Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Minecraft
Sandbox 2011

Minecraft

53%
Playable Your system meets minimum requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
216 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
85 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
136 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
54 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
71 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
28 FPS
7.4ms Frame Time
11ms Input Latency
1440p Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,554
Your CPU 57,498
Graphics Card
Required 26,954
Your GPU 1,482

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 28 45 56 71
1440p QHD 54 86 108 136
1080p Full HD 85 136 171 216

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 136
1920x1080 Low 216
1920x1080 Medium 171
1920x1080 Ultra 85
2560x1440 High 86
2560x1440 Low 136
2560x1440 Medium 108
2560x1440 Ultra 54
3840x2160 High 45
3840x2160 Low 71
3840x2160 Medium 56
3840x2160 Ultra 28

Performance Analysis: Minecraft on Your System

Minecraft places unusual demands on a system, relying heavily on both the CPU for game logic and world generation, and the GPU for rendering. The combination of the AMD Ryzen 9 9900X and Intel Arc B390 presents a significant performance imbalance that dictates how the game behaves across resolutions. The recorded data reveals a system capable of high frame rates in many scenarios, but one that is ultimately constrained by the graphics processor at higher settings and resolutions.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The database provides a complete set of average frame rate measurements for this specific CPU and GPU pairing in Minecraft. The data shows a clear pattern across the three tested resolutions and four graphics preset levels.

At 1920x1080, the system demonstrates its highest levels of performance. The Low preset produces an average of 216 FPS, which is the highest recorded frame rate for this combination. The High preset averages 136 FPS, while the Medium preset shows an average of 171 FPS. The Medium preset also has recorded minimum and maximum values of 146 FPS and 197 FPS, respectively, indicating a relatively stable performance window. The Ultra preset, while carrying the most demanding settings, still achieves an average of 85 FPS. The data shows that at this resolution, the system handles all presets with a substantial margin above the 60 FPS playability threshold.

Moving to 2560x1440, a noticeable decline in performance is observed across all presets. The Low preset still delivers a smooth experience with an average of 136 FPS. The High preset follows with an average of 86 FPS. The Medium preset achieves an average of 108 FPS, with recorded minimum and maximum values of 92 FPS and 124 FPS. This indicates that the Medium preset remains well within playable territory. However, the Ultra preset drops to an average of 54 FPS, which falls below the standard 60 FPS threshold. This is the first sign that the graphics processor is becoming a limiting factor.

At 3840x2160, the performance picture changes dramatically. The Low preset is the only option that maintains an average above 60 FPS, coming in at 71 FPS. The Medium preset averages 56 FPS, with a minimum of 48 FPS and a maximum of 65 FPS, showing significant fluctuation and moments of sub-60 FPS performance. The High preset drops to an average of 45 FPS, and the Ultra preset averages only 28 FPS. These figures clearly indicate that at 4K resolution, the Intel Arc B390 is heavily burdened by the rendering load, preventing the system from maintaining smooth gameplay at higher visual quality levels.

Best Settings per Resolution

The playability threshold is defined as 60 FPS average, and the database provides explicit guidance on the best settings for each resolution.

At 1920x1080, the system can run the game at the Ultra preset while maintaining an average of 85 FPS. This is the most demanding settings level tested and it clears the threshold with a comfortable margin. The data confirms that all four presets are playable at this resolution.

At 2560x1440, the best settings that stay at or above 60 FPS is the High preset, which delivers an average of 86 FPS. The Medium preset is also playable with an average of 108 FPS, but the High preset is the most demanding option that remains above the threshold. The Ultra preset, with its average of 54 FPS, is not considered playable according to the recorded data.

At 3840x2160, the situation is more restrictive. The only playable preset is Low, which achieves an average of 71 FPS. The Medium, High, and Ultra presets all fall below the 60 FPS threshold, with averages of 56 FPS, 45 FPS, and 28 FPS, respectively. For a smooth experience at 4K, users must select the Low preset.

The data indicates a clear inverse relationship between resolution and the ability to use higher settings. At 1080p, the system has ample headroom; at 1440p, it is comfortable with High settings; at 4K, it is limited to Low.

CPU and GPU Roles

The performance scaling across resolutions and presets provides insight into the respective roles of the AMD Ryzen 9 9900X and Intel Arc B390 in this game.

The CPU is a high-end desktop processor with 12 cores and 24 threads, based on the Zen 5 architecture. Its benchmark scores are substantial, including a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32172 and a single-core score of 2253. These scores place it in the 92nd percentile of all CPUs, indicating it is among the top performers. For a game like Minecraft, which is known for being sensitive to single-thread performance in many of its core operations, this processor provides a very strong foundation. The Ryzen 9 9900X is unlikely to be a bottleneck in most scenarios.

The Intel Arc B390, on the other hand, is an integrated graphics processor based on the Xe3-LPG architecture. Its benchmark presence is minimal, with a single 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1482. This places it in the 9th percentile of all GPUs, which is quite low. The GPU has 1536 shading units, 48 texture mapping units, and 24 raster operation units, but its memory is system shared, meaning its performance is dependent on the system memory bandwidth.

The data shows that at 1920x1080, the system achieves high frame rates even at the Ultra preset (85 FPS). This suggests that the CPU is able to feed the GPU effectively, and the GPU is capable of handling the rendering load at this resolution. The difference between Low (216 FPS) and Ultra (85 FPS) at 1080p is 131 FPS, showing a strong scaling with settings. This implies that the GPU is the primary factor in determining frame rate as settings increase, but at this resolution, it still has enough headroom.

At 2560x1440, the frame rates drop across the board. The Low preset still achieves 136 FPS, but the Ultra preset drops to 54 FPS. The scaling from Low to Ultra is a 82 FPS difference. The fact that the Medium preset (108 FPS) is still well above the High preset (86 FPS) suggests that the GPU is becoming more of a limiting factor as the pixel count increases.

At 3840x2160, the GPU is clearly the dominant constraint. The Low preset only manages 71 FPS, and the Medium preset falls to 56 FPS. The High and Ultra presets drop to 45 FPS and 28 FPS, respectively. The scaling between Low and Ultra at 4K is a 43 FPS difference, but the absolute values are low across the board. The CPU is likely still capable of higher performance, but the GPU cannot keep up with the rendering demands of 4K resolution.

The data implies that the CPU is sufficient for Minecraft at all tested resolutions, providing a solid base for game logic and draw calls. The GPU is the deciding factor for visual quality and resolution. At 1080p, the GPU is adequate for high and ultra settings. At 1440p, it can handle high settings. At 4K, it is only suitable for low settings. The system's performance is therefore a direct reflection of the GPU's capabilities, while the CPU ensures that it is not the limiting factor.

Similar Performance Alternatives

The database provides nearest rival comparisons for both the CPU and GPU, offering context for how this specific combination performs relative to other hardware.

For the AMD Ryzen 9 9900X, the nearest rivals are all server or high-end desktop processors. The AMD EPYC 9015 has an average score of 57555, which is only 0.1 percent lower than the Ryzen 9 9900X's average score of 57498. The AMD EPYC 7313 scores 57399, which is 0.2 percent higher. The Intel Core i9-14900 scores 58115, which is 1.1 percent higher. The Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M scores 58323, which is 1.4 percent higher. These deltas are all within a narrow range, indicating that the Ryzen 9 9900X performs very similarly to these alternatives in terms of average benchmark score. For Minecraft, users with any of these CPUs would likely see similar CPU-driven performance, meaning the frame rate differences would be minimal.

For the Intel Arc B390, the nearest rivals are all older, low-end NVIDIA GPUs. The NVIDIA GeForce GT 520MX has an average score of 1463, which is 1.3 percent higher than the Arc B390's score of 1482. The NVIDIA GeForce 800M scores 1460, which is 1.5 percent higher. The NVIDIA GeForce GT 625 OEM scores 1446, which is 2.5 percent higher. The NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 scores 1443, which is 2.7 percent higher. These deltas are small, but importantly, they are all positive, meaning the Arc B390 is actually slightly faster than these rivals. However, the absolute performance level is very low, as evidenced by the 9th percentile ranking. Users with any of these GPUs would experience similar frame rates in Minecraft, meaning that at 1440p and 4K, the system would still struggle with higher settings. The Arc B390 is on par with these older discrete GPUs, which puts it at a significant disadvantage for a game like Minecraft when compared to modern gaming graphics cards.

The combination of a top-tier CPU with a very low-tier GPU means that the overall system performance is capped by the GPU. The nearest rivals for the CPU would not change the outcome, as they are all similarly powerful. The nearest rivals for the GPU would also not change the outcome, as they are all similarly weak. This pairing is unique in its imbalance.

The Verdict

Based on the recorded data, this PC can run Minecraft, but its ability to do so depends heavily on the chosen resolution and settings.

At 1920x1080, the system provides a strong gaming experience. The data shows that all presets, including Ultra, achieve an average frame rate above the 60 FPS threshold. The Ultra preset runs at 85 FPS, which is smooth and responsive. This resolution is the best choice for this system, as it allows for the highest visual quality while maintaining playability.

At 2560x1440, the system is still capable of good performance, but with limitations. The High preset runs at 86 FPS, which is above the threshold and provides a good balance of visual quality and performance. The Medium preset is also a solid choice at 108 FPS. However, the Ultra preset, at 54 FPS, is not playable according to the standard. Users who want to play at 1440p should stick to High or Medium settings.

At 3840x2160, the system is only playable at the Low preset, which runs at 71 FPS. The Medium, High, and Ultra presets all fall below 60 FPS, with the Ultra preset being particularly low at 28 FPS. This resolution is not recommended for this system if users want to experience Minecraft with higher visual fidelity. The GPU is simply not powerful enough to handle 4K rendering at acceptable frame rates.

In summary, the system is fully capable of running Minecraft at 1080p with maximum settings. At 1440p, it can run the game well at High settings. At 4K, it is limited to Low settings. The verdict is that this PC can run the game, but users must adjust their expectations based on their display resolution.

How This Combo Ranks

The database ranks this specific CPU and GPU combination against all other tested combinations for Minecraft. The combo rank is 3282 out of 3710 total combinations. This places it in the lower portion of the ranking, at roughly the 88th percentile from the bottom.

This low ranking is a direct consequence of the GPU's performance. The AMD Ryzen 9 9900X is a high-end processor that would rank well in CPU-focused tests. However, the Intel Arc B390 is a low-end integrated GPU that severely limits the system's overall gaming performance. In a game like Minecraft, where the GPU handles the rendering load, this combination is held back by the graphics processor.

The ranking suggests that there are many other tested combinations that deliver better performance in Minecraft. This is likely due to the fact that most gaming systems pair a capable CPU with a dedicated graphics card that has significantly more rendering power than the Arc B390. The data confirms that this combo is not well-suited for demanding gaming scenarios, despite the strong CPU.

FAQ

Q: What is the highest average frame rate recorded for this system in Minecraft?

A: The highest recorded average frame rate is 216 FPS, achieved at 1920x1080 resolution with the Low preset.

Q: Can this system run Minecraft at 4K resolution with the Ultra preset?

A: No, the data shows that at 3840x2160 resolution, the Ultra preset only achieves an average of 28 FPS, which is well below the 60 FPS playability threshold.

Q: What is the best settings preset for 2560x1440 resolution that stays above 60 FPS?

A: The High preset is the most demanding option that stays above 60 FPS at 2560x1440, with an average frame rate of 86 FPS.

Q: Is the AMD Ryzen 9 9900X or the Intel Arc B390 the limiting factor in this system?

A: The data indicates that the Intel Arc B390 is the limiting factor, as its performance drops significantly at higher resolutions and settings, while the CPU remains capable of high performance.

Q: How does the Intel Arc B390 compare to its nearest rivals in terms of benchmark score?

A: The Intel Arc B390 has an average benchmark score of 1482, which is higher than the NVIDIA GeForce GT 520MX (1463), NVIDIA GeForce 800M (1460), NVIDIA GeForce GT 625 OEM (1446), and NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 (1443), but the differences are all under 3 percent.

Q: What is the only playable preset at 3840x2160 resolution?

A: The Low preset is the only playable option at 3840x2160, achieving an average frame rate of 71 FPS. All other presets fall below the 60 FPS threshold.