Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Minecraft: Java Edition
Action 2023

Minecraft: Java Edition

71%
Great Match Your system meets recommended requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
461 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
182 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
294 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
113 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
153 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
60 FPS
3.4ms Frame Time
5ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 33,226
Your CPU 25,517
Graphics Card
Required 26,068
Your GPU 17,639

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 60 95 123 153
1440p QHD 113 185 231 294
1080p Full HD 182 293 365 461

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 293
1920x1080 Low 461
1920x1080 Medium 365
1920x1080 Ultra 182
2560x1440 High 185
2560x1440 Low 294
2560x1440 Medium 231
2560x1440 Ultra 113
3840x2160 High 95
3840x2160 Low 153
3840x2160 Medium 123
3840x2160 Ultra 60

Performance Analysis: Minecraft: Java Edition on Your System

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700 paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 delivers a commanding performance profile in Minecraft: Java Edition, with measured frame rates that far exceed the 60 FPS playability threshold across nearly every configuration tested. The data shows a system that is heavily overqualified for this title, with the only sub-60 FPS result occurring at the absolute maximum settings at 4K resolution. Across all other tested combinations, the combo produces frame rates ranging from 94.5 FPS to over 461 FPS, indicating substantial headroom for high-refresh-rate displays and heavy modding workloads.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data reveals a clear performance hierarchy across resolutions and presets. At 1920x1080, the combo delivers exceptional results across the board. With Low settings, the average frame rate hits 461.1 FPS, which represents the highest measured value in the entire dataset. Moving to Medium settings drops performance to 364.6 FPS, while High settings produce 292.8 FPS. Even at Ultra settings, which typically impose the heaviest load, the system maintains a robust 182.4 FPS average. These figures indicate that at 1080p, the hardware is never the limiting factor, as even the most demanding preset leaves nearly three times the headroom above the 60 FPS threshold.

At 2560x1440, performance remains extremely strong but shows the expected scaling penalty. Low settings produce 293.7 FPS, which is still remarkably high. Medium settings deliver 231.4 FPS, and High settings yield 184.9 FPS. The Ultra preset at this resolution drops to 112.5 FPS, which is still well above the playability threshold but represents a significant 39% reduction compared to the 1080p Ultra result. The scaling from 1080p to 1440p is roughly linear in terms of pixel count, and the frame rate reductions reflect this increased rendering load.

Moving to 3840x2160 (4K), the performance curve steepens considerably. Low settings still manage a strong 153.4 FPS, while Medium settings achieve 122.7 FPS. High settings produce 94.5 FPS, which remains comfortably above 60 FPS. However, the Ultra preset at 4K drops to 59.8 FPS, just barely missing the 60 FPS playability threshold. This is the only configuration in the entire dataset that falls below the threshold, and the margin is razor-thin at just 0.2 FPS. The data suggests that 4K Ultra is the boundary of this combo's capabilities, with all other settings combinations providing substantial performance margins.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The nearestRivals data for both components provides context for what other hardware would perform similarly. For the AMD Ryzen 7 5700, the closest competitors are the Intel Xeon D-2752TER with an average score of 25530 and a delta of -0.1%, the AMD Ryzen 5 7640U with a score of 25485 and a delta of 0.1%, the AMD Ryzen 5 6600H with a score of 25550 and a delta of -0.1%, and the AMD Ryzen 7 5825U with a score of 25446 and a delta of 0.3%. These deltas are all within a fraction of a percent, meaning systems built with any of these CPUs would deliver nearly identical CPU-bound performance in Minecraft: Java Edition.

For the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060, the nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon HD 7790 with an average score of 17666 and a delta of -0.2%, the AMD Radeon 780M with a score of 17588 and a delta of 0.3%, the AMD Radeon Pro 560 with a score of 17551 and a delta of 0.5%, and the AMD Radeon Pro 460 with a score of 17509 and a delta of 0.7%. The extremely tight deltas here suggest that GPU performance is closely clustered among these options, though it is worth remembering the HD 7790 is a much older architecture that may not support the same feature set as the RTX 4060. In practice, a system combining any of these rival CPUs with any of these rival GPUs would produce frame rates within a few percentage points of the measured results for this combo.

Best Settings per Resolution

The best settings for each resolution are determined by identifying the most demanding preset that still maintains an average frame rate at or above 60 FPS. At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset qualifies with an average of 182.4 FPS, making it the clear choice for maximum visual quality without sacrificing performance. At 2560x1440, the Ultra preset also qualifies with an average of 112.5 FPS, providing excellent visual fidelity while still leaving substantial refresh rate headroom. At 3840x2160, the High preset is the most demanding option that stays above 60 FPS, delivering 94.5 FPS on average. The Ultra preset at 4K falls short at 59.8 FPS, so High is the recommended maximum for this resolution.

These results indicate that the combo scales gracefully with resolution. At 1080p and 1440p, users can enable the highest quality settings without concern. At 4K, a small compromise to High settings is necessary, but the resulting 94.5 FPS average is still highly playable and smooth. The gap between High and Ultra at 4K is substantial — roughly 37% — suggesting that the Ultra preset imposes a disproportionately heavy load at this resolution.

The Verdict

The verdict data confirms that this system is fully capable of running Minecraft: Java Edition at high quality across all tested resolutions. At 1920x1080, all four settings presets are playable, with Ultra delivering 182.4 FPS. At 2560x1440, all four presets are also playable, with Ultra achieving 112.5 FPS. At 3840x2160, three of the four presets are playable — Low at 153.4 FPS, Medium at 122.7 FPS, and High at 94.5 FPS — while Ultra narrowly misses the threshold at 59.8 FPS.

The overall assessment is that this PC can unequivocally run Minecraft: Java Edition. The only caveat is that users seeking 4K resolution with the absolute highest settings will need to accept a slight compromise, either by dropping to High settings or by tolerating a frame rate that is marginally below 60 FPS. For all other configurations, the system operates with massive performance reserves, making it suitable for high-refresh-rate monitors, shader packs, and extensive modded gameplay.

CPU and GPU Roles

The performance scaling across resolutions and presets provides insight into which component plays a larger role in Minecraft: Java Edition. At 1920x1080, the frame rates are exceptionally high across all settings, with the Ultra preset still producing 182.4 FPS. This suggests that at lower resolutions, the CPU is likely the primary bottleneck, as the GPU has ample capacity to render frames quickly. The Ryzen 7 5700's strong multi-threaded performance, evidenced by its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 20655 and PassMark multi-thread score of 24303, helps sustain high frame rates even when many entities and chunks are being processed.

As resolution increases to 2560x1440, the frame rates drop by approximately 30-38% depending on the preset, which aligns closely with the increased pixel count. This scaling indicates that the GPU begins to take on a more significant role as the resolution increases. The RTX 4060's 8 GB of GDDR6 memory and 272.0 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for this workload, but the rendering load at higher resolutions naturally shifts the balance toward the GPU.

At 3840x2160, the GPU becomes the dominant constraint. The Ultra preset drops to 59.8 FPS, which is a 67% reduction from the 1080p Ultra result. This steep decline suggests that the GPU is heavily taxed at 4K, particularly with the most demanding settings. The CPU's role diminishes at this resolution, as the frame rate is increasingly limited by pixel throughput rather than processing capability. The data shows a clear progression: CPU-bound at 1080p, balanced at 1440p, and GPU-bound at 4K.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo's overall ranking in Minecraft: Java Edition is 974 out of 1727 tested combinations, placing it in the upper-middle portion of the rankings. This percentile position is notable given the game's relatively modest hardware requirements. The rank of 974 suggests that while this combo is more than capable of running the game at high frame rates, there are many other tested hardware combinations that achieve even higher performance.

The CPU's percentile ranking of 78 among all tested CPUs indicates that the Ryzen 7 5700 is a strong processor overall, while the GPU's percentile ranking of 61 among all tested GPUs shows that the RTX 4060 is a solid mid-range performer. The combination of these two components produces a balanced system that is well-suited for Minecraft: Java Edition, but the data suggests that users seeking the absolute highest frame rates at 1080p might benefit from a more powerful GPU, while those prioritizing 4K performance would need a significantly stronger graphics card to push the Ultra preset above 60 FPS.

In the context of the 1727 tested combos, this pairing sits in the 56th percentile, meaning that roughly 44% of tested combinations deliver higher frame rates. This is a respectable position for a mid-range CPU and GPU pairing, and the measured FPS data confirms that the system exceeds the playability threshold in all but one configuration. For the vast majority of users, this combo provides a smooth and responsive Minecraft experience with ample headroom for enhanced graphics mods.