Instant compatibility check with FPS benchmarks and optimization tips
Microsoft Flight Simulator
Performance
1080p (Full HD)
1440p (2K / QHD)
4K (Ultra HD)
Requirements Check
Recommendations
Your hardware doesn't meet minimum requirements for this game.
Your GPU supports ray tracing.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 70 | 73 | 97 | 125 |
| 1440p QHD | 95 | 99 | 132 | 170 |
| 1080p Full HD | 117 | 123 | 164 | 211 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30. Cards marked Estimated above have no measured row and are scaled from your GPU benchmark percentile.
Performance Analysis: Microsoft Flight Simulator on Your System
The Intel Core i7-12700K and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 combination delivers a dominant performance profile in Microsoft Flight Simulator, placing the hardware at the 84th percentile for CPUs and 86th percentile for GPUs. The measured data confirms this pairing handles the simulator's demanding rendering workload with substantial headroom across all tested resolutions.
Similar Performance Alternatives
The CPU and GPU each sit near closely matched rivals in synthetic benchmarks, meaning users could expect broadly similar frame pacing in Microsoft Flight Simulator if swapped for these alternatives. The Intel Core i7-12700K posts an average benchmark score of 35287, placing it within 0.4% of four nearby processors. The Intel Core i5-13600T scores 35305, a negligible 0.1% delta, while the Intel Core i7-12700KF reaches 35365, just 0.2% higher. The Intel Core i7-13700T and Intel Core 5 213PE round out the group with scores of 35403 and 35428 respectively, representing deltas of 0.3% and 0.4%. This clustering indicates the 12700K's 12 cores and 20 threads deliver compute headroom nearly identical to these alternatives, making any of them viable substitutes for CPU-bound sections of the flight simulator.
On the GPU side, the RTX 4080 achieves an average benchmark score of 54247, placing it in the 86th percentile of all graphics cards. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER, scores 54209, a 0.1% delta that puts them statistically level. The AMD Radeon Pro W5700X trails by 1.1% with a score of 54828, while the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB and AMD Radeon 8060S sit 2.6% and 2.7% behind respectively. The RTX 4080's 16 GB of GDDR6X memory and 716.8 GB/s bandwidth provide substantial texture throughput, and the close rival scores suggest the RTX 4080 SUPER would deliver nearly identical frame rates in Microsoft Flight Simulator. The AMD options, while slightly lower in aggregate benchmarks, remain within a small enough margin that real-world differences would be modest.
CPU and GPU Roles
Microsoft Flight Simulator stresses both components, but the scaling patterns across resolutions reveal where each part dominates. At 1920x1080 with Low settings, the combo produces 211 FPS, dropping to 170 FPS at 2560x1440 and 125 FPS at 3840x2160. This 86 FPS decline from 1080p Low to 4K Low indicates the GPU becomes progressively more limiting as pixel count rises, while the CPU maintains sufficient headroom to feed the renderer. The 12700K's strong single-thread performance, evidenced by a 3dmark_single_thread score of 1043 and a passmark_single_thread score of 4013, supports the simulator's primary simulation thread, which is notoriously single-thread dependent.
The gap between settings widens at higher resolutions, confirming the GPU's growing influence. At 3840x2160, the spread from Low to Ultra spans 55 FPS (125 down to 70), while at 1920x1080 the same settings range produces a 94 FPS spread (211 down to 117). The CPU-bound nature of lower resolutions is evident: at 1080p Low, the frame rate reaches 211 FPS, approaching the practical ceiling for the processor's ability to feed frames. At 4K Ultra, the 70 FPS result shows the RTX 4080 working near its limit, with the 320W TDP and 48.74 TFLOPS FP32 throughput fully engaged. Medium settings at each resolution show a balanced workload, with the 12700K's 20 threads handling the simulator's background terrain and AI systems while the GPU renders the visual scene.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The measured frame rate data provides a complete picture across three resolutions and four quality presets. At 1920x1080, the combo delivers exceptional performance starting with Low settings at 211 FPS average. Medium settings drop to 164 FPS, with a minimum of 139 FPS and maximum of 188 FPS, representing the only 1080p preset with recorded min/max values. High settings produce 123 FPS, while Ultra maintains 117 FPS, keeping every 1080p preset well above the 60 FPS playable threshold. The 94 FPS delta between Low and Ultra demonstrates the GPU's ability to absorb additional visual workload without compromising playability.
At 2560x1440, performance remains strong but shows the expected scaling penalty. Low settings deliver 170 FPS, Medium produces 132 FPS with a minimum of 112 FPS and maximum of 152 FPS, High reaches 99 FPS, and Ultra settles at 95 FPS. The transition from 1080p to 1440p costs roughly 19% across most presets, with the Low setting dropping from 211 to 170 FPS and Ultra from 117 to 95 FPS. The 1440p Medium preset's 112 FPS minimum ensures smooth frame pacing even during dense terrain flyovers.
The 3840x2160 results show the RTX 4080 handling 4K with authority. Low settings produce 125 FPS, Medium achieves 97 FPS with a minimum of 83 FPS and maximum of 112 FPS, High delivers 73 FPS, and Ultra maintains 70 FPS. The step from 1440p to 4K costs approximately 26% across presets, with Ultra dropping from 95 to 70 FPS. The 4K Medium minimum of 83 FPS confirms that even the most demanding resolution stays comfortably playable, though the gap between High and Ultra narrows to just 3 FPS at this resolution, indicating the GPU approaches its memory bandwidth ceiling at 716.8 GB/s.
The Verdict
This PC runs Microsoft Flight Simulator at every resolution and preset tested. The verdict data confirms all four settings at each resolution clear the 60 FPS threshold. At 3840x2160, the best settings are Ultra with an average of 70 FPS, while High, Medium, and Low all remain playable at 73, 97, and 125 FPS respectively. The 4K Ultra result of 70 FPS demonstrates the RTX 4080's 16 GB memory buffer and 48.74 TFLOPS compute capacity handle the simulator's high-resolution textures without compromise.
At 2560x1440, Ultra runs at 95 FPS, providing substantial headroom above the 60 FPS target. The 1440p Medium preset's 132 FPS average and 112 FPS minimum ensure consistent frame delivery even in complex urban environments. At 1920x1080, the combo reaches 117 FPS on Ultra, with Low settings hitting 211 FPS for maximum refresh rate compatibility. Across all nine tested configurations, the minimum recorded frame rate is 83 FPS at 4K Medium, meaning no preset ever dips below the playable threshold. The Intel Core i7-12700K's 20 threads and 25 MB of L3 cache provide sufficient simulation processing power, while the RTX 4080's Ada Lovelace architecture delivers the rasterization throughput needed for the simulator's global terrain streaming.
How This Combo Ranks
Among all tested processor and graphics card combinations in Microsoft Flight Simulator, this pairing ranks 215th out of 3714 total combos. This places the system in the top 5.8% of all recorded configurations, a strong result given the simulator's reputation for demanding both CPU and GPU resources. The rank reflects the balanced nature of the pairing: the 12700K's 84th percentile CPU performance combines with the RTX 4080's 86th percentile GPU performance to produce consistent frame rates across all resolutions. The high rank also suggests that most of the 3714 tested combos use less capable hardware, with only 214 configurations achieving higher frame rates in this specific game.
The combination's strength lies in its ability to maintain high frame rates at 4K Ultra, a feat many high-end systems fail to achieve. The 70 FPS average at 4K Ultra places this combo ahead of systems that may have stronger CPUs but weaker GPUs, as the RTX 4080's 716.8 GB/s memory bandwidth and 280.6 GPixel/s pixel rate prove critical for the simulator's dense visual data. Similarly, the 12700K's 12229 Cinebench R20 multicore score ensures the simulation thread never becomes the bottleneck, allowing the GPU to operate at full capacity.
FAQ
Q: What is the best settings preset for this PC at 4K resolution?
A: At 3840x2160, Ultra settings deliver 70 FPS average, which is the highest quality preset available and remains above the 60 FPS playable threshold. High settings produce 73 FPS, Medium achieves 97 FPS, and Low reaches 125 FPS.
Q: How does the RTX 4080 compare to its closest GPU rival in synthetic benchmarks?
A: The RTX 4080 scores 54247 in average benchmark performance, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER scores 54209, a difference of only 0.1%. The AMD Radeon Pro W5700X trails by 1.1% with a score of 54828.
Q: Does this CPU hold back the GPU at lower resolutions?
A: At 1920x1080 Low, the combo reaches 211 FPS, while at 3840x2160 Low it produces 125 FPS. The 86 FPS difference suggests the GPU becomes more limiting as resolution increases, but the 12700K's 20 threads and single-thread score of 1043 in 3dmark keep the simulator's main thread adequately fed.
Q: What is the minimum frame rate recorded across all tested presets?
A: The lowest minimum frame rate recorded is 83 FPS at 3840x2160 with Medium settings. The 1440p Medium preset shows a 112 FPS minimum, and the 1080p Medium preset shows a 139 FPS minimum.
Q: How does this system rank among all tested combinations in this game?
A: This Intel Core i7-12700K and RTX 4080 combination ranks 215th out of 3714 total tested combos in Microsoft Flight Simulator, placing it in the top 5.8% of all configurations.
Q: Is the 4K Ultra preset playable with this hardware?
A: Yes, the 3840x2160 Ultra preset produces 70 FPS average, which exceeds the 60 FPS playable threshold. The verdict data confirms all four settings at each resolution are playable, with 4K Ultra being the most demanding tested configuration.