Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Minecraft: Java Edition
Action 2023

Minecraft: Java Edition

92%
Excellent Match Your system exceeds recommended requirements!

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
606 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
298 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
475 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
186 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
246 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
96 FPS
2.1ms Frame Time
3ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 33,226
Your CPU 27,896
Graphics Card
Required 26,068
Your GPU 31,087

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 96 156 199 246
1440p QHD 186 300 378 475
1080p Full HD 298 474 560 606

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 474
1920x1080 Low 606
1920x1080 Medium 560
1920x1080 Ultra 298
2560x1440 High 300
2560x1440 Low 475
2560x1440 Medium 378
2560x1440 Ultra 186
3840x2160 High 156
3840x2160 Low 246
3840x2160 Medium 199
3840x2160 Ultra 96

Performance Analysis: Minecraft: Java Edition on Your System

The AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER delivers exceptionally high frame rates in Minecraft: Java Edition, with measured data showing every tested resolution and preset combination clearing the 60 FPS playable threshold by a wide margin. Across the 12 measured configurations, the average frame rates range from a low of 95.9 FPS at 4K Ultra to a peak of 606.3 FPS at 1080p Low, indicating that this combination is not merely capable of running the game but is positioned far beyond the point of diminishing returns for typical display refresh rates.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a clear picture of how this hardware scales with resolution and graphics presets. At 1920x1080, the lowest resolution tested, the frame rates are extraordinarily high across all settings. The Low preset produces an average of 606.3 FPS, while Medium averages 560.3 FPS and High averages 473.9 FPS. Even the most demanding Ultra preset at 1080p maintains an average of 297.5 FPS, which is nearly five times the 60 FPS playable threshold. The gap between Low and Ultra at 1080p is substantial, with Ultra delivering roughly 49% of the Low preset's frame rate, but the absolute numbers remain so high that the difference is largely academic for real-world play.

Moving to 2560x1440, the performance scales downward in a predictable manner. The Low preset averages 475.4 FPS, Medium drops to 377.5 FPS, and High settles at 300.1 FPS. The Ultra preset at 1440p averages 186 FPS, which is considerably lower than its 1080p counterpart but still comfortably above any competitive or high-refresh-rate display requirement. The scaling from 1080p to 1440p shows a reduction of approximately 21.6% for Low, 32.6% for Medium, 36.7% for High, and 37.5% for Ultra, indicating that the higher resolution imposes a more significant load on the GPU as settings increase.

At 3840x2160, the highest resolution in the dataset, the performance remains strong but shows the expected additional decline. The Low preset averages 245.8 FPS, Medium averages 198.6 FPS, and High averages 156 FPS. The Ultra preset at 4K averages 95.9 FPS, which is the lowest measured frame rate in the entire dataset but still exceeds the 60 FPS threshold by roughly 60%. The scaling from 1440p to 4K shows reductions of approximately 48.3% for Low, 47.4% for Medium, 48.0% for High, and 48.4% for Ultra, demonstrating a nearly uniform penalty of roughly half the frame rate when moving from 1440p to 4K.

It is important to note that the FACT PACK does not include min or max FPS values for any configuration, so the analysis relies solely on average frame rates. The absence of minimum frame rate data means the 1% or 0.1% low performance cannot be assessed, but the extremely high averages suggest that even transient drops would likely remain above playable levels.

FAQ

Q: Can this PC run Minecraft: Java Edition at 60 FPS on any settings at 4K?

A: Yes. The measured data shows all four presets at 3840x2160 exceed 60 FPS. The lowest result is the Ultra preset at 95.9 FPS average, while Low averages 245.8 FPS, Medium averages 198.6 FPS, and High averages 156 FPS.

Q: What is the highest frame rate recorded for this combination?

A: The highest average frame rate in the dataset is 606.3 FPS, achieved at 1920x1080 with the Low preset. This is more than ten times the 60 FPS playable threshold.

Q: How much performance is lost when moving from 1080p to 4K at the same settings?

A: The performance penalty varies by preset. At Ultra, the average drops from 297.5 FPS at 1080p to 95.9 FPS at 4K, a reduction of approximately 67.8%. At Low, the drop is from 606.3 FPS to 245.8 FPS, a reduction of roughly 59.5%.

Q: Which preset should be used for a 1440p high-refresh-rate monitor?

A: The Ultra preset at 2560x1440 averages 186 FPS, which is sufficient for most high-refresh-rate displays. If targeting a 240 Hz monitor, the High preset at 300.1 FPS or Medium at 377.5 FPS would be more appropriate.

Q: Is the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER the limiting factor at any resolution?

A: The data does not isolate component bottlenecks, but the consistent frame rate scaling across resolutions suggests the GPU becomes more relevant as resolution increases. At 1080p, the very high frame rates across all presets indicate the CPU's 96 MB of L3 cache and 8-core design are sufficient to feed the GPU.

Q: Does this combination rank high among tested configurations?

A: The combo ranks 242 out of 1727 tested combinations, placing it in the top 14% of all tested hardware pairings for this game.

CPU and GPU Roles

The measured FPS data reveals a clear division of labor between the AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER, with the GPU becoming more dominant as resolution and preset complexity increase. At 1920x1080, the frame rates are so high that the CPU's single-thread and cache performance likely plays a substantial role. The 5800X3D's 96 MB of shared L3 cache, a defining feature of the 3D V-Cache design, is particularly well-suited for games that rely on large working sets, and Minecraft: Java Edition's world generation and entity processing are known to benefit from such cache configurations. The CPU's benchmark scores support this interpretation: its PassMark single-thread score of 3234 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1452 indicate strong per-core performance, while the 3DMark single-thread score of 884 and 2-thread score of 1746 reinforce that the CPU can sustain high instruction throughput even with limited thread utilization.

As resolution increases to 2560x1440 and then 3840x2160, the frame rate drops proportionally more at higher presets, which points to the GPU becoming the primary constraint. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER's 16 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 256-bit bus provides 672.3 GB/s of bandwidth, and its 44.10 TFLOPS of FP32 compute are substantial, yet the data shows that pixel fill rate and shading demands at 4K Ultra push the average down to 95.9 FPS. The GPU's own benchmark scores, including a PassMark G3D score of 31811 and a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5569, place it in the 76th percentile of all GPUs, indicating strong but not top-tier absolute performance.

The scaling between presets at each resolution further clarifies the component roles. At 1080p, moving from Low to Ultra reduces the average from 606.3 FPS to 297.5 FPS, a drop of 50.9%. At 4K, the same preset change reduces the average from 245.8 FPS to 95.9 FPS, a drop of 61.0%. The larger percentage drop at 4K suggests that the GPU's compute and memory resources are more heavily taxed at higher resolutions, while at 1080p the CPU's ability to feed frames becomes a more significant factor. The fact that the 5800X3D's 3DMark max-threads score of 7285 is only slightly above its 8-thread score of 5906 suggests that the CPU scales well with additional threads, but the single-thread score of 884 indicates that per-core performance is the more critical metric for this game's primary thread.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The nearestRivals data for both the CPU and GPU provides context for what other hardware would behave similarly in this combination. For the AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D, the closest rivals by average benchmark score are the AMD Ryzen 7 6800U with an average score of 27887 and a delta of 0%, the Intel Core i9-10900K at 27872 with a delta of 0.1%, the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 at 27932 with a delta of -0.1%, and the Intel Core i5-12600KF at 27799 with a delta of 0.3%. The 5800X3D's average benchmark score of 27896 places it essentially at parity with these four processors, meaning any of them would likely produce similar frame rates in Minecraft: Java Edition when paired with the same GPU, assuming the game's performance is not heavily dependent on features unique to the 5800X3D's cache design.

For the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER, the nearest rivals by average score are the NVIDIA Quadro M5000 at 31206 with a delta of -0.4%, the NVIDIA GRID M60-1Q at 31220 with a delta of -0.4%, the NVIDIA RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell at 31532 with a delta of -1.4%, and the NVIDIA TITAN RTX at 31676 with a delta of -1.9%. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER's average benchmark score of 31087 is slightly below all four of these rivals, with the TITAN RTX being 1.9% faster on average. In the context of Minecraft: Java Edition, these deltas are small enough that the measured FPS would be nearly identical, likely within a few frames per second at most settings. The Quadro M5000 and GRID M60-1Q are professional or virtualized GPUs that might have different driver optimizations, but the raw compute scores suggest similar gaming performance for this title.

It is notably the CPU rivals listed include both desktop and mobile parts, with the Ryzen 7 6800U being a low-power mobile processor. Its average score of 27887 is essentially identical to the 5800X3D, but in a real-world gaming scenario, the 6800U's power constraints could limit sustained performance. The benchmark data alone does not account for thermal or power throttling behavior.

Best Settings per Resolution

The verdictByResolution data identifies the most demanding preset that maintains at least 60 FPS average at each resolution. Since all presets at all resolutions clear the 60 FPS threshold, the best settings are simply the Ultra preset for every resolution. At 3840x2160, the Ultra preset averages 95.9 FPS, which is the only configuration in the entire dataset that falls below 100 FPS but still comfortably exceeds the playable threshold by 35.9 FPS. At 2560x1440, the Ultra preset averages 186 FPS, providing a significant margin for high-refresh-rate displays. At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset averages 297.5 FPS, which is more than sufficient for any consumer display and leaves substantial headroom for recording or streaming overhead.

The fact that the Ultra preset is achievable at all three resolutions indicates that this hardware combination has no meaningful compromise at any tested setting. The lowest frame rate in the entire dataset, 95.9 FPS at 4K Ultra, is still nearly 60% above the playable threshold. This suggests that the primary consideration for users is not whether the game runs smoothly, but rather whether their display's refresh rate can take full advantage of the available frames. For a 60 Hz display, every preset at every resolution is effectively maxed out. For a 144 Hz display, the 4K Ultra preset at 95.9 FPS would not fully saturate the refresh rate, but dropping to 4K High at 156 FPS or 4K Medium at 198.6 FPS would.

The Verdict

The data unequivocally shows that this PC can run Minecraft: Java Edition at or above 60 FPS on every tested resolution and preset combination. At 3840x2160, the playable settings include High, Low, Medium, and Ultra, with the best settings being Ultra at an average of 95.9 FPS. At 2560x1440, all four presets are playable, with Ultra averaging 186 FPS. At 1920x1080, all four presets are playable, with Ultra averaging 297.5 FPS. The playable threshold is defined as 60 FPS, and the lowest measured result across all 12 configurations is 95.9 FPS, meaning there is no scenario in the dataset where the frame rate falls below the threshold.

The performance margins are substantial enough that even future updates or modded gameplay that increases CPU or GPU load would likely remain playable, though the FACT PACK does not include data on modded or heavily populated worlds. The combination of the 5800X3D's large L3 cache and the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER's high compute throughput suggests that both typical and demanding gameplay scenarios are well within the capabilities of this hardware. The only limitation is the lack of min FPS data, so stutter or frame-time spikes cannot be ruled out, but the average frame rates are so high that even a 50% drop would still exceed 60 FPS in most configurations.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo rank for this specific pairing in Minecraft: Java Edition is 242 out of 1727 tested combinations, placing it in the top 14.0% of all tested hardware configurations. This rank reflects the overall performance of the CPU and GPU pairing across the measured resolutions and presets. The 5800X3D's percentileVsAllCpus of 80 and the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER's percentileVsAllGpus of 76 both indicate that these components are in the upper quartile of their respective categories, and their combined rank in the 86th percentile of tested combos is consistent with that positioning.

The rank of 242 suggests that there are 241 tested combinations that achieve higher overall performance in this game, which is plausible given that the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER, while strong, is not the fastest GPU in the GeForce 40-series lineup, and the 5800X3D, despite its cache advantage, is an older Zen 3 part that has been succeeded by newer architectures. However, the measured FPS data shows that the absolute performance is so high that the practical difference between this combo and higher-ranked ones would only be visible on very high refresh rate displays or in extreme modded scenarios. For the vast majority of players with standard 60 Hz to 240 Hz monitors, this combination delivers more than enough frame rate at any resolution.