Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Minecraft
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 43 | 69 | 87 | 110 |
| 1440p QHD | 82 | 132 | 166 | 210 |
| 1080p Full HD | 131 | 209 | 263 | 332 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Minecraft on Your System
The AMD Ryzen 5 9600X and Intel Arc B570 combination delivers a highly playable Minecraft experience across the board, with the only exception being the Ultra preset at 4K resolution. The data shows a system that scales predictably with resolution, maintaining high frame rates even at demanding settings, making it a strong contender for this sandbox title.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, this system is exceptionally fast, with all presets comfortably exceeding the 60 FPS threshold. The Low preset delivers an average of 332 FPS, while High follows at 209 FPS. Medium produces 263 FPS on average, with a minimum of 224 FPS and a maximum of 303 FPS. Even the most demanding Ultra preset achieves an average of 131 FPS, which is more than double the playable threshold. The performance headroom at 1080p is substantial, indicating that the CPU-GPU pairing is not stressed at this resolution.
Moving to 2560x1440, frame rates remain very strong, though the scaling shows a predictable drop from 1080p. Low preset hits 210 FPS average, High reaches 132 FPS, and Medium averages 166 FPS with a minimum of 141 FPS and maximum of 191 FPS. Ultra still delivers a solid 82 FPS average, which is well above the 60 FPS playability line. The 1440p results suggest that this combination is well-balanced for high-refresh-rate monitors at this resolution, with even the heaviest preset leaving significant performance in reserve.
At 3840x2160, the system begins to show its limits, but only at the top end of settings. Low preset maintains a healthy 110 FPS average, while Medium drops to 87 FPS with a minimum of 74 FPS and maximum of 100 FPS. High preset still clears the 60 FPS barrier with an average of 69 FPS, but Ultra falls to 43 FPS average, which is below the playable threshold. The 4K results indicate that the Intel Arc B570's 10 GB memory and 380 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for most settings, but the Ultra preset imposes a load that the GPU cannot sustain.
The minimum FPS data is only available for Medium settings across all resolutions, which provides insight into frame pacing. At 4K Medium, the 74 FPS minimum shows that even the worst-case frames stay above the 60 FPS target. At 1440p Medium, the 141 FPS minimum is exceptionally smooth, and at 1080p Medium, the 224 FPS minimum ensures no perceptible stutter. The lack of min/max data for other presets limits deeper analysis, but the available figures suggest consistent performance.
Similar Performance Alternatives
The CPU and GPU each have nearest rivals that would produce broadly similar results in Minecraft. For the AMD Ryzen 5 9600X, the closest alternatives are the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755GE, which scores 0.2% higher in average benchmark, and the AMD Ryzen 7 7840H, which is 0.5% lower. The AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT trails by 0.6%, while the AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS is 0.8% behind. These differences are negligible for gaming, meaning any of these CPUs paired with the same GPU would deliver nearly identical frame rates in Minecraft, which is heavily dependent on single-thread performance.
On the GPU side, the Intel Arc B570's nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile, which scores 0.1% higher, and the Intel Arc A750, which is 0.1% lower. The NVIDIA Quadro M4000M is 0.4% ahead, while the AMD Radeon R9 M390X is 0.5% behind. The deltaPct values here are all under 1%, indicating that these GPUs would produce essentially identical performance in Minecraft. Gamers with any of these alternatives would see the same FPS ranges at each resolution and preset, making the choice between them a matter of other factors like driver support or power consumption rather than raw speed.
The CPU's percentile rank of 81 versus all CPUs and the GPU's percentile rank of 65 versus all GPUs place this pairing in a solid mid-to-upper tier for Minecraft. The system's overall combo rank of 2955 out of 3710 combinations suggests that while many systems outperform it, a significant portion of the hardware landscape would deliver worse results.
CPU and GPU Roles
Minecraft's performance profile is unusual because it scales heavily with CPU single-thread performance, but the resolution scaling in the measured data reveals a shifting balance. At 1920x1080, the CPU is the primary bottleneck. The difference between Low and Ultra is 201 FPS (332 vs 131), which is a 61% drop. This wide gap indicates that the GPU is not the limiting factor at lower resolutions; instead, the Ryzen 5 9600X's single-core performance, as evidenced by its Geekbench single-core score of 2923 and Passmark single-thread score of 4570, drives the frame rates.
At 2560x1440, the CPU still dominates, but the GPU's role increases. The spread between Low (210 FPS) and Ultra (82 FPS) is 128 FPS, a 61% reduction from Low. The absolute numbers drop from 1080p, but the relative scaling remains similar, suggesting that the GPU is still not fully saturated at 1440p. The Ryzen 5 9600X's 6 cores and 12 threads, combined with its 32 MB of L3 cache, provide ample headroom for Minecraft's world generation and entity processing.
At 3840x2160, the GPU becomes the limiting factor. The frame rate drop from Low (110 FPS) to Ultra (43 FPS) is 67 FPS, a 61% reduction, but the absolute values are much lower. The Arc B570's FP32 throughput of 11.52 TFLOPS and pixel rate of 200.0 GPixel/s are insufficient for Ultra settings at 4K. The CPU's advantage is less relevant at this resolution because the GPU is working at full capacity. The scaling between 1440p and 4K at Ultra (82 to 43 FPS, a 48% drop) highlights this shift, whereas the same comparison at Low (210 to 110 FPS, a 48% drop) shows a proportional decline that still leaves both resolutions playable.
FAQ
Q: Can this PC run Minecraft at 4K?
A: Yes, but only up to High settings. The measured data shows 69 FPS average at 4K High, 87 FPS at Medium, and 110 FPS at Low. Ultra settings at 4K fall to 43 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS playable threshold.
Q: What is the best preset at 1440p for this system?
A: Ultra settings at 2560x1440 deliver an average of 82 FPS, which clears the 60 FPS threshold. This is the most demanding preset that remains playable at this resolution.
Q: How does the Intel Arc B570 compare to the Intel Arc A750?
A: The Arc B570 scores 0.1% lower than the Arc A750 in average benchmark. This difference is negligible, meaning both GPUs would produce nearly identical frame rates in Minecraft.
Q: Is the Ryzen 5 9600X a bottleneck for this game?
A: At 1080p and 1440p, the CPU is the primary performance driver, with its single-thread score of 4570 in Passmark ensuring high frame rates. At 4K, the GPU becomes the limiting factor, so the CPU is not a bottleneck at that resolution.
Q: What frame rates can I expect at 1080p with Medium settings?
A: The measured data shows an average of 263 FPS with a minimum of 224 FPS and maximum of 303 FPS. This is well above the 60 FPS playable threshold and suitable for high-refresh-rate displays.
Q: Does the system maintain smooth frame pacing?
A: Based on the available min/max data for Medium settings, the frame pacing is excellent. At 1080p, the minimum of 224 FPS ensures no drops below the playable threshold, while at 1440p the 141 FPS minimum and at 4K the 74 FPS minimum provide consistent performance.
The Verdict
This PC can absolutely run Minecraft, and it does so with authority at most resolutions and presets. At 1920x1080, every preset from Low to Ultra clears the 60 FPS threshold, with Ultra averaging 131 FPS. This makes the system ideal for high-refresh-rate gaming at 1080p. At 2560x1440, all four presets are playable, including Ultra at 82 FPS average, which provides a great balance of visual quality and performance. At 3840x2160, the system remains playable up to High settings, which delivers 69 FPS average, but Ultra at 43 FPS is not recommended. Gamers who prioritize 4K Ultra settings would need to consider a more powerful GPU, as the Arc B570's 11.52 TFLOPS of FP32 performance is the limiting factor at that resolution.
The verdict by resolution is clear: 1080p and 1440p offer full preset freedom, while 4K users should stick to High or lower. The system's rank of 2955 out of 3710 combinations indicates that it outperforms a majority of tested configurations, making it a reliable choice for this game.
Best Settings per Resolution
At 1920x1080, the best settings are Ultra, which achieves an average of 131 FPS. This is the most demanding preset and it still delivers more than double the 60 FPS playable threshold, so there is no reason to compromise on visual quality at this resolution.
At 2560x1440, the best settings are Ultra, with an average of 82 FPS. This clears the 60 FPS line comfortably, and the visual upgrade from High (132 FPS) to Ultra (82 FPS) is worth the frame rate trade-off for most players.
At 3840x2160, the best settings are High, which produces an average of 69 FPS. While this is just above the 60 FPS threshold, it represents the maximum visual fidelity that maintains playability. Medium at 87 FPS offers more headroom, but High remains the highest preset that clears the bar. Ultra at 43 FPS should be avoided at 4K.