Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Microsoft Flight Simulator
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your system exceeds recommended specs. Enjoy max settings!
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 58 | 61 | 81 | 105 |
| 1440p QHD | 79 | 83 | 110 | 142 |
| 1080p Full HD | 98 | 103 | 137 | 176 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Microsoft Flight Simulator on Your System
The Intel Core i7-13700K paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 presents a compelling configuration for Microsoft Flight Simulator, a title known for its demanding rendering of vast landscapes and complex aircraft systems. The benchmark data reveals a system that scales predictably across resolutions, with the GPU becoming the primary constraint at higher settings while the CPU provides a robust foundation for high frame rates at lower presets. This analysis breaks down the measured performance to determine the optimal settings for a fluid experience, examines the balance between processor and graphics card workloads, and contextualizes the hardware's standing within the broader benchmark database.
CPU and GPU Roles
The division of labor between the Intel Core i7-13700K and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 shifts significantly depending on the resolution and preset level. At 1920x1080 with Low settings, the configuration achieves an average of 176 FPS, a figure that suggests the CPU is capable of feeding frames rapidly without being a bottleneck. Moving to Medium settings at the same resolution drops the average to 137 FPS, and High settings further reduce it to 103 FPS. This scaling pattern indicates that while the CPU is strong, the GPU's workload increases with each preset tier, and the performance dip is a direct response to the added graphical complexity. The data implies that at 1080p, the RTX 5070 is the limiting factor once settings are raised, as the CPU has ample headroom to maintain high frame rates.
At 2560x1440, the relationship becomes more pronounced. The Low preset yields an average of 142 FPS, which is lower than the 176 FPS seen at 1080p Low, showing a 24% reduction in performance due to the increased pixel count. This drop is entirely attributable to the GPU's rendering load. When set to Ultra at this resolution, the average FPS falls to 79, a 44% decrease from the Low preset. The CPU's role here is to maintain a stable frame delivery, which it does, but the GPU is clearly the dominant factor in determining the final output. The benchmark results suggest that the i7-13700K is not holding back the RTX 5070 at 1440p, as the frame rates scale smoothly with graphical demands.
The pattern culminates at 3840x2160, where the GPU's limitations become the sole focus. At Low settings, the average FPS is 105, which is a substantial drop from the 142 FPS at 1440p Low, demonstrating the heavy cost of 4K resolution. Medium settings produce an average of 81 FPS, and High settings drop further to 61 FPS. The Ultra preset brings the average down to 58 FPS, which falls below the 60 FPS playable threshold. This progression clearly shows that at 4K, the RTX 5070 is working at its limits, and the CPU's performance is largely irrelevant to the final frame rate, as the GPU is fully saturated. The data implies that the i7-13700K is more than sufficient for this game, and users should focus on GPU settings when optimizing for higher resolutions.
Best Settings per Resolution
For users targeting a smooth experience at or above 60 FPS, the measured data provides clear guidance for each resolution. At 1920x1080, the highest preset that maintains this threshold is Ultra, which achieves an average of 98 FPS. This is well above the playable threshold, indicating that the system has significant headroom at this resolution. The Low preset reaches 176 FPS, Medium at 137 FPS, and High at 103 FPS, all of which are excellent for high-refresh-rate monitors. The data shows that 1080p is not a challenging scenario for this hardware combination, and users can confidently enable maximum settings.
At 2560x1440, the Ultra preset remains the best choice, delivering an average of 79 FPS. This comfortably clears the 60 FPS threshold, and the data confirms that all four presets are playable at this resolution. The Low preset yields 142 FPS, Medium produces 110 FPS, and High achieves 83 FPS. The Ultra setting at 79 FPS is the most demanding option that still provides a fluid experience, making it the recommended configuration for users with 1440p displays. The frame rates suggest a balanced system where the GPU can handle the increased pixel count while the CPU maintains consistent performance.
The situation changes at 3840x2160, where the High preset is the most demanding option that stays at or above 60 FPS, with an average of 61 FPS. This is a marginal pass, leaving little room for frame rate dips in complex scenes. The Medium preset offers a more comfortable margin at 81 FPS, and the Low preset reaches 105 FPS. The Ultra preset falls short at 58 FPS, which is below the playable threshold and should be avoided for a consistent experience. The data indicates that 4K users must make a compromise, accepting either the High preset at 61 FPS or the Medium preset for a more stable frame rate.
The Verdict
The benchmark results confirm that this PC can run Microsoft Flight Simulator effectively across all tested resolutions, provided the settings are adjusted appropriately. At 1920x1080, the system achieves playable frame rates on all presets, with the Ultra setting delivering an average of 98 FPS. This is a clear pass, offering a highly fluid experience with maximum visual fidelity. At 2560x1440, the system also passes on all presets, with the Ultra setting at 79 FPS providing a strong balance of performance and quality. The verdict for these two resolutions is unequivocal: the hardware is fully capable of handling the game at high settings.
At 3840x2160, the verdict is more nuanced. The system passes the 60 FPS threshold on the High, Medium, and Low presets, but the High preset at 61 FPS is the only option that offers near-maximum quality while staying playable. The Ultra preset at 58 FPS fails to meet the threshold, meaning users cannot enable the highest settings at 4K without accepting a sub-60 FPS experience. The data suggests that 4K gaming is possible but requires a sacrifice in visual fidelity to maintain smooth performance. Overall, the configuration is a strong performer for this title, with the GPU being the limiting factor only at the most demanding resolution and preset combination.
FAQ
Q: What is the average frame rate at 1920x1080 with Ultra settings?
A: The average frame rate is 98 FPS, which is well above the 60 FPS playable threshold.
Q: Can this system handle 3840x2160 at Ultra settings?
A: No, the Ultra preset at 4K produces an average of 58 FPS, which falls below the 60 FPS playable threshold.
Q: What is the best preset for a 2560x1440 monitor?
A: The Ultra preset is the best choice, delivering an average of 79 FPS while maintaining a smooth experience.
Q: How much performance is lost when moving from Low to Ultra at 2560x1440?
A: The average frame rate drops from 142 FPS at Low to 79 FPS at Ultra, a 44% reduction in performance.
Q: Is the CPU or GPU more important at 1920x1080?
A: The data shows that the GPU becomes the limiting factor at higher presets, as the frame rate drops from 176 FPS at Low to 98 FPS at Ultra, indicating the CPU has sufficient headroom.
Q: What are the minimum and maximum frame rates at 3840x2160 with Medium settings?
A: The average frame rate is 81 FPS, with a minimum of 69 FPS and a maximum of 94 FPS.
Similar Performance Alternatives
The Intel Core i7-13700K has an average benchmark score of 46881, placing it in the 89th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 9 5900, which scores 46971, a negligible 0.2% difference. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 scores 47022, just 0.3% higher, and the AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX scores 46654, a 0.5% difference. The Intel Xeon w3-2535 also scores 46653, also 0.5% lower. These results indicate that the i7-13700K is closely matched with several other processors, and users with any of these alternatives would see nearly identical performance in Microsoft Flight Simulator, as the CPU is not the primary bottleneck in most scenarios.
On the GPU side, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 has an average benchmark score of 40377, placing it in the 82nd percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are somewhat surprising, including the AMD Radeon Pro 580 with a score of 40318, a 0.1% difference, and the AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 with a score of 40063, a 0.8% difference. The AMD Radeon Pro 5300 scores 40870, which is 1.2% higher, and the NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile scores 39568, 2% lower. These professional-grade cards show that the RTX 5070's performance profile is closely matched by older workstation hardware, though these alternatives may lack the modern feature set and driver optimizations for gaming.
How This Combo Ranks
In the database of tested hardware combinations for Microsoft Flight Simulator, this specific pairing of the Intel Core i7-13700K and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 ranks 729th out of 3714 total combinations. This places it in the top 20% of all tested systems, indicating a strong overall performance level. The ranking reflects the balance between the high-performing CPU and the capable GPU, which together deliver playable frame rates at most settings and resolutions. While the GPU is the limiting factor at 4K Ultra, the combination's overall standing shows that it is a competitive option for this demanding title. The rank suggests that there are many other configurations that outperform it, but also a vast number that fall below it, making this a solid mid-to-high tier choice.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The following table details the exact average frame rates recorded for each resolution and settings combination. At 1920x1080, the Low preset achieves 176 FPS, Medium reaches 137 FPS with a minimum of 116 and a maximum of 157, High hits 103 FPS, and Ultra reaches 98 FPS. At 2560x1440, the Low preset delivers 142 FPS, Medium averages 110 FPS with a minimum of 94 and a maximum of 127, High achieves 83 FPS, and Ultra reaches 79 FPS. At 3840x2160, the Low preset produces 105 FPS, Medium averages 81 FPS with a minimum of 69 and a maximum of 94, High achieves 61 FPS, and Ultra drops to 58 FPS. These numbers provide a comprehensive view of the system's performance, showing a clear trend of decreasing frame rates as resolution and settings increase, with the most significant drops occurring at 4K.