Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Minecraft
Sandbox 2011

Minecraft

75%
Great Match Your system meets recommended requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
656 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
354 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
563 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
223 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
297 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
117 FPS
1.8ms Frame Time
3ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,554
Your CPU 19,039
Graphics Card
Required 26,954
Your GPU 60,347

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 117 187 235 297
1440p QHD 223 357 450 563
1080p Full HD 354 555 603 656

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 555
1920x1080 Low 656
1920x1080 Medium 603
1920x1080 Ultra 354
2560x1440 High 357
2560x1440 Low 563
2560x1440 Medium 450
2560x1440 Ultra 223
3840x2160 High 187
3840x2160 Low 297
3840x2160 Medium 235
3840x2160 Ultra 117

Performance Analysis: Minecraft on Your System

Can the Intel Core i5-12400F paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 run Minecraft? Absolutely, and the data shows it does so with overwhelming authority. This combination ranks 157th out of 3,710 tested combos, placing it in the top 5% of all systems benchmarked for this title. The RTX 4090, despite being an end-of-life product, delivers frame rates that are not merely playable but exceptionally high, even at 4K resolution with maximum settings. The benchmark results indicate that this setup is a top-tier performer for Minecraft, leaving no practical headroom concerns for any settings or resolution combination.

How This Combo Ranks

The Intel Core i5-12400F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 pairing achieves a combo rank of 157 out of 3,710 tested combinations for Minecraft. This places the system in the 95.8th percentile of all tested hardware configurations, a position that underscores its elite status for this game. The ranking reflects the exceptional capability of the RTX 4090, which holds an 88th percentile rank among all GPUs tested on this site, and the solid, if not spectacular, 73rd percentile ranking of the Core i5-12400F among all CPUs.

The performance disparity between the two components is notable. The GPU is the clear bottleneck in this pairing, though "bottleneck" is a relative term when the GPU produces an average benchmark score of 60,347. The CPU's average benchmark score of 19,039 is more than three times lower, yet it is more than sufficient to feed the GPU in Minecraft, a game that is heavily single-threaded and not as demanding on multi-core performance as other modern titles. The data shows that the CPU's single-thread performance, as evidenced by its 3DMark single-thread score of 909 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1,680, is strong enough to avoid holding back the GPU's immense rendering power. In practical terms, the combo's rank is driven almost entirely by the GPU's raw throughput, with the CPU providing a capable foundation that does not detract from the overall result.

FAQ

Q: What is the highest settings preset that can maintain a 60 FPS average at 4K resolution?

A: The data shows that the "Ultra" preset at 3840x2160 resolution yields an average of 117 FPS, which is well above the 60 FPS playable threshold. All four settings presets—Low, Medium, High, and Ultra—are playable at this resolution, with the Ultra preset being the most demanding that still clears the threshold.

Q: How much faster is this combo at 1080p compared to 4K on the Ultra preset?

A: At 1920x1080 with Ultra settings, the average frame rate is 354 FPS. At 3840x2160 with Ultra settings, the average drops to 117 FPS. This represents a 237 FPS difference, meaning the 1080p result is roughly three times faster than the 4K result.

Q: Is the RTX 4090's performance significantly better than its nearest rival, the Intel Arc Pro A60?

A: Based on the average benchmark scores, the RTX 4090 scores 60,347, while the Intel Arc Pro A60 scores 60,326, resulting in a deltaPct of 0. This indicates that their average benchmark scores are virtually identical, despite the massive difference in their specifications.

Q: Does the Core i5-12400F's multi-threaded performance align with its single-threaded performance?

A: The CPU's multi-threaded scores are robust, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 12,380 and a Passmark multi-thread score of 19,433. Its single-thread performance is also strong, with a Passmark single-thread score of 3,481. The data shows a balanced profile, with the multi-threaded score being approximately 5.5 times higher than the single-thread score, which is reasonable for a 6-core, 12-thread processor.

Q: What is the minimum FPS recorded for the Medium settings preset at 1440p?

A: At 2560x1440 resolution with Medium settings, the measured minimum FPS is 382, with an average of 450 FPS and a maximum of 517 FPS. This indicates that even the lowest frame rates are far above the playable threshold.

Q: Can this system play Minecraft at 4K with all settings maxed out?

A: Yes, the verdict by resolution confirms that the "Ultra" preset is playable at 3840x2160, with an average FPS of 117. This is nearly double the 60 FPS playable threshold, demonstrating that the system handles the most demanding settings at the highest resolution without issue.

Similar Performance Alternatives

For the CPU, the nearest rivals based on average benchmark score are the AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS, the Intel Core 3 201E, the Intel Core i5-1335U, and the AMD EPYC 7773X. The AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS has an average score of 19,047, which is effectively identical to the Core i5-12400F's 19,039, with a deltaPct of 0. The Intel Core 3 201E scores 19,056, a deltaPct of -0.1, meaning it is marginally slower. The Intel Core i5-1335U scores 19, -0.1% slower, and the AMD EPYC 7773X scores 19, -0.1% slower. In practical terms, any of these processors would deliver nearly identical CPU-bound performance in Minecraft, as the game is not heavily dependent on multi-core scaling.

For the GPU, the nearest rivals to the RTX 4090 are the Intel Arc Pro A60, the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48, the AMD Radeon Pro W6600M, and the AMD Radeon PRO V710. The Intel Arc Pro A60 matches the RTX 4090's average score of 60,326 with a deltaPct of 0, indicating equivalent average benchmark performance. The AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 is 0.3% faster with a score of 60,140, while the AMD Radeon Pro W6600M is 2.5% faster with a score of 61,896. The AMD Radeon PRO V710 is 2.9% slower with a score of 58,657. These alternatives would provide a similar level of GPU performance in Minecraft, though none of them offer the same level of raw specifications as the RTX 4090.

The Verdict

The benchmark data is unequivocal: this PC can run Minecraft at maximum settings across all tested resolutions. The verdict by resolution confirms that the "Ultra" preset is playable at every resolution from 1920x1080 up to 3840x2160. At 1080p, the Ultra preset achieves an average of 354 FPS, at 1440p it reaches 223 FPS, and at 4K it maintains a robust 117 FPS. All of these figures clear the 60 FPS playable threshold by a substantial margin, with the lowest average being nearly double the threshold.

The system's performance is so high that even the most demanding settings at 4K leave significant overhead. The data shows that the RTX 4090's immense compute power, with an FP32 performance of 82.58 TFLOPS and a memory bandwidth of 1.01 TB/s, is more than enough to handle Minecraft's voxel-based rendering at any resolution. The CPU, while not the primary driver of performance here, provides a stable platform with its 6 cores and 12 threads, ensuring that the game's logic and world generation do not create any frame pacing issues. There are no resolutions or presets in the tested data where this combination fails to meet the 60 FPS target.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a comprehensive view of the system's performance across three resolutions and four settings presets. At 3840x2160, the frame rates range from a low of 117 FPS on Ultra to a high of 297 FPS on Low. The Medium preset shows an average of 235 FPS with a minimum of 200 FPS and a maximum of 270 FPS, while the High preset averages 187 FPS. All 4K results are comfortably above the 60 FPS threshold.

At 2560x1440, the performance scales significantly. The Low preset achieves an average of 563 FPS, while Medium averages 450 FPS with a minimum of 382 and a maximum of 517. High settings produce an average of 357 FPS, and Ultra settings still manage a very high 223 FPS average. The 1440p results show a clear pattern of diminishing returns as settings increase, but even the most demanding preset remains far above playable.

At 1920x1080, the system's performance is extraordinary. The Low preset averages 656 FPS, Medium averages 603 FPS with a minimum of 513 and a maximum of 694, High averages 555 FPS, and Ultra averages 354 FPS. The 1080p results demonstrate that the RTX 4090 is so powerful that the CPU becomes a more significant factor, but the Core i5-12400F's strong single-thread performance prevents any noticeable bottleneck. The data shows that the system is capable of delivering frame rates that far exceed the refresh rates of virtually all consumer monitors.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 3840x2160, the most demanding preset that maintains an average of at least 60 FPS is "Ultra," which achieves an average of 117 FPS. This is the highest quality setting available, and the system clears the 60 FPS threshold with a 57 FPS margin. The data shows that no sacrifices in visual quality are necessary at 4K.

At 2560x1440, the "Ultra" preset is also the best choice, delivering an average of 223 FPS. This is more than 3.7 times the playable threshold, indicating that the system has immense headroom at this resolution. The 1440p Ultra result is 106 FPS higher than the 4K Ultra result, showing a clear scaling benefit from the lower resolution.

At 1920x1080, the "Ultra" preset again provides the highest quality experience, with an average of 354 FPS. This is nearly 6 times the 60 FPS threshold, making the system vastly overqualified for 1080p gaming. The data confirms that the best settings for this combo are always the maximum available, as the hardware's performance is so high that there is no reason to reduce visual quality to achieve higher frame rates.