Can I Run It?

Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips

Microsoft Flight Simulator
Flight Simulation 2020

Microsoft Flight Simulator

97%
Excellent Match Your system exceeds recommended requirements!

Performance

1080p (Full HD)

Low 1080p Measured
208 FPS
Ultra 1080p Measured
132 FPS

1440p (2K / QHD)

Low 1440p Measured
188 FPS
Ultra 1440p Measured
102 FPS

4K (Ultra HD)

Low 4K Measured
137 FPS
Ultra 4K Measured
79 FPS
7.4ms Frame Time
11ms Input Latency
4K Best Resolution

Requirements Check

Processor
Required 37,444
Your CPU 35,365
Graphics Card
Required 27,967
Your GPU 60,347

Recommendations

Upgrade Needed

Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.

Ray Tracing Ready

Your GPU supports ray tracing.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 79 77 107 137
1440p QHD 102 109 146 188
1080p Full HD 132 135 182 208

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.

Every measured configuration

1920x1080 High 135
1920x1080 Low 208
1920x1080 Medium 182
1920x1080 Ultra 132
2560x1440 High 109
2560x1440 Low 188
2560x1440 Medium 146
2560x1440 Ultra 102
3840x2160 High 77
3840x2160 Low 137
3840x2160 Medium 107
3840x2160 Ultra 79

Performance Analysis: Microsoft Flight Simulator on Your System

The Intel Core i7-12700KF paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 delivers exceptionally high frame rates in Microsoft Flight Simulator across all tested resolutions and presets. Measured data shows the combination never drops below the 60 FPS playable threshold, with average frame rates ranging from 76.7 FPS at 4K Ultra to 208.3 FPS at 1080p Low. The RTX 4090's dominance is evident, but the i7-12700KF provides sufficient single-threaded throughput to avoid bottlenecking the simulator's CPU-heavy rendering pipeline.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the combo produces outstanding frame rates regardless of settings. The Low preset yields an average of 208.3 FPS, while Medium climbs to 182.2 FPS. High settings deliver 134.8 FPS, and Ultra still maintains 132.3 FPS. The gap between High and Ultra is minimal at just 2.5 FPS, suggesting the Ultra preset adds visual fidelity without a proportional performance cost at this resolution. The delta from Low to Ultra is 76 FPS, representing a 36.5% reduction in frame rate when maxing out all visual options.

Moving to 2560x1440, the performance scaling is predictable but still impressive. Low settings produce 188.1 FPS, dropping to 145.6 FPS at Medium. High settings average 109 FPS, and Ultra maintains 102.3 FPS. The resolution increase from 1080p to 1440p costs roughly 10-20 FPS at each preset tier, with the largest absolute drop occurring at Low settings (20.2 FPS). At Ultra, the difference narrows to 30 FPS, indicating that the GPU workload scales more heavily with resolution than with preset complexity.

At 3840x2160, the RTX 4090 demonstrates its flagship capability. Low settings average 136.8 FPS, Medium drops to 106.7 FPS, and High settles at 76.7 FPS. Ultra remains playable at 78.7 FPS, which is actually 2 FPS higher than High settings — a minor anomaly likely attributable to measurement variance. The 4K Low result is particularly noteworthy, as it exceeds the 1080p High result by 2 FPS, showing that the GPU has ample headroom even at the highest resolution when settings are reduced.

The performance deltas between resolutions reveal the GPU-bound nature of this title at higher settings. From 1080p to 4K at Ultra, the frame rate drops from 132.3 to 78.7 FPS, a 40.5% reduction. However, at Low settings, the same resolution change only reduces performance from 208.3 to 136.8 FPS, a 34.3% drop. This compresses the performance envelope as resolution increases, with the spread between Low and Ultra shrinking from 76 FPS at 1080p to 58.1 FPS at 4K.

CPU and GPU Roles

The data indicates that Microsoft Flight Simulator scales primarily with GPU capability at higher resolutions, but the CPU's single-threaded performance remains relevant. The i7-12700KF's 3DMark single-thread score of 1043 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4071 suggest strong per-core performance, which is critical for the simulator's main thread. The CPU also achieves a PassMark single-thread score of 3984, placing it in the 85th percentile among all CPUs.

At 1080p, the GPU has the easiest workload, yet the frame rates still climb substantially from Low (208.3 FPS) to Ultra (132.3 FPS). This 76 FPS spread shows that while the CPU can push very high frame rates, the GPU still determines the ceiling at every preset. The RTX 4090's PassMark G3D score of 38194 and DirectX 12 score of 150 indicate it has massive compute headroom, but the simulator's engine appears to create a CPU bottleneck around the 200 FPS mark at 1080p Low.

When moving from 1080p to 1440p, the average frame rate drop across all presets is approximately 15%. From 1440p to 4K, the average drop is roughly 28%. This accelerating degradation with resolution confirms that the GPU becomes the primary constraint as pixel count increases. At 4K Ultra, the 78.7 FPS result represents the system's most demanding scenario, yet it still clears the 60 FPS threshold by 31.2%.

The CPU's role is more pronounced at lower resolutions and settings. At 1080p Low, the 208.3 FPS result approaches the practical limit for this CPU in this game, as evidenced by the smaller gains from Low to Medium (26.1 FPS) compared to Medium to High (47.4 FPS). The i7-12700KF's 20 threads and 25 MB of L3 cache help maintain consistent frametimes, but the simulator's preference for high single-thread performance means the CPU is rarely the limiting factor above 60 FPS.

FAQ

Q: Can this system run Microsoft Flight Simulator at 4K with maximum settings?

A: Yes. At 3840x2160 with the Ultra preset, the combo averages 78.7 FPS, which exceeds the 60 FPS playable threshold by 31.2%. Even the High preset at 4K delivers 76.7 FPS, so there is no need to compromise on visual quality.

Q: What is the performance difference between High and Ultra settings at 1440p?

A: At 2560x1440, High settings average 109 FPS while Ultra averages 102.3 FPS. The 6.7 FPS difference is relatively small, suggesting that Ultra settings at 1440p are a worthwhile trade-off for the additional visual fidelity.

Q: How does the system perform at 1080p for competitive or high-refresh-rate play?

A: The 1920x1080 results range from 208.3 FPS at Low to 132.3 FPS at Ultra. This system can easily drive a 144 Hz monitor even at Ultra settings, and reaches beyond 200 FPS on lower presets for maximum smoothness.

Q: Is the RTX 4090 the bottleneck at any resolution?

A: The data suggests the GPU becomes the limiting factor primarily at 4K Ultra (78.7 FPS) and 4K High (76.7 FPS). At 1080p Low (208.3 FPS), the CPU likely imposes a ceiling, as the GPU would be capable of higher frame rates given its performance percentile ranking.

Q: Which resolution provides the best balance of visual quality and frame rate?

A: At 2560x1440 Ultra, the system averages 102.3 FPS, which comfortably exceeds 60 FPS while offering high resolution and maximum settings. The 4K Ultra result of 78.7 FPS is also viable, but 1440p provides more headroom for demanding flight scenarios.

Q: How does this combo rank among all tested configurations?

A: The combination ranks 118th out of 3714 tested combos for this game, placing it in the top 3.2% of all configurations. This indicates that while there are faster systems, this pairing delivers near-top-tier performance for Microsoft Flight Simulator.

The Verdict

The data clearly shows that this system can run Microsoft Flight Simulator at all tested resolutions and presets with frame rates well above the 60 FPS threshold. At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset averages 132.3 FPS, providing a 120% margin over the playable threshold. At 2560x1440, Ultra settings deliver 102.3 FPS, a 70.5% margin. Even at 3840x2160, the most demanding configuration, Ultra settings maintain 78.7 FPS, which is 31.2% above the 60 FPS line.

The verdict by resolution confirms that all three resolutions are fully playable at every preset level. The best settings at each resolution are Ultra, with average FPS of 132.3 at 1080p, 102.3 at 1440p, and 78.7 at 4K. This system offers no meaningful performance compromises — users can enable maximum graphical fidelity at any resolution without worrying about frame rate drops below the playable threshold.

Similar Performance Alternatives

Looking at the CPU's nearest rivals, the Intel Core i7-12700KF has an average benchmark score of 35365, placing it in the 85th percentile. The Intel Core i7-13700T scores 35403, a 0.1% difference, making it essentially equivalent in performance. The Intel Core i5-13600T scores 35305, 0.2% lower, while the Intel Core 5 213PE scores 35428, 0.2% higher. The Intel Core i7-12700K scores 35287, 0.2% lower than the 12700KF. Any of these CPUs would deliver nearly identical frame rates when paired with the RTX 4090 in this game.

For the GPU, the RTX 4090's average benchmark score is 60347, ranking in the 88th percentile. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Arc Pro A60 with a score of 60326 (0% difference), the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 at 60140 (0.3% higher), and the AMD Radeon Pro W6600M at 61896 (2.5% higher). The AMD Radeon PRO V710 scores 58657, which is 2.9% lower. These alternatives would produce very similar frame rates, with the W6600M potentially offering slightly better performance and the PRO V710 slightly worse.

How This Combo Ranks

The Intel Core i7-12700KF and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 combination ranks 118th out of 3714 tested configurations for Microsoft Flight Simulator. This places the system in the top 3.2% of all tested combos, confirming that it is a high-end pairing capable of excellent performance. The rank reflects the balanced nature of the duo — the CPU's strong single-threaded performance complements the GPU's massive rasterization power, avoiding the bottlenecks that can plague less balanced pairings.

Given that there are 3714 total combinations tested, a rank of 118 means only 117 configurations perform better in this specific game. The top-ranking systems likely feature newer or higher-clocked CPUs, but the 12700KF's 12 cores and 20 threads provide sufficient parallel processing for the simulator's multi-threaded aspects, while its 5.00 GHz boost clock handles the demanding main thread.

Best Settings per Resolution

At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset is the most demanding setting that stays at or above 60 FPS, delivering an average of 132.3 FPS. This provides a substantial cushion above the playable threshold, allowing for consistent frame rates even in complex scenes with dense scenery or weather effects.

At 2560x1440, Ultra settings again prove playable, with an average of 102.3 FPS. The margin above 60 FPS is 70.5%, giving ample headroom for demanding scenarios. Users could also consider High settings at 109 FPS if they prefer even higher frame rates, but Ultra offers the best visual quality without sacrificing playability.

At 3840x2160, the Ultra preset averages 78.7 FPS, remaining 31.2% above the 60 FPS threshold. This is the most demanding configuration tested, yet it still provides smooth performance. The High preset at 4K averages 76.7 FPS, nearly identical to Ultra, so there is no practical reason to drop below Ultra at this resolution. The system's capability at 4K Ultra confirms that the RTX 4090 is sufficient for the highest fidelity experience in Microsoft Flight Simulator.