Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Microsoft Flight Simulator
Flight Simulation 2020

Microsoft Flight Simulator

77%
Great Match Your system meets recommended requirements.

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
118 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
69 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
96 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
52 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
71 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
41 FPS
14.7ms Frame Time
22ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,444
Your CPU 69,355
Graphics Card
Required 27,967
Your GPU 17,639

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 41 41 53 71
1440p QHD 52 57 71 96
1080p Full HD 69 68 94 118

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 68
1920x1080 Low 118
1920x1080 Medium 94
1920x1080 Ultra 69
2560x1440 High 57
2560x1440 Low 96
2560x1440 Medium 71
2560x1440 Ultra 52
3840x2160 High 41
3840x2160 Low 71
3840x2160 Medium 53
3840x2160 Ultra 41

Performance Analysis: Microsoft Flight Simulator on Your System

The Intel Core i7-14700K paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 delivers a playable experience in Microsoft Flight Simulator, but the margin for error depends heavily on your target resolution. At 1080p, this combo has headroom to spare across every preset. At 1440p, it holds the line at Medium settings. At 4K, you are limited to Low settings if you want to stay above the 60 FPS threshold. The data shows a system that is well-balanced for mainstream gaming, but the RTX 4060's 8 GB frame buffer and 128-bit memory bus become the limiting factor as resolution climbs. The following analysis breaks down exactly what to expect.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured frame rates for this combo in Microsoft Flight Simulator show a clear pattern: the RTX 4060 scales predictably with resolution, while the i7-14700K provides enough single-thread headroom to keep frame pacing consistent. At 1920x1080, the average FPS ranges from 118.3 FPS on Low settings to 69 FPS on Ultra. Medium sits at 93.7 FPS, and High comes in at 67.9 FPS. The gap between Low and Ultra is 49.3 FPS, indicating that the GPU is doing most of the work at this resolution, but the CPU is not bottlenecking even at the highest preset.

Moving to 2560x1440, the averages drop noticeably. Low settings produce 96.1 FPS, Medium delivers 71.4 FPS, High falls to 57.4 FPS, and Ultra drops to 52.1 FPS. The step from Medium to High is a 14 FPS loss, which is the largest single-preset drop at this resolution. This suggests that the game's High preset introduces shading and texture workloads that strain the RTX 4060's memory bandwidth. At 3840x2160, the situation tightens further: Low averages 70.5 FPS, Medium averages 52.5 FPS, High averages 40.5 FPS, and Ultra averages 40.9 FPS. Notably, High and Ultra are nearly identical at 4K, differing by only 0.4 FPS, which means the GPU has hit a hard ceiling regardless of the preset's extra effects.

The min and max FPS values are not provided in the data, so the analysis relies solely on averages. This is worth noting, as flight simulators can have micro-stutters when loading new scenery. However, the consistency across presets at each resolution suggests that the i7-14700K's 28 threads and 33 MB of L3 cache are keeping the simulation's background threads fed, preventing CPU-driven frame drops. The RTX 4060's 272.0 GB/s bandwidth is the more likely source of any frame pacing issues at higher resolutions.

Best Settings per Resolution

The playable threshold is defined as 60 FPS average. Based on the measured data, the best settings for each resolution are as follows. At 1920x1080, every preset is playable, but Ultra delivers 69 FPS, which is the highest visual quality you can run while staying above the threshold. There is no reason to drop below Ultra at this resolution, as even the most demanding preset leaves a 9 FPS buffer. This makes 1080p the sweet spot for this combo if you want maximum fidelity.

At 2560x1440, the best playable setting is Medium, which averages 71.4 FPS. High falls to 57.4 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS threshold, and Ultra is worse at 52.1 FPS. The data shows that Medium is the correct choice here, as it provides a comfortable margin above the threshold while still offering better textures and shadows than Low. Dropping to Low would give you 96.1 FPS, but you would sacrifice significant visual detail for performance you do not need.

At 3840x2160, the only playable setting is Low, which averages 70.5 FPS. Medium averages 52.5 FPS, which misses the threshold by 7.5 FPS. High and Ultra are both in the low 40s, which is not suitable for a smooth experience. The verdict is clear: if you want to run this game at 4K with this hardware, you must use Low settings. The 70.5 FPS average on Low is solid, but you are giving up most of the game's visual enhancements to get there. For a flight simulator where ground detail matters, this is a significant compromise.

CPU and GPU Roles

The data reveals a shifting balance of responsibility between the i7-14700K and the RTX 4060 depending on resolution and preset. At 1920x1080, the CPU is likely the primary driver of performance. The i7-14700K's single-core score of 2160 in Cinebench R23 and its 94th percentile ranking among all CPUs ensure that the simulation's physics and AI calculations are processed quickly. The RTX 4060, which sits at the 61st percentile among all GPUs, has enough headroom to render frames at an average of 118.3 FPS on Low, which is far above what the CPU can feed in complex scenarios.

At 2560x1440, the balance tips toward the GPU. The average FPS on Low drops from 118.3 to 96.1, a 22.2 FPS decrease, while the drop from Low to Medium is 24.7 FPS. This indicates that the GPU's fill rate and memory bandwidth are becoming limiting factors. The RTX 4060's 8 GB GDDR6 memory and 272.0 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for Medium, but the High preset's increased texture streaming demands push the GPU past its comfort zone. The CPU's role diminishes here, as the i7-14700K can easily keep up with the frame rates the GPU can produce.

At 3840x2160, the GPU is almost entirely the bottleneck. The average FPS on Low is 70.5, which is lower than the 1080p Ultra average of 69 FPS but not by much. This suggests that the CPU is still capable of feeding the GPU at 4K, but the RTX 4060 simply does not have the raw pixel throughput or memory bandwidth to handle higher presets. The fact that High and Ultra are within 0.4 FPS of each other at 4K is strong evidence that the GPU is saturated. The i7-14700K's role at 4K is to maintain frame pacing and avoid stutters, which its 20 cores and 28 threads handle without issue.

FAQ

Q: Can this combo run Microsoft Flight Simulator at 4K with High settings?

A: No. The measured average FPS at 3840x2160 with High settings is 40.5 FPS, which is significantly below the 60 FPS playable threshold. Ultra is similarly limited at 40.9 FPS. You would need to drop to Low settings to achieve 70.5 FPS at 4K.

Q: What is the best visual quality I can get at 1440p?

A: Medium settings is the highest preset that stays above 60 FPS at 2560x1440, with an average of 71.4 FPS. High settings fall to 57.4 FPS, which is below the playable threshold, and Ultra is even lower at 52.1 FPS.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU more important for this game at 1080p?

A: The data indicates the CPU is more influential at 1920x1080. The i7-14700K's strong single-core performance (2160 in Cinebench R23) allows the RTX 4060 to stretch to 118.3 FPS on Low settings. The GPU becomes the limiting factor at higher resolutions where pixel throughput and memory bandwidth matter more.

Q: How does this combo rank compared to other tested combinations?

A: The combo ranks 2037th out of 3714 tested combinations in this game, placing it in the 45th percentile of all tested systems. This is a mid-pack ranking, reflecting the RTX 4060's mid-range position rather than the CPU's high-end capability.

Q: What is the difference between Low and Ultra settings at 1080p?

A: At 1920x1080, Low averages 118.3 FPS while Ultra averages 69 FPS, a difference of 49.3 FPS. Both are playable, but Ultra provides significantly better visual quality at the cost of 49.3 FPS.

Q: Is the RTX 4060's 8 GB memory a problem for this game?

A: The measured data suggests it is a limiting factor at higher resolutions. At 4K, High and Ultra settings produce nearly identical averages (40.5 and 40.9 FPS), which indicates the GPU has hit a memory bandwidth or capacity ceiling. At 1440p, the step from Medium to High causes a 14 FPS drop, likely due to increased texture demands.

Similar Performance Alternatives

Looking at the nearest rivals for the CPU and GPU provides context for what other hardware would behave similarly. For the Intel Core i7-14700K, the closest match is the AMD EPYC 9115, which has an average benchmark score of 69288, just 0.1% behind the i7-14700K's 69355. The AMD Ryzen 9 7950X scores 69515, which is 0.2% higher, making it a virtually identical performer in synthetic tests. The AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX is 0.7% ahead at 69875, and the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F is 0.9% ahead at 69996. In practical terms, any of these CPUs would deliver nearly identical frame rates in Microsoft Flight Simulator, as the game is not heavily threaded beyond a few cores.

For the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060, the nearest rival is the AMD Radeon HD 7790, which has an average score of 17666, just 0.2% off the RTX 4060's 17639. This is surprising given the generational gap, but the data shows they perform similarly in aggregate benchmarks. The AMD Radeon 780M is 0.3% behind at 17588, and the AMD Radeon Pro 560 is 0.5% behind at 17551. The AMD Radeon Pro 460 is 0.7% behind at 17509. This suggests that if you were to swap the RTX 4060 for any of these GPUs, you would see very similar FPS in this game, though the Radeon Pro cards are workstation parts not designed for gaming.

It is worth remembering the CPU rivals are all strong performers, but the GPU rivals include older or integrated parts. This means the RTX 4060's closest competitors are not necessarily newer cards, but rather a mix of legacy discrete GPUs and modern integrated graphics. In practice, the RTX 4060's advantage in this combo comes from its driver support and feature set, not from a massive raw performance lead.

How This Combo Ranks

The Intel Core i7-14700K + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 combination ranks 2037th out of 3714 tested combos in Microsoft Flight Simulator. This places it in the lower half of all tested systems, specifically around the 45th percentile. This ranking is heavily influenced by the GPU, as the i7-14700K is a top-tier CPU (94th percentile among all CPUs) while the RTX 4060 is a mid-range part (61st percentile among all GPUs). The combo's overall rank reflects the GPU's limitations at higher resolutions and presets.

Given the measured FPS data, this ranking makes sense. At 1080p, the combo performs well, hitting 69 FPS on Ultra, which would place it above many systems with weaker CPUs. However, at 1440p and 4K, the RTX 4060's lack of memory bandwidth and VRAM capacity drags the combo down relative to systems with higher-end GPUs. The 2037th rank suggests that there are over 1600 tested combinations that can outperform this setup, likely due to better GPU choices or more balanced pairings.

For a builder targeting 1080p or 1440p Medium, this combo is a reasonable choice. For 4K or high-refresh 1440p, the data indicates you would be better served by a stronger GPU, even if it means pairing it with a less powerful CPU. The i7-14700K has enough headroom to support a faster GPU, so the bottleneck is clearly the RTX 4060.