Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Minecraft: Java Edition
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 78 | 124 | 162 | 202 |
| 1440p QHD | 151 | 239 | 305 | 385 |
| 1080p Full HD | 237 | 381 | 481 | 609 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Minecraft: Java Edition on Your System
The Intel Core i5-12400 paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 delivers overwhelming performance in Minecraft: Java Edition, with every tested resolution and preset combination clearing the 60 FPS playability threshold by a wide margin. The data shows this combo is not merely capable—it is excessive for this title, producing frame rates that range from a low of 77.7 FPS at 4K Ultra to a towering 608.8 FPS at 1080p Low. Across all twelve measured configurations, the average FPS never dips below 77.7, meaning users can max out the game at any resolution and still enjoy headroom well beyond standard display refresh rates.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The measured FPS data covers four settings presets—Low, Medium, High, and Ultra—across three resolutions: 1920x1080, 2560x1440, and 3840x2160. All figures represent average FPS, with no minimum or maximum values recorded in the dataset.
At 1920x1080, the combo performs at extraordinary levels. The Low preset yields 608.8 FPS, which is the highest frame rate in the entire dataset. Medium settings produce 480.5 FPS, High settings reach 380.6 FPS, and even the demanding Ultra preset maintains 237 FPS. These numbers indicate that at 1080p, the RTX 3080 is nowhere near saturated; the CPU and GPU are effectively idle relative to their maximum capabilities. The gap between Low and Ultra is 371.8 FPS, showing that Minecraft’s visual settings do scale performance, but even the most punishing configuration remains far beyond any practical display limit.
Moving to 2560x1440, the performance remains exceptional. Low settings deliver 385 FPS, Medium drops to 305.3 FPS, and High holds at 239.3 FPS. The Ultra preset still produces 150.5 FPS, which is more than double the 60 FPS threshold. The scaling from 1080p to 1440p shows a consistent reduction of roughly 36-37% across presets: Low goes from 608.8 to 385, Medium from 480.5 to 305.3, High from 380.6 to 239.3, and Ultra from 237 to 150.5. This linear behavior suggests the game is largely resolution-bound at these settings, with the GPU handling the increased pixel count predictably.
At 3840x2160, 4K resolution, the performance still remains comfortably playable. Low settings produce 201.7 FPS, Medium delivers 161.7 FPS, and High achieves 123.7 FPS. The Ultra preset, the most demanding configuration in the entire dataset, still averages 77.7 FPS—well above the 60 FPS threshold. The drop from 1440p to 4K is steeper, around 45-48% for each preset, reflecting the four-fold increase in pixel count. Notably, the 4K Ultra result of 77.7 FPS is the only measurement that falls below 100 FPS in the entire dataset, yet it remains fully playable and suitable for high-refresh-rate monitors at 60 Hz or even 75 Hz.
Across all resolutions, the pattern is consistent: Low settings always produce the highest FPS, followed by Medium, then High, then Ultra. The relative performance gaps between presets shrink as resolution increases—at 1080p, Ultra is 61% slower than Low (608.8 vs 237), while at 4K, Ultra is 61% slower than Low (201.7 vs 77.7)—indicating that Minecraft’s settings have a proportional impact regardless of resolution.
FAQ
Q: Can this PC run Minecraft: Java Edition at 60 FPS on Ultra settings?
A: Yes. The data shows the combo achieves 237 FPS at 1080p Ultra, 150.5 FPS at 1440p Ultra, and 77.7 FPS at 4K Ultra. All three exceed the 60 FPS playable threshold.
Q: What is the best resolution for this combo?
A: The data does not designate a "best" resolution, but 2560x1440 Ultra provides 150.5 FPS, which is more than sufficient for 144 Hz monitors. For 4K gaming, 4K Ultra still averages 77.7 FPS, making it viable for 60 Hz displays.
Q: How much performance is lost when moving from 1080p to 4K?
A: At Ultra settings, average FPS drops from 237 at 1080p to 150.5 at 1440p (a 36.5% reduction) and further to 77.7 at 4K (a 67.2% reduction from 1080p). The largest absolute drop occurs between 1440p and 4K.
Q: Which preset gives the highest frame rate?
A: Low settings at 1920x1080 produce the highest measured FPS of 608.8. At every resolution, Low settings outperform Medium, High, and Ultra presets.
Q: Is there any resolution or preset where the combo fails to reach 60 FPS?
A: No. All twelve measured configurations—four presets at three resolutions—exceed 60 FPS. The lowest recorded average is 77.7 FPS at 3840x2160 Ultra.
Q: Does the RTX 3080 bottleneck the CPU in this game?
A: The data does not include CPU-GPU utilization metrics, but the extreme FPS values at 1080p (608.8 FPS on Low) suggest the GPU is not the limiting factor at lower resolutions, while the consistent performance scaling indicates balanced operation.
Best Settings per Resolution
At 1920x1080, the best settings are Ultra, which produces 237 FPS. This is the most demanding preset available, and it still delivers more than triple the 60 FPS threshold. Users can enable every visual enhancement without concern.
At 2560x1440, Ultra settings also represent the best option, achieving 150.5 FPS. This comfortably exceeds 60 FPS and provides enough headroom for 144 Hz displays, which require 144 FPS to fully utilize their refresh rate.
At 3840x2160, Ultra settings remain the best choice, averaging 77.7 FPS. While this is the lowest result in the dataset, it still clears the 60 FPS mark by 17.7 FPS, making it suitable for 4K gaming on standard 60 Hz monitors or even entry-level 75 Hz panels.
The verdict-by-resolution data confirms that Ultra is the recommended preset at every resolution, with no need to compromise on visual quality. The measured FPS at Ultra settings across all three resolutions—237, 150.5, and 77.7—demonstrates that this combo has sufficient headroom to run the game at maximum fidelity.
Similar Performance Alternatives
The CPU and GPU each have nearest rivals based on average benchmark scores, indicating hardware that would perform similarly in synthetic tests.
For the Intel Core i5-12400, the nearest rival is the AMD EPYC 7643, which scores 18697 on average benchmark compared to the i5-12400’s 18683—a negligible delta of -0.1%. This means the EPYC 7643 would deliver virtually identical CPU-bound performance in Minecraft. The Intel Core i7-1355U scores 18730 (delta -0.3%), also essentially equivalent. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 330 scores 18811 (delta -0.7%), and the Intel Core i3-14100F scores 18519 (delta +0.9%). All four rivals fall within 1% of the i5-12400’s average score, indicating that swapping the CPU for any of these would produce nearly indistinguishable frame rates in this game.
For the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080, the nearest rival is the NVIDIA P106-100, which scores 23249 versus the RTX 3080’s 23172—a delta of -0.3%. The AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 scores 23250 (delta -0.3%), the AMD Radeon RX 6600M scores 23273 (delta -0.4%), and the AMD Radeon R9 M290X scores 23276 (delta -0.4%). All four GPUs are within 0.4% of the RTX 3080’s average benchmark score, suggesting they would produce similar GPU-bound frame rates in Minecraft. However, note that the RTX 3080 has a percentile rank of 68 versus all GPUs, while the i5-12400 has a percentile rank of 72 versus all CPUs, indicating both components sit comfortably above the median.
The Verdict
This PC can run Minecraft: Java Edition at every resolution and preset tested, with all configurations exceeding the 60 FPS playable threshold. The verdict-by-resolution data confirms that all four settings presets (Low, Medium, High, Ultra) are playable at 3840x2160, 2560x1440, and 1920x1080.
At 1920x1080, the combo delivers 237 FPS on Ultra, 380.6 FPS on High, 480.5 FPS on Medium, and 608.8 FPS on Low. These numbers are far beyond any practical need; even a 240 Hz monitor would be saturated at Low and Medium settings.
At 2560x1440, Ultra settings still provide 150.5 FPS, which is ideal for 144 Hz gaming. High settings reach 239.3 FPS, Medium hits 305.3 FPS, and Low produces 385 FPS—all exceptional.
At 3840x2160, the Ultra preset averages 77.7 FPS, which is above the 60 FPS threshold by 17.7 FPS. High settings reach 123.7 FPS, Medium delivers 161.7 FPS, and Low achieves 201.7 FPS. The 4K Ultra result is the only measurement below 100 FPS in the entire dataset, yet it remains fully playable.
The data indicates this combo is overkill for Minecraft: Java Edition, providing performance headroom that exceeds the requirements of virtually all displays. Users can run the game at maximum settings at any resolution without worrying about frame drops below 60 FPS.
How This Combo Ranks
The Intel Core i5-12400 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 combination ranks 509th out of 1727 tested combos in this game, placing it in the top 29.5% of all configurations. This percentile position reflects the fact that while the combo is undeniably fast, many higher-end systems (likely featuring newer GPUs or more powerful CPUs) achieve even higher frame rates in Minecraft’s largely CPU-bound rendering.
The ranking is consistent with the component-level percentiles: the i5-12400 ranks in the 72nd percentile against all CPUs, and the RTX 3080 ranks in the 68th percentile against all GPUs. The combo’s 509th rank out of 1727—roughly the 70.5th percentile—aligns closely with the lower of the two component percentiles, suggesting the GPU’s relative position is the limiting factor in this pairing.
In practical terms, a rank of 509 out of 1727 means the combo outperforms approximately 1218 other tested combinations. However, this ranking does not diminish the measured FPS results: the data shows the combo achieves 77.7 FPS at 4K Ultra, which is the most demanding configuration tested. The rank reflects relative standing among all tested combos, not absolute playability. Since all twelve measured configurations exceed 60 FPS, the combo’s rank indicates strong performance even if other combos score higher in synthetic benchmarks or achieve even higher frame rates in specific scenarios.