Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Minecraft: Java Edition
Action 2023

Minecraft: Java Edition

38%
Not Recommended Your system may struggle with this game.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
422 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
213 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
336 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
134 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
176 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
72 FPS
3ms Frame Time
5ms Input Latency
1440p Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 33,226
Your CPU 21,484
Graphics Card
Required 26,068
Your GPU 2,913

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Available

Your GPU supports ray tracing but may impact FPS.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 72 110 143 176
1440p QHD 134 213 271 336
1080p Full HD 213 338 384 422

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 338
1920x1080 Low 422
1920x1080 Medium 384
1920x1080 Ultra 213
2560x1440 High 213
2560x1440 Low 336
2560x1440 Medium 271
2560x1440 Ultra 134
3840x2160 High 110
3840x2160 Low 176
3840x2160 Medium 143
3840x2160 Ultra 72

Performance Analysis: Minecraft: Java Edition on Your System

Best Settings per Resolution

At 1920x1080, the most demanding preset that maintains at least 60 FPS is Ultra, which delivers an average of 213.1 FPS. This leaves substantial headroom above the 60 FPS threshold, indicating that the combination of the AMD Ryzen 5 2600 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB is far from stressed at this resolution.

Moving to 2560x1440, the Ultra preset again remains the most demanding playable option, producing an average of 133.5 FPS. The frame rate drops by roughly 37% compared to the 1080p Ultra result, but still comfortably exceeds the 60 FPS playability threshold.

At 3840x2160, Ultra settings yield an average of 71.5 FPS, which remains above the 60 FPS line. This is the most demanding preset that stays playable at 4K. The data shows a clear progression: as resolution increases, the average frame rate under Ultra settings declines from 213.1 to 133.5 to 71.5 FPS. The 4K Ultra result is the closest this combination comes to the playability floor, but it does not cross it.

For users seeking maximum visual quality, Ultra is the recommended preset at every resolution, as it remains above 60 FPS in all three cases. The lowest headroom appears at 3840x2160 Ultra, where the 71.5 FPS average is only 11.5 FPS above the threshold.

CPU and GPU Roles

The recorded data reveals how the balance between CPU and GPU workload shifts across resolutions. At 1920x1080, the average frame rates are exceptionally high across all presets, ranging from 213.1 FPS on Ultra to 422.3 FPS on Low. These numbers suggest that at this resolution, the GPU is not the primary bottleneck; the CPU's single-thread performance, which the Ryzen 5 2600 delivers at a PassMark single-thread score of 2239, becomes more influential in maintaining such high frame rates.

At 2560x1440, frame rates remain high but begin to show GPU scaling pressure. The Ultra preset drops to 133.5 FPS, a 37.4% reduction from the 1080p Ultra result. The Low preset falls from 422.3 to 336.3 FPS, a 20.4% decrease. This disproportionate drop at higher settings indicates that the GPU is starting to take on more of the rendering load as pixel count increases.

At 3840x2160, the GPU's role becomes dominant. The Ultra preset averages 71.5 FPS, which is 46.4% lower than the 1440p Ultra result. The Low preset at 4K averages 175.7 FPS, which is 47.7% lower than the 1440p Low result. The scaling between resolutions is steep, confirming that the RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB's pixel throughput, rated at 121.7 GPixel/s and 288.0 GB/s memory bandwidth, becomes the limiting factor at 4K.

The pattern across presets within each resolution is also informative. At 1080p, the difference between Low (422.3 FPS) and Ultra (213.1 FPS) is roughly a factor of two. At 1440p, the same comparison yields 336.3 versus 133.5 FPS, a 2.5x spread. At 4K, Low (175.7) versus Ultra (71.5) is a 2.5x spread as well. This consistent widening between Low and Ultra as resolution increases indicates that GPU compute and memory bandwidth, not CPU limits, dictate the upper-end performance at higher resolutions.

In summary, the CPU plays a more significant role at 1080p where frame rates are extremely high, while the GPU becomes the clear bottleneck at 4K. The 1440p results sit in a balanced middle ground.

FAQ

Q: Can this PC run Minecraft: Java Edition at 60 FPS on Ultra settings at 3840x2160?

A: Yes. The recorded average at 4K Ultra is 71.5 FPS, which is above the 60 FPS playability threshold. The Ultra preset is listed as playable at this resolution.

Q: What is the highest playable preset at 1920x1080?

A: Ultra is the highest playable preset at 1080p, with an average of 213.1 FPS. All four presets (Low, Medium, High, Ultra) are marked as playable at this resolution.

Q: How does the 4K Ultra performance compare to the 1080p Ultra performance?

A: The 4K Ultra average of 71.5 FPS is approximately 66% lower than the 1080p Ultra average of 213.1 FPS. This is the largest drop between adjacent resolutions in the dataset.

Q: Which resolution shows the smallest gap between Low and Ultra presets?

A: At 1920x1080, the gap between Low (422.3 FPS) and Ultra (213.1 FPS) is a factor of 1.98. At 1440p, the gap is 2.52x (336.3 vs 133.5). At 4K, the gap is 2.46x (175.7 vs 71.5). The 1080p gap is the smallest.

Q: Is the RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB's 8 GB memory capacity a concern at 4K?

A: Based on the measured data, 4K Ultra still delivers 71.5 FPS on average, so the 8 GB frame buffer does not prevent playability at this resolution. The memory bandwidth of 288.0 GB/s appears sufficient for this game's needs.

Q: What is the average FPS at 1440p Medium settings?

A: The recorded average at 2560x1440 with Medium settings is 271 FPS, which is well above the 60 FPS threshold and even exceeds the High preset's 213.4 FPS at the same resolution.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the AMD Ryzen 5 2600 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB ranks 789th out of 1727 tested combos in Minecraft: Java Edition. This places it in the 45.7th percentile overall, meaning it outperforms roughly 54% of the tested configurations. The rank reflects the game's relatively low demand on modern hardware, particularly given the high frame rates observed across all resolutions.

The CPU's percentileVsAllCpus of 75 indicates that the Ryzen 5 2600 sits above the median for all tested processors in general benchmarks. The GPU's percentileVsAllGpus of 19 is lower, suggesting that the RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB ranks below the median for all tested GPUs when measured by the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2913. However, in this game, the combination still achieves excellent frame rates, showing that Minecraft's rendering workload does not heavily stress the GPU's raw compute capabilities.

The combo rank of 789 out of 1727 suggests that while this system is not at the top tier for this game, it is firmly in the upper half of tested configurations. Given that the game runs at over 200 FPS at 1080p Ultra and remains above 60 FPS at 4K Ultra, the rank likely understates the practical experience for most users.

Similar Performance Alternatives

For the CPU, the nearest rivals to the Ryzen 5 2600 in overall benchmark score are the Intel Core Ultra 5 228V (0.2% faster), the Intel Core i9-11900H (0.5% faster), the Intel Xeon D-1746TER (0.7% slower), and the AMD EPYC 9454 (1.2% faster). These processors should deliver comparable CPU-bound performance in Minecraft, assuming the GPU remains the same.

For the GPU, the nearest rivals to the RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB are the NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF (0.1% faster), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB (0.2% faster), the NVIDIA Quadro P600 (0.3% slower), and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010 (0.7% faster). The RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB is essentially identical in raw score to the 8 GB variant, so swapping between them would yield nearly the same frame rates in this game.

Users who own any of these CPU or GPU alternatives can expect very similar performance in Minecraft: Java Edition. The delta percentages are all within 1.2% of the tested components, meaning the practical differences in frame rates would be negligible. The Quadro P600, despite being a professional card, matches the RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB within 0.3%, though its driver and feature set may differ.

The Verdict

The data clearly shows that this PC can run Minecraft: Java Edition at every resolution and preset combination tested. At 1920x1080, all four presets are playable, with Ultra averaging 213.1 FPS. At 2560x1440, all four presets are playable, with Ultra averaging 133.5 FPS. At 3840x2160, all four presets are playable, with Ultra averaging 71.5 FPS.

The verdictByResolution confirms that the best playable setting at every resolution is Ultra. The 4K Ultra result of 71.5 FPS is the only point where the system approaches the 60 FPS threshold, but it stays above it. For users who prioritize maximum visual fidelity, this combination delivers a fully playable experience at 4K with room to spare.

At 1080p and 1440p, the frame rates are so high that the system is effectively overkill for this game. The 1080p Ultra result of 213.1 FPS exceeds typical high-refresh-rate monitors, and even 4K Ultra at 71.5 FPS would suit a 60 Hz display perfectly. This is a strong combination for Minecraft regardless of the user's display resolution.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the recorded averages are as follows: Low settings produce 422.3 FPS, Medium produces 383.5 FPS, High produces 338.2 FPS, and Ultra produces 213.1 FPS. The progression from Low to Ultra shows a steady decline, with Ultra being approximately 49.5% slower than Low.

At 2560x1440, Low averages 336.3 FPS, Medium averages 271 FPS, High averages 213.4 FPS, and Ultra averages 133.5 FPS. The drop from High to Ultra is the steepest within this resolution, a 37.4% reduction. The Medium setting at 1440p still exceeds the 1080p High result, indicating substantial headroom.

At 3840x2160, Low averages 175.7 FPS, Medium averages 142.9 FPS, High averages 110.2 FPS, and Ultra averages 71.5 FPS. The 4K Ultra result is the lowest in the entire dataset but remains above the 60 FPS playability threshold. The 4K Low result of 175.7 FPS is higher than the 1440p Ultra result of 133.5 FPS, showing that lowering settings has a larger impact than lowering resolution at these levels.

No minimum or maximum FPS values were recorded in the dataset, so only average frame rates are available for analysis. The lack of min/max data means that frame time consistency cannot be assessed, but the averages are consistently high enough to indicate a smooth experience. The dataset covers 12 unique resolution and settings combinations, all of which exceed the 60 FPS threshold.