Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Minecraft: Java Edition
Action 2023

Minecraft: Java Edition

88%
Great Match Your system meets recommended requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
620 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
317 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
511 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
202 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
268 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
104 FPS
2ms Frame Time
3ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 33,226
Your CPU 25,517
Graphics Card
Required 26,068
Your GPU 54,209

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 104 165 211 268
1440p QHD 202 322 403 511
1080p Full HD 317 510 568 620

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 510
1920x1080 Low 620
1920x1080 Medium 568
1920x1080 Ultra 317
2560x1440 High 322
2560x1440 Low 511
2560x1440 Medium 403
2560x1440 Ultra 202
3840x2160 High 165
3840x2160 Low 268
3840x2160 Medium 211
3840x2160 Ultra 104

Performance Analysis: Minecraft: Java Edition on Your System

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700 paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER delivers overwhelming performance in Minecraft: Java Edition, with every tested preset at every resolution landing far above the 60 FPS playability threshold. The data shows a combination that is effectively bottlenecked by the game’s engine at lower resolutions, yet still produces triple-digit frame rates even at 4K Ultra. This analysis breaks down the measured FPS across resolutions and settings, examines the CPU/GPU balance, and contextualizes the combo’s standing among 1,727 tested configurations.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data for this combo covers three resolutions (1920x1080, 2560x1440, 3840x2160) and four settings presets (Low, Medium, High, Ultra). All figures are average FPS; no min or max values were recorded in the dataset.

At 1920x1080, the combo produces its highest raw numbers. The Low preset averages 619.5 FPS, which drops to 567.8 FPS on Medium, 509.9 FPS on High, and 317.1 FPS on Ultra. The gap between Low and Ultra is substantial—302.4 FPS—showing that the Ultra preset imposes a significant load increase even at 1080p. Still, even the most demanding setting at this resolution nearly quintuples the 60 FPS playability threshold.

Moving to 2560x1440, the frame rates remain exceptionally high but show a clear scaling pattern. Low averages 510.7 FPS, Medium 403.1 FPS, High 322 FPS, and Ultra 201.9 FPS. The drop from Low to Ultra is 308.8 FPS, slightly larger than at 1080p. Notably, the 1440p Ultra figure of 201.9 FPS is still more than triple the playability threshold, indicating that resolution scaling has a moderate but not crippling effect.

At 3840x2160, the performance curve steepens considerably. Low averages 267.8 FPS, Medium 211.4 FPS, High 165.4 FPS, and Ultra 103.7 FPS. The difference between Low and Ultra here is 164.1 FPS—a smaller absolute gap than at lower resolutions, but the percentage drop is steeper. The Ultra preset at 4K is the only configuration tested that falls below 200 FPS, yet it still exceeds 100 FPS, comfortably clearing the 60 FPS threshold.

Across all resolutions, the pattern holds: Low always produces the highest FPS, Ultra the lowest, with Medium and High in between. The scaling from 1080p to 1440p to 4K is consistent, with each resolution step roughly halving the frame rate at a given preset. For example, High goes from 509.9 FPS at 1080p to 322 FPS at 1440p (a 36.8% reduction) to 165.4 FPS at 4K (a 48.6% reduction from 1440p). The data indicates that no setting or resolution combination comes close to failing the 60 FPS requirement.

CPU and GPU Roles

Benchmark results indicate that this game, at these settings, is heavily dependent on both components but in different proportions depending on resolution. The Ryzen 7 5700, with 8 cores and 16 threads based on Zen 3 architecture, provides strong single-thread performance—evidenced by its 3DMark single-thread score of 901 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2916. Minecraft: Java Edition is known for being single-thread bound, so the CPU’s 3.70 GHz base and 4.60 GHz boost clocks are critical.

At 1920x1080, the CPU appears to be the primary limiter. The frame rate differences between Low (619.5 FPS) and High (509.9 FPS) are modest relative to the 4K scaling, suggesting that the CPU’s single-thread capacity caps performance before the GPU becomes saturated. The RTX 4080 SUPER, with its 10240 shading units and 52.22 TFLOPS FP32 performance, is far more powerful than what 1080p demands. The fact that Low at 1080p is only 21.5% faster than High (619.5 vs 509.9 FPS) reinforces that the CPU is the bottleneck.

As resolution increases to 2560x1440, the GPU begins to take on more responsibility. The scaling from Low to High at 1440p shows a 36.9% drop (510.7 to 322 FPS), which is steeper than at 1080p. This indicates the RTX 4080 SUPER’s fillrate and bandwidth—736.3 GB/s memory bandwidth on a 256-bit bus—are being utilized more heavily. However, the CPU still plays a significant role, as the 1440p Ultra frame rate of 201.9 FPS is still well above what a GPU-bound scenario would produce for this title.

At 3840x2160, the GPU becomes the dominant factor. The Ultra preset at 4K (103.7 FPS) is only 31.4% of the 1080p Ultra figure (317.1 FPS), showing a steep scaling curve that points to GPU limitations. The RTX 4080 SUPER’s 16 GB of GDDR6X memory and 285.6 GPixel/s pixel rate are being pushed hard at 4K Ultra. Yet even here, the CPU is not entirely idle: the difference between Low (267.8 FPS) and Ultra (103.7 FPS) at 4K is a 61.3% reduction, which is more than pure GPU scaling would suggest, indicating the CPU still influences frame pacing.

The data shows a clear handoff: at 1080p the CPU is the primary constraint, at 1440p the balance shifts toward the GPU, and at 4K the GPU is the clear bottleneck. This is consistent with the CPU’s 78th percentile ranking among all CPUs and the GPU’s 86th percentile among all GPUs—both are strong, but the GPU has more headroom relative to its peer group.

How This Combo Ranks

Among 1,727 tested CPU-GPU combinations for Minecraft: Java Edition, this pairing ranks 148th, placing it in the top 8.6% of all configs. That percentile is higher than either component’s individual standing—the CPU sits at the 78th percentile and the GPU at the 86th—which suggests the combination is synergistic for this game.

The combo’s rank of 148 out of 1,727 means there are 147 configurations that deliver higher average FPS in this title. Given that the measured FPS at 4K Ultra is 103.7, those higher-ranked combos must be achieving even more extreme frame rates, likely with newer or higher-tier CPUs that push single-thread performance further. The Ryzen 7 5700’s Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2916 is solid, but the top-tier CPUs in the database would exceed that.

Relative to its nearest CPU rivals, the Ryzen 7 5700 is closely matched. The Intel Xeon D-2752TER has an average score of 25530 versus the Ryzen’s 25517, a delta of -0.1%. The AMD Ryzen 5 7640U scores 25485 (0.1% slower), the Ryzen 5 6600H scores 25550 (-0.1% slower), and the Ryzen 7 5825U scores 25446 (0.3% slower). These tiny deltas mean that swapping the CPU for any of these would produce nearly identical FPS in Minecraft.

On the GPU side, the RTX 4080 SUPER’s nearest rivals are also very close. The RTX 4080 scores 54247 versus 54209 for the SUPER, a delta of -0.1%. The AMD Radeon Pro W5700X scores 54828 (-1.1%), the Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB scores 55698 (-2.7%), and the Radeon 8060S scores 55757 (-2.8%). These deltas are small enough that in Minecraft, where GPU load is moderate at best, the differences would be negligible.

The rank of 148 is driven more by CPU single-thread performance than GPU raw power. Given that the game is heavily single-thread bound, the combo’s position reflects the CPU’s 3DMark single-thread score of 901 and PassMark single-thread score of 3296. Configurations with higher single-thread scores would naturally rank higher, regardless of GPU tier.

FAQ

Q: Can this combo run Minecraft: Java Edition at 4K Ultra settings?

A: Yes. The measured average FPS at 3840x2160 with Ultra settings is 103.7 FPS, well above the 60 FPS playability threshold. All four settings presets at 4K are playable.

Q: What is the fastest preset at 1080p?

A: The Low preset yields the highest average FPS at 1920x1080, at 619.5 FPS. The Ultra preset is the slowest at that resolution, but still averages 317.1 FPS.

Q: How does the RTX 4080 SUPER compare to the regular RTX 4080 in this game?

A: The RTX 4080 SUPER has an average benchmark score of 54209, while the RTX 4080 scores 54247, a delta of -0.1%. In Minecraft, this difference is negligible, and both would produce nearly identical frame rates.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU more important for this game at 1440p?

A: At 2560x1440, the balance shifts toward the GPU, but the CPU still matters. The frame rate drops from 510.7 FPS on Low to 201.9 FPS on Ultra, indicating both components contribute. The CPU’s single-thread performance remains a factor at 1440p.

Q: What is the best settings preset at 4K?

A: The Ultra preset is playable at 4K with an average of 103.7 FPS, making it the most demanding preset that remains above 60 FPS. All lower presets also exceed 60 FPS.

Q: How does this combo rank among all tested configurations?

A: It ranks 148th out of 1,727 tested CPU-GPU combos for Minecraft: Java Edition, placing it in the top 8.6% of all configurations. This is higher than either component’s individual percentile ranking.

Similar Performance Alternatives

For users seeking similar performance, the nearest CPU rivals to the Ryzen 7 5700 offer virtually identical results. The Intel Xeon D-2752TER has an average score of 25530, just 0.1% higher than the Ryzen’s 25517. The AMD Ryzen 5 7640U scores 25485 (0.1% lower), the Ryzen 5 6600H scores 25550 (0.1% higher), and the Ryzen 7 5825U scores 25446 (0.3% lower). Any of these CPUs paired with the RTX 4080 SUPER would produce FPS figures within a fraction of a percent of the measured results.

On the GPU side, the RTX 4080 SUPER’s nearest rival is the RTX 4080 itself, with a delta of -0.1%. The AMD Radeon Pro W5700X is 1.1% slower, the Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB is 2.7% slower, and the Radeon 8060S is 2.8% slower. In Minecraft, these differences are unlikely to change the playable settings at any resolution, as the game is not heavily GPU-bound except at 4K Ultra.

A configuration using the Ryzen 7 5700 with an RTX 4080 would behave essentially identically to this combo. Similarly, swapping the CPU to a Ryzen 5 7640U or Ryzen 7 5825U would maintain the same frame rates, given the sub-0.5% score deltas. The data suggests that the combo’s rank of 148 is robust to minor component swaps within these rival groups.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset is the most demanding option that stays above 60 FPS, with an average of 317.1 FPS. Since all presets at this resolution exceed the threshold by a wide margin, users can enable Ultra without concern.

At 2560x1440, the Ultra preset also remains the best choice, averaging 201.9 FPS. This is more than triple the playability threshold, so there is no need to reduce settings for smooth gameplay.

At 3840x2160, the Ultra preset is still playable, averaging 103.7 FPS. This is the only resolution where the frame rate drops below 200 FPS, but it remains comfortably above 60 FPS. Users seeking higher frame rates could drop to High (165.4 FPS) or Medium (211.4 FPS), but the data confirms that Ultra is viable at 4K.

In summary, this combo can max out Minecraft: Java Edition at every resolution tested. The 4K Ultra figure of 103.7 FPS is the lowest measured value, yet it still provides a fluid experience. The combination of the Ryzen 7 5700’s strong single-thread performance and the RTX 4080 SUPER’s massive rasterization power ensures that no setting or resolution in this test presents a challenge.