Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Minecraft: Java Edition
Action 2023

Minecraft: Java Edition

75%
Great Match Your system meets recommended requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
463 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
179 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
292 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
114 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
150 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
58 FPS
3.4ms Frame Time
5ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 33,226
Your CPU 27,896
Graphics Card
Required 26,068
Your GPU 17,639

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 58 96 119 150
1440p QHD 114 181 231 292
1080p Full HD 179 293 363 463

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 293
1920x1080 Low 463
1920x1080 Medium 363
1920x1080 Ultra 179
2560x1440 High 181
2560x1440 Low 292
2560x1440 Medium 231
2560x1440 Ultra 114
3840x2160 High 96
3840x2160 Low 150
3840x2160 Medium 119
3840x2160 Ultra 58

Performance Analysis: Minecraft: Java Edition on Your System

The AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 delivers playable frame rates in Minecraft: Java Edition across all tested resolutions, with the sole exception of 4K Ultra, which falls below the 60 FPS threshold. The data shows that this combination is well-suited for high-refresh 1080p and 1440p gaming, and remains capable at 4K with settings reduced to High. The CPU’s strong single-thread performance and large L3 cache, combined with the GPU’s 8 GB GDDR6 memory and 272 GB/s bandwidth, produce a balanced system that handles the game’s demands effectively.

Best Settings per Resolution

The most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS at each resolution is as follows:

  • 3840x2160 (4K): High settings, averaging 95.5 FPS. Ultra settings drop to 57.7 FPS, below the 60 FPS threshold. Low and Medium also clear 60 FPS, at 150 FPS and 118.9 FPS respectively.
  • 2560x1440 (1440p): Ultra settings, averaging 114 FPS. All presets are playable: Low 292 FPS, Medium 230.6 FPS, High 180.6 FPS, and Ultra 114 FPS.
  • 1920x1080 (1080p): Ultra settings, averaging 178.6 FPS. All presets are playable: Low 462.8 FPS, Medium 362.7 FPS, High 292.9 FPS, and Ultra 178.6 FPS.

At 4K, the gap between High and Ultra is significant—95.5 FPS versus 57.7 FPS—meaning that players seeking the highest visual fidelity at 4K must accept a frame rate below the playable threshold. At 1440p and 1080p, even the most demanding preset leaves ample headroom for high-refresh monitors.

CPU and GPU Roles

The measured FPS scaling across resolutions and presets reveals how the CPU and GPU each contribute to performance. At 1080p, the average FPS ranges from 462.8 at Low to 178.6 at Ultra, a reduction of 61%. At 4K, the range is 150 at Low to 57.7 at Ultra, a reduction of 61.5%. The similar relative drop indicates that the impact of settings is consistent regardless of resolution. However, the absolute FPS at 4K is much lower: High settings drop from 292.9 FPS at 1080p to 95.5 FPS at 4K, a 67% reduction. This pattern suggests that the GPU becomes the primary limiting factor as resolution increases, since the pixel workload grows substantially.

The CPU’s benchmark scores support this interpretation. The Ryzen 7 5800X3D achieves a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1452 and a multi-core score of 14317, with a large 96 MB L3 cache. These figures indicate strong single-thread performance, which is critical for maintaining high frame rates at lower resolutions where CPU overhead is more pronounced. At 1080p Low, the system reaches 462.8 FPS, more than three times the 4K Low result of 150 FPS. This disparity aligns with the GPU’s rendering load: the RTX 4060’s Passmark G3D score is 19545, and its memory bandwidth is 272 GB/s, which are moderate values that become stressed at 4K Ultra.

In summary, the data shows that at 1080p and 1440p, the CPU is not a bottleneck—the frame rates are high enough to be limited by the GPU’s pixel throughput. At 4K, the GPU’s capabilities are the deciding factor, as evidenced by the Ultra preset falling below 60 FPS. The CPU’s strong single-thread performance and large cache ensure that it can keep up with the GPU’s output at all tested resolutions.

FAQ

Q: Can this combo run Minecraft at 4K with all settings maxed?

A: No. At 4K Ultra, the average FPS is 57.7, below the 60 FPS threshold. The highest playable setting at 4K is High, which averages 95.5 FPS.

Q: What is the best setting for 1440p?

A: Ultra, with an average of 114 FPS. All presets at 1440p exceed 60 FPS, but Ultra provides the highest visual quality while maintaining a comfortable frame rate.

Q: What is the best setting for 1080p?

A: Ultra, with an average of 178.6 FPS. This leaves substantial headroom for high-refresh displays, and even the most demanding preset stays well above 60 FPS.

Q: How does this combo rank among all tested combinations?

A: It ranks 993rd out of 1727 tested combinations, placing it in the upper-middle tier. The CPU is in the 80th percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU is in the 61st percentile of all GPUs, indicating that the CPU is relatively stronger than the GPU in this pairing.

Q: Which components are closest in performance to the CPU and GPU?

A: The CPU’s nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Intel Core i9-10900K, AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340, and Intel Core i5-12600KF, with average benchmark scores within 0.3% of the 5800X3D. The GPU’s nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon HD 7790, AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Radeon Pro 560, and AMD Radeon Pro 460, within 0.7% of the RTX 4060’s average score.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU more important for this game?

A: The data shows that at 1080p, the FPS is very high (e.g., 462.8 at Low), suggesting the CPU is not a bottleneck. At 4K, the FPS drops significantly (e.g., 95.5 at High), indicating that the GPU is the limiting factor at higher resolutions.

How This Combo Ranks

The AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 combination ranks 993rd out of 1727 tested systems in Minecraft: Java Edition. This places it in the upper-middle tier, outperforming approximately 57.5% of all tested combos. The CPU’s percentile of 80 is notably higher than the GPU’s percentile of 61, which suggests that the CPU is a stronger contributor to the overall performance than the GPU in this specific pairing. In practical terms, this means the system is well-balanced for CPU-intensive scenarios, but the GPU may hold back the CPU at very high resolutions or with demanding settings.

The rank reflects the measured FPS data: the system achieves playable frame rates at all resolutions except 4K Ultra. At 1080p and 1440p, the FPS is high enough to take advantage of high-refresh monitors, while at 4K, the system still delivers smooth gameplay on High settings. The combination’s position in the rankings is consistent with its component-level strengths—the CPU’s strong single-thread performance and the GPU’s moderate but capable specifications.

Similar Performance Alternatives

For the CPU, the nearest rivals based on average benchmark score are the AMD Ryzen 7 6800U (delta 0%), Intel Core i9-10900K (delta 0.1%), AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 (delta -0.1%), and Intel Core i5-12600KF (delta 0.3%). These processors have average scores within 0.3% of the 5800X3D, meaning they would likely deliver similar CPU-bound performance in Minecraft: Java Edition. The Ryzen 7 6800U is particularly close, with an identical average score.

For the GPU, the nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon HD 7790 (delta -0.2%), AMD Radeon 780M (delta 0.3%), AMD Radeon Pro 560 (delta 0.5%), and AMD Radeon Pro 460 (delta 0.7%). These GPUs have average scores within 0.7% of the RTX 4060, indicating comparable graphics throughput. While the RTX 4060 offers modern features like ray tracing and DLSS, the raw performance is similar to these older or integrated alternatives, so frame rates in this game would be close.

When considering a system with similar overall performance, pairing any of these CPUs with any of these GPUs would likely yield FPS numbers in the same range as the measured results. However, the exact combination matters, as the CPU and GPU interact to determine the final frame rate.

The Verdict

This PC can run Minecraft: Java Edition at 60+ FPS at 1080p and 1440p on Ultra settings, and at 4K on High settings. At 4K Ultra, the average FPS drops to 57.7, just below the 60 FPS threshold, so that preset is not recommended for a smooth experience. For the best visual quality, use Ultra at 1080p or 1440p, and High at 4K. The system’s strong CPU performance ensures high frame rates at lower resolutions, while the GPU’s capabilities are sufficient for 4K gaming with a modest settings reduction. Overall, this combination is a capable choice for Minecraft: Java Edition, delivering playable performance across the board.