Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Minecraft: Java Edition
Action 2023

Minecraft: Java Edition

88%
Great Match Your system meets recommended requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
633 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
252 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
403 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
157 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
209 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
81 FPS
2.5ms Frame Time
4ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 33,226
Your CPU 25,005
Graphics Card
Required 26,068
Your GPU 41,187

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 81 135 167 209
1440p QHD 157 253 318 403
1080p Full HD 252 401 501 633

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 401
1920x1080 Low 633
1920x1080 Medium 501
1920x1080 Ultra 252
2560x1440 High 253
2560x1440 Low 403
2560x1440 Medium 318
2560x1440 Ultra 157
3840x2160 High 135
3840x2160 Low 209
3840x2160 Medium 167
3840x2160 Ultra 81

Performance Analysis: Minecraft: Java Edition on Your System

The AMD Ryzen 5 8400F paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti delivers exceptional performance in Minecraft: Java Edition, with measured frame rates that far exceed the 60 FPS playability threshold across every tested resolution and settings combination. The data reveals a system where even the most demanding Ultra preset at 4K maintains a comfortable margin above playable, while lower resolutions push into territory that benefits high-refresh-rate displays. This analysis breaks down the measured performance, component roles, and comparative standing of this combination.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 3840x2160, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Ultra, which achieves an average of 80.5 FPS. This leaves meaningful headroom above the playable threshold, indicating the GPU is not fully saturated even at maximum settings in 4K.

For 2560x1440, the Ultra preset again represents the best playable option, delivering an average of 157.3 FPS. This is more than double the 60 FPS threshold, suggesting that players with 144Hz or higher refresh rate monitors could be well served by this configuration.

At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset reaches an average of 251.5 FPS. This is over four times the playable threshold, meaning the combination is limited more by the display's refresh rate than by hardware capability. The data shows no scenario where this PC struggles to maintain playable frame rates, as every preset at every resolution clears 60 FPS by a substantial margin.

CPU and GPU Roles

Examining the scaling between resolutions reveals how the workload shifts between the AMD Ryzen 5 8400F and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti. At 1920x1080, the Low preset produces 633 FPS, while High produces 400.7 FPS and Ultra produces 251.5 FPS. The gap between Low and Ultra at 1080p is 381.5 FPS, a 60.3% reduction, indicating that settings changes heavily influence frame rates when resolution is low.

Moving to 2560x1440, the same settings progression shows Low at 403.1 FPS, High at 253.2 FPS, and Ultra at 157.3 FPS. The reduction from Low to Ultra is 245.8 FPS, or 61% — nearly identical proportionally to 1080p. This consistency suggests that at both resolutions, the game's settings are the primary driver of performance differences, with the CPU keeping pace even as the GPU workload increases.

At 3840x2160, the pattern shifts. Low produces 209.3 FPS, High produces 134.6 FPS, and Ultra produces 80.5 FPS. The reduction from Low to Ultra is 128.8 FPS, a 61.5% drop. While the percentage remains similar, the absolute frame rates are much lower, indicating that the GPU becomes more influential at 4K. The RTX 3080 Ti's 12 GB of GDDR6X memory and 912.4 GB/s bandwidth appear sufficient to handle the increased pixel count, but the frame rate ceiling drops noticeably.

Resolution scaling itself tells a clear story. From 1080p to 1440p, Ultra FPS drops from 251.5 to 157.3, a 37.5% reduction. From 1440p to 4K, Ultra drops from 157.3 to 80.5, a 48.8% reduction. The steeper decline at higher resolutions indicates the GPU is the limiting factor at 4K, while the CPU has more headroom at lower resolutions. The Ryzen 5 8400F's strong single-thread performance, evidenced by its 3dmark_single_thread score of 951 and passmark_single_thread score of 3685, likely helps maintain high frame rates at 1080p where the CPU is more frequently the bottleneck.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the measured averages are 633 FPS on Low, 501.2 FPS on Medium, 400.7 FPS on High, and 251.5 FPS on Ultra. The progression from Low to Ultra shows a steady decline, with Medium representing a 20.8% drop from Low, High a 36.7% drop, and Ultra a 60.3% drop.

For 2560x1440, the averages are 403.1 FPS on Low, 317.9 FPS on Medium, 253.2 FPS on High, and 157.3 FPS on Ultra. Medium drops 21.1% from Low, High drops 37.2%, and Ultra drops 61% — nearly identical percentages to 1080p, reinforcing that settings have consistent relative impact across these two resolutions.

At 3840x2160, the averages are 209.3 FPS on Low, 167 FPS on Medium, 134.6 FPS on High, and 80.5 FPS on Ultra. Medium is 20.2% lower than Low, High is 35.7% lower, and Ultra is 61.5% lower. The absolute values are substantially lower than at lower resolutions, but the relative scaling remains consistent, suggesting the game's rendering pipeline scales predictably with settings regardless of resolution.

Across all resolutions, the gap between Medium and High is smaller than between High and Ultra. For example, at 1080p, Medium to High drops 100.5 FPS, while High to Ultra drops 149.2 FPS. This pattern holds at 1440p (64.7 FPS drop from Medium to High versus 95.9 FPS from High to Ultra) and at 4K (32.4 FPS versus 54.1 FPS). The Ultra preset imposes a disproportionately larger performance cost, likely due to increased draw distance and shadow quality demands.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The Ryzen 5 8400F's nearest rivals in the benchmark database include the AMD Ryzen 5 7500F, which scores an average of 24964 versus the 8400F's 25005, a delta of 0.2%. This indicates the 7500F would perform nearly identically in CPU-bound scenarios, making it a close substitute for Minecraft: Java Edition, where single-thread performance is crucial.

The Intel Core i7-11850H scores 24935, just 0.3% lower than the 8400F. Despite being a mobile processor, its benchmark parity suggests similar gameplay experience. The Intel Core i7-13620H follows at 24911, a 0.4% deficit, again indicating near-identical performance. On the higher end, the AMD EPYC 9474F scores 25103, which is 0.4% above the 8400F, though its server-oriented design makes it an unlikely practical alternative for gaming.

For the GPU, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti averages 41187 in benchmarks. The AMD Radeon Pro 5300 scores 40870, a 0.8% difference, meaning it would deliver very similar frame rates in most scenarios. The NVIDIA Tesla M40 24 GB scores 41707, 1.2% higher, while the standard Tesla M40 scores 41897, 1.7% higher. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 scores 40377, 2% lower than the 3080 Ti, indicating slightly weaker but comparable performance. These alternatives would produce similar results in Minecraft: Java Edition, with differences unlikely to cross the 60 FPS threshold at any resolution.

The Verdict

This PC can absolutely run Minecraft: Java Edition at playable frame rates. The verdict data shows that at 3840x2160, the Ultra preset runs at 80.5 FPS, which comfortably clears the 60 FPS threshold. All four presets — Low, Medium, High, and Ultra — are marked as playable at this resolution.

At 2560x1440, the Ultra preset achieves 157.3 FPS, and all settings are playable. This resolution offers a strong balance between visual quality and performance, with enough headroom for high refresh rate displays. At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset runs at 251.5 FPS, and all settings are playable, making this combination exceptionally well-suited for competitive or high-refresh-rate gameplay.

The data indicates that the RTX 3080 Ti is the dominant factor at 4K, where frame rates drop more steeply, but even the worst-case scenario at Ultra 4K remains well above playable. The Ryzen 5 8400F's 6 cores and 12 threads, with a boost clock of 4.70 GHz, appear sufficient to avoid bottlenecking the GPU at any tested resolution.

How This Combo Ranks

This combination ranks 391 out of 1727 tested combos in the benchmark database for Minecraft: Java Edition. This places it in the top 22.6% of all tested systems, a strong showing that reflects the high frame rates measured across all resolutions.

The ranking is likely influenced by the fact that Minecraft: Java Edition is not particularly demanding on modern hardware. The RTX 3080 Ti, with its 34.10 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 10240 shading units, provides more than enough raw power. The Ryzen 5 8400F's single-thread score of 951 in 3dmark and 3685 in passmark contributes to the high frame rates at lower resolutions, where CPU performance matters more.

Despite ranking 391st, the actual performance gap to higher-ranked combos may be minimal, given that many systems in the database would also clear 60 FPS in this game. The ranking reflects the ceiling of this particular CPU-GPU pairing rather than any deficiency in playability.

FAQ

Q: What is the highest preset that maintains 60 FPS at 4K resolution?

A: The Ultra preset at 3840x2160 achieves an average of 80.5 FPS, which is above the 60 FPS playable threshold. All presets at this resolution are marked as playable.

Q: How much faster is this combo at 1080p Ultra compared to 4K Ultra?

A: At 1920x1080 Ultra, the average is 251.5 FPS, while at 3840x2160 Ultra it drops to 80.5 FPS. The 1080p result is 171 FPS higher, representing a 212.4% increase.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU more important for reaching high frame rates in this game?

A: The data shows that resolution scaling has a greater impact at higher resolutions, with Ultra FPS dropping 37.5% from 1080p to 1440p and 48.8% from 1440p to 4K. This suggests the GPU becomes the limiting factor at 4K, while the CPU's strong single-thread performance supports high frame rates at lower resolutions.

Q: What CPU benchmark scores does the Ryzen 5 8400F achieve?

A: The CPU scores 20851 in Cinebench R23 multicore and 2943 in Cinebench R23 single-core. Its passmark multithread score is 24389 and passmark single-thread score is 3685.

Q: How close is the RTX 3080 Ti's benchmark score to its nearest rival?

A: The RTX 3080 Ti averages 41187 in benchmarks. The nearest rival, the AMD Radeon Pro 5300, scores 40870, a 0.8% difference, indicating near-identical performance.

Q: What is the average FPS at 1440p Medium settings?

A: At 2560x1440 with Medium settings, the measured average FPS is 317.9, which is well above the 60 FPS playable threshold.