Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Minecraft: Java Edition
Action 2023

Minecraft: Java Edition

76%
Great Match Your system meets recommended requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
559 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
368 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
478 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
230 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
306 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
119 FPS
2.1ms Frame Time
3ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 33,226
Your CPU 17,177
Graphics Card
Required 26,068
Your GPU 79,842

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 119 191 243 306
1440p QHD 230 373 440 478
1080p Full HD 368 475 515 559

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 475
1920x1080 Low 559
1920x1080 Medium 515
1920x1080 Ultra 368
2560x1440 High 373
2560x1440 Low 478
2560x1440 Medium 440
2560x1440 Ultra 230
3840x2160 High 191
3840x2160 Low 306
3840x2160 Medium 243
3840x2160 Ultra 119

Performance Analysis: Minecraft: Java Edition on Your System

Minecraft: Java Edition remains one of the most popular games in the world, and its performance characteristics are unusual compared to most modern titles. This analysis examines a specific hardware combination: the Intel Core i5-11400F paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090. The recorded data comes from our database of measured frame rates, covering three resolutions and four quality presets. The goal is to determine what settings this combo can handle while maintaining at least 60 FPS, which is the playable threshold used throughout this analysis.

The database shows this combination ranks 129th out of 1,727 tested combos for this game. That places it in the top 7.5% of all configurations tested. The CPU sits at the 71st percentile among all processors in the database, while the GPU is at the 92nd percentile among all graphics cards. This is a strong pairing, but Minecraft's unique engine behavior means the results are not always what you might expect from such high-end hardware.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 1920x1080, the highest preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Ultra. The measured average frame rate at this setting is 367.9 FPS. That is far above the playable threshold, leaving enormous headroom. The data shows every preset at this resolution is playable, including Low at 558.6 FPS, Medium at 515 FPS, and High at 475.1 FPS. Ultra is the most demanding option, and the average of 367.9 FPS means there is no practical reason to drop below it. Even in the most complex scenes, the recorded average suggests this combo will not struggle.

At 2560x1440, the best settings remain Ultra. The measured average at Ultra is 230.4 FPS. The other presets are also well above 60 FPS: High delivers 373 FPS, Medium delivers 440.4 FPS, and Low delivers 478.2 FPS. The difference between 1080p and 1440p is significant, but the RTX 5090 has enough headroom to keep even the heaviest preset comfortably playable. The 230.4 FPS average at Ultra is still more than three times the playable threshold.

At 3840x2160, which is 4K, the best settings are again Ultra. The measured average at Ultra is 118.7 FPS. This is the only resolution where the frame rate drops below 200 FPS, but it still clears the 60 FPS threshold by a wide margin. The other presets at 4K are also playable: High at 191 FPS, Medium at 242.8 FPS, and Low at 305.9 FPS. The verdict is clear: this combo can run Minecraft at maximum quality across all three tested resolutions without ever falling below the playable threshold. The data shows Ultra is the recommended setting at every resolution, with the lowest recorded average being 118.7 FPS at 4K.

CPU and GPU Roles

The recorded data reveals an interesting division of labor between the CPU and GPU for this game. At 1920x1080, the frame rates are extremely high across all presets. The jump from Low to Medium is modest, 558.6 to 515 FPS, while the jump from Medium to High is smaller, 515 to 475.1 FPS. The biggest drop comes when moving from High to Ultra, 475.1 to 367.9 FPS. This pattern suggests that at lower resolutions, the CPU becomes the limiting factor. The RTX 5090 is capable of far higher frame rates, but the Core i5-11400F, with its 6 cores and 12 threads, cannot feed the GPU fast enough to reach its full potential. The single-thread performance of 868 in the 3dmark single-thread test and 2981 in Passmark single-thread support this interpretation.

At 2560x1440, the frame rates drop, but not proportionally to the pixel count increase. The resolution increases by 78% from 1080p to 1440p, yet the Ultra average only falls from 367.9 to 230.4 FPS, a 37% reduction. This indicates that the GPU is starting to take on more of the workload, but the CPU still plays a substantial role. The Low preset at 1440p runs at 478.2 FPS, which is still extremely high and suggests the CPU is still the bottleneck in lighter settings.

At 3840x2160, the GPU becomes the dominant factor. The pixel count quadruples from 1080p to 4K, and the Ultra average falls to 118.7 FPS, a 68% reduction from the 1080p figure. The Low preset drops to 305.9 FPS, which is still high but shows that the GPU is now doing the heavy lifting. The scaling between resolutions is key: at 1080p, the CPU limits the combo, at 1440p both components share the load, and at 4K the GPU is the primary constraint. This is typical for Minecraft, which relies heavily on single-threaded CPU performance for chunk generation and entity handling, while the GPU handles rendering and shader work. The data shows that the RTX 5090 has ample power for this game, but the Core i5-11400F holds back the absolute maximum frame rates at lower resolutions.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the full set of measurements is as follows. Low settings produce an average of 558.6 FPS. Medium settings produce an average of 515 FPS. High settings produce an average of 475.1 FPS. Ultra settings produce an average of 367.9 FPS. The difference between Low and Ultra is 190.7 FPS, which is a substantial gap but still leaves even the lowest figure far above the playable threshold. The data shows no frame rate dips below 367.9 FPS on average, meaning even the most demanding preset has a comfortable margin.

At 2560x1440, the measurements are as follows. Low settings produce an average of 478.2 FPS. Medium settings produce an average of 440.4 FPS. High settings produce an average of 373 FPS. Ultra settings produce an average of 230.4 FPS. The scaling from Low to Ultra shows a 247.8 FPS drop, which is larger than at 1080p. The step from High to Ultra is particularly steep, 373 to 230.4 FPS, indicating that Ultra introduces rendering features that significantly increase GPU load. Still, all presets remain well above the 60 FPS threshold.

At 3840x2160, the measurements are as follows. Low settings produce an average of 305.9 FPS. Medium settings produce an average of 242.8 FPS. High settings produce an average of 191 FPS. Ultra settings produce an average of 118.7 FPS. This is the only resolution where any preset approaches the playable threshold. The Ultra average of 118.7 FPS is still nearly double the threshold, but it is the lowest recorded figure for this combo. The drop from High to Ultra at 4K is 72.3 FPS, which is significant. The data does not include minimum or maximum frame rate values, so the analysis relies on averages, but the averages suggest consistent performance across all settings.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo rank for this pairing is 129 out of 1,727 tested combinations. This places it in the top 7.5% of all configurations in the database for Minecraft: Java Edition. The rank reflects the overall performance across all resolutions and settings, weighted by the playable threshold. The GPU's 92nd percentile ranking among all graphics cards is a major contributor, as is the CPU's 71st percentile ranking. The combination of a mid-range CPU and a top-tier GPU produces a balanced result for this game, though the CPU does limit the ceiling.

Looking at the nearest rivals for the CPU helps contextualize the rank. The Intel Core i5-11400F has an average benchmark score of 17,177. The AMD EPYC 7H12 scores 17,120, which is 0.3% lower. The Intel Core Ultra 7 164U scores 17,074, 0.6% lower. The Intel Core i5-12450H scores 17,239, 0.4% higher. The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G scores 17,278, 0.6% higher. These are all within a narrow band, meaning the CPU's performance is comparable to several other processors. The differences are small enough that they would not meaningfully change the frame rates in Minecraft, where single-thread performance matters most.

For the GPU, the nearest rivals show similar clustering. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 has an average benchmark score of 79,842. The NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB scores 79,605, 0.3% lower. The NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 12 GB scores 79,396, 0.6% lower. The AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT scores 78,940, 1.1% lower. The AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X scores 80,959, 1.4% higher. These deltas are modest, indicating that the RTX 5090 sits in a performance tier where nearby alternatives produce very similar results in synthetic benchmarks. In Minecraft, the differences would likely be minimal, since the game is not heavily GPU-bound at lower resolutions.

The rank of 129th suggests that many other CPU and GPU pairings outperform this combo, but the overwhelming majority of tested configurations do not. For a game that can run on almost any hardware, this combo is far above average. The data shows that the RTX 5090 is overkill for Minecraft in many respects, but the rank reflects the overall capability across the tested settings.

Similar Performance Alternatives

Based on the nearest rivals in the database, several other hardware combinations would behave similarly to this setup. The CPU's nearest rivals all have average benchmark scores within 0.6% of the Core i5-11400F. The AMD EPYC 7H12 is 0.3% slower, the Intel Core Ultra 7 164U is 0.6% slower, the Intel Core i5-12450H is 0.4% faster, and the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G is 0.6% faster. In Minecraft, these differences are negligible. A system with any of these CPUs paired with the RTX 5090 would produce nearly identical frame rates, assuming the rest of the system is comparable.

The GPU's nearest rivals include the NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB, which is 0.3% slower, and the NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 12 GB, which is 0.6% slower. The AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT is 1.1% slower, and the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X is 1.4% faster. These are all workstation or mobile parts, which is unusual for a gaming comparison, but the benchmark scores indicate they are in the same performance class. For Minecraft specifically, the differences in GPU performance would be even smaller than the synthetic scores suggest, because the game is not particularly demanding on graphics hardware at lower presets.

If a user were to swap the CPU for one of the nearest rivals, the frame rates would change by less than 1% on average. If the GPU were swapped for a similar-performing alternative, the frame rates would change by a few percent at most. The practical takeaway is that this combo's performance is representative of a broad tier of hardware. The exact model matters less than the overall performance class. The data shows that the Core i5-11400F and RTX 5090 pairing sits in a sweet spot where the CPU and GPU are well matched for Minecraft's demands, despite the CPU being a generation old.

FAQ

Q: Can this combo run Minecraft at Ultra settings at 4K?

A: Yes. The recorded data shows an average of 118.7 FPS at 3840x2160 with Ultra settings, which is well above the 60 FPS playable threshold.

Q: What is the highest frame rate recorded for this combo?

A: The highest average frame rate is 558.6 FPS, recorded at 1920x1080 with Low settings.

Q: Does the CPU or GPU matter more for this game?

A: At 1920x1080, the CPU is the main limiter, as frame rates are extremely high but the GPU is not fully utilized. At 3840x2160, the GPU becomes the primary factor, with frame rates dropping significantly due to the higher pixel count.

Q: How does this combo rank compared to other tested configurations?

A: It ranks 129th out of 1,727 tested combos for Minecraft, placing it in the top 7.5% of all configurations.

Q: Are there any settings where this combo falls below 60 FPS?

A: No. Every tested resolution and preset combination stays above 60 FPS on average. The lowest recorded average is 118.7 FPS at 4K Ultra.

Q: What is the difference between Low and Ultra at 1440p?

A: Low settings average 478.2 FPS, while Ultra settings average 230.4 FPS. The difference is 247.8 FPS, but both are far above the playable threshold.

Q: Would a different CPU or GPU produce similar results?

A: The nearest rival CPUs and GPUs in the database have benchmark scores within 1.4% of this combo's components. Swapping to those parts would produce nearly identical frame rates in Minecraft.