Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Minecraft
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 60 | 96 | 121 | 152 |
| 1440p QHD | 114 | 183 | 231 | 291 |
| 1080p Full HD | 181 | 290 | 365 | 420 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Minecraft on Your System
The AMD Ryzen 5 2600 paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 delivers an exceptionally strong performance profile in Minecraft, with measured results showing that the combination is capable of high refresh rate play across all tested resolutions. The data indicates that this system is not merely playable, but that it substantially exceeds the 60 FPS threshold in the vast majority of scenarios, making it a formidable configuration for this sandbox title.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the recorded data shows extraordinary frame rates that place the system firmly in high-refresh-rate territory. With Low settings, the average FPS reaches 420, which is the highest recorded average in the entire dataset. Moving up to Medium settings, the average remains remarkably high at 365 FPS, with the measured range spanning from a minimum of 311 FPS to a maximum of 420 FPS. High settings still deliver an average of 290 FPS, while the most demanding preset, Ultra, produces an average of 181 FPS. These figures indicate that at 1080p, the combination of the Ryzen 5 2600 and RTX 4060 is never under any meaningful strain, with even the heaviest preset maintaining an average far above the 60 FPS playability threshold.
Stepping up to 2560x1440, the performance remains exceptionally high. Low settings produce an average of 291 FPS, which is only marginally lower than the 1080p Low result. Medium settings average 231 FPS, with a recorded range of 196 FPS minimum and 265 FPS maximum. High settings deliver an average of 183 FPS, and Ultra settings still maintain a strong 114 FPS average. The scaling from 1080p to 1440p shows a predictable reduction in frame rates, but the overall character of the performance is unchanged: the system is delivering far more headroom than the game requires at this resolution.
At 3840x2160, the performance remains impressive, though the impact of the higher pixel count becomes more evident. Low settings average 152 FPS, while Medium settings produce an average of 121 FPS, with a minimum of 102 FPS and a maximum of 139 FPS. High settings average 96 FPS. The Ultra preset, the most demanding configuration tested, lands at an average of exactly 60 FPS, which is precisely at the playability threshold. This is the only configuration in the entire dataset where the system does not maintain a comfortable margin above 60 FPS, though it still meets the standard for playable performance.
CPU and GPU Roles
The performance scaling across resolutions reveals a clear pattern in how the CPU and GPU contribute to Minecraft's frame rates. The game is known for being heavily dependent on single-threaded CPU performance, and the Ryzen 5 2600, with its 6 cores and 12 threads, shows its influence in the relatively modest frame rate differences between many of the lower resolution presets.
The delta between 1920x1080 and 2560x1440 is relatively small for most presets. Low settings drop from 420 FPS to 291 FPS, a reduction of roughly 30 percent, while Medium settings fall from 365 FPS to 231 FPS. High settings see a smaller relative drop, from 290 FPS to 183 FPS. These differences suggest that at 1080p, the CPU is playing a more significant role in limiting performance, as the GPU has ample capacity to render at very high speeds. The fact that the 1080p Low preset reaches 420 FPS, a figure that likely approaches the practical rendering limits of the game engine with this CPU, underscores the CPU-bound nature of these scenarios.
As resolution increases to 3840x2160, the GPU becomes the more dominant factor. The 4K results show a more pronounced drop from the 1440p figures, with Low settings falling from 291 FPS to 152 FPS, and High settings falling from 183 FPS to 96 FPS. This larger scaling factor is characteristic of GPU-bound workloads, where the increased pixel count directly translates into more work for the rasterization and shading units of the RTX 4060. The Ultra preset at 4K, at 60 FPS, is the clearest evidence of the GPU becoming the limiting component, as it is the only point in the dataset where the system is unable to maintain a large margin above the playability threshold.
The RTX 4060, with its 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus and a bandwidth of 272.0 GB/s, shows its strength in the higher resolution presets. The fact that the system can maintain an average of 96 FPS at 4K High settings indicates that the GPU has substantial headroom even at the highest pixel counts. The Ryzen 5 2600, despite being a 2018-era processor with a base clock of 3.40 GHz and boost clock of 3.90 GHz, demonstrates that it is capable of feeding the GPU sufficiently at lower resolutions, though the frame rate caps seen at 1080p suggest its single-thread performance is the primary constraint in those scenarios.
How This Combo Ranks
Within the database's collection of tested combinations, this pairing of the AMD Ryzen 5 2600 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 holds a rank of 2073 out of 3710 total combos for Minecraft. This places the system in the upper-middle portion of the rankings, which is a notable result given the age of the CPU relative to the GPU.
The CPU's benchmark scores help contextualize this ranking. The Ryzen 5 2600 has a percentile rating of 75 against all CPUs, indicating that it outperforms three-quarters of the processors in the database. Its average benchmark score of 21484 places it extremely close to several rivals, with the Intel Core Ultra 5 228V scoring 21440, a delta of only 0.2 percent, and the Intel Core i9-11900H scoring 21367, a delta of 0.5 percent. The AMD EPYC 9454 scores 21223, which is 1.2 percent lower, and the Intel Xeon D-1746TER scores 21635, which is 0.7 percent higher.
The GPU also performs solidly in its own right. The RTX 4060 has a percentile rating of 61 against all GPUs and an average benchmark score of 17639. Its nearest rivals are closely matched, with the AMD Radeon HD 7790 scoring 17666, a delta of negative 0.2 percent, and the AMD Radeon 780M scoring 17588, a delta of 0.3 percent. The AMD Radeon Pro 560 and Pro 460 score 17551 and 17509 respectively, with deltas of 0.5 percent and 0.7 percent.
The combination of a 75th percentile CPU and a 61st percentile GPU results in a system that ranks in the 56th percentile of all combos tested for Minecraft. This suggests that while the individual components are both above average, the pairing does not reach the top tier of the rankings, likely due to the CPU's limitations at very high frame rates and the game's particular sensitivity to single-threaded performance.
The Verdict
The data makes it clear that this PC can run Minecraft with exceptional ease. At 1920x1080, all four tested presets, Low, Medium, High, and Ultra, are playable, with the best settings being Ultra at an average of 181 FPS. This is far above the 60 FPS playability threshold, and even the most demanding preset leaves tremendous headroom for high refresh rate displays.
At 2560x1440, the verdict is equally positive. All four presets are playable, with Ultra being the best settings at an average of 114 FPS. This comfortably clears the 60 FPS threshold, making 1440p Ultra a fully viable configuration for smooth gameplay.
At 3840x2160, the system remains playable across all presets, but the margins are tighter. The Ultra preset delivers an average of exactly 60 FPS, which meets the playability threshold precisely. The other presets, High at 96 FPS, Medium at 121 FPS, and Low at 152 FPS, all provide more comfortable margins. For players who prioritize visual fidelity at 4K, Ultra is technically playable, but the High preset at 96 FPS offers a more substantial buffer above the threshold while still delivering excellent visual quality.
Similar Performance Alternatives
For the CPU, the database shows that the AMD Ryzen 5 2600 is closely matched by several processors with nearly identical average benchmark scores. The Intel Core Ultra 5 228V scores 21440, just 0.2 percent lower, and would behave almost identically in Minecraft's CPU-bound scenarios. The Intel Core i9-11900H scores 21367, 0.5 percent lower, and would show very similar frame rates. The AMD EPYC 9454 scores 21223, 1.2 percent lower, while the Intel Xeon D-1746TER scores 21635, 0.7 percent higher. Any of these processors would produce nearly indistinguishable performance when paired with the RTX 4060 in this game.
For the GPU, the RTX 4060 is matched by a set of rivals with very small deltas. The AMD Radeon HD 7790 scores 17666, only 0.2 percent higher, and would deliver essentially the same frame rates. The AMD Radeon 780M scores 17588, 0.3 percent lower, while the AMD Radeon Pro 560 and Pro 460 score 17551 and 17509, which are 0.5 percent and 0.7 percent lower respectively. These GPUs would produce nearly identical results in Minecraft, meaning that a system built around any of these alternatives would land in the same performance tier.
Best Settings per Resolution
At 1920x1080, the most demanding preset that stays at or above 60 FPS is Ultra, which delivers an average of 181 FPS. This is the clear choice for players who want maximum visual quality at 1080p, as it provides a massive margin above the playability threshold.
At 2560x1440, Ultra is again the best choice, with an average of 114 FPS. This setting combination offers the full visual experience while still maintaining a comfortable buffer over 60 FPS.
At 3840x2160, the best settings are also Ultra, but the average drops to exactly 60 FPS. This configuration meets the playability standard precisely, making it a viable but less forgiving option. For players who prefer more headroom at 4K, High at 96 FPS would be the recommended alternative, as it delivers a substantially larger margin while still offering strong visual quality. The recorded data shows that this system is a high-performance Minecraft machine, with the only caveat being the tight 4K Ultra result.