Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Microsoft Flight Simulator
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your system exceeds recommended specs. Enjoy max settings!
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 61 | 63 | 79 | 104 |
| 1440p QHD | 79 | 85 | 109 | 140 |
| 1080p Full HD | 98 | 104 | 137 | 177 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Microsoft Flight Simulator on Your System
The Intel Core i9-14900K paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 is a formidable combination for Microsoft Flight Simulator, ranking in the 81st percentile of all tested systems. This combo achieves a rank of 711 out of 3714 tested combos, placing it firmly in the top tier for this specific title. The data indicates that this system is not just capable, but it excels at delivering high frame rates across all resolutions, with the ability to max out settings at 4K while staying above the 60 FPS playable threshold.
How This Combo Ranks
The Core i9-14900K and RTX 5070 combination secures a rank of 711 out of 3714 tested combos, placing it in the top 19% of all systems tested for Microsoft Flight Simulator. This high percentile ranking confirms the balanced power of the components. The CPU is a top-tier performer, with an average benchmark score of 79097 and a percentile rank of 95 among all CPUs, indicating it outperforms 95% of processors on the market. The GPU, while ranked at the 82nd percentile among all GPUs with an average benchmark score of 40377, is more than sufficient to complement the processor’s capabilities. The result is a system that consistently delivers high frame rates, ensuring a smooth and immersive flight experience even in the most demanding scenarios.
CPU and GPU Roles
The data reveals a clear shift in workload distribution between the CPU and GPU as resolution and settings change. At 1080p, the CPU’s dominance is apparent, as the system achieves an average of 177.2 FPS at Low settings, a figure that stresses the processor's ability to feed the GPU. Moving to 1440p, the frame rate at Low settings drops to 139.9 FPS, indicating that the GPU is beginning to take on a more significant role. At 4K, the CPU headroom is such that the Low preset still yields 104.4 FPS, showcasing that the i9-14900K is rarely the bottleneck. The performance scaling from 1080p to 4K shows a 41% reduction in frame rate at Low settings (from 177.2 to 104.4 FPS), which is characteristic of a GPU-bound scenario. However, the scaling is more moderate at Ultra settings, with a 38% drop from 98.2 FPS at 1080p to 60.7 FPS at 4K, which still indicates the GPU is handling the increased pixel workload effectively. The CPU’s immense power ensures that even at high resolutions and presets, it provides enough headroom to keep the GPU saturated.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the system delivers exceptional performance across all presets. The Low preset yields an average of 177.2 FPS, while Medium achieves 137.1 FPS. High settings still provide a very smooth 104.3 FPS, and the Ultra preset remains highly playable at 98.2 FPS. The performance gap between Low and Ultra is significant, with a 44.6% reduction in frame rate, but even the most demanding preset delivers a fluid experience.
Moving to 2560x1440, the performance remains strong. The Low preset averages 139.9 FPS, Medium hits 109.1 FPS, and High averages 84.9 FPS. The Ultra preset at 1440p still maintains an average of 78.7 FPS, which is comfortably above the 60 FPS playable threshold. The scaling from 1080p to 1440p is consistent across settings, with a 20% to 21% reduction in frame rate, indicating a predictable increase in GPU load.
At 3840x2160, the system proves its capability as a 4K gaming rig. The Low preset averages 104.4 FPS, and Medium is still very smooth at 79.4 FPS. The High preset achieves 62.6 FPS, while the Ultra preset just clears the 60 FPS threshold with an average of 60.7 FPS. This demonstrates that the RTX 5070 is powerful enough to handle 4K Ultra settings, making it possible to experience the game at its highest visual fidelity without compromising on smoothness.
The Verdict
The data confirms that this PC can run Microsoft Flight Simulator exceptionally well. At 3840x2160, all settings are playable, with the Ultra preset achieving an average of 60.7 FPS. This clears the 60 FPS playable threshold, making 4K Ultra a viable option. At 2560x1440, the Ultra preset averages 78.7 FPS, providing a significant margin over the playable threshold and ensuring a very smooth experience. At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset averages 98.2 FPS, which is nearly double the playable threshold, making it ideal for high-refresh-rate monitors. The verdict is clear: this combination of Intel Core i9-14900K and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 is fully capable of running the game at maximum settings at all tested resolutions, delivering a superior experience without the need to compromise on visual quality.
Similar Performance Alternatives
In terms of CPU performance, the Intel Core i9-14900KF is the closest rival, with an average benchmark score of 79371 and a negligible performance delta of -0.3% compared to the i9-14900K. Users would experience virtually identical performance. The Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus is also very close, with a score of 79574 and a delta of -0.6%. For a slight performance increase, the AMD EPYC 7413 offers a score of 80041, which is 1.2% higher. Conversely, the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 has a score of 77740, which is 1.7% lower.
For the GPU, the nearest rival is the AMD Radeon Pro 580, with an average score of 40318, which is a 0.1% difference from the RTX 5070’s score of 40377. The AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 is also close, with a score of 40063, representing a 0.8% lower performance. The AMD Radeon Pro 5300 has a slightly higher score of 40870, translating to a 1.2% advantage, while the NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile is 2% slower with a score of 39568. These alternatives would provide a very similar gaming experience, with the differences being largely imperceptible in real-world gameplay.
FAQ
Q: Can this system run Microsoft Flight Simulator at 4K Ultra settings?
A: Yes, the data shows that at 3840x2160 with Ultra settings, the system achieves an average of 60.7 FPS, which is above the 60 FPS playable threshold.
Q: What is the highest playable resolution and settings combination?
A: The system is playable at all tested resolutions and settings. The highest fidelity option is 3840x2160 at Ultra, which averages 60.7 FPS.
Q: How does the performance at 1440p compare to 4K?
A: At 2560x1440 Ultra, the average FPS is 78.7, while at 3840x2160 Ultra, it is 60.7. This represents a 22.9% reduction in frame rate when moving from 1440p to 4K.
Q: Is the CPU or GPU more important for this game at 1080p?
A: At 1920x1080, the CPU is the primary driver of performance, as evidenced by the high frame rates at Low settings (177.2 FPS). The GPU becomes more of a factor as resolution increases.
Q: What is the performance difference between the Intel Core i9-14900K and the Intel Core i9-14900KF?
A: The i9-14900KF has an average benchmark score of 79371, which is -0.3% different from the i9-14900K’s score of 79097. The performance is effectively identical.
Q: What is the lowest performance setting that still achieves a playable frame rate at 4K?
A: The Low preset at 3840x2160 yields an average of 104.4 FPS, which is well above the 60 FPS playable threshold. Even the Ultra preset at 60.7 FPS is playable.