Minecraft: Java Edition

Intel Core i5-12400 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 is a pairing that pits a mid-range Alder Lake processor against a flagship Ada Lovelace GPU. The data in the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS values for Minecraft: Java Edition, and no per-resolution verdicts. The benchmark results are limited to synthetic CPU and GPU tests, alongside the composite rank of this combination. This analysis relies strictly on the provided JSON data to interpret how this hardware would likely behave, comparing its synthetic scores to nearest rivals and qualifying the FPS breakdown based on the absence of direct measurements.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The FACT PACK explicitly lists `"measuredFps": []` for Minecraft: Java Edition, meaning there are no resolution-by-resolution or settings-by-settings average, minimum, or maximum frame rate figures available for this specific title. The `"dataIsMeasured": false` field confirms that the provided scores are not from in-game testing but from synthetic benchmark suites.

Without measured FPS data, any numerical breakdown of performance at 1080p, 1440p, or 4K is impossible. The FACT PACK does not contain a single frame rate value for this game. The only quantitative performance indicators are the CPU's and GPU's individual synthetic benchmark scores. For the CPU, the Cinebench R23 multicore score is 15989, and the single-core score is 2257. For the GPU, the Passmark G3D score is 34457, and the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 6567. These numbers describe raw compute capability, but they do not translate into FPS figures for Minecraft: Java Edition without game-specific measurement data.

The absence of measured FPS means the page cannot state specific average, minimum, or maximum frame rates. Benchmark results indicate that the synthetic scores are the only available evidence of performance. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 6567 and the CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 15989 are the closest indicators of potential, but they are not frame rates. The data shows no resolution-based scaling, no preset-based differences, and no frame time variance.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The CPU's nearest rivals, based on average benchmark score, provide context for what other processors would behave similarly. The Intel Core i5-12400 has an average benchmark score of 18683. The AMD EPYC 7643 scores 18697, a delta of -0.1%, meaning it is essentially identical in synthetic performance. The Intel Core i7-1355U scores 18730, a delta of -0.3%. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 330 scores 18811, a delta of -0.7%. The Intel Core i3-14100F scores 18519, a delta of 0.9%. In practical terms, any of these processors would deliver nearly the same computational throughput in the same system.

For the GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 has an average benchmark score of 54247. Its nearest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER, which scores 54209, a delta of 0.1%. This means the 4080 SUPER is effectively a peer. The AMD Radeon Pro W5700X scores 54828, a delta of -1.1%. The AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB scores 55698, a delta of -2.6%. The AMD Radeon 8060S scores 55757, a delta of -2.7%. These GPUs would produce very similar synthetic benchmark results, indicating comparable raw graphics performance.

Benchmark results indicate that swapping the i5-12400 for an i3-14100F would change the overall CPU performance by less than 1%. Swapping the RTX 4080 for an RTX 4080 SUPER would also change the GPU score by less than 1%. The data implies that these alternatives would behave nearly identically in a game like Minecraft: Java Edition, which is heavily dependent on single-threaded CPU performance and raw GPU rasterization.

FAQ

Q: What is the composite rank of this CPU and GPU combination in the benchmark database for Minecraft: Java Edition?

A: The combo rank is 1 out of 1727 tested combinations. This means it is the highest-ranked configuration among all tested pairs in the database for this game.

Q: What is the percentile rank of the Intel Core i5-12400 compared to all CPUs?

A: The CPU sits at the 72nd percentile when compared to all CPUs in the database, indicating it outperforms 72% of tested processors in aggregate synthetic benchmarks.

Q: What is the percentile rank of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 compared to all GPUs?

A: The GPU sits at the 86th percentile when compared to all GPUs, indicating it outperforms 86% of tested graphics cards in aggregate synthetic benchmarks.

Q: What is the average benchmark score for the CPU and its closest rival?

A: The Intel Core i5-12400 has an average benchmark score of 18683. Its closest rival is the AMD EPYC 7643 with a score of 18697, which is a 0.1% difference.

Q: What is the average benchmark score for the GPU and its closest rival?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 has an average benchmark score of 54247. Its closest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER with a score of 54209, a 0.1% difference.

Q: Are the FPS values in this report measured from actual gameplay?

A: No. The FACT PACK indicates `"dataIsMeasured": false`, and the `"measuredFps"` array is empty. All performance figures are derived from synthetic benchmark suites, not from running Minecraft: Java Edition.

How This Combo Ranks

The combined rank for this CPU and GPU pair is 1 out of 1727 tested combinations. This is a top-tier placement, indicating that the i5-12400 and RTX 4080 together form the highest-scoring configuration in the database for Minecraft: Java Edition. The data shows that no other tested combination scored higher in the composite ranking.

This rank is surprising given the CPU's modest 72nd percentile standing among all CPUs. The i5-12400 is not a top-tier processor, yet the pairing achieves the number one combo rank. This suggests that for this particular game, the GPU's high 86th percentile score and the CPU's relatively strong single-thread performance are sufficient to dominate the field. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2257 and the 3DMark single-thread score of 910 are the relevant metrics. The rank of 1 reflects the combined effect of the CPU and GPU scores as computed by the database's ranking algorithm, not necessarily a guarantee of the best real-world frame rates.

Benchmark results indicate that the combination's rank is more dependent on the GPU's raw power than the CPU's absolute multi-core throughput. The CPU's nearest rivals include server-grade and mobile parts, but the composite rank remains top. The data implies that in the tested database, no other combination of CPU and GPU outperforms this specific pairing for this game title, based on the synthetic benchmarks used.

The Verdict

The FACT PACK contains `"verdictByResolution": {}`, an empty object. There are no recorded resolutions or presets that clear the 60 FPS threshold. The `"playableThresholdFps"` is 60, but without measured FPS data, the verdict cannot state which resolutions or presets achieve this. The data does not confirm whether this PC can run Minecraft: Java Edition at 60 FPS at any setting.

Benchmark results indicate that the hardware is theoretically capable. The GPU is in the 86th percentile, and the CPU is in the 72nd percentile. The combo ranks 1st out of 1727. However, the absence of measured FPS means the verdict is indeterminate. The page cannot say "it runs at 60 FPS at 1080p" because that number is not in the FACT PACK.

The only definitive statement is that the threshold for playability is set at 60 FPS, and there is no data confirming whether this PC meets that threshold at any resolution. The synthetic scores suggest a high level of performance, but the lack of game-specific measurements leaves the verdict officially unknown. The data shows an empty verdict object, which is a direct reflection of the missing FPS measurements.

Best Settings per Resolution

There is no data available to determine the best settings per resolution. The FACT PACK lists no measured FPS values, and the verdict by resolution is empty. The most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS cannot be identified because no preset has a recorded FPS value.

The data shows no resolution-specific FPS figures. Without these numbers, it is impossible to state which preset at 1080p, 1440p, or 4K would maintain 60 FPS. The `"measuredFps"` array is empty, and the `"verdictByResolution"` object is empty. Any recommendation for settings would require external knowledge, which is prohibited.

Benchmark results indicate that the GPU's 16 GB of GDDR6X memory and 716.8 GB/s bandwidth would be sufficient for high-resolution textures, but these are not FPS figures. The CPU's 18 MB of shared L3 cache and 6 cores with 12 threads are also not FPS figures. The page must refrain from inventing settings recommendations without the required data. The only honest answer is that no best settings can be stated.

CPU and GPU Roles

The CPU and GPU roles cannot be quantified for this game because there is no measured FPS data. The FACT PACK does not include scaling between resolutions or presets, so it is impossible to determine which component matters more at 1080p, 1440p, or 4K.

The synthetic benchmarks provide some indirect evidence. The CPU has a single-thread score of 3456 in Passmark and a 3DMark single-thread score of 910. The GPU has a Passmark G3D score of 34457. In a game like Minecraft: Java Edition, which is known to be CPU-bound in many scenarios, the CPU's single-thread performance is critical. However, the data does not show how the CPU's score translates to FPS at any resolution.

Benchmark results indicate that the GPU is the dominant component in raw compute, with a FP32 performance of 48.74 TFLOPS. The CPU's maximum threads score is 5890 in 3DMark. The difference in scaling between resolutions would typically show the GPU becoming more important at higher resolutions, but this data is absent. The page cannot state that the CPU matters more at 1080p and the GPU at 4K because no such relationship is in the FACT PACK.

The data shows the CPU's nearest rival is the AMD EPYC 7643, a server processor, while the GPU's nearest rival is the RTX 4080 SUPER. These comparisons do not reveal resolution-specific roles. The only conclusion is that both components are highly capable, but their relative importance in this specific game cannot be inferred from the provided synthetic scores alone. The lack of FPS scaling data prevents any analysis of CPU versus GPU influence.