Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Minecraft
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 117 | 187 | 235 | 297 |
| 1440p QHD | 223 | 349 | 379 | 413 |
| 1080p Full HD | 339 | 407 | 442 | 481 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Minecraft on Your System
Measured FPS Breakdown
Minecraft is not a demanding title by modern standards, and the recorded data for the AMD Ryzen 5 3600 paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 reflects that. The benchmark results show frame rates that are, in almost every configuration, far beyond what a 60 FPS display requires.
At 1920x1080, the lowest recorded average comes from the Ultra preset, which still produces 339 FPS. High settings reach 407 FPS, Medium 442 FPS, and Low tops out at 481 FPS. The Medium preset also provides the only full min/max data at this resolution: a minimum of 376 FPS and a maximum of 509 FPS. The gap between Low and Ultra is significant, roughly 142 FPS, but even the most demanding preset leaves enormous headroom.
Moving to 2560x1440, the pattern repeats with slightly lower absolute numbers. Ultra averages 223 FPS, High 349 FPS, Medium 379 FPS, and Low 413 FPS. Medium again has min/max figures: 323 FPS minimum and 436 FPS maximum. The spread between Low and Ultra here is about 190 FPS, which is larger than at 1080p, indicating that resolution scaling affects the most demanding settings more than the lighter ones.
At 3840x2160, the RTX 4090 finally starts to show some strain, though "strain" is relative. Ultra drops to 117 FPS average, High to 187 FPS, Medium to 235 FPS, and Low to 297 FPS. The Medium preset provides min/max data: 200 FPS minimum and 270 FPS maximum. The gap between Low and Ultra expands to 180 FPS, and the Ultra preset at 4K is the only configuration tested that falls below 200 FPS average.
Across all resolutions, the data consistently shows that Low settings produce the highest frame rates, followed by Medium, High, and Ultra in descending order. The frame rates are so high that the differences, while measurable, have little practical impact for most users. A 144 Hz monitor would be saturated at every setting except 4K Ultra, and even that configuration exceeds 100 FPS.
Best Settings per Resolution
The playable threshold in the database is 60 FPS, and every tested preset at every resolution clears that bar by a wide margin. The verdict data lists all four settings, Low, Medium, High, and Ultra, as playable at all three resolutions.
At 1920x1080, the best settings are Ultra, which delivers an average of 339 FPS. This is the most visually demanding preset, and it still runs at more than five times the playable threshold. There is no reason to drop below Ultra at this resolution unless aiming for an extremely high refresh rate display, such as a 360 Hz panel.
At 2560x1440, the best settings are again Ultra, with an average of 223 FPS. This is still nearly four times the 60 FPS threshold. The RTX 4090 has ample compute headroom here, and the Ryzen 5 3600 does not appear to bottleneck the GPU in this title.
At 3840x2160, Ultra remains the best settings, producing an average of 117 FPS. This is just under double the playable threshold. While it is the lowest average recorded in the entire dataset, it is still comfortably playable on a high-refresh-rate 4K display. The data shows that even the most demanding configuration in this test, 4K Ultra, leaves no reason to compromise on visuals for the sake of smoothness.
The conclusion is straightforward: for any resolution tested, the user should select Ultra settings. The GPU is powerful enough that lowering settings only serves to increase frame rates that are already far beyond what is necessary for a smooth experience.
CPU and GPU Roles
The data suggests that Minecraft's rendering workload scales primarily with resolution and preset, but the CPU still matters, particularly at lower resolutions. The Ryzen 5 3600 has a single-thread benchmark score of 696 in 3DMark, which is modest by current standards, yet it is sufficient to drive very high frame rates in this game.
At 1920x1080, the difference between Low and Ultra is 142 FPS (481 versus 339). At 2560x1440, the same comparison yields a 190 FPS gap (413 versus 223). At 3840x2160, the gap is 180 FPS (297 versus 117). The fact that the resolution scaling is not linear, and that the Ultra preset suffers disproportionately at higher resolutions, points to the GPU becoming the limiting factor as pixel count rises.
However, the CPU's role is evident in the absolute frame rates. At 1080p Low, the system produces 481 FPS, which is near the practical limit for many CPUs. The Ryzen 5 3600's multi-thread score of 17,700 in PassMark and its single-thread score of 2,562 indicate a processor that can keep up with the RTX 4090 in this particular workload. In many modern games, a Ryzen 5 3600 would bottleneck an RTX 4090, but Minecraft's relatively simple geometry and lack of heavy physics simulation allow the CPU to stay ahead.
The recorded data shows that at 1440p and 4K, the GPU becomes more important, as evidenced by the larger frame rate drops when moving from Medium to Ultra. At 4K Ultra, the average drops to 117 FPS, which is a 44% reduction from 4K High (187 FPS). This is a GPU-driven scaling pattern. At 1080p, the same preset comparison shows only a 68 FPS drop (407 to 339), a 17% reduction, suggesting the CPU is starting to assert some influence even though absolute frame rates remain high.
In summary, the CPU is sufficient at all resolutions, and the GPU is the primary driver of performance differences between presets, especially at 1440p and 4K. The Ryzen 5 3600 does not appear to be a bottleneck in this title, even when paired with the fastest consumer GPU available.
FAQ
Q: Can this combination run Minecraft at 4K with playable frame rates?
A: Yes. The Ultra preset at 3840x2160 produces an average of 117 FPS, which is well above the 60 FPS playable threshold. All four presets at 4K are listed as playable.
Q: What is the highest frame rate recorded in the dataset?
A: The highest average is 481 FPS, achieved at 1920x1080 with Low settings. The highest maximum frame rate recorded is 509 FPS, also at 1080p Medium.
Q: Is there any resolution where the system cannot maintain 60 FPS?
A: No. Every preset at every resolution tested, from 1080p Low to 4K Ultra, exceeds 60 FPS. The lowest average is 117 FPS at 4K Ultra.
Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals in synthetic benchmarks?
A: The Ryzen 5 3600 has an average benchmark score of 17,035. The Intel Core i7-1260P scores 17,007 (0.2% higher), the Intel Core i5-11400 scores 17,067 (0.2% lower), and the AMD EPYC 7742 scores 16,998 (0.2% higher). The differences are negligible.
Q: How does the GPU compare to its nearest rivals in synthetic benchmarks?
A: The RTX 4090 has an average benchmark score of 60,347. The Intel Arc Pro A60 scores 60,326 (0% difference), the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 scores 60,140 (0.3% lower), and the AMD Radeon PRO V710 scores 58,657 (2.9% lower).
Q: What is the best setting to use for a 1440p monitor?
A: The data shows Ultra at 2560x1440 delivers 223 FPS average. Since all presets are playable and Ultra is the most demanding, it is the recommended choice.
Similar Performance Alternatives
The nearest rivals for the Ryzen 5 3600, based on average benchmark scores, all fall within a fraction of a percent of its performance. The Intel Core i7-1260P scores 17,007, which is 0.2% higher. The Intel Core i5-11400 scores 17,067, which is 0.2% lower. The AMD EPYC 7742 scores 16,998, also 0.2% higher. The AMD EPYC 7573X scores 17,070, 0.2% lower. In practice, any of these CPUs would deliver nearly identical frame rates in Minecraft when paired with the RTX 4090. The single-thread performance of the Ryzen 5 3600, a key factor for this game, is mirrored closely by these rivals.
For the GPU, the nearest rivals are more varied. The Intel Arc Pro A60 scores 60,326, essentially identical to the RTX 4090's 60,347. The AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 scores 60,140, 0.3% lower. The AMD Radeon Pro W6600M scores 61,896, 2.5% higher. The AMD Radeon PRO V710 scores 58,657, 2.9% lower. While these GPUs may have very different feature sets and power characteristics, the benchmark data suggests they would produce similar average frame rates in Minecraft. However, the RTX 4090's massive 24 GB memory buffer and 1.01 TB/s bandwidth are not captured in the average score alone, so the comparison should be treated as indicative rather than exact.
The combination of a mid-range CPU from 2019 with a flagship GPU from 2022 results in a system that is heavily GPU-biased in this title. Users considering alternatives should know that the CPU is not the limiting factor, so choosing a faster processor would yield little to no improvement in Minecraft.
How This Combo Ranks
The database records this specific CPU-GPU combination as ranked 600 out of 3,710 tested combos for Minecraft. This places it in the top 16.2% of all combinations, which is a strong result given that the CPU is a relatively modest six-core part from 2019.
The high rank is almost entirely attributable to the GPU. The RTX 4090 sits in the 88th percentile among all GPUs, and its raw compute power, 82.58 TFLOPS FP32, is more than enough for a game like Minecraft. The Ryzen 5 3600, while only in the 71st percentile among CPUs, still provides sufficient single-thread performance to avoid bottlenecking at the frame rates measured.
The data shows that this combo outperforms the vast majority of tested systems, which likely include many older GPUs and weaker CPUs. The rank of 600 out of 3,710 reflects a system that can run Minecraft at maximum settings in 4K with nearly double the playable frame rate threshold. There are 599 combinations that rank higher, presumably with newer or higher-clocked CPUs, but the practical difference in this game is minimal given the already enormous frame rates.
For context, the RTX 4090's nearest GPU rivals, such as the Intel Arc Pro A60, would likely place a system in a similar performance tier, while the CPU's nearest rivals would not materially change the outcome. The combination is overkill for Minecraft in the best sense: it delivers performance far beyond what any display can show, and the ranking reflects that dominance.