Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Minecraft: Java Edition
Action 2023

Minecraft: Java Edition

74%
Great Match Your system meets recommended requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
390 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
151 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
244 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
94 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
126 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
50 FPS
4ms Frame Time
6ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 33,226
Your CPU 19,039
Graphics Card
Required 26,068
Your GPU 24,442

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 50 82 104 126
1440p QHD 94 155 196 244
1080p Full HD 151 247 308 390

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 247
1920x1080 Low 390
1920x1080 Medium 308
1920x1080 Ultra 151
2560x1440 High 155
2560x1440 Low 244
2560x1440 Medium 196
2560x1440 Ultra 94
3840x2160 High 82
3840x2160 Low 126
3840x2160 Medium 104
3840x2160 Ultra 50

Performance Analysis: Minecraft: Java Edition on Your System

The Intel Core i5-12400F paired with the AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT ranks 1236th out of 1727 tested combinations for Minecraft: Java Edition, placing it in the 71st percentile of all tested combos. This is a strong ranking that reflects a system capable of delivering high frame rates across most settings, though the data reveals a notable performance cliff at 4K Ultra settings where the combo falls below the 60 FPS playability threshold. The measured frame rates show this pairing excels at 1080p and 1440p, with the CPU and GPU both contributing to a smooth experience, but the 4K Ultra preset exposes a limitation that users should consider.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo ranks 1236th out of 1727 tested combinations, meaning it outperforms roughly 71% of all tested hardware pairings for this game. This percentile placement is consistent with the hardware’s individual standings: the CPU sits in the 73rd percentile against all CPUs, while the GPU ranks in the 70th percentile against all GPUs. The near-equal percentile scores for both components suggest a well-balanced pairing where neither part is a significant bottleneck for the other in this title.

The ranking is driven by the measured FPS data showing exceptional performance at lower resolutions. At 1080p, the average frame rates range from 151.3 FPS at Ultra to 389.7 FPS at Low, which places this combo well above the 60 FPS playability threshold in every tested preset. At 1440p, the system maintains an average of 94.1 FPS at Ultra, demonstrating that the combination has headroom for demanding settings at mid-range resolutions. The ranking drops slightly due to the 4K results, where the Ultra preset achieves only 50.4 FPS, which is below the playable threshold and indicates that this combo is not suited for maximum settings at 2160p.

CPU and GPU Roles

The benchmark data reveals a clear pattern where the GPU becomes the limiting factor as resolution increases, while the CPU provides sufficient headroom at all tested settings. At 1080p, the frame rate differences between presets are substantial: Low achieves 389.7 FPS, Medium 307.7 FPS, High 247 FPS, and Ultra 151.3 FPS. The scaling from Low to Ultra at 1080p shows a 61.2% reduction in frame rate, which indicates that the GPU is handling the increased graphical load without the CPU becoming a constraint.

Moving to 1440p, the frame rates drop by approximately 37% across all presets compared to 1080p. The Ultra preset at 1440p still achieves 94.1 FPS, showing that the GPU has enough headroom for this resolution. At 4K, the performance degradation becomes more pronounced: the Ultra preset falls to 50.4 FPS, a 46.4% reduction from the 1440p Ultra result. The Low preset at 4K still manages 125.6 FPS, which suggests the CPU is not the bottleneck even at 4K, but the GPU’s rendering capabilities are strained by the higher pixel count at higher presets.

The data shows that the CPU’s performance is sufficient for this game at all tested configurations, as the frame rates scale predictably with resolution and settings. The GPU’s role becomes dominant at 4K Ultra, where its 8 GB of GDDR6 memory and 256.0 GB/s bandwidth are insufficient to maintain 60 FPS. In contrast, the CPU’s 12 threads and 18 MB of shared L3 cache provide consistent performance across all resolutions, with no evidence of CPU-induced frame rate drops.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 1920x1080, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Ultra, with an average frame rate of 151.3 FPS. This gives users substantial headroom above the playability threshold, allowing for maximum settings with a comfortable margin. The High preset achieves 247 FPS, Medium 307.7 FPS, and Low 389.7 FPS, all of which far exceed the 60 FPS threshold.

At 2560x1440, the Ultra preset also remains playable with an average of 94.1 FPS, which is 56.8% above the 60 FPS threshold. The High preset delivers 155 FPS, Medium 196.2 FPS, and Low 244.4 FPS, making this resolution fully playable at all tested settings. The data indicates that 1440p Ultra is the best balance of visual quality and performance for this combo, as it maintains a comfortable frame rate while using the most demanding preset.

At 3840x2160, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is High, with an average of 81.7 FPS. The Medium preset achieves 103.6 FPS, and Low reaches 125.6 FPS, but the Ultra preset falls to 50.4 FPS, which is below the playable threshold. This means 4K users must choose between High settings at 81.7 FPS or lower presets for higher frame rates, as the Ultra preset is not viable.

Similar Performance Alternatives

For the CPU, the nearest rivals based on average benchmark scores include the AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS with a delta of 0%, the Intel Core 3 201E at -0.1%, the Intel Core i5-1335U at 0.3%, and the AMD EPYC 7773X at 0.3%. These processors all have average scores within approximately 0.3% of the i5-12400F, meaning they would deliver nearly identical CPU-bound performance in Minecraft: Java Edition. The Ryzen 5 7535HS is particularly notable as a direct performance equivalent, while the EPYC 7773X represents a server-class chip that offers similar gaming performance despite its different design goals.

For the GPU, the nearest rivals are the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 with a delta of 0.7%, the Intel Arc A350M at -0.8%, the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti at 0.8%, and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER at 1.1%. These GPUs have average scores within approximately 1.1% of the RX 6600 XT, so they would produce very similar frame rates in this game. The RTX 2080 SUPER is an interesting comparison, as it is a higher-tier card from a previous generation but achieves nearly identical average scores, suggesting that the RX 6600 XT offers comparable performance in this specific workload.

FAQ

Q: Can this combo run Minecraft: Java Edition at 60 FPS on Ultra settings at 1080p?

A: Yes, the measured average frame rate at 1920x1080 Ultra settings is 151.3 FPS, which is 151.8% above the 60 FPS playability threshold.

Q: What is the highest resolution at which this combo can maintain 60 FPS on Ultra settings?

A: The highest resolution with a playable Ultra preset is 2560x1440, where the average frame rate is 94.1 FPS. At 4K Ultra, the average drops to 50.4 FPS, which is below the threshold.

Q: How does the GPU compare to its nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER?

A: The RX 6600 XT has an average benchmark score of 24442, while the RTX 2080 SUPER has a score of 24170, giving the RX 6600 XT a 1.1% advantage over its rival.

Q: What is the frame rate difference between Low and Ultra settings at 4K?

A: At 3840x2160, the Low preset achieves an average of 125.6 FPS, while the Ultra preset achieves 50.4 FPS, a reduction of 75.2 FPS or 59.9% when moving from Low to Ultra.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU more likely to limit performance at 4K Ultra?

A: The data indicates the GPU is the limiting factor at 4K Ultra, as the frame rate drops to 50.4 FPS while the same CPU maintains 389.7 FPS at 1080p Low, showing the CPU has ample headroom.

Q: Does this combo rank in the top half of all tested combinations?

A: Yes, the combo ranks 1236th out of 1727 tested, meaning it outperforms approximately 71% of all tested hardware pairings for this game.

The Verdict

This PC can run Minecraft: Java Edition, but the playable settings vary significantly by resolution. At 1920x1080, the system is fully capable of running the game at Ultra settings with an average of 151.3 FPS, which is well above the 60 FPS threshold. At 2560x1440, the Ultra preset remains playable at 94.1 FPS, providing a high-quality experience with a comfortable frame rate margin. At 3840x2160, the system can run the game at High settings with an average of 81.7 FPS, but the Ultra preset falls to 50.4 FPS, which is below the playable threshold.

The verdict by resolution confirms these findings: 1080p and 1440p are fully playable at all tested settings, while 4K supports High, Medium, and Low presets but not Ultra. Users targeting 4K should stick to High settings or lower to maintain smooth gameplay, while 1080p and 1440p users can max out the settings without concern.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data covers three resolutions and four settings presets, with all results representing average frame rates.

At 1920x1080, the Low preset achieves an average of 389.7 FPS, Medium reaches 307.7 FPS, High delivers 247 FPS, and Ultra produces 151.3 FPS. The scaling from Low to Ultra shows a 61.2% reduction in frame rate, which is the largest relative drop across all resolutions.

At 2560x1440, the Low preset averages 244.4 FPS, Medium achieves 196.2 FPS, High reaches 155 FPS, and Ultra delivers 94.1 FPS. The transition from 1080p to 1440p reduces frame rates by approximately 37% at each preset, indicating a consistent GPU workload increase.

At 3840x2160, the Low preset averages 125.6 FPS, Medium achieves 103.6 FPS, High reaches 81.7 FPS, and Ultra produces 50.4 FPS. The 4K Ultra result is the only measured configuration that falls below the 60 FPS playability threshold, confirming that this combo’s limit is reached at 4K with maximum settings. The frame rate drop from 1440p Ultra to 4K Ultra is 46.4%, which is the largest single-resolution reduction observed in the data.