Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Minecraft: Java Edition
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 95 | 155 | 195 | 248 |
| 1440p QHD | 188 | 297 | 374 | 473 |
| 1080p Full HD | 294 | 471 | 515 | 559 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Minecraft: Java Edition on Your System
FAQ
Q: Can this PC run Minecraft: Java Edition at 4K Ultra settings?
A: Yes. At 3840x2160 with Ultra settings, the Intel Core i5-11400F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER combination delivers an average of 95.2 FPS, which clears the 60 FPS playable threshold by a comfortable margin.
Q: What is the best setting to use at 1440p?
A: At 2560x1440, Ultra settings produce an average of 188.3 FPS, and this is the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS. All four presets (Low, Medium, High, Ultra) are playable at this resolution.
Q: How does the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER compare to its nearest rivals in synthetic benchmarks?
A: The database shows the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has an average benchmark score of 31087. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA Quadro M5000, scores 31206, which is 0.4% higher. The NVIDIA TITAN RTX scores 31676, putting it 1.9% ahead. The RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell scores 31532, 1.4% higher.
Q: Is the CPU a bottleneck at 1080p?
A: At 1920x1080, the lowest preset (Low) yields 559.1 FPS, while Ultra yields 293.6 FPS. The scaling from Low to Ultra shows a 48% performance drop, indicating the GPU is heavily utilized even at lower presets, with the CPU maintaining high frame delivery throughout.
Q: What is the frame rate difference between 1080p and 4K at High settings?
A: At 1920x1080 High settings, the average FPS is 471. At 3840x2160 High settings, it drops to 155.4 FPS. This represents a 67% reduction in frame rate when moving from 1080p to 4K.
Q: How many tested combinations does this setup rank among?
A: This CPU and GPU combination ranks 272nd out of 1727 tested combos in Minecraft: Java Edition, placing it in the top 16% of all configurations in the database.
CPU and GPU Roles
The data for Minecraft: Java Edition reveals a clear pattern in how the CPU and GPU share workload across resolutions. At 1920x1080, the lowest preset produces 559.1 FPS, while the Ultra preset produces 293.6 FPS. This 265.5 FPS gap demonstrates that even at lower presets, the GPU is doing substantial work, and the CPU is capable of feeding frames at extremely high rates.
Moving to 2560x1440, the Low preset delivers 473.2 FPS, a drop of 85.9 FPS from 1080p Low. The Ultra preset at 1440p delivers 188.3 FPS, a drop of 105.3 FPS from 1080p Ultra. These reductions show that resolution scaling impacts both low and high presets similarly, with roughly an 18% reduction at Low and a 36% reduction at Ultra when moving from 1080p to 1440p.
At 3840x2160, the scaling becomes more pronounced. Low settings produce 248.4 FPS, which is 47% lower than the 1440p Low result. Ultra settings produce 95.2 FPS, which is 49% lower than the 1440p Ultra result. The consistent percentage drops across presets when moving to 4K indicate that the GPU is becoming the dominant constraint at this resolution, as the pixel throughput demands increase by 2.25 times from 1440p to 4K.
The CPU's role is most visible at 1080p, where even the most demanding preset stays above 293.6 FPS. The i5-11400F, with its 6 cores and 12 threads, maintains sufficient headroom to keep frame delivery high. The GPU's role becomes more apparent at 4K, where the gap between Low and Ultra narrows to 153.2 FPS, compared to 265.5 FPS at 1080p. This narrowing suggests that at 4K, the GPU is working closer to its limits, and the CPU has less influence on the final frame rate.
The data indicates that at 1080p, both components have ample headroom, with the CPU potentially being the limiting factor at the highest frame rates. At 1440p, the balance shifts slightly toward the GPU, while at 4K, the GPU is clearly the dominant component, as the frame rate differences between presets compress and the overall performance drops proportionally with pixel count.
Similar Performance Alternatives
Looking at the nearest rivals in the database provides context for what other hardware might deliver comparable results. For the CPU, the Intel Core i5-11400F has an average benchmark score of 17177. The AMD EPYC 7H12 scores 17120, which is 0.3% lower, making it a near-identical performer in synthetic tests. The Intel Core Ultra 7 164U scores 17074, 0.6% lower, while the Intel Core i5-12450H scores 17239, 0.4% higher, and the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300G scores 17278, 0.6% higher. All four rivals sit within a 1.2% performance band, meaning any of these CPUs would produce nearly identical frame rates in Minecraft: Java Edition.
For the GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has an average benchmark score of 31087. The NVIDIA Quadro M5000 scores 31206, only 0.4% higher. The NVIDIA GRID M60-1Q scores 31220, also 0.4% higher. The NVIDIA RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell scores 31532, 1.4% higher, and the NVIDIA TITAN RTX scores 31676, 1.9% higher. These four GPUs represent the closest performance match to the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER in the database, with all of them falling within a 2% margin.
Users seeking comparable gameplay experiences could consider these alternatives. The CPU rivals would deliver essentially identical performance in this game, as Minecraft: Java Edition is not heavily multithreaded, and the synthetic benchmark differences are minimal. The GPU rivals would also produce similar frame rates, though the Quadro M5000 and GRID M60-1Q are workstation-oriented cards that may lack the same driver optimization for gaming workloads.
The tight clustering of these rivals suggests that the i5-11400F and RTX 4070 Ti SUPER sit at a performance plateau where small benchmark differences do not translate into perceptible gameplay differences. The recorded data shows that all these alternatives would fall within a few FPS of the measured results.
The Verdict
This combination can run Minecraft: Java Edition at all tested resolutions and presets above the 60 FPS playable threshold. At 3840x2160, the Ultra preset averages 95.2 FPS, which clears the threshold by 35.2 FPS. The High preset at 4K averages 155.4 FPS, Medium averages 194.9 FPS, and Low averages 248.4 FPS, all well above 60 FPS.
At 2560x1440, the Ultra preset averages 188.3 FPS, more than three times the playable threshold. High settings produce 297.1 FPS, Medium produces 374.3 FPS, and Low produces 473.2 FPS. Every preset at 1440p provides substantial headroom above 60 FPS.
At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset averages 293.6 FPS, nearly five times the playable threshold. High settings reach 471 FPS, Medium reaches 515 FPS, and Low reaches 559.1 FPS. The 1080p results confirm that this hardware is far beyond the minimum requirements for this game, with even the most demanding preset delivering close to 300 FPS.
The verdict is unambiguous: this PC runs Minecraft: Java Edition with maximum settings at every resolution tested, with the lowest recorded average being 95.2 FPS at 4K Ultra. Players can enable the highest graphics quality settings without concern for dropping below 60 FPS.
How This Combo Ranks
The database places this combination at rank 272 out of 1727 tested combos for Minecraft: Java Edition. This position places it in the top 15.8% of all configurations tested, which is notable given the large number of CPU and GPU pairings in the database.
The ranking reflects the strong performance of both components. The i5-11400F sits at the 71st percentile among all CPUs, while the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER sits at the 76th percentile among all GPUs. When combined for this specific game, the pairing achieves a higher relative position than either component's individual percentile, suggesting that the combination is particularly well-suited to Minecraft: Java Edition's workload characteristics.
The gap between this combo and the top-ranked configurations is not directly measured in the data, but the 272nd position out of 1727 indicates that many other combinations deliver higher frame rates. However, the practical significance of that ranking is limited by the fact that this combo already delivers 95.2 FPS at 4K Ultra, which is far beyond the playable threshold. For players seeking higher frame rates at competitive levels, the 1080p results of 293.6 FPS at Ultra and 559.1 FPS at Low provide ample performance for high-refresh-rate displays.
Best Settings per Resolution
At 3840x2160, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Ultra, with an average of 95.2 FPS. This is the highest quality setting available, and it clears the threshold by 35.2 FPS. Players at 4K can enable every visual option without compromise.
At 2560x1440, the best setting is also Ultra, producing 188.3 FPS. This is more than triple the playable threshold, providing extensive headroom for demanding scenes or shader mods. The 1440p Ultra result is 93.1 FPS higher than the 4K Ultra result, showing the benefit of the lower pixel count.
At 1920x1080, Ultra settings deliver 293.6 FPS, which is nearly five times the threshold. This makes 1080p Ultra the best choice for players with high-refresh-rate monitors, as the frame rate approaches 300 FPS even at maximum quality.
Across all three resolutions, Ultra is the recommended preset, as it always clears 60 FPS with substantial margin. The lowest margin is at 4K, where the 95.2 FPS average still provides a comfortable buffer.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the measured average frame rates across presets are as follows: Low settings produce 559.1 FPS, Medium produces 515 FPS, High produces 471 FPS, and Ultra produces 293.6 FPS. The progression from Low to Ultra shows a stepwise reduction, with the largest single drop occurring between High and Ultra, a decrease of 177.4 FPS.
At 2560x1440, Low settings average 473.2 FPS, Medium averages 374.3 FPS, High averages 297.1 FPS, and Ultra averages 188.3 FPS. The drop from Low to Ultra is 284.9 FPS, with each preset step reducing performance by roughly 60 to 110 FPS.
At 3840x2160, Low settings average 248.4 FPS, Medium averages 194.9 FPS, High averages 155.4 FPS, and Ultra averages 95.2 FPS. The total range from Low to Ultra is 153.2 FPS, which is narrower than at lower resolutions, confirming the GPU-bound nature of 4K rendering.
The database records only average FPS values for this game, with no minimum or maximum frame time data available. The averages across all twelve measurements (three resolutions, four presets) consistently exceed 60 FPS, with the lowest single measurement being 95.2 FPS at 4K Ultra. The highest single measurement is 559.1 FPS at 1080p Low. The data shows a consistent pattern: performance scales predictably with resolution and preset, and every configuration tested delivers playable frame rates.