultra settings?

A: Yes. The measured average frame rate at 3840x2160 with Ultra settings is 117.9 FPS, which is well above the 60 FPS playable threshold.

Q: What is the highest average frame rate recorded for this combination?

A: The highest average is 683.6 FPS, achieved at 1920x1080 resolution with Low settings.

Q: How does performance scale when moving from 1080p to 1440p?

A: At Low settings, the frame rate drops from 683.6 FPS to 567 FPS, a 17.1% decrease. At Ultra settings, the drop is from 353.6 FPS to 224.5 FPS, a 36.5% decrease, showing that higher presets are more sensitive to resolution increases.

Q: Which preset offers the largest performance jump at any resolution?

A: At 4K, the transition from Ultra to High provides a 58.4% increase in frame rate (from 117.9 FPS to 186.7 FPS), which is the largest relative gain between consecutive presets in the dataset.

Q: Is the 60 FPS threshold ever at risk with this hardware?

A: No. The lowest measured average frame rate across all twelve tested configurations is 117.9 FPS, meaning every resolution and preset combination clears the playable threshold by at least 96.5%.

Q: What does the ranking data indicate about this combination?

A: The combo ranks 49th out of 1727 tested combinations in Minecraft: Java Edition, placing it in the top 2.8% of all systems benchmarked for this game.

CPU and GPU Roles

The benchmark results indicate that the RTX 4090 is the dominant component in most scenarios, but the CPU's role becomes proportionally more significant at lower resolutions and presets. At 1080p with Low settings, the system achieves 683.6 FPS, a figure that is far beyond what most displays can show. This extreme frame rate suggests that the i5-13400F is successfully feeding the GPU with enough data to keep it fully utilized, even in a title that is traditionally more CPU-bound than most modern games.

When comparing 1080p Low (683.6 FPS) to 4K Low (295.6 FPS), there is a 56.8% reduction in performance. This substantial drop is primarily attributable to the GPU's workload increasing with pixel count, as the CPU's workload remains relatively constant. Conversely, the difference between 1080p Ultra (353.6 FPS) and 4K Ultra (117.9 FPS) is 66.7%, showing that the GPU's role expands further when more demanding graphical settings are enabled.

The scaling between presets at a fixed resolution provides additional insight into component roles. At 4K, going from Low to Ultra reduces frame rates by 60.1%, while at 1080p the same preset change reduces frame rates by 48.3%. This pattern indicates that the GPU is the primary bottleneck at higher resolutions, whereas the CPU's influence is more apparent at 1080p, where the frame rates approach the limits of what the processor can command.

The 10-core, 16-thread i5-13400F demonstrates sufficient single-thread performance for Minecraft's Java-based engine, which relies heavily on a single primary thread for world generation and game logic. The benchmark scores support this, with a 3DMark single-thread score of 960 and a Geekbench single-core score of 1996. These figures indicate that the CPU can sustain the high frame rates observed at lower resolutions, where the GPU is not yet saturated.

The Verdict

This PC can run Minecraft: Java Edition at maximum settings across all tested resolutions, and the data confirms that the 60 FPS playable threshold is cleared with substantial margin in every configuration. The verdict by resolution shows that at 1920x1080, the Ultra preset achieves 353.6 FPS, which is 5.9 times the minimum playable frame rate. At 2560x1440, Ultra settings produce 224.5 FPS, still nearly four times the threshold. Even at 3840x2160, the most demanding scenario, Ultra settings maintain 117.9 FPS, which is 96.5% above the 60 FPS requirement.

The data indicates that this combination is not merely capable of running the game, but rather that it vastly exceeds the requirements for smooth gameplay. The lowest recorded performance, 117.9 FPS at 4K Ultra, would be suitable for high-refresh-rate displays, and all other configurations offer frame rates that exceed the capabilities of most gaming monitors. This system is effectively overqualified for Minecraft: Java Edition in its vanilla form, and the performance headroom would accommodate significant additional mods, shader packs, or render distance increases without dropping below the playable threshold.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 1920x1080, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Ultra, with a measured average of 353.6 FPS. This is the highest quality setting available and provides nearly six times the required frame rate, making it the clear recommendation for this resolution.

For 2560x1440, the Ultra preset again delivers the best experience, achieving 224.5 FPS. This represents a 36.5% reduction from the 1080p Ultra result but remains far above the 60 FPS threshold, ensuring that maximum visual quality is attainable at this resolution.

At 3840x2160, the Ultra preset produces 117.9 FPS, which is the only configuration tested that falls below 120 FPS. Despite this, it still clears the playable threshold by a wide margin, and the visual fidelity of 4K Ultra settings is entirely achievable without compromise. For users seeking the absolute highest frame rates at 4K, the High preset at 186.7 FPS offers a 58.4% improvement over Ultra, but the Ultra preset remains fully playable.

How This Combo Ranks

The Intel Core i5-13400F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 combination ranks 49th out of 1727 tested combos in Minecraft: Java Edition, placing it in the 97th percentile of all systems benchmarked for this game. This ranking reflects the GPU's exceptional performance, as the RTX 4090 sits in the 88th percentile among all GPUs, while the CPU is in the 77th percentile among all processors. The combination's performance is dominated by the GPU's capabilities, which are sufficient to overcome any potential CPU limitations in this title.

The rank of 49 out of 1727 indicates that only 48 other tested combinations achieve higher average frame rates in this game. Given that the RTX 4090 is the flagship consumer GPU in the data set, the combinations that rank higher likely feature even more powerful CPUs paired with this same GPU, or configurations with more favorable memory bandwidth. However, the practical difference is minimal, as the frame rates already far exceed what any display can present.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The nearest rivals to the Intel Core i5-13400F, based on average benchmark scores, include the AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, which scores 25284 (a 0% delta), the Intel Core 5 120 at 25362 (a -0.3% delta), the AMD Ryzen 5 5600X3D at 25365 (a -0.3% delta), and the AMD Ryzen 7 6800H at 25201 (a 0.4% delta). All four alternatives fall within a 0.7% performance band of the i5-13400F, indicating that users with these CPUs would experience nearly identical frame rates in Minecraft: Java Edition when paired with the RTX 4090.

For the GPU, the nearest rivals to the RTX 4090 are the Intel Arc Pro A60 with an average score of 60326 (0% delta), the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 at 60140 (0.3% delta), the AMD Radeon Pro W6600M at 61896 (-2.5% delta), and the AMD Radeon PRO V710 at 58657 (2.9% delta). These alternatives represent a tight performance cluster around the RTX 4090's score, though they are primarily workstation-oriented cards. The data suggests that any of these GPU alternatives, when paired with the i5-13400F or one of its CPU rivals, would produce benchmark results within a few percent of the tested configuration, yielding similarly overwhelming performance in Minecraft: Java Edition.