Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Minecraft: Java Edition
Action 2023

Minecraft: Java Edition

88%
Great Match Your system meets recommended requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
635 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
252 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
404 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
156 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
209 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
80 FPS
2.5ms Frame Time
4ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 33,226
Your CPU 25,292
Graphics Card
Required 26,068
Your GPU 41,187

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 80 133 168 209
1440p QHD 156 254 320 404
1080p Full HD 252 397 504 635

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 397
1920x1080 Low 635
1920x1080 Medium 504
1920x1080 Ultra 252
2560x1440 High 254
2560x1440 Low 404
2560x1440 Medium 320
2560x1440 Ultra 156
3840x2160 High 133
3840x2160 Low 209
3840x2160 Medium 168
3840x2160 Ultra 80

Performance Analysis: Minecraft: Java Edition on Your System

The Intel Core i5-13400F paired with NVIDIA's GeForce RTX 3080 Ti delivers far more performance than Minecraft: Java Edition demands, clearing the 60 FPS playability threshold at every tested resolution and preset, including Ultra at native 4K. The data below walks through where this combo lands, how it scales, and what nearby hardware behaves the same way.

FAQ

Q: Can the i5-13400F + RTX 3080 Ti run Minecraft: Java Edition at 60 FPS?

A: Yes, at every resolution and preset tested. The lowest average recorded is 80.3 FPS at 3840x2160 Ultra — still above the 60 FPS playable threshold by a comfortable margin.

Q: What is the highest setting this combo can use at 4K while staying at or above 60 FPS?

A: Ultra, with an average of 80.3 FPS at 3840x2160. All four presets — Low, Medium, High, and Ultra — are playable at 4K.

Q: How many FPS does this pairing average at 1080p on Ultra?

A: 251.7 FPS average at 1920x1080 Ultra, rising to 634.5 FPS on the Low preset.

Q: How does the i5-13400F compare to rival CPUs in the database?

A: Its average benchmark score of 25292 places it in the 77th percentile of all CPUs. The nearest rivals — AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS (25284, 0% delta), Intel Core 5 120 (25362, -0.3%), AMD Ryzen 5 5600X3D (25365, -0.3%), and AMD Ryzen 7 6800H (25201, 0.4%) — sit within a fraction of a percent of its aggregate performance.

Q: Where does this CPU + GPU combination rank for Minecraft: Java Edition?

A: Rank 390 out of 1727 tested combinations, placing it in roughly the top quarter of tested pairings for this game.

Q: How strong is the RTX 3080 Ti in the broader GPU field?

A: Its average benchmark score of 41187 puts it in the 83rd percentile of all GPUs, with nearest rivals including the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 (40377, 2% delta) and AMD Radeon Pro 5300 (40870, 0.8% delta).

CPU and GPU Roles

Minecraft: Java Edition's rendering load is modest for a GPU of this class, and the measured scaling shows the RTX 3080 Ti is never the constraint in this pairing. Moving from 1920x1080 to 3840x2160 — four times the pixel count — drops the Ultra average from 251.7 FPS to 80.3 FPS, a decline of roughly two-thirds. That proportional falloff indicates the GPU is doing the heavy lifting at the top end while retaining enough headroom that even the quadrupled pixel load of 4K cannot push it under the 60 FPS line.

The i5-13400F's role matters more at the low end of the settings spectrum. At 1080p Low the average reaches 634.5 FPS, a regime where frame delivery is typically bounded by single-thread throughput rather than rasterization. Here the CPU's single-thread credentials are relevant: a Geekbench single-core score of 1996, a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3191, and a 3DMark single-thread score of 960. Its 77th-percentile standing among all CPUs means it is a capable partner, though at these extreme frame rates the CPU is likely the limiter rather than the 83rd-percentile GPU. For practical gameplay at any preset, either component is sufficient; the pairing is well balanced for this title.

Measured FPS Breakdown

All figures below are measured averages; minimum and maximum frame rates were not captured for this game.

1920x1080

  • Low: 634.5 FPS average
  • Medium: 503.8 FPS average
  • High: 396.8 FPS average
  • Ultra: 251.7 FPS average

2560x1440

  • Low: 403.7 FPS average
  • Medium: 319.5 FPS average
  • High: 253.7 FPS average
  • Ultra: 155.5 FPS average

3840x2160

  • Low: 208.8 FPS average
  • Medium: 168.4 FPS average
  • High: 132.7 FPS average
  • Ultra: 80.3 FPS average

The pattern is consistent and clean: each step up in resolution costs roughly 35–40% of the average frame rate at any given preset, and each step up in preset quality costs a similar share at any given resolution. Even the worst cell in the grid — 4K Ultra at 80.3 FPS — exceeds the 60 FPS playable threshold by more than 20 frames. The best cell, 1080p Low at 634.5 FPS, is more than ten times the threshold. There is no measured configuration in which this pairing struggles with the game.

The Verdict

Yes — this PC runs Minecraft: Java Edition without compromise. The verdict data is unambiguous: at 1920x1080, 2560x1440, and 3840x2160 alike, every tested preset from Low through Ultra is playable, and the best settings at each resolution are Ultra across the board.

At 1080p, Ultra averages 251.7 FPS. At 1440p, Ultra averages 155.5 FPS. At 4K, Ultra averages 80.3 FPS — the closest any configuration comes to the threshold, and still comfortably clear of it. No compromise is required at any resolution. Players should simply select the highest preset their display supports and play.

How This Combo Ranks

Against the full field of tested hardware pairings for Minecraft: Java Edition, the i5-13400F + RTX 3080 Ti ranks 390th out of 1727 combinations. That places it in approximately the top 23% of tested systems for this title — a strong standing, though not an extreme one, reflecting that Minecraft: Java Edition scales well on modest hardware and that many lighter combinations also clear its requirements by wide margins.

The rank is consistent with the component-level percentiles. The CPU sits in the 77th percentile of all CPUs with an average benchmark score of 25292, and the GPU sits in the 83rd percentile of all GPUs with an average benchmark score of 41187. A pairing of two upper-quadrant parts landing in the top quarter of combinations for a game with light rendering demands is exactly what the component data would predict.

Best Settings per Resolution

  • 1920x1080: Ultra — 251.7 FPS average
  • 2560x1440: Ultra — 155.5 FPS average
  • 3840x2160: Ultra — 80.3 FPS average

Ultra is the most demanding preset available in the test data, and it clears 60 FPS at all three resolutions. There is no reason to step down: even at 4K, the Ultra average holds above 80 FPS, leaving a buffer of more than 20 frames over the playable threshold. Players targeting high-refresh displays at 1080p or 1440p will find the High preset interesting too, averaging 396.8 FPS and 253.7 FPS respectively — but for image quality alone, Ultra is the answer at every resolution.

Similar Performance Alternatives

For CPUs, the i5-13400F's aggregate score of 25292 is bracketed by near-identical performers: the AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS at 25284 (0% delta), the Intel Core 5 120 at 25362 (-0.3%), the AMD Ryzen 5 5600X3D at 25365 (-0.3%), and the AMD Ryzen 7 6800H at 25201 (0.4%). All four sit within half a percent of the i5-13400F's average benchmark result, so any of them paired with a comparable GPU would be expected to produce effectively the same Minecraft: Java Edition experience — a game where, at these frame rates, small CPU differences matter little.

For GPUs, the RTX 3080 Ti's average score of 41187 is closely matched by the AMD Radeon Pro 5300 at 40870 (0.8% delta), the NVIDIA Tesla M40 24 GB at 41707 (-1.2%), the NVIDIA Tesla M40 at 41897 (-1.7%), and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 at 40377 (2% delta). Given the enormous headroom this pairing shows — every tested cell above 80 FPS — any of these neighboring GPUs would also deliver 60 FPS at all resolutions and presets in this title. The measured results indicate the bottleneck in this configuration is nowhere near the playable threshold, so equivalent-class substitutions preserve the verdict entirely.