Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Minecraft: Java Edition
Action 2023

Minecraft: Java Edition

78%
Great Match Your system meets recommended requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
431 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
168 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
271 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
108 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
139 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
54 FPS
3.7ms Frame Time
6ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 33,226
Your CPU 27,051
Graphics Card
Required 26,068
Your GPU 20,282

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 54 89 112 139
1440p QHD 108 168 213 271
1080p Full HD 168 269 341 431

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 269
1920x1080 Low 431
1920x1080 Medium 341
1920x1080 Ultra 168
2560x1440 High 168
2560x1440 Low 271
2560x1440 Medium 213
2560x1440 Ultra 108
3840x2160 High 89
3840x2160 Low 139
3840x2160 Medium 112
3840x2160 Ultra 54

Performance Analysis: Minecraft: Java Edition on Your System

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700G paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER is a highly capable combination for Minecraft: Java Edition, delivering playable performance across nearly every setting tier tested. The data shows that at 1080p and 1440p, the system clears the 60 FPS threshold even at the most demanding Ultra preset, while 4K remains highly playable at High settings with a substantial frame rate buffer. This configuration ranks 1063 out of 1727 tested combos for this title, placing it in the upper portion of the database.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The recorded measurements provide a clear picture of performance scaling across three resolutions and four quality presets. At 1920x1080, the system produces exceptional frame rates. The Low preset averages 430.5 FPS, which is the highest recorded result for this configuration. Moving to Medium drops the average to 341.2 FPS, while High settles at 268.9 FPS. The Ultra preset, the most demanding setting tested, still maintains an average of 167.6 FPS, leaving a massive margin above the 60 FPS playability threshold.

At 2560x1440, the performance remains very strong but shows the expected impact of increased pixel count. The Low preset averages 271 FPS, a substantial reduction from the 1080p result but still extremely high. Medium produces an average of 213.4 FPS, and High delivers 168.2 FPS. The Ultra preset at this resolution averages 108 FPS, which is comfortably above the playability threshold and demonstrates that the GPU and CPU combination can handle demanding settings at higher resolutions.

The 3840x2160 results show where the system begins to feel the pressure. The Low preset averages 139.4 FPS, which remains very smooth. Medium averages 112.2 FPS, and High delivers 89 FPS. The Ultra preset at 4K drops to an average of 53.5 FPS, falling below the 60 FPS threshold and representing the only setting tested that is not considered playable. The scaling from 1440p to 4K at Ultra shows a reduction of roughly half the frame rate, indicating that the 4K Ultra preset is the primary limitation for this hardware in this game.

Best Settings per Resolution

For 1920x1080, the best setting that stays at or above 60 FPS is Ultra, with an average of 167.6 FPS. This is the most demanding preset available, and the system handles it with significant headroom, meaning users can enjoy maximum quality without any performance concerns.

At 2560x1440, the best setting is also Ultra, averaging 108 FPS. This result is particularly notable because it shows the system can maintain high frame rates at a higher resolution while using the most demanding preset, making it a strong choice for high refresh rate monitors at this resolution.

For 3840x2160, the best playable setting is High, averaging 89 FPS. The Ultra preset at this resolution falls short at 53.5 FPS, so High represents the optimal balance for 4K gaming. The data indicates that Medium and Low are also playable at 4K, but High offers the best visual quality while remaining comfortably above the 60 FPS threshold.

FAQ

Q: Can this system run Minecraft: Java Edition at 4K Ultra settings?

A: No. The measured average FPS at 3840x2160 with Ultra settings is 53.5 FPS, which falls below the 60 FPS playability threshold. The best playable setting at 4K is High, which averages 89 FPS.

Q: What is the highest frame rate recorded for this configuration?

A: The highest average FPS recorded is 430.5 FPS, achieved at 1920x1080 with Low settings. The next highest results are 341.2 FPS at 1080p Medium and 271 FPS at 1440p Low.

Q: Is the Ultra preset playable at 1440p?

A: Yes. The measured average FPS at 2560x1440 with Ultra settings is 108 FPS, well above the 60 FPS threshold. This makes Ultra the best playable setting at this resolution.

Q: How does performance scale from 1080p to 4K at High settings?

A: At 1920x1080 High, the average is 268.9 FPS. At 2560x1440 High, it drops to 168.2 FPS. At 3840x2160 High, it drops further to 89 FPS. The scaling shows a consistent reduction as resolution increases.

Q: Which settings are considered playable at 4K?

A: The database lists High, Low, and Medium as playable settings at 3840x2160. High is the best playable setting with an average of 89 FPS, while Low averages 139.4 FPS and Medium averages 112.2 FPS.

Q: Does the system meet the 60 FPS threshold at 1080p with all presets?

A: Yes. All four presets at 1920x1080 exceed 60 FPS. The lowest result at this resolution is 167.6 FPS on Ultra, while High averages 268.9 FPS, Medium averages 341.2 FPS, and Low averages 430.5 FPS.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The nearest rivals for the AMD Ryzen 7 5700G provide context for its processing capability. The Intel Core i9-9900K has an average benchmark score of 27097, which is 0.2% lower than the Ryzen 7 5700G. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 445 scores 26936, placing it 0.4% behind. The Intel Core i5-14400T scores 27166, which is 0.4% ahead, and the Intel Core i7-1370P scores 26900, sitting 0.6% behind. These four processors are effectively in the same performance band, meaning any of them would likely produce very similar frame rates in Minecraft: Java Edition when paired with the same GPU.

For the GPU side, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER has several close rivals. The NVIDIA Quadro M4000M has an average score of 20480, which is 1% lower. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile scores 20534, coming in 1.2% lower. The Intel Arc B570 scores 20556, also 1.2% lower, and the Intel Arc A750 scores 20582, which is 1.5% lower. The tight clustering of these scores indicates that any of these GPUs would deliver nearly identical performance in this title, though the RTX 2070 SUPER holds a slight edge over each of them.

CPU and GPU Roles

The benchmark results indicate that this game is highly responsive to both resolution scaling and preset changes, which points to the GPU being the primary factor at higher resolutions. At 1080p, the frame rates are extraordinarily high across all presets, with Low hitting 430.5 FPS and Ultra still reaching 167.6 FPS. The gap between Low and Ultra at 1080p is roughly 263 FPS, showing that settings have a major impact on the rendering load.

As resolution increases to 1440p, the frame rates drop across the board. The Low preset falls from 430.5 FPS to 271 FPS, a reduction of about 37%. At 4K, the Low preset averages 139.4 FPS, which is nearly half of the 1440p result. This consistent decline with resolution indicates that the GPU is the limiting factor at higher pixel counts, as the CPU workload from Minecraft: Java Edition does not scale as dramatically with resolution.

The CPU still plays a meaningful role, particularly at 1080p where the frame rates are high enough to stress single-thread performance. The Ryzen 7 5700G has a single-thread benchmark score of 899 in 3dmark and a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1494, which are solid results for a desktop processor. At 1080p Low, the system reaches 430.5 FPS, a level where the CPU can become a bottleneck in many games, but the recorded data shows the combination still delivers extreme frame rates.

At 4K, the GPU role becomes dominant. The Ultra preset drops to 53.5 FPS, while High stays at 89 FPS, a difference of 35.5 FPS between just two settings. This sensitivity to preset changes at 4K confirms that the RTX 2070 SUPER is the component determining the ceiling at this resolution. The CPU, with its 8 cores and 16 threads, provides ample headroom for the game's logic and chunk processing, but the rendering load at 4K Ultra exceeds what the GPU can manage.

The Verdict

The data clearly shows that this PC can run Minecraft: Java Edition with excellent performance at most settings. At 1920x1080, all presets are playable, with Ultra averaging 167.6 FPS and Low reaching 430.5 FPS. At 2560x1440, all presets are also playable, including Ultra at 108 FPS. At 3840x2160, the system maintains playability at High, Medium, and Low settings, with High being the best option at 89 FPS. The only configuration that fails to clear the 60 FPS threshold is 4K Ultra at 53.5 FPS. Users targeting 1080p or 1440p can enable maximum settings without concern, while 4K users should stick to High for a smooth experience.