Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Minecraft: Java Edition
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 106 | 170 | 210 | 266 |
| 1440p QHD | 202 | 322 | 404 | 512 |
| 1080p Full HD | 315 | 508 | 594 | 647 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Minecraft: Java Edition on Your System
The AMD Ryzen 7 5800X paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER delivers exceptional performance in Minecraft: Java Edition, with measured frame rates that far exceed the 60 FPS playability threshold across every resolution and preset combination tested. The data shows a system capable of running the game at maximum settings even at 4K, with headroom that suggests the primary bottleneck shifts between CPU and GPU depending on resolution and graphical load.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the combination produces some of the highest frame rates recorded in the dataset. The Low preset yields an average of 647.3 FPS, which serves as the absolute ceiling for this configuration at this resolution. Moving to Medium settings, the average drops to 594 FPS, a reduction of 53.3 FPS or roughly 8.2% from Low. The High preset averages 508.4 FPS, while the most demanding Ultra preset still maintains a robust 315.4 FPS average. The scaling from Low to Ultra at 1080p shows a total performance reduction of 331.9 FPS, indicating that the game’s graphical settings have a significant impact on frame output even when the CPU is heavily loaded.
At 2560x1440, the same pattern emerges but with lower absolute values. The Low preset averages 511.8 FPS, which is 135.5 FPS lower than the 1080p Low result. Medium follows at 404 FPS, High at 322 FPS, and Ultra at 202.1 FPS. The delta between Low and Ultra at this resolution is 309.7 FPS, slightly less than at 1080p. Notably, the 1440p High result of 322 FPS is nearly identical to the 1080p Ultra result of 315.4 FPS, suggesting that resolution scaling and preset scaling interact in a predictable manner.
At 3840x2160, the frame rates remain remarkably high for a 4K workload. The Low preset averages 266 FPS, Medium drops to 210 FPS, and High reaches 170.2 FPS. The Ultra preset, which represents the most demanding configuration, still averages 106.3 FPS. This value is particularly telling because it stays comfortably above the 60 FPS threshold while running the game at its highest visual quality. The gap between Low and Ultra at 4K is 159.7 FPS, which is the smallest absolute difference across all resolutions, indicating that the GPU is becoming a more significant factor as pixel count increases.
Every measured FPS value in the dataset includes only average frame rates; no minimum or maximum FPS figures were recorded. This means the analysis relies solely on average performance, which typically represents the sustained frame output rather than transient spikes or drops. The absence of min/max data does not diminish the overall conclusion, as even the lowest average of 106.3 FPS at 4K Ultra leaves considerable margin above the 60 FPS playability threshold.
Best Settings per Resolution
At 1920x1080, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Ultra, which averages 315.4 FPS. This is the maximum quality setting available, and the system handles it with more than five times the required frame rate. The data shows no reason to compromise on quality at this resolution, as even the heaviest load leaves substantial performance headroom.
At 2560x1440, the Ultra preset again qualifies as the best setting, averaging 202.1 FPS. This represents a 113.3 FPS reduction compared to the 1080p Ultra result, but still more than triples the 60 FPS threshold. The scaling from 1080p to 1440p at Ultra settings shows a 35.9% performance decrease, which is consistent with the increased pixel count taxing the GPU more heavily.
At 3840x2160, the Ultra preset averages 106.3 FPS, making it the best playable setting at this resolution as well. This is the only resolution where the Ultra result falls below 200 FPS, yet it remains 46.3 FPS above the playability threshold. The data indicates that this combination can run Minecraft at maximum settings in 4K without any need to reduce graphical fidelity. Across all three resolutions, the verdict data confirms that Ultra is the recommended setting, with average frame rates of 315.4 FPS, 202.1 FPS, and 106.3 FPS for 1080p, 1440p, and 4K respectively.
CPU and GPU Roles
The scaling between resolutions and presets provides insight into which component limits performance in Minecraft: Java Edition. At 1920x1080, the difference between Low and Ultra is 331.9 FPS, which is the largest preset-to-preset delta across all resolutions. This suggests that at lower resolutions, the CPU plays a more dominant role, as the GPU has ample capacity to render frames quickly, and the game’s single-threaded nature becomes the limiting factor.
As resolution increases to 2560x1440, the Low-to-Ultra delta narrows to 309.7 FPS. The absolute frame rates drop across all presets, but the relative ordering remains unchanged. At 3840x2160, the Low-to-Ultra delta shrinks further to 159.7 FPS, indicating that the GPU is increasingly responsible for performance as pixel count rises. The 4K Ultra result of 106.3 FPS versus the 1080p Ultra result of 315.4 FPS shows a 209.1 FPS reduction, which is a 66.3% decrease. This substantial drop points to the GPU becoming the primary constraint at higher resolutions.
The CPU’s role is evident in the 1080p results, where even at Ultra settings the frame rate exceeds 300 FPS. The Ryzen 7 5800X, with its 8 cores and 16 threads based on the Zen 3 architecture, provides enough single-thread performance to feed the RTX 4080 SUPER at lower resolutions. The GPU’s role becomes more pronounced at 4K, where the 16 GB of GDDR6X memory and 736.3 GB/s bandwidth are exercised more fully. The data suggests that at 1080p and 1440p, the CPU is the more significant factor, while at 4K, the GPU takes over as the limiting component.
Similar Performance Alternatives
The nearest rivals for the AMD Ryzen 7 5800X provide context for CPU-bound scenarios. The Intel Core Ultra 5 135H has an average benchmark score of 29093, which is 0.1% lower than the Ryzen 7 5800X’s average of 29123. This indicates near-identical performance in synthetic tests. The Intel Xeon Phi 7210 scores 29245, sitting 0.4% higher, while the Intel Core i5-13500HX scores 29270, 0.5% higher. The AMD Ryzen 5 5600XT scores 28940, which is 0.6% lower. These delta values are all within a narrow band, meaning any of these CPUs would produce similar frame rates in CPU-limited scenarios at 1080p.
For the GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER has an average benchmark score of 54209. Its closest rival is the standard NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 with a score of 54247, just 0.1% higher. The AMD Radeon Pro W5700X scores 54828, 1.1% higher, while the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB scores 55698, 2.7% higher. The AMD Radeon 8060S scores 55757, 2.8% higher. These differences are small enough that in GPU-bound scenarios at 4K Ultra, swapping to any of these cards would yield frame rates within a few percent of the measured 106.3 FPS.
The combination of these rival components suggests that a system with any of the listed CPUs paired with any of the listed GPUs would perform nearly identically to the tested configuration. The percentile rankings reinforce this: the CPU sits at the 81st percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU sits at the 86th percentile among all GPUs, placing both in the upper tier of available hardware.
How This Combo Ranks
The combination of the AMD Ryzen 7 5800X and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER ranks 137th out of 1727 tested combos in Minecraft: Java Edition. This places it in the top 7.9% of all configurations tested, which is a strong showing given the game’s reputation for being CPU-intensive. The rank reflects the measured FPS data across all resolutions and presets, with the system’s ability to maintain high frame rates at 4K Ultra being a key contributor to its position.
The percentile versus all CPUs of 81 and versus all GPUs of 86 indicate that both components are above average individually, and their combination yields a result that outperforms the vast majority of tested systems. The rank of 137 out of 1727 suggests that while many configurations can run Minecraft well, few can match the consistent high frame rates this combo delivers at maximum settings across all resolutions.
The Verdict
This PC can run Minecraft: Java Edition with exceptional results. At 1920x1080, all four presets clear 60 FPS, with the Ultra preset averaging 315.4 FPS. At 2560x1440, the Ultra preset averages 202.1 FPS, again clearing the threshold with massive headroom. At 3840x2160, the Ultra preset averages 106.3 FPS, which is 46.3 FPS above the 60 FPS playability threshold.
The verdict data confirms that every resolution and preset combination is playable, with the most demanding scenario—4K Ultra—still delivering nearly double the required frame rate. The system never dips below 106.3 FPS in any tested configuration, and at lower resolutions, frame rates exceed 500 FPS on multiple presets. For users with high-refresh-rate monitors, this combination can fully utilize displays up to 240 Hz at 1080p and 1440p, and even at 4K, the frame rates are sufficient for smooth gameplay on standard 60 Hz displays.
FAQ
Q: What is the highest average FPS this combination achieves at 1080p?
A: The highest average FPS at 1920x1080 is 647.3 FPS, achieved with the Low preset. The Medium preset averages 594 FPS, High averages 508.4 FPS, and Ultra averages 315.4 FPS.
Q: Can this system handle 4K Ultra settings?
A: Yes, the 3840x2160 Ultra preset averages 106.3 FPS, which is well above the 60 FPS playability threshold. All other presets at 4K—Low at 266 FPS, Medium at 210 FPS, and High at 170.2 FPS—also exceed the threshold.
Q: How does the RTX 4080 SUPER compare to the standard RTX 4080?
A: The RTX 4080 SUPER has an average benchmark score of 54209, while the standard RTX 4080 scores 54247. The delta is 0.1%, meaning the standard RTX 4080 is marginally faster in synthetic tests, but the difference is negligible in real-world gaming.
Q: Which component is more important at 1440p?
A: At 2560x1440, the CPU still plays a significant role, as evidenced by the 511.8 FPS Low preset result versus 202.1 FPS at Ultra. The 309.7 FPS delta between Low and Ultra suggests that both CPU and GPU are active contributors, but the CPU’s influence is more pronounced at lower graphical settings.
Q: What is the combo’s rank among all tested systems?
A: This combination ranks 137th out of 1727 tested combos in Minecraft: Java Edition, placing it in the top 7.9% of all configurations. The CPU sits at the 81st percentile among all CPUs, and the GPU at the 86th percentile among all GPUs.
Q: Is there any resolution where the frame rate drops below 60 FPS?
A: No. The lowest average FPS recorded across all resolutions and presets is 106.3 FPS at 3840x2160 with Ultra settings. Every other combination of resolution and preset produces higher average frame rates, with the 1080p Low preset reaching as high as 647.3 FPS.