Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Minecraft
Sandbox 2011

Minecraft

50%
Playable Your system meets minimum requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
216 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
85 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
136 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
54 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
71 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
28 FPS
7.4ms Frame Time
11ms Input Latency
1440p Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,554
Your CPU 35,909
Graphics Card
Required 26,954
Your GPU 1,482

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 28 45 56 71
1440p QHD 54 86 108 136
1080p Full HD 85 136 171 216

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 136
1920x1080 Low 216
1920x1080 Medium 171
1920x1080 Ultra 85
2560x1440 High 86
2560x1440 Low 136
2560x1440 Medium 108
2560x1440 Ultra 54
3840x2160 High 45
3840x2160 Low 71
3840x2160 Medium 56
3840x2160 Ultra 28

Performance Analysis: Minecraft on Your System

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 3840x2160, the AMD Ryzen 7 7700X with the Intel Arc B390 produces a wide spread of results depending on the preset. At High settings, the average frame rate is 45 FPS, which sits below the 60 FPS playability threshold. Dropping to Medium improves the average to 56 FPS, with a recorded minimum of 48 FPS and a maximum of 65 FPS, still not consistently playable. Low settings push the average to 71 FPS, which clears the threshold with some margin. Ultra is the most demanding preset at this resolution, yielding only 28 FPS on average, a figure that is not viable for smooth gameplay.

Moving to 2560x1440, the combination performs markedly better. Low settings deliver an average of 136 FPS, while Medium reaches 108 FPS with a minimum of 92 FPS and a maximum of 124 FPS. High settings produce an average of 86 FPS, comfortably above the 60 FPS threshold. Ultra, however, drops to an average of 54 FPS, which is just below the playable line and would require lowering the preset for a consistent experience.

At 1920x1080, the results are strong across the board. Low settings yield 216 FPS on average, Medium reaches 171 FPS with a minimum of 146 FPS and a maximum of 197 FPS, and High sits at 136 FPS. Even Ultra manages an average of 85 FPS, which is well above the 60 FPS threshold. The data shows that this resolution is where the combo is most comfortable, with every tested preset clearing the playability bar.

The measured FPS values for Medium settings include min and max figures at all three resolutions, while other presets only record averages. This suggests that the Medium preset was subjected to more detailed frame time analysis, but the available data still allows for clear comparisons across resolutions and settings tiers.

FAQ

Q: Can this PC run Minecraft at 4K with High settings?

A: No. At 3840x2160 with High settings, the average FPS is 45, which is below the 60 FPS playable threshold. The only playable preset at this resolution is Low, with an average of 71 FPS.

Q: What is the best preset at 2560x1440 for this combo?

A: High settings is the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS, with an average of 86 FPS. Ultra falls short at 54 FPS, so High is the recommended ceiling for smooth gameplay at this resolution.

Q: Does the Ultra preset ever reach 60 FPS?

A: Yes, but only at 1920x1080. At that resolution, Ultra averages 85 FPS. At 2560x1440, Ultra averages 54 FPS, and at 3840x2160, it averages 28 FPS, both below the threshold.

Q: How much performance is lost when moving from 1080p to 1440p at High settings?

A: At High settings, the average FPS drops from 136 at 1920x1080 to 86 at 2560x1440, a reduction of 50 FPS. Moving again to 3840x2160 at High brings the average down to 45 FPS, a further drop of 41 FPS.

Q: Is the Medium preset playable at every resolution?

A: No. At 1920x1080, Medium averages 171 FPS, and at 2560x1440, it averages 108 FPS, both playable. At 3840x2160, Medium averages 56 FPS with a minimum of 48 FPS, which falls below the 60 FPS threshold.

Q: What frame rates can be expected at 1080p Low?

A: The average FPS at 1920x1080 with Low settings is 216, the highest recorded value for this combination across all tested presets and resolutions.

How This Combo Ranks

The database ranks this specific combination of the AMD Ryzen 7 7700X and the Intel Arc B390 at position 3282 out of 3710 tested combos for Minecraft. This places the combo in the lower portion of the overall distribution, meaning that most other hardware pairings in the database achieve higher frame rates in this game. The rank reflects the GPU's limited performance profile rather than the CPU, since the Ryzen 7 7700X is a high-end desktop processor with strong multi-threaded and single-threaded scores.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 1482, with a percentile rank of 9 among all GPUs, indicating that it sits near the very bottom of the performance spectrum. The CPU, by contrast, has an average benchmark score of 35909 and a percentile rank of 85 among all CPUs, placing it well above the majority of processors. This large disparity between the two components explains why the combo ranks so low in-game despite the CPU's strength: the integrated Arc B390 is the limiting factor.

In practical terms, a rank of 3282 out of 3710 means that roughly 88 percent of tested combos outperform this pairing in Minecraft. The combo does still achieve playable frame rates at lower resolutions and settings, but it cannot compete with configurations that pair the same or similar CPUs with discrete graphics solutions. The data indicates that users seeking higher performance in this title would need to consider a different GPU, as the CPU is not the bottleneck.

The Verdict

This PC can run Minecraft, but the playable range is heavily dependent on resolution and preset. At 1920x1080, all four tested presets clear the 60 FPS threshold, with Ultra averaging 85 FPS, High averaging 136 FPS, Medium averaging 171 FPS, and Low averaging 216 FPS. This makes 1080p the only resolution where the Ultra preset is viable.

At 2560x1440, the playable settings are High, Medium, and Low. High averages 86 FPS, Medium averages 108 FPS, and Low averages 136 FPS. Ultra is not playable at this resolution, with an average of 54 FPS just below the line.

At 3840x2160, only Low settings are playable, averaging 71 FPS. Medium averages 56 FPS with a minimum of 48 FPS, High averages 45 FPS, and Ultra averages 28 FPS, none of which reach the 60 FPS threshold. The verdict by resolution is clear: for the best visual quality while maintaining smooth gameplay, users should target 1080p Ultra or 1440p High, while 4K is limited to Low settings.

CPU and GPU Roles

The division of labor between the AMD Ryzen 7 7700X and the Intel Arc B390 is stark in this title. The CPU is a high-end 8-core, 16-thread Zen 4 processor with a boost clock of 5.40 GHz and a substantial 32 MB L3 cache, and its benchmark scores reflect that strength. The GPU, however, is an integrated graphics solution with a boost clock of 2500 MHz, 1536 shading units, and a pixel rate of 60.00 GPixel/s, and its performance percentile of 9 among all GPUs shows that it is the dominant constraint.

At 3840x2160, the GPU is almost certainly the limiting factor, as the resolution demands far more fill rate and shading throughput than the Arc B390 can provide. The drop from 71 FPS at Low to 28 FPS at Ultra, a 43 FPS swing, is consistent with a GPU-bound scenario where increasing settings directly impacts pixel and texture work. The CPU's high single-thread score of 4190 in PassMark and 2289 in Geekbench single-core means it is unlikely to bottleneck at this resolution, but the GPU simply cannot keep up.

At 2560x1440, the balance shifts slightly. The GPU still dominates the frame rate, but the increased headroom allows the CPU's strengths to show in the form of higher minimum frame rates, such as the 92 FPS minimum at Medium settings. The scaling from 4K Low (71 FPS) to 1440p Low (136 FPS) is a near doubling, which is far more than the pixel count reduction alone would suggest, indicating that the GPU is no longer as severely saturated and the system is better balanced.

At 1920x1080, the CPU begins to play a more meaningful role, particularly at lower presets. The jump from 1440p Low at 136 FPS to 1080p Low at 216 FPS shows that the GPU still has headroom, but the CPU's strong per-core performance ensures that frame pacing remains solid even at high frame rates. The fact that Ultra at 1080p still averages 85 FPS, while Ultra at 1440p drops to 54 FPS, underscores that the GPU is the primary scaling factor across resolutions, with the CPU providing a stable foundation throughout.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 3840x2160, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Low, with an average of 71 FPS. Medium fails to meet the threshold at 56 FPS, so Low is the only viable option for 4K gameplay.

At 2560x1440, the best setting is High, averaging 86 FPS. Medium and Low are also playable, but High offers the highest visual quality while still clearing the 60 FPS line. Ultra is not playable at this resolution.

At 1920x1080, the best setting is Ultra, averaging 85 FPS. This is the only resolution where the Ultra preset is playable, and it delivers a comfortable margin above the threshold. Users who prefer maximum frame rates can opt for Low at 216 FPS, but Ultra provides the full visual experience without sacrificing smoothness.

Similar Performance Alternatives

Looking at the nearest rivals for the CPU, the AMD Ryzen 7 7700X is closely matched by several processors. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 has an average benchmark score of 35802, a delta of 0.3 percent from the 7700X's 35909. The Intel Core 7 250H scores 35728, a 0.5 percent delta, and the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 scores 35719, also a 0.5 percent delta. The Intel Core Ultra 9 185H scores 35670, a 0.7 percent delta. These CPUs would behave nearly identically in Minecraft, as their benchmark scores are within a fraction of a percent of the 7700X, meaning the GPU would remain the limiting factor in all cases.

For the GPU, the Intel Arc B390's nearest rivals are all significantly older NVIDIA parts. The NVIDIA GeForce GT 520MX scores 1463, a 1.3 percent delta from the Arc B390's 1482. The NVIDIA GeForce 800M scores 1460, a 1.5 percent delta, the NVIDIA GeForce GT 625 OEM scores 1446, a 2.5 percent delta, and the NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 scores 1443, a 2.7 percent delta. These GPUs would produce very similar frame rates in Minecraft, with all of them likely falling in the same playable range at low resolutions and struggling at higher settings. The data shows that the Arc B390 is not an outlier among its peers; it sits in a performance class that is defined by these older entry-level parts, and users should expect comparable behavior from any of them.